跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.201.94.236) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/03/24 12:34
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:高淑娟
研究生(外文):KAO,SHU-CHUAN
論文名稱:台灣高鐵員工企業社會責任認知對服務績效之影響:以公共服務動機為調節變數
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Attitudes Among THSRC Staff on Service Performance:The Moderating Effect of Public Service Motivation
指導教授:丁裕家丁裕家引用關係
指導教授(外文):DING,YU-JIA
口試委員:劉亞秋郭俊良丁裕家
口試委員(外文):LIU,YA-CHIUGUO,CHUN-LIANGDING,YU-JIA
口試日期:2018-11-29
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國防大學
系所名稱:運籌管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:行銷與流通學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:76
中文關鍵詞:企業社會責任服務績效公共服務動機
外文關鍵詞:Corporate Social ResponsibilityService PerformancePublic Service Motivation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:228
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
當今企業強調善盡社會責任已成為經營顯學,台灣高鐵在興建完成通車營運滿十週年之際,隨者財務改善案通過,高鐵實質上已成為「公有民營」企業,企業經營方針同時也面臨轉型需求,新任管理者提出三大經營方針「重視誠信經營、強化公司治理及善盡企業社會責任」,希冀成為「公有民營」的典範企業。本研究以高鐵列車服務人員為研究樣本進行問卷調查,探討企業善盡社會責任,是否影響員工在其服務行為上的表現,同時了解「公有民營」企業員工的公共服務動機,是否對企業善盡社會責任影響員工的服務績效具有調節效果,以作為「公有民營」企業對於提升服務品質的參考方針,培養服務文化的領導指標。研究結果證實,企業善盡社會責任會提高員工的服務績效,而公共服務動機對於企業社會責任影響員工的服務績效有顯著效果。建議組織應對員工加強傳遞企業推行社會責任活動的資訊,並透過工作設計強化公共服務的價值,將更有助於提升員工的服務績效。
The concept of social responsibility has risen to prominence in the field of management studies. After the Taiwan High Speed Rail passed the tenth anniversary of its construction and operation, and with the passage of the Financial Improvement Act, the THSR has essentially become a "publicly owned but privately run" enterprise. At the same time, due to the demands of changing corporate strategy, the new management have put forward three principles—valuing integrity in management, strengthening corporate governance, and fulfilling the corporation’s social responsibility—with the aim of becoming a model for "publicly owned but privately run" enterprises. The present study utilizes survey results from THSR employees to investigate whether social responsibility attitudes and public service motivations held by employees of a "publicly owned but privately run" enterprise have a moderating effect on service performance. This study can serve as guidance for improving the service quality and leadership goals of such an organization. The results demonstrate that both attitudes of social responsibility and public service motivations improve the service performance of employees. Therefore, we recommend that firms should reinforce messages of corporate social responsibility to their employees and improve service performance by increasing the public service value of task designs.
誌謝....i
摘要........i
Abstract...ii
目錄.......iii
圖目錄......vi
表目錄......vii
第一章 緒論.....1
1.1研究背景.....1
1.2研究動機.....2
1.3研究範圍.....3
1.4研究目的.....3
1.5論文架構.....4
第二章 文獻探討..6
2.1企業社會責任..6
2.1.1企業社會責任的發展緣由....6
2.1.2企業社會責任的定義.......7
2.1.3企業社會責任的類型.......8
2.1.4企業社會責任的規範與評等..10
2.2服務績效......... 15
2.2.1服務品質的定義...15
2.2.2服務績效的衡量...16
2.3公共服務動機.......18
2.3.1公共服務動機的發展與定義..18
2.3.2公共服務動機的衡量.......20
2.3.3公共服務動機與運輸服務....21
2.4研究假設..................22
2.4.1員工對企業社會責任的知覺程度對服務績效表現的影響........22
2.4.2公共服務動機在企業社會責任知覺與員工服務績效間的調節效果..23
第三章 企業個案介紹.............25
3.1台灣高鐵成立背景.............25
3.2台灣高鐵B.O.T.模式..........25
3.3台灣高鐵財務解決案...........26
3.4台灣高鐵對運輸服務的影響......27
3.5 台灣高鐵企業社會責任實行簡介..29
第四章 研究方法..32
4.1研究設計.....32
4.2研究變項操作型定義與衡量..32
4.3研究架構........36
4.4統計分析方法.....37
第五章 實證結果分析..39
5.1敘述性統計.......39
5.2探索性因素分析....40
5.3信度分析.........44
5.4相關分析.........44
5.5獨立樣本t檢定.....45
5.5.1不同職務的員工企業社會責任知覺程度、服務績效和公共服務動機的差異..46
5.5.2不同性別的員工企業社會責任知覺程度、服務績效和公共服務動機的差異..46
5.6 迴歸分析..47
5.6.1企業社會責任知覺對服務績效的影響分析..48
5.6.2公共服務動機對服務績效的影響分析......48
5.6.3企業社會責任知覺對服務績效的影響分析以公共服務動機的自我犧牲為調節變項..49
5.6.4企業社會責任知覺對服務績效的影響分析以公共服務動機的同情心為調節變項....50
5.6.5企業社會責任知覺對服務績效的影響分析以公共服務動機的公共服務的吸引力為調節變項..50
5.6.6企業社會責任知覺對服務績效的影響分析以公共服務動機的公共價值的承諾為調節變項....51
5.7 本章總結......52
第六章 結論與建議..54
6.1 研究結論......54
6.2 研究貢獻與管理意涵..55
6.3 研究限制與建議.....55
參考文獻...57
附錄A.....62
附錄B.....64


中文文獻
池祥萱、池祥麟、梁綺羚 (2016)。企業社會責任之策略性分析。管理評論,35 (1),頁21-45。
李慕華、李宗鴻 (譯)(1997)。工商心理學導論 (原作者:Muchinsky, P. M.)。台北市:五南。
吳宗憲 (2012)。台南市政府文官公共服務動機與工作滿意、工作努力意願之實證研究—以個人∕組織配適度作為調節變項。公共行政學報,43,頁91-126。
吳宗憲、黃浩瑋 (2014)。促參承辦人工作動機和團隊關係對其工作態度的影響研究。行政暨政策學報,58,頁87-120。
林玉雯 (2015)。公共服務動機量表與前導因子之實證研究 (博士論文)。取自台灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號103NCNU0054029)
紀乃文 (2014)。情緒勞動對組織是利是弊?探討知覺主管支持、同事支持對情緒勞動與服務績效、離職傾向關係的差異化干擾效果。組織與管理,7 (1),頁115-160。
邱浩政 (2010)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析。台北市:五南。
柯彥輝、謝書怡、嚴國晉 (2016)。員工企業社會責任知覺對其組織公民行為之影響:職場靈性的中介效果與同理心的調節式中介效果之探討。管理與法遵,1 (2),頁27-50。
孫同文、許耿銘 (2014)。橘淮為枳:公共服務動機指標適用性的分析。民主與治理,1 (1),頁33-52。
張有恆 (1999)。運輸學。台北:華泰文化出版社。
張姮燕、許順旺、吳紀美、陳冠霖 (2017)。國際觀光旅館的組織氣候能影響員工績效表現嗎?探討服務品質的中介效果。企業管理學報,114,頁89-115。
張鎧如、陳敦源、簡鈺珒、李仲彬 (2015)。探索台灣公務人員工作績效之影響因素:能力、動機與機會的整合觀點。東吳政治學報,33 (4),頁1-71。
魏文欽、朱聖和(2008)。人格特質、工作態度、服務品質、工作績效及顧客滿意度關連性之實證研究-以國內金融控股公司為例,中華理論結構模式LISREL學會,1 (2),頁1-24。
嚴秀茹、林育理、戴淑賢 (2004)。服務氣候對服務導向公民行為之影響歷程探討-心理授權與角色界定之中介模式。管理評論,23 (1),頁25-48。
中華民國統計資訊網 (2017)。臺灣地區歷年就業者之行業人力資源調查。http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc4/manpower/year/t13_o_a.asp?ym=1&yearb=105&yeare=105&num=9&out=1
台灣高鐵Taiwan High Speed Rail (2017)。企業社會責任專區。
http://www.thsrc.com.tw/
財團法人證券暨期貨市場發基金會 (2017)。公司治理評鑑。
http://www.sfi.org.tw/cga/cga1
經濟部工業局產業永續發展整合資訊網 (2017)。企業社會責任規範與標準介紹。 https://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/Member/Join
證交所公司治理中心網站之企業社會責任專區 (2016)。http://cgc.twse.com.tw/front/responsibility
證交所公司治理中心網站之企業社會責任專區 (2017)。 http://cgc.twse.com.tw/front/responsibility

英文文獻
Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Solan Management Review, 49 (2), 36-44.
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54, 71-84.
Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S.C. (1998). Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 8 (3), 413-439.
Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10 (4), 685-711.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39-48.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), 497–505.
Dawkins, J. (2004). The Public’s Views of Corporate Responsibility 2003. London: MORI.
Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949-969.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233-258.
Frederick, W.C. (1983). Point of view corporate social responsibility in the Reagan era and beyond . California Management Journal, 33, 233-258.
Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable ? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 10-22.
Heskett, J. L. (1987). Lesson in the service sector. Harvard Business Review, 65, 118-126.
Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E., Jr., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review, 72, 164-174.
Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., Desmarais, C., Koumenta, M., Leisink, P., Liu, B., Palidauskaite, J., Pedersen, L. H., Perry, J. L., Ritz, A., Taylor, J., &
De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the meaning and structure of public service motivation across populations, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23 (1), 79-102.
Koehler, M., & Hal, G. R. (2008). Interdisciplinary Foundations of Public Service Motivation. In Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, James L. Perry and Annie Hondeghem (eds.), 33–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kolk, A., Dolen, W. V., & Ma, L. (2015). Consumer perceptions of CSR: (How) is China different? International Marketing Review, 32: 492-517.
Kraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. (2004). Centring in regression analyses: A strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13 (3), 141-145.
Liao, H. & Chuang, A. (2004). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 41-58.
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in twocountries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23 (3), 283-297.
Marr, J. W. (1986). Letting the Customer Be the Judge of Equality, Quality Progress, 19 (10), 46-49.
Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effect of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39: 121-147.
Paarlberg, L. E., Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). From Theory to Practice: Strategies for Applying Public Service. In James L. Perry and Annie Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in Public Management: the Call of Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing, 49 (3), 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL:A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12-40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality:Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 111-124.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50 (3), 367-373.
Perry, J.L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Motivation in Public Management : The Call of Public Service. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A. & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and a Agenda for the Future. Public Administration Review, 70 (5), 681- 690.
Perry, J. L. (2014). The motivational bases of public service: Foundations for a third wave of research. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 36 (1), 34-47.
Peterson, D. K. (2004). Therelationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment, Business and Society, 43 (3), 296-319.
Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic. American review of public administration, 16 (4), 288-302.
Rainey, H.G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government rganizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9 (1), 1.
Regan, W. J. (1963). The service revolution, Journal of Marketing, 47 (7), 57-62.
Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes, Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 265-283.
Sasser, W. E., Olsen,R. P., & Wyckoff , D. D. (1978). Management of Service Operations-Text, Case, and Readings, Boston NY : Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Schneider, B., Wheeler, J. K., & Cox, J. F. (1992). A Passion For Service: Using Content Analysis To Explicate Service Climate Themes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 705-716.
Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9 (4), 545-556.

電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20231226)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊