臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究係探討國軍部隊領導者因文化因素所具備之儒家、道家工作價值觀，選擇運用現代新興領導理論—矛盾領導，以形塑團隊凝聚力之關聯性。研究問卷採「領導者-部屬」配對方式發放。研究發現：領導者之道家價值觀對矛盾領導具有正向關聯性，而儒家價值觀對矛盾領導不具關聯性；矛盾領導與團隊凝聚力具有正向的關聯性。基於本研究之結果，希冀能使軍事領導統禦相關理論及研究能更趨多元化，並妥適導入更有效的領導方法，建立兼具人性之工作環境，以因應社會現實環境變遷與挑戰。

This research is to explore the association among work values and paradoxical leadership and their impact on team cohesion for the ROC Armed Forces（ROCAF） leaders. The Confucian and Taoist work values of ROCAFs leadership developed from cultural influence while the paradoxical leadership theory has been adopted from modern, emerging leadership theory. The research questionnaires were distributed by the “officer-subordinate” pairing method. The research found that the officers Taoist work values have a positive impact on paradoxical leadership behavior, while Confucian work values have no influence on paradoxical leadership behavior. Moreover, paradoxical leadership behavior and team cohesion have positive correlation. It is hoping that based on the result of this research, it will add diversification to the related armed force leadership theory and advance existing research by importing more effective leadership styles to develop a better, more modern working environment that is capable of overcoming challenge.

摘要 i
ABSTRACT iii
致謝詞 v
目錄 vii
表目錄 ix
圖目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 領導者工作價值觀 7
2.1.1 工作價值觀之意涵 7
2.1.2 工作價值觀之分類 10
2.1.3 領導者工作價值觀 14
2.1.4 儒家工作價值觀 16
2.1.5 道家工作價值觀 23
第二節 矛盾領導 38
2.2.1 矛盾領導之定義 38
2.2.2 矛盾領導之內涵 40
第三節 團隊凝聚力 43
2.3.1 團隊凝聚力的定義 43
2.3.2 團體凝聚力模式 46
2.3.3 影響團隊凝聚力之因素 48
第4節 研究假說 51
2.4.1 儒家、道家工作價值觀與矛盾領導 51
2.4.2 矛盾領導與團隊凝聚力 53
第三章 研究方法 55
第一節 研究樣本與程式 55
第二節 研究變項衡量 57
3.2.1 儒家、道家工作價值觀 57
3.2.2 矛盾領導 58
3.2.3 團隊凝聚力 60
3.2.4 基本資料與控制變項 61
第三節 資料分析方法 62
3.3.1 敘述性統計分析 62
3.3.2 信度分析 62
3.3.3相關分析 63
3.3.4 迴歸分析 63
第四章 研究結果 65
第一節 描述性統計分析 65
4.1.1 人口統計變項之描述性統計 65
4.1.2 研究變項描述性統計分析 74
第二節 信度分析 80
4.2.1 領導者儒家、道家工作價值觀之信度分析 80
4.2.2 矛盾領導 82
4.2.3 團隊凝聚力 88
第三節 相關分析 91
4.3.1 人口統計變項與各變項之相關分析 91
4.3.2 各變項間之相關分析 92
第四節 迴歸分析 95
4.4.1 領導者之儒家與道家工作價值觀對矛盾領導之迴歸分析 95
4.4.2 矛盾領導對團隊凝聚力之迴歸分析 97
第五章 研究結論與建議 99
第一節 研究結論 99
5.1.1 領導者之儒家、道家工作價值觀對矛盾領導之影響 99
5.1.2 矛盾領導行為對團隊凝聚力之影響 102
第二節 研究限制 103
5.2.1 研究方法之限制 103
5.2.2 研究變項之限制 103
5.2.3 研究樣本之限制 104
第三節 理論與實務意涵 106
5.3.1 理論意涵 106
5.3.2 實務意涵 107
文獻參考 109
一、中文文獻: 109
二、西方文獻: 120

一、中文文獻:
1.丁亮.(2009).《老子》文本中的修身與無名.臺灣人類學刊 7（2）：107-146.
2.王叢桂.(1993).三個世代大學畢業工作者的價值觀.本土心理學研究,(2), 206-250.
3.王秀麗、許家梁.（2001）.「《老子》對現代企業管理的啟示」.第5屆兩岸中華文化與經營管理學術研討會論文集.62-66.
4.王邦雄.(2002).老子[以天下觀天下]的無爲治道.鵝湖月刊 (326),12-20.
5.王邦雄.(2003).老莊道家論齊物兩行之道.鵝湖學誌,(30),43-65.
6.王榮春,& 陳彰儀.(2003).部屬觀點之領導互動論:部屬對主管領導行為的知覺因素與互動內涵初探.應用心理研究,(20),181-215.
7.王俊明.(2004).教練工作價值觀對組織承諾、工作投入及工作滿意度的影響.臺灣運動心理學報,(5),59-86.
8.王弼 & 樓宇烈.(2008).老子道德經注校釋 (Vol.30). 臺北市：中華書局.
9.王邦雄.(2010).老子道德經的現代解讀.臺北市：遠流出版.
10古成一.（2012）.領導行為,組織承諾與組織公民行為之相關研究—以工作價值觀為調節變項.義守大學管理學院碩士在職專班學位論文.1-130.
11.牟宗三.(2003).中國哲學十九講.臺北市：聯合報系文化基金會出版.
12.朴英培.（1988）.工作價值觀、領導型態、工作滿足與組織承諾關係之研究.國立政治大學企管研究所博士論文.1-110.
13.江美華.(2001).從五倫論儒家倫理觀的主體性.花蓮師院學報,(13),87-104.
14.吳聰賢.(1983).農村青年職業興趣、工作價值與職業選擇之關係研究.臺北:行政院青年輔導委員會.
15.吳鐵雄,李坤崇,劉佑星,& 歐慧敏.(1995).工作價值觀工作量表之研究.臺北: 行政院青年輔導委員會.
16.吳 怡.(1998).新譯老子解義.臺北市：三民書局股份有限公司.
17.吳慧卿.(2001).選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊衝突、團隊凝聚力及滿意度關係之實證研究.臺灣師範大學體育學系學位論文.1-414.
18.吳展良.(2002).尋找核心價值：儒學與現代社會的價值困境. 第一屆中華文明的二十一世紀新意義學術研討會宣讀之論文 (華蓮美倫大飯店).
19.吳慧卿.(2002)。大學校院桌球選手滿意度與團隊凝聚力關係之研究。成大體育研究集刊，7，61-72。
20.吳佳煇,& 林以正.(2005).中庸思維量表的編製.本土心理學研究,(24), 247-300.
21.吳惠齡.(2008).老子論人與自然.東吳大學哲學系研究所學位論文.1-96.
22.吳淑敏,&唐國銘.(2009).決策者價值觀、組織氣候與組織績效之關聯性研究: 以高科技產業為例.中華管理評論,（12）,1-27.
23.吳惠齡.(2013). 以道家思想探討動物之權益-以老子、莊子思想為主.中央大學哲學研究所應用倫理評論,(55),38-40.
24.李弘暉.(2003). 知識經濟下領導新思維 (Vol.59).臺北市：聯經出版.
25.李漢相.(2004).關於老子修養功夫-以道德經三章為中心.鵝湖月刊,(351), 42-48.
26.李昱東.(2006).西漢前期.政治思想的轉變及其發展–從黃老思想向獨尊儒術的演變.中興大學歷史學系所學位論文.1-296.
27.李文瑞,王仕茹,&黃恆獎.(2007).管理學概論.臺北市：華泰文化.
28.佘思科.(2008).工作價值之契合對工作士氣與生活滿意度之影響.中央大學人力資源管理研究所學位論文.1-117.
29.邱淑媛.(1993).工作價值觀對員工工作態度及工作表現之影響研究.私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文.1-70.
30.邱淑妙.(2006).團隊人格特質、轉換型領導與團隊效能之關係探討-團隊凝聚力之仲介角色.國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所學位論文.1-91.
31.林純雯.(2000). 國民中學校長道德領導之研究.臺灣師範大學教育學系學位論文.1-320.
32.林正士.(2011).儒家、道家中領導思想與西方領導理論之比較-跨文化的觀點.國立金門大學學報,(1),19-37.
33.林遠澤.(2013).禮治與正名-論儒家對於政治正當性之倫常奠基的道德文法學構想.漢學研究,(31).255-284.
34.林姿葶,鄭伯壎,&周麗芳.(2014).家長式領導:回顧與前瞻.本土心理學研究, (42),3-82.
35.林清富.(2014).文化對組織對偶角色認同之影響探討.臺灣大學心理學研究所學位論文.1-107.
36.林欣宜.(2015).論中華文化倫理中之權力關係與距離.南台人文社會學報,(14), 141-166.
37.林真余.(2016). 矛盾領導與目標導向的關係: 檢視團隊成員關係品質的仲介效果.國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所學位論文.1-54.
38.林文政（2016）.銳利、嚴格卻不傷人的領導者，才能讓部屬信服！3個歷史小故事.經理人.取自https://www.managertoday.com.tw/columns/view/52696. (May 5, 2019）
39.林文政（2019）.成為最佳矛盾領導人.哈佛商業評論全球中文版 2月號/2019 第150期.取自https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0008639.html. (May 5, 2019）
40.卓伯翰.(2001).老子政治思想研究.東吳大學文學院中國文學系研究所碩士論文.1-167.41.
41.洪瑞斌,&劉兆明.(2003).工作價值觀研究之回顧與前瞻.應用心理研究,19, 211-50.
42.范黎波.（2000）.管理需要倡導一種理念.國立成功大學第 4 屆兩岸中華文化與經營管理學術研討會論文集.42-48.
43.胡 適.(1971).中國中古思想史長編.臺北市：胡適紀念館.
44.南懷瑾.(1987).老子他說.臺北市:老古文化.
45.陳大齊.(1986).孔子學說 (Vol.5).臺北市：正中書局.
46.陳銘宗,&劉兆明.(1994).工作價值觀及其形成歷程之探討.輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文.1-88.
47.陳瑞,&周桂如.(2002).團體凝聚力.志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌,(1),23-28.
48.陳俊生.(2002).促進學校教育革新的關鍵-轉型領導.學校行政 (18),16-28.
49.陳右勳.(2003).老子道的管理觀.中華技術學院學報,(26), 288-309.
50.陳秀美.（2010）.從「實踐性」反思《老子》「無為」思想的意義.空大人文學報,(19),77-108.
51.陳蓁琬,& 劉敏熙.(2011).承諾型人力資源管理實務、團隊凝聚力、合作組織氣候對員工知識分享行為的影響.第 14 屆科際整合管理研討會,6-183.
52.陳明哲.(2014).文化雙融:一位管理學者的反思與行踐-2013 年國際管理學會 (AOM)年會的主席演講.管理學報,(31),263-282.
53.陳銘薰, & 遊淑萍. (2015). 工作價值觀, 家長式領導與組織公民行為影響之研究.商管科技季刊,16(4),535-591.
54.陳昌宗.(2016).海軍志願役潛水士官(兵)[工作價值觀]與[工作滿意度]之研究.勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊,24(1),77-101.
55.陳文宗.（2017）.從老子哲學思想析論學校領導之道. 國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文.1-176.
56.徐復觀.(1969).中國人性論史:先秦篇.臺北市:臺灣商務.
57.徐克謙.(1998).從[中]字的三重含義看中庸思想.孔孟月刊,37,5-9.
58.徐慶帆.(2007).從華人家長式領導談運動教練領導行為.中華體育季刊,(21), 51-58.
59.徐木蘭,陳必碩,歐陽,惠華,& 孔祥科.(2007).《 道德經》領導智慧的現代意義-系統性的探索.管理學報,(24),229-251.
60.郭逸智.(2016).老子《道德經》應世思想研究.南華大學生死學系哲學與生命教育系碩士論文.1-148.
61.孫蒨如.（2008）.中國人的陰陽思維.中國社會心理學會主辦「第七 屆中國社會心理學會年會」（天津）宣讀之論文.
62.許順旺,葉欣婷,&王媛慧.(2010).國際觀光旅館員工工作價值觀與工作績效關係之研究-以工作態度為仲介變項.輔仁民生學誌,(16),17-37.
63.許作新.（2012）.每天讀一點老子自然哲學.新北市：漢湘文化.
64.許玉青.(2018).《論語》與《老子》之生命觀照與人際實踐.興大中文學報,（43）,1-33.
65.張順發,&羅希哲.(2005).國小教師工作價值觀與組織承諾關係之研究.國立嘉義大學,國民教育研究學報, (14),79-111.
66.張守中,& 陳美貴.(2006).團體界線的開放性、團體表現與成員流動性之關聯.中華心理學刊,(48), 411-424.
67.張守中.(2008).團體凝聚力的變化機制與影響因素.人文及社會科學集刊, (20),141-172.
68.張鴻愷.(2008).“一陰一陽之謂道”-試論《易傳》中的儒道互補思想.中華人文社會學報,(8),184-203.
69.康自立, & 許世卿. (2001).從傳統文化探討國人之領導行為取向.彰化師範大學修平人文社會學報,（99-2）,117-140.
70.莊淑,鄭豐,& 聶喬齡.(2011).國內教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力研究再探.臺灣體育論壇,(3),49-59.
71.黃昆輝.（1989）.教育行政學.臺北市：東華書局.
72.黃文雄.（1993）.台灣人的價值觀.臺北市：前衛出版.
73.黃國隆.(1994).海峽兩岸企業員工工作價值觀之差異.海峽兩岸企業員工工作價值觀之差異研討會論文集.
74.黃光國.(1995).儒家價值觀的現代轉化:理論分析與實徵研究.本土心理學研究, (3),276-338.
75.黃囇莉.(1996).中國人的和諧觀/衝突觀:和諧化辯證觀之研究取徑.本土心理學研究,(5),47-71.
76.黃國隆, & 蔡啟通. (1998).工作價值觀與領導行為對員工效能的影響.臺大管理論叢,9(1),51-85.
77黃俊傑. (1999). 傳統中國的思維方式及其價值觀. 本土心理學研究, (11), 129-152.
78.黃乃熒.(2000).弔詭管理及其在學校目標的應用.教育政策論壇,(32),16-56.
79.黃俊傑.(2002).傳統中國的思維方式及其價值觀: 歷史回顧與現代啟示.第一屆中華文明的二十一世紀新意義學術研討會宣讀之論文 (華蓮美倫大飯店).
80.黃宗顯.(2008).學校領導:新理論與實踐.臺北市：五南.
81.勞思光.(1986).新編中國哲學史(一).臺北市：三民書局.
82.曾仕強、劉君政（1993）.中國的經權管理.臺北市: 國家出版社.
83.曾春海.(2001).評述陳大齊對義利之辨的研究.哲學與文化,(28),977-987.
84.傅佩榮.(2010).原來老子這樣說.臺北市：九歌出版社有限公司.
85.楊中芳.(1991).試論中國人的 [自己]: 理論與研究方向.中國人,中國心-人格與社會篇.臺北市:遠流出版公司.
86.楊先舉.(1996).老子管理學.臺北:遠流出版事業公司.
87.楊文琪. (2000).老莊思想與學校行政領導之研究. 國立臺北教育大學國民教育研究所學位論文,1-161.
88.楊中芳.(2001).中國人的世界觀:中庸實踐思維初探.如何理解中國人.臺北市:遠流出版公司.
89.楊中芳.(2010).庸實踐思維體系探研的初步進展.土心理學研究,(34),3-96.
90.楊輝南. (2012）.道家觀點之經營管理意涵.商業現代化學術研討會論文集,中華民國商業現代化學會主辦.
91.楊勝崴.（2018）.足球選手知覺教練領導行為及領導信任與團隊凝聚力之相關研究.臺北市立大學運動教育研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文.1-76.
92.溫連雄.(1996）.老子管理思想研究.國立中興大學企管所碩士論文.1-81.
93.趙志裕.(2000).中庸思維的測量.香港社會科學學報(香港),(18),33-55.
94.廖春文.(2002).中國儒家領導模式之建構及其在學校行政應用之研究.國民教育研究集刊,（10）,1-42.
95.鄭伯壎、謝光進（1979）.工業心理學.臺北市：大洋出版社.
96.鄭燕祥、陳若敏.（1992）.老子管理思想及其在現代組織管理上的涵義.國立中央大學管理與哲學研討會.253-273.
97.鄭伯壎,周麗芳 &樊景立.(2000).家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量.本土心理學研究,(14),3-64.
98.樊景立,&鄭伯壎.(2000).華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析.本土心理學研究, (13), 126-180.
99.劉笑敢.(2005).老子：年代新考與思想新詮.臺北市：東大圖書股份有限公司.
100.蔣憶德,陳淑滿,&葉志仙.(2001).教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究.體育學報,(30),195-206.
101.錢 穆.(1963).論語新解 (Vol.1).臺北市：新亞研究所.
102.錢 穆.(1979).從中國歴史來看中國民族性及中國文化.臺北：聯經出版公司.
103.謝君直.(2018).老子思想的道論及其生命治療之義涵.興大人文學報,(60), 35-64.
104.謝琇玲,林惠敏,&謝佳儒.(2016).工作價值觀對組織公民行為之影響─社會認定理論觀點.勞資關係論叢,(18),35-61.
105.簡曜輝,季力康,卓俊伶,洪聰敏,黃英哲,黃崇儒 & 盧俊宏.(2002).競技與健身運動心理學.臺北市: 運動心理學會.
106.龐宇、周艷萍.（2001）.道家思想對現代企業管理的影響.第5屆兩岸中華文化與經營管理學術研討會論文集.哈爾濱工業大學與成功大學合辦.67-72.
107.羅瑾璉,花常花,& 鐘競.(2015).悖論式領導對知識團隊創新的影響及作用機制研究.科技進步與對策,(32),121-125.



二、西方文獻:
1. Antonuccio, D. O., Davis, C., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Breckenridge, J. S. (1987). Therapist variables related to cohesiveness in a group treatment for depression. Small Group Behavior, 18(4), 557-564.
2. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of applied psychology, 83(3), 377.
3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan.
4. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public administration quarterly, 112-121.
5. Bass, B. M. (1996). A New Paradigm for Leadership: An Inquiry into Transformational Leadership. STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON.
6. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of applied psychology, 88(6), 989.
7. Berger, P. L. (1983, May). Secularity: west and east. In Cultural Identity and Modernization in Asian Countries: Proceedings of Kokugakuin University Centennial Symposium. Kokugakuin University Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics.
8. Bishop, J. W., & Scott, K. D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of applied Psychology, 85(3), 439.
9. Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid: Key orientations for achieving production through people Houston. TX: Gulf Publishing Co.
10. Bond, M. H. (1988). Invitation to a wedding: Chinese values and global economic growth.
11. Brindley, T. A. (1989). Socio-psychological values in the Republic of China (I). Asian Thought and Society, 14(41-42), 98-115.
12. Brown, D. (2002). The role of work values and cultural values in occupational choice, satisfaction and success. Career choice and development, 4, 465-509.
13. Burns, J.M. (1978), Leadership, Harper & Row Publishers, New York, NY.
14. Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations ani Considerations. Journal of Sport psychology, 4(2), 123-138.
15. Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1990). The impact of group size in an exercise setting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(4), 376-387.
16. Cartwright, D. E., & Zander, A. E. (1960). Group dynamics: Research and theory.
17. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1968), Group dynamic: Research and theory. New York: Harper & Row.
18. Clark, T. (1990). International marketing and national character: A review and proposal for an integrative theory. Journal of marketing, 54(4), 66-79.
19. Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations ani Considerations. Journal of Sport psychology, 4(2), 123-138.
20. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of sport psychology, 7(3), 244-266.
21. Chaney, R. (1969). Vocational values of children as they relate to economic community, grade level, sex and parental occupational level (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning).
22. Chaney, R. (1969). Vocational values of children as they relate to economic community, grade level, sex and parental occupational level (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning).
23. Chao, Y. T. (1990). Culture and work organization the Chinese case. International Journal of Psychology, 25(3-6), 583-592.
24. Chemers, M. M., & Ayman, R. E. (1993). Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions. Academic Press.
25. Chou, L. F., Chu, C. C., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, J. (2014). Work stress and employee well‐being: The critical role of Z hong‐Y ong. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 115-127.
26. Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of management journal, 50(6), 1281-1303.
27. De Vaus, D., & McAllister, I. (1991). Gender and work orientation: Values and satisfaction in Western Europe. Work and Occupations, 18(1), 72-93.
28. Dobbins, G. H., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1986). The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction. Group & Organization Studies, 11(3), 203-219.
29. Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in international comparative management, 3(1), 127-150.
30. Dose, J. J. (1997). Work values: An integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 70(3), 219-240.
31. Dreher, D. E. (2002). Leading with the Tao: the energizing power of respect. The Learning Organization, 9(5), 206-213.
32. Elizur, D. (1984). Facets of work values: A structural analysis of work outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 69(3), 379.
33. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A THEORY OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS. MCGRAW-HILL SERIES IN MANAGEMENT.
34. Forsyth, D. R., & McGovern, T. V. (1983). An introduction to group dynamics. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
35. Evans, N. J., & Jarvis, P. A. (1980). Group cohesion: A review and reevaluation. Small group behavior, 11(4), 359-370.
36. Frosch, R. A. (2000). Learning from Lao Tzu: A leadership primer. Research Technology Management, 43(3), 27.
37. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups; a study of human factors in housing.
38. Forsyth, D. R.(2010). Group dynamics(5th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
39. Franke, V. C. (2000). Duty, honor, country: The social identity of West Point cadets. Armed Forces & Society, 26(2), 175-202.
40. Frosch, R. A. (2000). Learning from Lao Tzu: A leadership primer. Research Technology Management, 43(3), 27.
41. Gartland, T. C. (1985). Individual Differences and Historical Trends in Work Values of Employed Adults.
42. Gavin, M. B., & Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(1), 15-33.
43. George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of applied psychology, 75(6), 698.
44. Ginzberg, E., Ginsburg, S. W., Axelrad, S., & Herma, J. L. (1951). Occupational Choice: An Approach to A General Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
45. Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
46. Gross, N., & Martin, W. E. (1952). On group cohesiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 57(6), 546-564.
47. Harpaz, I. (1999). The transformation of work values in Israel. Monthly Lab. Rev., 122, 46.
48. Heider, J. (2014). The Tao of leadership: Lao Tzus Tao te ching adapted for a new age. Green Dragon Books.
49. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1974). So you want to know your leadership style?. Training & Development Journal.
50. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad?. Organizational dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
51. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15-41.
52. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstedes culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeachs value survey. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 15(4), 417-433.
53.Hogg, M. A.,G. M. Vaughan(2005).Social Psychology.London:Pearson.
54. Hollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. Free Pr.
55. House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 321-339.
56. House, R. J. (1976). A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership. Working Paper Series 76-06.
57. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of applied psychology, 69(1), 85.
58. James, L. A., & James, L. R. (1989). Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74,739-751.
59. Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American sociological review, 124-143.
60. Kazanas, H. C. (1978). Relationship of job satisfaction and productivity to work values of vocational education graduates. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 12(2), 155-164.
61. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual review of psychology, 41(1), 585-634.
62.Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management review, 25(4), 760-776.
63. Littlepage, G. E., Cowart, L., & Kerr, B. (1989). Relationships between group environment scales and group performance and cohesion. Small Group Behavior, 20(1), 50-61.
64. Lin, L. H., Ho, Y. L., & Lin, W. H. E. (2013). Confucian and Taoist work values: An exploratory study of the Chinese transformational leadership behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 91-103.
65. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., & Clark, R. A. (1953). Lowell, EL The Achievement Motive. New York: appleton-century-crofts, 262.
66. MacFarquhar, R. (1980). The post Confucian challenge. The Economist, 44, 67-72.
67. McDougall, W. (2015). An introduction to social psychology. Psychology Press.
68. McGregor, D. (1960). Theory X and theory Y. Organization theory, 358, 374.
69. Man, D. C., & Lam, S. S. (2003). The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: a cross‐cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(8), 979-1001.
70. Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 74(3), 424.
71. Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of management, 24(3), 351-389.
72. Merrens, M. R., & Garrett, J. B. (1975). The Protestant Ethic Scale as a predictor of repetitive work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 125.
73. Miller, M. F. (1974). Relationship of vocational maturity to work values. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 5(3), 367-371.
74.Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159.
75. Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 42(9), 771-785.
76. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological bulletin, 115(2), 210.
77. Nord, W. R., Brief, A. P., Atieh, J. M., & Doherty, E. M. (1988). Work Values and The Conduct of Organizational-Behavior. Research in organizational behavior, 10, 1-42.
78. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: MacGraw-Hill. _ d. Intentar embellecer nuestras ciudades y también las.
79. OReilly III, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative science quarterly, 21-37.
80. Pine, G. J., & Innis, G. (1987). Cultural and individual work values. The Career Development Quarterly, 35(4), 279-287.
81. Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American psychologist, 54(9), 741.
82. Pryor, R. (1979). In search of a concept: Work values. Vocational Guidance Quarterly.
83. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
84. Portugal, E., & Yukl, G. (1994). Perspectives on environmental leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(3-4), 271-276.
85. Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1992). Values and the American manager: An update updated. California Management Review, 34(3), 80-94.
86. Peters, T. J., Waterman, R. H., & Jones, I. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from Americas best-run companies.
87. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual review of psychology, 28(1), 363-392.
88. Qian, M. (1976). The spirit of Chinese history. Taipei: Don Da.
89. Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Ballinger Publishing Co/Harper & Row Publishers.
90. Robbins, S. P., DeCenzo, D. A., & Coulter, M. K. (2008). Fundamentals of management: Essential concepts and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
91. Robbins, S. (2005). Overview: Classroom literacies and public culture. Writing America: Classroom literacy and public engagement, 8-24.
92. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2012). Essentials of organizational behavior.
93. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.
94. Rounds, J. B. (1990). The comparative and combined utility of work value and interest data in career counseling with adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37(1), 32-45.
95. Roy, M. H. (2001). Small group communication and performance: do cognitive flexibility and context matter?. Management Decision, 39(4), 323-330.
96. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Academic Press.
97. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
98.Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 43(1), 118-135.
99. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management Review, 36(2), 381-403.
100. Stogdill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (1957). Leadership behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University.
101. Stokes, J. P. (1983). Components of group cohesion: Intermember attraction, instrumental value, and risk taking. Small Group Behavior, 14(2), 163-173.
102. Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of management review, 28(3), 397-415.
103. Sui Pheng, L. (1994). Lessons from Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching for the facilities manager. Facilities, 12(12), 6-14.
104. Super, D. E. (1970). Work values inventory: Manual. Riverside Publishing Company.
105. Tziner, A. (1982). Differential effects of group cohesiveness types: A clarifying overview. Social Behavior and Personality.
106. Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S. F., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of experimental social psychology, 40(1), 1-13.
107. Vroom, V. H., & Phillip, W. Yetton (1973) Leadership and Decision-Making. Pittsburgh: Univer-sity of Pittsburgh Press. VroomLeadership and Decision-Making1973.
108. Watson, J. G., & Barone, S. (1976). The self-concept, personal values, and motivational orientations of black and white managers. Academy of Management Journal, 19(1), 36-48.
109. Westre, K. R., & Weiss, M. R. (1991). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and group cohesion in high school football teams. The Sport Psychologist, 5(1), 41-54.
110. Wollack, S., Goodale, J. G., Wijting, J. P., & Smith, P. C. (1971). Development of the survey of work values. Journal of Applied psychology, 55(4), 331.
111. Wortzel, R. (1979). Multivariate analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Zack, M.(1999) Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41, 125-143.
112. Williams, B. C., & Plouffe, C. R. (2007). Assessing the evolution of sales knowledge: A 20-year content analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 408-419.
113. Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1990). The effects of group size in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(2), 177-190.
114. Wright, T. L., & Duncan, D. (1986). Attraction to group, group cohesiveness, and individual outcome: A study of training groups. Small Group Behavior, 17(4), 487-492.
115. Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. Basic Books (AZ).
116. Yukl, G. A. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education India.
117. Yukl, G. (2013). Leading in organizations.
118. Zaccaro, S. J., & Lowe, C. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(4), 547-558.
119. Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566.