(3.238.186.43) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/28 21:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳研廷
研究生(外文):CHEN, YEN-TING
論文名稱:悖論領導對團隊工作敬業心的影響-團隊凝聚力之中介效果
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Paradoxical Leadership on Team Work Engagement:Group Cohesion as the Mediator
指導教授:陳儀蓉陳儀蓉引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHEN, YI-JUNG
口試委員:劉韻僖鍾安宜
口試委員(外文):LIU, YUN-SHICHUNG, AN-YI
口試日期:2020-06-13
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄科技大學
系所名稱:人力資源發展系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:80
中文關鍵詞:悖論領導團隊工作敬業心團隊凝聚力
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:61
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要乃探討悖論領導、團隊工作敬業心與團隊凝聚力等三個構念之間的關係,探討團隊凝聚力在悖論領導與團隊工作敬業心間關聯性的中介效果。本研究發現:

1、悖論領導對團隊凝聚力具有正向的影響。
2、悖論領導對團隊工作敬業心具有正向的影響。
3、團隊凝聚力對團隊工作敬業心具有正向的影響。
4、團隊凝聚力在悖論領導與團隊工作敬業心間之關係有中介影響。
The present study is not only to explore the relationships between paradoxical leadership, team work engagement and group cohesion, but also to examine the mediating effect of group cohesion between the relationship between paradoxical leadership and team work engagement. This study found that:

1. Paradoxical Leadership has a positive impact on Group Cohesion.
2. Paradoxical Leadership has a positive impact on Team Work Engagement.
3. Group Cohesion has a positive impact on Team Work Engagement.
4. Group Cohesion mediates the relationship between Paradoxical Leadership and Team Work Engagement.
目錄
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝詞 iii
目錄 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 悖論領導的概要 4
2.1.1 領導的意涵 4
2.1.2 悖論領導的組成構面 9
第二節 團隊工作敬業心的概要 12
第三節 團隊凝聚力的概要 15
2.3.1 團隊凝聚力的意涵 15
2.3.2 團隊凝聚力的組成構面 19
第四節 研究變項之推論 21
2.4.1 悖論領導對團隊凝聚力的影響 21
2.4.2 悖論領導對團隊工作敬業心的影響 21
2.4.3 團隊凝聚力對團隊工作敬業心的影響 22
2.4.4團隊凝聚力對悖論領導與團隊工作敬業心之影響 22
第五節 研究架構 24
第三章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究對象與資料蒐集方法 25
第二節 研究變項及衡量 27
3.2.1 基本控制變項 27
3.2.2 悖論領導 27
3.2.3 團隊工作敬業心 28
3.2.4 團隊凝聚力 28
第三節 資料處理與分析方法 30
3.3.1 描述性統計分析 30
3.3.2 信度分析 30
3.3.3 差異分析 30
3.3.4 相關分析 31
3.3.5 迴歸分析 31
第四章 研究結果 32
第一節 描述性統計分析 32
4.1.1 人口統計變項之描述性統計分析 32
4.1.2 研究變項之描述性統計分析 36
第二節 信度分析 41
4.2.1 悖論領導之信度分析 41
4.2.2 團隊凝聚力之信度分析 44
4.2.3 團隊工作敬業心之信度分析 45
第三節 各研究構面之性別差異分析 46
第四節 各變項之相關分析 47
4.4.1 人口統計變項與研究變項之相關分析 47
4.4.2 研究各變項之相關分析 47
第五節 迴歸分析 49
4.5.1 悖論領導對團隊凝聚力之迴歸分析 49
4.5.2 團隊凝聚力中介之迴歸分析 51
第六節 研究假設之驗證結果 53
第五章 結論與建議 54
第一節 研究結論 54
5.1.1 悖論領導對團隊凝聚力之影響 54
5.1.2 悖論領導對團隊工作敬業心之影響 54
5.1.3 團隊凝聚力對團隊工作敬業心之影響 55
5.1.4 團隊凝聚力對悖論領導與團隊工作敬業心之影響 55
第二節 研究限制 56
第三節 學術及實務意涵 57
文獻參考 59
一、中文文獻 59
二、西文文獻 62
一、中文文獻
1.王益明、許燕、湯圓(2010)。從滿意度到敬業度:轉變與啟示。第六屆海峽兩岸組織行為與人才開發學術研討會論文集。
2.王加微(1990)。行為科學。台北市:五南圖書。
3.吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。台北市:知城數位科技股份有限公司。
4.邱郁雅(2017)。矛盾追隨行為量表之建立。中央大學碩士論文。
5.呂俊毅、陳麗玉(2020)。工作重塑對工作敬業與工作績效影響之研究-尋求回饋行為的中介調節效果。企業管理學報。45(1),91-119。
6.周俊善(2019)。領導者儒、道家工作價值觀、矛盾領導與團隊凝聚力三者之關聯性-以國軍為例。高雄科技大學碩士論文。
7.林文政(2019)。成為最佳矛盾領導人.哈佛商業評論全球中文版2月號/2019第150 期.取自 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0008639.html. (May 5, 2019)
8.林宛姿(2013)。主管支持、員工工作敬業心與工作績效關係之研究:跨層次驗證。中山大學碩士論文。
9.卓姵妤(2018)。人才管理措施與工作敬業心之關係-以組織自尊為中介變項。清華大學碩士論文。
10.洪光遠(1992)。組織領導。台北:桂冠書局。
11.胡龍騰、徐瑋鴻(2017)。組織成員觀點下公部門團體績效評比之製度效應檢驗:目標校準, 績效學習與團隊動態。公共行政學報,(52),1-38。
12.高瑞堂、張婉菁(2017)。以角色理論觀點探討影響高科技產業員工離職傾向之因素。企業管理學報。(115),1-26。
13.張守中(2008)。團體凝聚力的變化機制與影響因素。人文及社會科學集刊,20(2),141-172。
14.張守中、陳美貴(2006)。團體界線的開放性、團體表現與成員流動性之關聯。中華心理學刊,48(4),411-424。
15.莊宜家(2016)。金融業分行主管之矛盾領導行為對部屬之領導者信任的影響: 檢視主管與部屬關係品質的中介效果。中山大學碩士論文,高雄市。
16.陳其昌(1993)。排球教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力的影響暨驗證運動情境領導理論之研究,台灣體育學院碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
17.陳香文(2019)。正向領導對工作敬業心影響之研究:團體凝聚力中介效果之分析。高雄科技大學碩士論文。
18.陳烽堯(2014)。從員工幸福觀點論主計人員陞遷制度,主計月刊,703,80-83。
19.陳彰儀(1995)。組織心理學。台北市:心理。
20.陳膺宇(2000)。我國女性軍職人員特質研究。國防部補助研究計畫。
21.黃金柱(1985)。體育社會心理學。台北:師大書苑。
22.黃品全、韓明娟(2015)。顧客導向、工作投入與顧客焦點建言:挑戰、妨礙型壓力源之調節效果。人力資源管理學報,15(2),1-24。
23.彭瑞振. (2017)。真誠領導, 團隊敬業貢獻, 正向心理資本與員工創造力:一個跨層次的研究。人力資源管理學報,17(4),37-60。
24.詹明蒼(2014)。組織變革不確定感對組織挫折、職場退縮之影響-探討正向心理資本調節效果。國防大學管理學院碩士論文,台北市。
25.鄧筱芹(2014)。銀行員工工作創造力、個人-工作契合度與工作敬業關係之研究。台中科技大學碩士論文。
26.劉俊志(2011)。台北市國小羽球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究。台北市立教育大學,台北市。
27.潘福來(2005)。國中校長塑造學校團隊凝聚力之行動研究。國立中正大學碩士論文。
28.樊學良、陸洛(2017),團隊結構特徵及社會特質與團隊產出之關係:團隊信任和團隊凝聚力之角色。組織與管理,10(1),57-89。
29.謝欣紋(2014)。心理資本對於工作壓力,員工幸福感與敬業精神影響之研究。中央大學碩士論文。
30.簡忠仁、黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、林良軒(2019)。上下只會交征賊嗎?領導者與部屬的私交關係如何增進組織效益。管理學報,36(2),195-223。
31.顏明哲、張家昌(2006)。運動團隊凝聚力之初探。彰化師大體育學報,6,114-160。
二、西文文獻
1.Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
2.Bahli, B., & Buyukkurt, M. D. (2005). Group performance in information systems project groups: an empirical study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 4(1), 97-113.
3.Bandura, A.(1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
4.Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Collier Macmillan.
5.Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112-121.
6.Beishline, J. R. (1950). Military Management for National Defense. New York: Prentice-Hall.
7.Benjamin, L., & Flynn, F. J. (2006). Leadership style and regulatory mode: Value from fit? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 216-230.
8.Bishop, J. W., & Scott, K. D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment.Journal of Applied Psychology,85(3), 439.
9.Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? a meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288-307.
10. Burns, J. M. (1978) Leadership. New York : Harper & Row, 280.
11.Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations ani Considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4(2), 123-138.
12.Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1990). The impact of group size in an exercise setting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,12(4), 376-387.
13.Carron, A. V., Shapcott, K. M., & Burke, S. M. (2007). Group cohesion in sport and exercise: past, present and future. Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology. Routledge. (pp. 135-158)
14.Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7(3), 244-266.
15.Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1968). Power and influence in groups: Introduction. Group dynamics: Research and theory, 3, 215-235.
16.Carvalho, M. G. D. (2016). The effect of teamwork engagement on team learning and team adaptation in tourism sector (Master's thesis, instituto universitário de lisboa). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12555
17.Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
18.De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2004). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), 140-155.
19.De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (2002). Intergroup and intragroup aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 126-136.
20.Donnelly, P., Carron, A. V., & Chelladurai, P. (1978). Group cohesion and sport. Canadian Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation.
21.Dorfman, P. W. (1996). International and cross-cultural leadership research. Handbook for international management research, 2.
22.Drath, W. H., & Palus, C. J. (1994). Making Common Sense: Leadership as Meaning-Making in a Community of Practice. Center for Creative Leadership.
23.Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435–457.
24.Dyaram, L., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2005). Unearthed: The Other Side of Group Cohesiveness. Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3), 185-190.
25.Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups; a study of human factors in housing. Harper.
26.Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
27.Foddy, M., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Impact of leaders on resource consumption in social dilemmas: The intergroup context. Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects, 309-330.
28.Forsyth, D. R. (2005). Group Dynamics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
29.Gardner, C. E. (2007). Engaged Employee Drive the Bottom Line, DVM, 38(3), pp.4F
30.Gardner, W. L., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 32-58.
31.George, J. M., 1990, “Personality, affect, and behavior in groups,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 107-116.
32.Gordon, T. (1955). Group-Centered Leadership: A Way of Releasing the Creative Power of Groups. Oxford, England: Houghton, Mifflin Company.
33.Gruman, J. A., & A. M. Saks (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21 (2), 123-136.
34.Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that Work (and those that don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. Jossey-Bass.
35.Hart, C. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). From fault line to group fission: Understanding membership changes in small groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 392-404.
36.Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. and Hayes, T.L. (2002) Business-Unit-Level Relationship between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.
37.Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Natemeyer, W. E. (1979). Situational leadership, perception, and the impact of power. Group & Organization Studies, 4(4), 418-428.
38.Higgins, E. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Pierro, A. (2003). Regulatory Mode: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Orientations. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 35, pp. 293-344). Elsevier Academic Press.
39.Houghton, J. D., & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: when should self-leadership be encouraged? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83.
40.House, R. J. (1971). A Path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-339.
41.House, R.J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership.
42. Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 65(2), 153-169.
43.James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85.
44.Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45(4), 321-349.
45.Lavine, M. (2014). Paradoxical leadership and the competing values framework. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 189-205.
46.Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47.
47.Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585-634.
48.Lewis, M. (2000). Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760-776.
49.Li, Q., She, Z., & Yang, B. (2018). Promoting innovative performance in multidisciplinary teams: the roles of paradoxical leadership and team perspective taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 9,
50.Lussier, R. N. (2003). Management fundamentals: Concepts, Applications, Skill Development (2nd ed.). Mason: Thomson South-Western.
51.Luthans, F., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Lester, P. B. (2006). Developing the psychological capital of resiliency. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 25-44.
52.Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.
53.Man, D. C., & Lam, S. S. (2003). The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: a cross‐cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 979-1001.
54.May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.
55.Mone, E. M., & London, M. (2010). Employee Engagement through Effective Performance Management: A Practical Guide for Managers. New York: Routledge.
56.Mullen, B., & C. Copper. (1994). The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychology Bulletin, 115(2),210-227.
57.Paine, L. S. (2010). The China Rules: A Practical Guide for CEOs Managing Multinational Corporations in the People's Republic. Harvard Business Interview 88.
58.Pearce, C. L., Wassenaar, C. L., Berson, Y., & Tuval-Mashiach, R. (2019). Toward a theory of meta-paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 31-41.
59.Poole, M. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1989). Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 562-578.
60.Rauch Jr, C. F., & Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism: Basis for an alternate approach to the study of leadership. In Leaders and managers. Pergamon.
61.Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
62.Richards, D., & Engle, S. (1986). After the Vision: Suggestions to Corporate Visionaries and Vision Champions. VA: Miles River Press.
63.Robbins, S. P. (1983), Organizational Theory, the Structure & Design of Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs: NJ.
64.Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Person Education.
65.Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., Devloo, T., Rico, R., Salanova, M., & Anseel, F. (2017). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement, and performance across creativity tasks: A three-wave study. Group & Organization Management, 42(4), 521-547.
66.Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655-684.
67.Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116-131.
68.Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217-1227.
69.Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
70.Schein, E. H. (1992). How can organizations learn faster? the problem of entering the Green Room. MIT Sloan Management Review.
71.Schutte, N., Toppinen, S., Kalimo, R., & Schaufeli, W.(2000). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS) across occupational groups and nations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 53-66
72.Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research.Organizational behavior and human decision processes,43(1), 118-135.
73.Shao, Y., Nijstad, B. A., & Täuber, S. (2019). Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 7-19.
74.Shirom, A. (2003). Job-related burnout: A review. Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology, 245-264.
75.Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward A Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of management review, 36(2), 381-403.
76.Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35-71.
77.Sweetman, D., & Luthans, F. (2010). The power of positive psychology: Psychological capital and work engagement. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 54-68.
78.Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
79.Tripathi N (2017). Hindrance or challenge: Dynamics of paradoxical leadership and subordinate’s work motivation. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), 10611.
80.Valent. E. P., Sugiyarti. G., & Hikmah (2018). Working Group Cohesiveness of Antecedent for Successful for Performance. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management.
81.Van Fleet, D. D., & Yukl, G. A. (1986). Military Leadership: an Organizational Behavior Perspective. Jai Press.
82.Van Vugt, M. (2001). Community identification moderating the impact of financial incentives in a natural social dilemma: water conservation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1440-1449.
83.Van Vugt, M., & Hart, C. M. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 585-598.
84.Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S. F., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 1-13.
85.Vardiman, P. D., Houghton, J. D., & Jinkerson, D. L. (2006). Environmental leadership development: Toward a contextual model of leader selection and effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(2), 93-105.
86.Vaughan, G., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). Introduction to Social Psychology. Frenchs Forest, Sydney, Australia: Pearson Education Australia.
87.Waite, P. J., & Richardson, G. E. (2004). Determining the efficacy of resiliency training in the work site. Journal of Allied Health, 33(3), 178-183.
88.Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 316-327.
89.Ward, J., & Wilkes, B. (2016). Staff Engagement for Cohesion. Association of College and Research Libraries. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries
90.Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. Basic Books (AZ)
91.Yang, Y., Li, Z., Liang, L., & Zhang, X. (2019). Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: Thriving at work and psychological safety. Current Psychology, 1-12.
92.Yi, L., Mao, H., & Wang, Z. (2019). How paradoxical leadership affects ambidextrous innovation: The role of knowledge sharing. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 47(4), 1-15.
93.Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15-32.
94.Zaccaro, S. J., Gilbert, J. A., Thor, K. K., & Mumford, M. D. (1991). Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perspectiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(4), 317-342.
95.Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20250706)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔