跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/16 19:18
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:徐菀璘
研究生(外文):HSU, WAN-LIN
論文名稱:二階層供應鏈於企業社會責任策略之訂價及通路競爭
論文名稱(外文):The Pricing and Channel Competition for the Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy in the Two-echelon Supply Chain
指導教授:陳宗輝陳宗輝引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHEN, TSUNG-HUI
口試委員:陳彥銘劉子年
口試委員(外文):CHEN, YEN-MINGLIU, TZU-NIEN
口試日期:2019-07-02
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東大學
系所名稱:行銷與流通管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:行銷與流通學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:43
中文關鍵詞:企業社會責任雙重通路訂價策略通路競爭供應鏈協調
外文關鍵詞:Corporate Social ResponsibilityDual-channelPricingChannel CompetitionSupply Chain Coordination
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:201
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:10
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
  近年來,全球生態環境遭到嚴重的破壞,企業對永續發展的理念也愈來愈重視。而企業社會責任(CSR)已經成為企業永續經營不得不面對的趨勢,在傳統供應鏈的產銷活動中,供應鏈的每個成員都是以各自的產品需求以及對自身利潤最大化,且成本最小化來制定通路策略。本研究將環境設定為單一製造商以及單一零售商所組成之供應鏈結構,以整體供應鏈系統利潤最大化為目標投入企業社會責任以及加入直接通路,尋找最佳訂價策略以及能協調供應鏈所有成員的合作機制。透過參數變動敏感度分析結果中顯示出零售市場規模明顯的影響整體供應鏈系統之利潤,當零售市場規模增加時,消費者對產品的需求會越高,因此整體供應鏈系統之利潤會大幅提升。而於決策變數敏感度分析之結果中顯示出企業社會責任的投入影響整體供應鏈系統之利潤最為明顯,當企業社會責任的投入程度增加時,基本市場規模也會大幅擴大,因此市場需求量也將增加,進而讓整體通路系統之利潤大幅提升。但整體通路系統之利潤並非會隨著企業社會責任投入程度遞增而增加,當企業社會責任的投入程度大於到一定程度時,整體通路系統之利潤也將受到投入成本增加而損害。
  In recent years, the global ecological environment has been severely damaged, and enterprises have paid more and more attention to the concept of sustainable development. And corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become a trend that enterprises have to face in the sustainable operation. In the traditional supply chain sales activities, each member of the supply chain maximizes their own product demand and their own profits. Minimize costs to develop a pathway strategy. This study sets the environment as a supply chain structure consisting of a single manufacturer and a single retailer. It invests in corporate social responsibility and joins direct access to maximize the profit of the overall supply chain system, find the best pricing strategy and coordinate the supply chain. Cooperation mechanism for all members. Through the parameter change sensitivity analysis results, the retail market size obviously affects the profit of the overall supply chain system. When the retail market scale increases, the demand for products will be higher, so the profit of the overall supply chain system will be greatly improved. In the results of the sensitivity analysis of decision variables, it shows that the investment of corporate social responsibility affects the profit of the overall supply chain system. When the input of corporate social responsibility increases, the basic market size will also expand significantly, so the market demand is also It will increase, which will greatly increase the profit of the overall access system. However, the profit of the overall access system will not increase with the increasing degree of corporate social responsibility investment. When the input level of corporate social responsibility is greater than a certain level, the profit of the overall access system will also be damaged by the increase of input costs.
中文摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 III
表目錄 IV
圖目錄 V

第一章 緒論 1
 1.1 研究背景 1
 1.2 研究目的 2
 1.3 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
 2.1 企業社會責任 5
 2.2 訂價策略 6
 2.3 通路協調 9
第三章 模型建立 11
 3.1 環境設定 11
 3.2 模型符號定義 13
 3.3 模型描述 14
  3.3.1 製造商無考慮企業社會責任且無加入雙重通路 14
  3.3.2 製造商考慮企業社會責任且無加入雙重通路 16
  3.3.3 製造商無考慮企業社會責任且加入雙重通路 20
  3.3.4 製造商考慮企業社會責任且加入雙重通路 22
第四章 數值分析 26
 4.1 基本實驗範例 26
 4.2 參數變動對通路系統利潤之影響 28
 4.3 決策變數對通路系統利潤之影響 32
第五章 結論與未來研究建議 35
參考文獻 37
Bai R., and Kendall, G. (2008). A model for fresh produce shelf-space allocation and inventory management with freshness-condition-dependent demand, INFORMS Journal on Computing, 20, 78-85.
Brand, B., and Grothe, M. (2015). Social responsibility in a bilateral monopoly, Journal of Economics, 115(3), 275-289.
Carter, C. R., and Jennings, M. M. (2002). Social responsibility and supply chain relationships, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 38(1), 37-52.
Chan C. K., Lee Y. C. E., and Campbell, J. F. (2013). Environmental performance—Impacts of vendor–buyer coordination, International Journal of Production Economics, 145, 683-695.
Chen, S. C., Min, J., Teng, J. T., and Li, F. (2016). Inventory and shelf-space optimization for fresh produce with expiration date under freshness-and-stock-dependent demand rate, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67, 884-896.
Chen, Y. H., Nie, P. Y., and Yang, Y. C. (2017). Effects of corporate social responsibility on food safety, Agricultural Economics (Zemedelska Ekonomika), 63(12), 539-547.
Cohen, M. (1977). Joint Pricing and Ordering Policy for Exponentially Decaying Inventory with Known Demand, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 24(2), 257-268.
Crifo, P., Diaye, M.-A., and Pekovic, S. (2016). CSR related management practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis of the quantity–quality trade-off on French data, International Journal of Production Economics, 171(3), 405-416.
Dasu, S., and Tong, C. (2010). Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes, European Journal of Operational Research, 204(3), 662-671.
David, Z. (2012). Foxconn, Apple Contractor, Shares Plunge On Protests, Lower Earnings Call, International Business Times, Business.
Deng, L.,and Yang, S. (2016). Pricing strategies in the remanufacturing market for the uncertain market size in the second period, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2016, 13.
Deutsch, N., and Berenyi, L. (2018). Personal approach to sustainability of future decision makers: a Hungarian case, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(1), 271-303.
Egri, P., and Vancza, J. (2012). Channel coordination with the newsvendor model using asymmetric information, International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 491-499.
Feng, L., Chan, Y. L., and Cárdenas-Barron, L. E. (2017). Pricing and lot-sizing polices for perishable goods when the demand depends on selling price, displayed stocks, and expiration date, International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 11-20.
Goering, G. E. (2007). The strategic use of managerial incentives in a non-profit firm mixed duopoly, Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(2), 83-91.
Goering, G. E. (2008). Socially concerned firms and the provision of durable goods. Economic Modelling, 25(3), 575-583.
He, Y., and Zhao, X. (2012). Coordination in multi-echelon supply chain under supply and demand uncertainty, International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 106-115.
Hediger, W. (2010). Welfare and capital-theoretic foundations of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability, Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 518-526.
Hirose, K., Lee, S.H., and Matsumura, T. (2017). Environmental corporate social responsibility: a note on the first-mover advantage under price competition, Economic Bulletin, 37(1), A20.
Holmstrom, B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams. The Bell Journal of Economics, 324-340.
Hong, X., Xu, L., Du, P., and Wang, W. (2015). Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 12-22.
Huh, W. T., Kachani, S., and Sadighian, A. (2010). Optimal pricing and production planning for subscription-based products, Production and Operations Management, 19(1), 19-39.
Jiang, B., and Zhang, X. (2011). How does a retailer's service plan affect a manufacturer's warranty?, Management Science, 57(4), 727-740.
Xu, K., & Li, W. (2013). An Ethical Stakeholder Approach to Crisis Communication:A Case Study of Foxconn’s 2010 Employee Suicide Crisis, Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 371-386.
Koenig, M., and Meissner, J. (2010). List pricing versus dynamic pricing: Impact on the revenue risk, European Journal of Operational Research, 204, 505-512.
Kopel, M., and Brand, B. (2012). Socially responsible firms and endogenous choice of strategic incentives, Economic Modelling, 29(3), 982-989.
Kopnina, H. (2017). Sustainability: New Strategic Thinking for Business, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(1), 27-43.
Kotler, P., and Armstrong, G. (2003).Principles of Marketing.(10th ed.), Prentice Hall.
KPMG. (2015). Currents of Change: KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015. Available online at. http://www.kpmg.com/cn/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2015-o-201511.aspx
Kumar, R., and Ramachandran, P. (2016). Revenue management in remanufacturing: perspectives, review of current literature and research directions, International Journal of Production Research, 54, 2185-2201.
Kurata, H., Yao, D.Q., and Liu, J. J. (2007). Pricing policies under direct vs. indirect channel competition and national vs. store brand competition, European Journal of Operational Research, 180(1), 262-281.
Lambertini, L., and Tampieri, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility in a Mixed Oligopoly, Working Paper No. 723, University of Bologna.
Lau, H. S., and Lau, A. H. L. (1999). Manufacturer's pricing strategy and return policy for a single period commodity, European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 291-304.
Li, B., Hou, P. W., Chen, P., and Li, Q. H. (2016). Pricing strategy and coordination in a dual channel supply chain with a risk-averse retailer, International Journal of Production Economics, 178, 154-168.
Lien, D. (2002). Competition between non-profit and for-profit firms, International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 1(3), 193-207.
Lin K., and Sibdari, S. (2009). Dynamic price competition with discrete customer choices, European Journal of Operational Research, 197(3), 969-980.
Lioui, A., & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: disentangling direct and indirect effects, Ecological Economics, 78, 100-111.
Liu, J., Zhai, X., and Chen, L. (2019). Optimal pricing strategy under trade-in program in the presence of strategic consumers, Omega, 84, 1-17.
Manasakis, C. E., and Petrakis, E. (2013). Certification of corporate social responsibility activities in oligopolistic markets, Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(1), 282-309.
Ni, D., and Kevin, L. W. (2012). A game-theoretic analysis of social responsibility conduct in two-echelon supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 303-313.
Ni, D., Kevin, L. W., and Tang, X. (2010). Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: insights from wholesale price contracts, European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1269-1279.
Panda, S. (2013). Coordinating a manufacturer–retailer chain under time and price dependent demand rate, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 8(2), 84-92.
Panda, S. (2014). Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 67, 92-104.
Panda, S., Modak, N. M., and Pradhan, D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, channel coordination and profit division in a two-echelon supply chain, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 1-12.
Panda, S., Modak, N. M., Basu, M., and Goyal, S. (2015). Channel coordination and profit distribution in a social responsible three-layer supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 224-233.
Popescu, I., and Wu, Y. (2007). Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects, Operations Research, 55, 413-429.
Saha, S., and Goyal, S. (2015). Supply chain coordination contracts with inventory level and retail price dependent demand, International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 140-152.
Sato, K., and Sawaki, K. (2013). A continuous-time dynamic pricing model knowing the competitor’s pricing strategy, European Journal of Operational Research, 229, 223-229.
Taleizadeh, A. A., Alizadeh-Basban, N., and Sarker, B.R. (2018). Coordinated contracts in a two-echelon green supply chain considering pricing strategy, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 124, 249-275.
Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: The MIT press.
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003).Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion, Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95-105.
Wang Q., and Wang R. (2005). Quantity discount pricing policies for heterogeneous retailers with price sensitive demand, Naval Research Logistics, 52, 645-658.
Wee, H. M., and Yang, P. C. (2007). A mutual beneficial pricing strategy of an integrated vendor-buyers inventory system, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 34(1), 179-187.
Xiao, T., Yu, G., Sheng, Z., and Xia, Y. (2005). Coordination of a supply chain with one-manufacturer and two-retailers under demand promotion and disruption management decisions, Annals of Operations Research, 135(1), 87-109.
Yoo, S. H., Kim, D. S., and Park, M. S. (2015). Pricing and return policy under various supply contracts in a closed-loop supply chain, International Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 106-126.
Zhao, W., and Zheng, Y. S. (2000). Optimal dynamic pricing for perishable assets with non-homogeneous demand, Management Science, 46(3), 375-388.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top