跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.212.94.18) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/12/10 16:04
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林柏翰
研究生(外文):Po-Han Lin
論文名稱:台灣電子零售業之服務創新:服務主導邏輯觀點之實證研究
論文名稱(外文):Service Innovation of E-retailing Industries in Taiwan: An Empirical Study on Service-Dominant Logic Perspective
指導教授:何筱文
指導教授(外文):Hsiao-Wen Ho
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:管理學院國際經營管理碩士學程
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:52
中文關鍵詞:商業夥伴合作顧客參與資源密度員工參與度電子零售資源流動性資源整合
外文關鍵詞:resource liqueficationemployment participationbusiness partner collaborationcustomer involvementresource densitye-retailingresource integration
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:528
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:179
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
台灣零售市場已經進入數位化的時代,面對電子零售發展的崛起,各行各業無可避免地進入電子商務的市場,而台灣網路零售業如何越來越競爭的市場中生存和發展,為企業創造營收,此研究認為服務創新為其要素,並假設顧客參與、商業夥伴合作與員工投入對網路零售發展服務創新具有調節作用。本研究致力於探討引導台灣電子零售產業服務創新發展的關鍵調節變項,從過往學者的研究中的得知的獨立變數如:資源流動性、資源整合、資源密度(資源特性),假設其調節變項為顧客參與、商業夥伴合作與員工參與度,檢視各變項經調節後對公司的市場和盈利表現產生的影響。此研究採用問卷設計與統計分析,結果顯示資源特性(流動性、整合性、密度)對公司績效表現有正向影響,且顧客參與、商業夥伴合作、員工參與度對資源特性與公司績效表現的關係有正向調節作用,本研究因此能給予企業發展及製作服務創新程序時提供參考依據。
Taiwanese retailing industry is entering the digital era. E-retailing is growing rapidly. Many of retailers cannot help coming after this digital trend. How could Taiwanese retailer grab this trend in order to stand out in this growing market? Further create profit for companies. This research considers service innovation to be a focal factor in contributing to the firm performance. It also proposes that the relationship between service innovation and the firm performance is positively moderated by customer involvement, business partner collaboration, and employment participation in the multi-actor e-tailing ecosystem. Based on the survey research and statistical analysis, the findings first of all, support the positive association between service innovation, through resource liquefication, resource density and resource integration, and the firm performance. Next, the results also indicate that with the interactions between customer involvement, business partner collaboration, and employee participation, service innovation can pose stronger positive impact on the firm performance. This research therefore provides theoretical and managerial implications for e-tailing businesses in Taiwan.
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
Chapter 1 :Introduction 1
1.1. Research Background 1
1.2. Research Gaps 2
1.3. Research Objectives and Questions 2
1.4. Research Contexts 3
Chapter 2 : Literature Review 4
2.1. Service Innovation and Firm Performance 4
2.2. Multi-actor Service Ecosystem 8
Chapter 3 : Research Methodology 12
3.1. Research Design 12
3.2. Data Collection 12
3.2.1. Data Sources 12
3.2.2. Population and Sampling 12
3.2.3. Questionnaire Design and Pre-testing 13
3.2.4. Respondent Profile 15
3.2.5. Operational Variables and Measures 15
3.3. Data Analysis 21
Chapter 4 : Research Findings 22
4.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis 22
4.2. Descriptive Statistics on Samples 26
4.3. Hypotheses Testing 27
Chapter 5 : Discussion and Conclusion 28
5.1. Theoretical Implications 28
5.2. Managerial Implications 30
5.3. Limitation and Future Research Directions 31
Appendix 1: Survey Questions with Item Codes 32
Appendix 2: Online Survey Questions in Chinese 37
References 40
A. Mina et al. (2014). Open service innovation and the firm’s search for external knowledge. Research Policy, 43, 853–866
Andrea Ordanini and A. Parasuraman (2011). Service Innovation Viewed Through a Service-Dominant Logic Lens: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23
Anna Shaojie Cui and Fang Wu (2017). The Impact of Customer Involvement on New Product Development: Contingent and Substitutive Effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(1), 60–80
B. Moliner-Velázquez et al. (2017). Effects of Retail Innovation and Image on “Value-Satisfaction-Loyalty” Chain, Academy of Marketing Science285–299
C.C. Cheng, D. Krumwiede / Technovation (2012). The role of service innovation in the market orientation—new service performance linkage. Technovation, 32, 487–497
Coombs, R., & Miles, I. (2000) Innovation, Measurement and services: The new problematique. In J.S. Metcalf, & I. Miles (Eds) Innovation systems in the service economy,(18) 85–103
C. Wang, M.I. Kafouros (2009). What factors determine innovation performance in emerging economies? Evidence from China. International Business Review, 18, 606–616
D. Kindström et al. (2013). Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1063–1073
Drejer, Ina (2004), ‘‘Identifying Innovation in Surveys of Services: A Schumpeterian Perspective,’’ Research Policy, 33 (3), 551–562
E. J. Nijssen et al. (2006). Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 241–251
H. Snyder et al. (2016). Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2401–2408
H. Song et al. (2016). The effects of service supply on perceived value proposition under different levels of customer involvement. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 116–128
J.-K. Hsieh, Y.-C. Hsieh (2015). Dialogic co-creation and service innovation performance in high-tech companies. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2266–2271
J. Li, R.K. Kozhikode (2009). Developing new innovation models: Shifts in the innovation landscapes in emerging economies and implications for global R&D management. Journal of International Management, 15, 328–339
J.-S. Chen et al. (2011). Co-production and its effects on service innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1331–1346
K.-H. Chen et al. (2016). Service innovation and new product performance: The influence of market-linking capabilities and market turbulence. International Journal of Production Economics, 172, 54–64
K. Koskela-Huotari et al. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems—Breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource integration. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2964–2971
Lance A. Bettencourt, Stephen W. Brown, Nancy J. Sirianni (2013). The secret to true service innovation. Business Horizons 56, 13–22
Leyland F. Pitt, Richard T. Watson and C. Bruce Kavan (1995). Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173–187
Lusch, R., & Vargo, S. (2014). It’s all actor-to-actor (A2A). In Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102–117
L.V. Ngo, A. O''Cass (2013). Innovation and business success: The mediating role of customer participation. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1134–1142
L.V. Ngo et al. (2017). Effective sense-and-respond strategies: Mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovation. Journal of Business Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.050
L. Witell et al. (2016). Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2863–2872
Menor, Larry J. and Aleda V. Roth (2007), ‘‘New Service Development Competence in Retail Banking: Construct Development and Measurement Validation,’’ Journal of Operations Managements, 25 (4), 825–846
M.F.Y. Cheung, W.M. To (2011). Customer involvement and perceptions: The moderating role of customer co-production. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 271–277
Pilar Carbonell, Ana I. Rodrı ́guez-Escudero, and Devashish Pujari (2009). Customer Involvement in New Service Development: An Examination of Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 536–550
Pim den Hertog, Wietze van der Aa, Mark W. de Jong, (2010). Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 490–514
P. Papastathopoulou and E.J. Hultink (2012). New Service Development: An Analysis of 27 Years of Research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 705–714
Robert F. Lusch, Satish Nambisan (2015). Service Innovation: a Service-dominant Logic Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175
R. Thakur, D. Hale (2013). Service innovation: A comparative study of U.S. and Indian service firms. Journal of Business Research 66, 1108–1123
Stuart L. Hart and Clayton M. Christensen (2002). The Great Leap: Driving Innovation From the Base of the Pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(01), 51-56
T. Anning-Dorson (2018). Customer involvement capability and service firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Business Research, 86, 269–280
Tether, B. S. (2005). Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European innobarometer survey. Industry & Innovation, 12(2), 153–184
T. Feng et al. / Industrial Marketing Management (2010). The effects of customer and supplier involvement on competitive advantage: An empirical study in China. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 1384–1394
Toivonen, M., & Tuomiinen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. The Service Industries Journal, 29(7) 887–902
Vargo, Stephen L. and Robert F. Lusch (2004), ‘‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,’’ Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17
Vargo, Stephen L. and Robert F. Lusch (2006), “Service-Dominant Logic: Reactions, Reflections, and Refinements,” Journal of Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288
Y.-C. Chang, M.-N. Chen (2016). Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan. Research Policy, 45, 1845–1857
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top