臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

自 1988 起，台灣蝴蝶蘭業者充分利用天然氣候的優勢，將傳統小農栽培轉型 為企業經營模式。長年外銷市場的經營，使台灣成為供應全球蘭花市場的重要產 地。但近年面臨荷蘭廠商的競爭，國內業者順應發展分工接續栽培模式應對，希 望以高「品質」在競爭激烈的市場中佔有一席之地。然而生物性產品本不如工業 性產品能均一生產，如何在供應鏈中維持生產品質，達供應要求標準，必有其可 控制之因素，也是本研究想探討之處。
本研究以控制理論為討論基礎，結合跨組織合作模式的理論運用，探討蝴蝶 蘭產業供應鏈的生產管理效率策略，以質性的個案研究為本研究方法，針對一家 在台灣蝴蝶蘭產的業經營多年的貿易商及其主要供應廠商作為研究對象，透過訪 談此個案公司與供應商公司六位高階主管及相關次級資料整理，來深入分析個案 公司供應鏈的品質效率分析，並就控制理論實行結果做為訂單交貨品質管理改善 效益之建議分析。
本研究對於實務界的供獻是透過了解控制模式的效果以及不同控制模式交互 運用的綜效，可提供一般農業對於供應商管理與控制建議，讓相關組織更進一步 了解在農業代工生產方面該如何建立有效控制理論，以提昇供應商的供貨品質。 另外，學術方面的供獻是本研究為早期在農業領域針對供應商控制的研究之一。 透過控制理論的應用以及供應商管理文獻的彙整，提出可能的控制模式，另外再 透過個案公司的實例展示，了解單一控制模式的效果以及不同控制模式統合運用 的綜效。本研究的結果，可做為未為相關研究的基礎。

Since 1988, Taiwanese Phalaenopsis industry has fully utilized the advantages of natural weather to transform traditional small size cultivation into a large scale business. As a result, Taiwan has become a famous producer of the global orchid market. However, facing competition from Dutch manufacturers in recent years, Taiwan manufacturers have turned their focus to quality and have developed a multi-stage production mode to react to the external competition. However, different from industrial products, plants cannot be produced uniformly. How to maintain product quality in the whole supply chain and meet the requirements is worth to study, and therefore is the focus of this study.
Based on the control theory and cross-organizational cooperation model, this study focuses on the strategies of managing supplier. A qualitative case study method was adopted. The target of this study is one Phalaenopsis exporter and its suppliers. In addition to written documents and secondary data, six senior executives of the case company and the supplier company were interviewed. In-depth analysis was conduct to understand the efficiency of the case company''s supply chain and summarized the supplier management approach based on control theory.
This study contributes to the practical community by showing how different control modes and be used jointly to maximize the controlling effects. This study also provides suggestions to the agriculture industry by showing how to effective collaborative with suppliers to improve the quality of the final product. For academia, this study applies control theory in the agriculture industry and integrates control mode and control style and proposes a possible control mechanism. Besides, through the case study of case companies, we can understand the effects of single control mode and the synergized effects of utilizing multiple control mechanisms simultaneously.

論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 1
第三節 研究目的 1
第四節 研究流程 2
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 蝴蝶蘭市場 4
第二節 控制理論 10
第三節 跨組織合作模式 19
第三章 研究設計 24
第一節 研究結構 24
第二節 研究方法 24
第四章 實證分析 27
第一節 供應商現況與問題 27
第二節 產業代工控制模式分析 27
第三節 控制模式方案之影響及效果 32
第五章 結論與建議 35
第一節 結論 35
第二節 實務建議 36
第三節 學術建議 36
第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 37
參考文獻 38
附錄 44

一、中文部分
方俊儒(2000)，領導行為、工作特性與工作滿足關係之探討--以我國大型會計師事務所為例，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文。
王寶閔(2012)，從社會鍵觀點了解影響個人服從群體控制 與角色外行為之因素，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文。
任彰雄(2004)，產學合作管理機制之探索性研究，中原大學企業管理學系，碩士論文。
何靖遠, & 莊木林. (2007). 以資訊處理理論探討跨組織資訊系統對供應商績效的影響. 電子商務學報, 9(1), 177-204.
林欣美. (2007). 跨組織策略聯盟之統治機制: 交易成本與網路鑲嵌之觀點. 管理評論, 26(3), 25-46.
林信惠、黃明祥、王文良著(2005)，軟體專案管理，智勝文化。
林鉦棽. (2004). 休閒旅館業從業人員的組織公正, 組織信任與組織公民行為關係: 社會交換理論觀點的分析. 中華管理學報, 5(1), 91-112.
施宗佑(2009)，軟體開發統計流程控制架構，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文。
陳承瑞(2005)，控制理論在資訊系統委外專案管理之運用 ─以母公司與資訊衍生公司之關係為例，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文。
曾增展(1999)，組織間關係型態及結構與控制機制之研究，義守大學管理 ，碩士論文。
番蕙琳(2006)，軟體測試制度的建立與應用：以半導體 MES為例，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文。
黃家齊. (2000). 績效資訊特性與控制, 薪資設計-組織控制觀點與代理理論觀點之整合. 臺大管理論叢, 10(2), 227-255.
龔天鈞(2008)，人力資源客服代表之管控–控制理論的觀點，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Adler, P.S. and Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive, Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 61–89.
Ahrens, T. and Chapman, C.S. (2004). Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain, Contemporary Accounting Research 21(2): 271–301.
Antia, K.D., Frazier, G.L. (2001). The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channel relationships. J. Marketing 65 (4), 67–81.
Arranz, N., de Arroyabe, J.C.F. (2012). Effect of formal contracts, relational norms and trust on performance of joint research and development projects. Br. J. Manage. 23 (4), 575–588.
Barber, B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
Barney, J.B., Hansen, M.H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strat. Manage. J. 15 (S1), 175–190.
Bastl, M., Johnson, M., Lightfoot, H., Evans, S. (2012). Buyer–supplier relationships in a servitized environment: an examination with Cannon and Perreault’s framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 32, 650–675.
Ben-Ner, A., Putterman, L. (2009). Trust, communication and contracts: an experiment. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 70 (1-2), 106–121.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
Cannon, J.P., Achrol, R.S., Gundlach, G.T. (2000). Contracts, norms, and plural form governance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 28 (2), 180–194.
Cannon, J.P., Doney, P.M., Mullen, M.R., Petersen, K.J. (2010). Building long-term orientation in buyer–supplier relationships: the moderating role of culture. J. Oper. Manage. 28, 506–521.
Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 15-42.
Cavusgil, S.T., Deligonul, S., Zhang, C. (2004). Curbing foreign distributor opportunism: an examination of trust, contracts, and the legal environment in international channel relationships. J. Int. Marketing 12 (2), 7–27.
Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information systems research, 14(3), 291-314.
Cropanzano, R., Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J. Manage. 31, 874–900.
Das, T.K., Teng, B.S. (1998). Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 (3), 491–512.
Deakin, S., Wilkinson, F. (1998). Contract law and the economics of interorganisational trust. In: Lane, C., Bachmann, R. (Eds.), Trust Within and Between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 146–172.
Dyer, J., Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 (4), 660– 679.
Faems, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A., Van Looy, B. (2008). Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. Acad. Manage. J. 51, 1053–1078.
Flamholtz, E. (1979). Organizational Control Systems as a Managerial Tool. California Management Review, 22: 50-59.
Genc¸ türk, E.F., Aulakh, P.S. (2007). Norms-and control-based governance of international manufacturer-distributor relational exchanges. J. Int. Marketing 15 (1), 92–126.
Ghoshal, S., Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Manage. Rev. 21, 13–47.
Goo, J., Kishore, R., Rao, H., Nam, K. (2009). The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: an empirical study. MIS Quart. 33 (1), 119–145.
Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Manage. J. 38 (1), 85–112.
Gulati, R., & Nickerson, J. A. (2008). Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 688-708.
Hart, O.D. (1988). Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm. J. Law Econ. Org. 4, 119–139.
Heide, J.B., John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing 56 (2), 32–44.
Henderson, J. C., & Lee, S. (1992). Managing I/S design teams: a control theories perspective. Management science, 38(6), 757-777.
Heumann, J., Wiener, M., Remus, U., & Mähring, M. (2015). To coerce or to enable? Exercising formal control in a large information systems project. Journal of information technology, 30(4), 337-351.
Huang, M.-C., Cheng, H.-L., Tseng, C.-Y. (2014). Reexamining the direct and interactive effects of governance mechanisms upon buyer–supplier cooperative performance. Ind. Marketing Manage. 43, 704–716.
Huber, T.L., Fischer, T.A., Dibbern, J., Hirschheim, R. (2013). A process model of com-plementarity and substitution of contractual and relational governance in ISoutsourcing. JMIS 30, 81–114.
Kirsch, L.J. (1997). Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management. Information System Research. 8(3): p. 215-239.
Kirsch, L.J., et al (2002). Controlling Information Systems Development Projects:The View from the Client. Management Science. 48(4): p. 484-498.
Lambe, C.J., Wittmann, C.M., Spekman, R.E. (2001). Social exchange theory and research on business-to-business relational exchange. J. Bus.-to-Bus. Marketing 8, 1–36.
Lazzarini, S.G., Miller, G.J., Zenger, T.R. (2008). Dealing with the paradox of embedded-ness: the role of contracts and trust in facilitating movement out of committedrelationships. Org. Sci. 19 (5), 709–728.
Lee, Y., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). Enhancing alliance performance: The effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance. Journal of business research, 59(8), 896-905.
Lewis, M.A., Roehrich, J.K. (2009). Contracts, relationships and integration: towards a model of the procurement of complex performance. Int. J. Procure. Manage. 2, 125–142.
Lui, S.S., Ngo, H.Y. (2004). The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances. J. Manage. 30 (4), 471–485.
Lui, S.S., Wong, Y., Liu, W. (2009). Asset specificity roles in interfirm cooperation: reducing opportunistic behavior or increasing cooperative behavior? J. Bus. Res. 62 (11), 1214–1219.
Macneil, I.R. (1980). The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Malhotra, D. (2009). When contracts destroy trust. Harv. Bus. Rev. 87 (5), 25.
Malhotra, D., Lumineau, F. (2011). Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: the effects of contract structure. Acad. Manage. J. 54 (5), 981–998.
Merchant, K. A. (1982). The Control Function of Management. Sloan Management Review, 23, 4: 43-55.
Merchant, K. A. (1998). Modern management control systems, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp.1-261.
Mesquita, L.F., Lazzarini, S.G. (2008). Horizontal and vertical relationships in develop-ing economies: implications for SMEs’ access to global markets. Acad. Manage.J. 51 (2), 359–380.
Olsen, M. E. (1978). The Process of Social Organization. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Chicago, IL.
Palmatier, R.W., Dant, R.P., Grewal, D. (2007). A comparative longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of interorganizational relationship performance. J. Marketing 71, 172–194.
Poppo, L., Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strat. Manage. J. 23 (8), 707–725.
Roehrich, J., Lewis, M. (2014). Procuring complex performance: implications for exchange governance complexity. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 34, 221–241.
Schepker, D.J., Oh, W.-Y., Martynov, A., Poppo, L. (2014). The many futures of contracts: moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. J. Manage. 40 (1), 193–225.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q 42 (1), 35–67.
Wang, L., Yeung, J.H.Y., Zhang, M. (2011). The impact of trust and contract on innovation performance: the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 134, 114–122.
Weitz, B.A., Jap, S.D. (1995). Relationship marketing and distribution channels. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 23 (4), 305–320.
Williamson, O.E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econ. 22, 233–261.
Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free press, New York.
Williamson, O.E. (1993). Opportunism and its critics. Manage. Decis. Econ. 14 (2),97–107.
Woolthuis, R.K., Hillebrand, B., Nooteboom, B. (2005). Trust, contract and relationshipdevelopment. Org. Stud. 26 (6), 813–840.
Yang, C., Wacker, J.G., Sheu, C. (2012a). What makes outsourcing effective? Atransaction-cost economics analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50 (16), 4462–4476.
Yang, Z., Su, C., Fam, K.S. (2012). Dealing with institutional distances in interna-tional marketing channels: governance strategies that engender legitimacy andefficiency. J. Marketing 76 (3), 41–55.
Zaheer, A., Harris, J. (2006). lnterorganizational trust. In: Shenkar, O., Reuer, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 169–197.
Zhou, K.Z., Xu, D. (2012). How foreign firms curtail local supplier opportunism in China: detailed contracts, centralized control, and relational governance. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 43 (7), 677–692.