臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要探討產業的新進入者如何辨識現有制約框架與競爭劣勢，並透過時機辨識與價值轉換來建構資源的隨創歷程。本研究以芝麻開門創業空間為研究對象，並使用單一個案研究方法，於2017年12月至2019年5月針對上述問題針對訪談受訪者的方式進行分析。根據研究結果，本研究提出以下4個發現：一、現有育成中心大多獲得政府預算的補助而讓新進入者面臨制約與競爭劣勢。二、新進入者藉由現有育成中心所帶來的制約進行時機辨識以尋找其服務上的不足之處。三、源自時機辨識的價值轉換能讓新進入者找到新的服務區隔。四、新進入者透過就地取材﹅將就著用﹅資源重組一系列的隨創歷程得以在新的服務區隔內建構新的資源。

This study mainly explores how a new entrant identifies the existing industrial constraints and its competitive disadvantages. And, this new entrant uses opportunity identification and value migration to build its resources for implementing bricolage processes. This study uses Sesame Opening Entrepreneurial Space as a single-case study to analyze the primary data from interviewing the participants with research questions during a period from December 2017 to May 2019. Based on the results, this study proposes four findings, as follows: First, the majority of Taiwan’s incubators can obtain the subsidies from government, which constrains the new entrant. Second, new entrant can identify the opportunities from the industrial constraints to find the insufficiencies of the existing incubators. Third, new entrant can find a new service segmentation by using value migration. Finally, new entrant can implement bricolage processes through a series of resource at hand, making-do, and resource recombination for building its new resources.

目次
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
目次 iv
表次 v
圖次 vi
第一章緒論 1
1.1. 研究背景與動機 1
1.2. 研究問題 2
1.3. 研究目的 3
1.4. 研究流程 3
第二章文獻探討 4
2.1 制約與競爭劣勢 4
2.2 資源拼湊與建構 6
2.3 時機辨識 8
2.4 價值轉換 9
第三章研究方法 12
3.1 研究架構 12
3.2 個案研究方法 12
3.3 個案選取 14
3.4 資料蒐集 15
第四章個案公司簡介 16
4.1 創業育成產業概況 16
4.2 個案公司簡介 23
第五章個案公司分析 25
5.1 透過整合資源的能力降低制約與劣勢的影響 25
5.2 透過制約與競爭劣勢來辨識時機 29
5.3 價值轉換制約與競爭劣勢 33
5.4 隨創打造新資源 36
第六章研究討論與未來研究建議 43
6.1 研究意涵 43
6.2 管理意涵 45
6.3 未來研究建議 46
參考文獻 47
附錄 50

中文部分
吳克振，2010，品牌權益解析，經理人月刊，68期，頁132-139。
畢恆達，1996，詮釋學與質性研究，臺北：巨流圖書股份有限公司。
韓培爾，1998，社會科學方法論，臺北：風雲論壇。
袁建中，1996，台灣創新育成中心的發展趨勢與未來挑戰，中華創業育成協會。
羅仁權，2014，育成中心的使命及其發展困境與展望，中華創業育成協會。
陳萬淇，1992，個案研究法，臺北：華泰書局出版。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬，2014，劣勢創新:梵谷策展中的隨創行為，中山管理評論，22 卷，頁323~367。

西文部分
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105-123.
Aaker, D. (2014). Aaker on Branding: 20 Principles that Drive Success, New York: Morgan James Publishing.
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process, Research Policy, 32, 255-276.
Baker, T. & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329-366.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy, Management Science, 32, 1231-1241.
Baum, J. A. & Korn, H. J. (1996). Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 255-291.
Bechky, B. A. & Okhuysen, G. A. (2011). Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handles surprises, Academy of Management Journal, 54, 239-261.
Boxenbaum, E. & Rouleau, L. (2011). New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory, Academy of Management Review, 36, 272-296.
Burt, R. S. (2001). The social capital of structural holes, in Guillen, M. F., Collins, R., England, P., & Meyer, M. (eds.), New Directions in Economic Sociology, First Edition, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 202-246
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, 1st, New York: Anchor Books.
Di Domenico, M. L., Haugh, H. & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 681-703.
Deuze, M. (2006). Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture, Information Society, 22, 63-75.
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M. & Bednar, J. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources, Academy of Management Review, 35, 265-293.
Garud, R. & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 32, 277-300.
Graebner, M. E. (2004). Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 751-777.
Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. (2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations, Journal of Management Studies, 49, 743-784.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity and diversity of social circles in managerial networks, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1968). The Savage Mind, 1st, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Larsson, R. & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, Organizational and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization, Organization Science, 10, 1-26.
Mian, S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubator to tenant firm, Research Policy, 25, 325-335
Nelson, R. E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 12, 105-124.
Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, Organization science, 11, 448-469.
Sonenshein, S. (2014). How organization foster the creative use of resources, Academy of Management Journal, 57, 814-848
Stinchfield, B. T., Nelson, R. E., & Wood, M. S. (2013). Learning from Levi-Strauss' Legacy: Art, craft, engineering, bricolage, and brokerage in entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice, 37, 889-921.
Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171-193.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 211-230.
Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry, Educational Researcher, 7, 5-8
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities, Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 77-94.
Tyre, M. & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations, Organization Science, 5, 98- 118.
Thompson, A.A. Jr., Gamble, J.E., & Strickland, A.J. III & Gamble, J.E. (2006). Crafting and Executing Strategy The Quest for Competitive Advantage, McGraw-Hill International Edition.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research Design and Methods, London, UK: Sage Publication.