(3.227.235.183) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/18 11:42
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張心柔
研究生(外文):Chang, Hsin-Jou
論文名稱:線上共創學習中自我導向學習傾向與認知臨場感對學習成效的關係研究
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between Self-directed Learning Readiness and Cognitive Presence on Learning Outcomes in Online Collaborative Learning
指導教授:王健華王健華引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wang, Chang-Hwa
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:圖文傳播學系
學門:傳播學門
學類:圖文傳播學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:94
中文關鍵詞:線上共創學習自我導向學習傾向認知臨場感學習成效
外文關鍵詞:online collaborative learningself-directed learning readinesscognitive presencelearning outcomes
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:93
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在線上學習環境中以團體合作共同完成學習任務的方式是線上共創學習的特色, 因此了解學生的個別差異藉以提升學生主動且持續地進行線上學習的意願,成為探討 線上共創學習中重要的議題。本研究擬採用學生之個別差異即自我導向學習傾向作為 自變項,以桃園市某技術型高中設計群學生為例,探討不同程度的自我導向學習傾向 學生在線上學習環境中以合作共創的小組自主學習方式,是否會有學習表現以及參與 度上的差異。除此之外,探究社群模型在探討線上共創學習具有其重要性與指標性, 故本研究採用該模型中的認知臨場感建構,設計一套單元線上共創學習活動,並探究 學生自我導向學習傾向與認知臨場感對於學習成效之間是否有顯著的關聯性。
本研究採用實驗研究法-單組後測設計,選定技術型高中廣告設計科二年級「造形 原理」課程,利用Google共創文件以及Facebook Messenger線上聊天通訊軟體,進行單 元知識與技能創作之主題共創學習實驗後進行變項程度檢測以及學習成效之評量。
研究結果發現自我導向學習傾向不論在對於認知臨場感及學習成效獨立變項探討 時都具有顯著關聯性,但以認知臨場感作為中介變項之效果未成立。研究者參考結果 數據後將原本設定之變項做調整,發現認知臨場感是受到自我導向學習傾向的中介影 響了學習成效,此發現有助於日後教師進行線上共創學習活動設計以及教學引導時的 參考依據,幫助教學者擬定適當且有效的教學活動與教材設計。本次研究對象有效樣 本73位學生中之自我導向學習傾向屬於中程度的居多,在面向表現上以「效率學習」 表現最弱、「喜愛學習」表現最佳,顯示學生對於學習保有相當程度的興趣,只要教學 者能夠設計適當教學教法與教材,必能提升學生學習成效。
Online collaborative learning emphasizes achieving learning tasks through team cooperation. Some individual difference factors need to be considered in order to better organize proper instructional strategies for different learners. This study intends to investigate how self-directed learning readiness, an individual factor, may affect learning outcomes. This study. Moreover, the cognitive presence is an element of Community of Inquiry model, which was used to design a set of online collaborative learning activities in this study to explore whether there is a significant correlation between students' self-directed learning readiness and cognitive presence. 
An experiment was done in a technical high school located in Taoyuan, Taiwan to explore whether there are differences in learning performance and participation among students with different degrees of self-directed learning readiness in online collaborative learning. A "Principle of Formation" course was selected as the learning contents. Google collaborative documents and Facebook Messenger were used as tools for achieving the online collaborative learning tasks.
The results show that there are significant correlations between self-directed learning readiness and cognitive presence, and between self-directed learning readiness and independent variables of learning outcomes. However, the assumption of considering cognitive presence as a mediating variable is not valid. The researcher adjusted the variables after referring to the result data, and found that cognitive presence is mediated by self-directed learning readiness. This result helps teachers design online collaborative learning activities and use as teaching guidance in designing appropriate and effective teaching activities and teaching materials. Furthermore, we also found that most attendant’s self-directed learning readiness were among average, they most agreed “likes to learn” but felt most uncomfortable with “learn efficiently”, indicating that students have a considerable degree of interests in online collaborative learning. This finding encourages the education practitioners to develop more appropriate teaching methods and teaching materials that benefit students' online learning outcomes.
誌謝 1
摘要 2
Abstract 3
目錄 4
表目錄 6
圖目錄 7

第一章 緒論 8
第一節 研究背景與動機 8
第二節 研究目的與問題 10
第三節 研究範圍與限制 11
第四節 研究流程 12
第五節 名詞解釋 13

第二章 文獻探討 15
第一節 線上共創學習 15
第二節 自我導向學習傾向 17
第三節 認知臨場感 20
第四節 學習成效 24
第五節 小結 26

第三章 研究設計 28
第一節 研究架構 28
第二節 研究方法 29
第三節 研究對象 30
第四節 研究工具 30
第五節 線上共創學習活動設計 36
第六節 研究實施 44
第七節 資料處理方法 56

第四章 研究結果與討論 58
第一節 實驗結果量表信度分析與狀態描述 58
第二節 自我導向學習傾向與學習成效關係分析 61
第三節 自我導向學習傾向與認知臨場感關係分析 62
第四節 認知臨場感與學習成效關係分析 62
第五節 自我導向學習傾向與認知臨場感對學習成效之關係分析 64
第六節 研究調整與結果分析 64

第五章 研究結論與建議 68
第一節 研究結論 68
第二節 研究建議 71

參考文獻 74

附錄一、自我導向學習傾向量表 80
附錄二、認知臨場感量表 81
附錄三、學習成就測驗 82
附錄四、設計地圖創作單 85
附錄五、設計地圖評分表 89
附錄六、整理作答小組宣傳語創作 93
一、中文部分
方之光、黃碧雲(2012)。影像處理混成教學課程應用 Web 2.0 之行動研究,教學科技與媒體,102,41-60。
王智弘(2014)。自我調節學習,T&D飛訊,183,1-17。
王德蕙、李奕璇、曾芬蘭、宋曜廷(2013)。「國民中學學生基本學力測驗寫作測驗」信度與效度分析研究,測驗學刊,60(1),151-185。
方舟、奚群英、呂有偉(2010)。學習支持服務與學生參與度關係的調查研究—以浙江奧鵬遠程教育為例。開放教育研究,16(1),95-99。取自https://www.1xuezhe.e-
xuezhe.com/Qk/art/426830?dbcode=1&flag=2
李建儒(2008)。數位學習者人格特質,自我導向學習與學習成效之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
邱美文(2010)。創造課堂學習新驚喜:互動討論教學在專題討論課程上之應用。幼兒教保研究期刊,5,155-176。
吳佳儒(2010)。不同自我導向學習能力國小學童在網路合作契約式學習活動中語文能力提升成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。
林明志(2004)。九年一貫生活科技課程教學評量。生活科技教育月刊,8(37),40-51。
林崇宏(2001)。設計史教學的課程理念與內容再詮釋。東海學報,42,113-122。
柯俊如(2015)。以探究社群理論架構探討臺大MOOCs討論區臨場感展現的學科差異 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
周芳華(2007)。從性別與學習風格探討傳統教材與多媒體輔助教材對電腦硬碟組裝學習成效之研究-以國中二年級學生為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
陳易芬(2011)。職前教師對師資培育課程與教學的看法與建議。彰化師大教育學報, 20,21-45。
陳年興、林甘敏(2002)。網路學習之學習行為與學習成效分析。資訊管理學報,8 (2),121-133。
陳年興、謝盛文、陳怡如(2006)。探討新一代混成學習模式之學習成效。TANET 2006台灣網際網路研討會,花蓮。
陳俞霖(2002)。網路同儕型塑及對青少年社會化影響之探討。資訊社會研究,3, 149-181。
陳德順(2009)。全國國小棒球聯賽球員社會支持與學習成效之研究 (未出版之碩士論文) 。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
孫志誠(2013)。設計作品評量方式與規準在視覺傳達設計類競賽評審之應用。教育研究月刊,235,85-101。
郭盈芝(2007)。數位學習混誠方式對學習成效影響之探討:以「教育部離島及偏遠地區遠距教學培訓計畫」為例。淡江大學,新北市。
梁麗珍(2008)。在職進修學生自我導向學習,學習動機與學習策略之結構方程模式。 嶺東學報,23,149-179。
張春興(1991)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華書局。
教育部(2010)。職業學校群科課程綱要暨設備基準-設計群。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育技術型高級中等學校群科課程綱要-設計群。臺北:教育部。
黃鈺涵(2015)。不同程度的自我導向學習能力大學生於數位教學媒體之創作歷程研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
鄧運林(1995)。成人教學與自我導向學習。臺北市:五南圖書。
劉杰(2008)。e-Learning 2.0環境中大學生自我導向學習與網路學習動機之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
諶家蘭、余玫萱(2005)。一項適性、協同性、和建構性之互動式數位學習設計。電子商務研究,3,331-358。
鍾宜智(2001)。自我導向學習傾向對非同步遠距學習影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
簡茂發(1999)。多元化評量之理念與方法。教師天地,99 ,11-17 。

二、英文部分
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? 
Educause review, 41(2), 32.
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136.
Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 37-44.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. (2011b). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233– 250.
Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231-246.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Edu-cational psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Concepual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bartholomew, S. (2015). My journey with self-directed learning. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 90(2), 46-50.
Bidjerano, T. (2005). Gender differences in self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, October 19-21, Kerhonkson, NY, USA.
Bonham, L. A. (1989). Self-directed orientation toward learning: A learning style, In H.B. Long, & associates (Eds.), Self-directed learning: Emerging theory and practice. Norman, OKla: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education, University of Okalahoma.
Boyd, R. D., & Apps, J. W. (1980). Redefining the discipline of adult education. The AEA Handbook Series in Adult Education.
Boyd, D. (2007). The significance of social software. In T. N. Burg & J. Schmidt (Eds), BlogTalks reloaded: Social software research & cases (pp. 15-30). Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand
Brockett, R.G., Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
Choy, J. L. F., & Quek, C. L. (2016). Modelling relationships between students' academic achievement and community of inquiry in an online learning environment for a blended course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4).
Chiu, C. H., & Hsiao, H. F. (2010). Group differences in computer supported collaborative learning: Evidence from patterns of Taiwanese students’ online communication. Computers & Education, 54(2), 427-435.
Chuang, H. H. (2016). Leveraging CRT awareness in creating web-based projects through use of online collaborative learning for pre-service teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 857-876.
Dewey, J. (1959). The child and the curriculum (No. 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185-215.
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult education quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7−23.
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the Community of Inquiry Framework: Review, issues and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157−172.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19, 133−148.
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E–Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd Edition). London: Routledge/Falmer.
Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). What is the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale? Retrieved from http://www.lpasdlrs.com/
Heo, J., & Han, S. (2017). Effects of motivation, academic stress and age in predicting self-directed learning readiness (SDLR): Focused on online college students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 61-71.
Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Adesope, O., & Hatala, M. (2014). Psychological characteristics in cognitive presence of communities of inquiry: A linguistic analysis of online discussions. The internet and higher education, 22, 1-10.
Majeski, R. A., Stover, M., & Valais, T. (2018). The Community of Inquiry and Emotional Presence. Adult Learning, 29(2), 53-61.
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2001(89), 25-34.
McVay, M. (2000). Developing a web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online bachelor’s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report presented to the Ed. D. Program, Nova Southeastern University, Florida.
Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65.
Mohammadi, P., & Mahdi Araghi, S. (2013). The relationship between learners’ self-directed learning readiness and their English for Specific Purposes course accomplishment at distance education in Iran. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 4(2), 73-84.
Moore, M. (1986). Self-directed learning and distance education. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 1(1), 7-24.
Naismith, L., Lee, B. H., & Pilkington, R. M. (2011). Collaborative learning with a wiki: Differences in perceived usefulness in two contexts of use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 228-242.
Kuh, G. & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), pp. 309-332.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loyens, S. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411-427.
Naismith, L., Lee, B.-H., & Pilkington, R. M. (2011). Collaborative learning with a wiki: Differences in perceived usefulness two contexts of use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 228-242. Oddi, L. F. (1986). Development and validation of an instrument to identify self-directed continuing learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 36, 97-107. 
Oddi, L. F. (1987). Perspectives on self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 38(1), 21-31.
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. [Online]. Available: https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/ar-
chive/what-is-web-20.html.
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
Richardson, J. C., Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Ice, P., Swan, K. P., & Garrison, D. R. (2012). Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to Inform Effective Instructional Design. In L. Moller, & J. B. Huett. The Next Generation of Distance Education: Unconstrained Learning, 97-125.
Saleh, I., & Kim, S. I. (2009). A fuzzy system for evaluating students’ learning achievement. Expert systems with Applications, 36(3), 6236-6243.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543-553.
Siegfried, J. J., & Fels, R.(1979). Research on teaching college economic: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 17(3), 923-969.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 409-426.
Stockdale, S. L., & Brockett, R. G. (2011). Development of the PRO-SDLS: A measure of self-direction in learning based on the personal responsibility orientation model. Adult Education Quarterly, 61(2), 161-180.
Swan, K. P., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. e-mentor, 2(24), (at http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul_v2.php?numer= 24&id=543).
Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010). The community of inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 1–4.
Su, C.-H., & Cheng, C.-H. (2013). A mobile game-based insect learning system for improving the learning achievements. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 42-50.
Tough, A. (1966). The assistance obtained by adult self-teachers. Adult Education, 17(1), 30-37.
Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. The Internet and Higher Education, 8, 1–12.
Verduin, J. R., & Clark, T. A. (1991). Distance education: The foundations of effective practice. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yucel, U. A., & Usluel, Y. K. (2013). The quality of interaction and participation in knowledge building processes within the online collaborative learning environments. In International academic conference on education, teaching and e-learning (IAC-ETeL 2013), Prague, Czech Republic.
Zhao, J. (2006). Computer supported collaborative learning. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
Zheng, B., & Zhuang, X. (2008). Wiki-based collaborative learning activity design: A case study. In Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2008 International Conference on , 5, 141-145.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20240129)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 全國國小棒球聯賽球員社會支持與學習成效之研究
2. 自我導向學習傾向對非同步遠距學習影響之研究
3. 從性別與學習風格探討傳統教材與多媒體輔助教材對電腦硬體組裝學習成效之研究—以國中二年級學生為例
4. 數位學習者人格特質、自我導向學習與學習成效之關係研究
5. 不同自我導向學習能力國小學童在網路合作契約式學習活動中語文能力提升成效之研究
6. e-Learning2.0環境中大學生自我導向學習與網路學習動機之探討
7. 以探究社群理論架構探討臺大MOOCs討論區臨場感展現的學科差異
8. 不同程度的自我導向學習能力大學生於數位教學媒體之創作歷程研究
9. 工作熱情、自我導向學習傾向、學習動機與學習效能之關聯性研究: 以技專校院空中進修學院學生為例
10. 企業員工自我導向學習傾向、電腦態度與e-learning學習成效之關係研究
11. 自我導向學習傾向、資訊素養與混成學習成效之關係-以台糖公司為例
12. 檔案評量對成人英語學習者自我導向學習傾向、學習策略及學習成效影響之研究
13. 學生自我導向學習傾向、學習氣氛與學習成效關聯性之研究─以某技術學院為例
14. 技術型高中學生自我導向學習傾向與專題製作學習成效之關係:解決問題能力之中介效果
15. 線上共創學習中自我效能與認知臨場感對學習成效影響之研究
 
無相關期刊
 
無相關點閱論文
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔