跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/03/18 13:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王辭雅
研究生(外文):WANG, TZU-YA
論文名稱:教師介入可解碼讀本教學與否對國小學生認字能力之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Teacher’s Intervention in Decodable Books Teaching on Fourth-graders’ Word Recognition
指導教授:戴雅茗戴雅茗引用關係
指導教授(外文):TAI, YA-MING
口試委員:詹餘靜陳淑惠
口試委員(外文):CHAN, YU-CHINGCHEN, SHU-HUI
口試日期:2019-07-22
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北教育大學
系所名稱:兒童英語教育學系碩士班
學門:教育學門
學類:普通科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:119
中文關鍵詞:字母拼讀教學可解碼讀本教師介入英語認字能力
外文關鍵詞:phonics instructiondecodable booksteacher’s interventionEnglish word recognition
DOI:doi: 10.6344/THE.NTUE.CEE.022.2019.F02
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:233
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究旨在探討教師介入可解碼讀本教學與否,對於國小四年級學生之認字能力影響。研究對象為研究者任教之桃園市某國小兩個四年級班級共49位的學生,24位擔任教師介入組,25位擔任教師不介入組。教師介入組與教師不介入組進行相同之字母拼讀教學,接著進行可解碼讀本閱讀時,教師介入組採取教師介入的教學策略,教師不介入組則採取教師不介入的教學策略。實驗課程每週一次,進行30分鐘,共計十週。本實驗為準實驗研究,將針對研究對象在接受實驗教學前後之前、後測成績進行獨立樣本t檢定及相依樣本t檢定。實驗工具有研究者自編之英語唸字測驗及認讀測驗,以評量學生之單字認讀能力、字音聽辨能力與字義辨別能力。
研究結果發現,不論教師是否介入可解碼讀本教學,教師介入組與教師不介入組分別在組內的整體認字能力上皆有顯著進步;但兩組組間在整體認字能力及其分項能力中之單字認讀能力、字音聽辨能力與字義辨別能力都未達到顯著差異。從實驗結果可知,無論教師介入還是教師不介入可解碼讀本教學的策略,都能顯著提升學生單字認讀能力、字音聽辨能力與字義辨別能力,且兩者並無顯著差異。
最後,研究者根據研究結果提出對未來研究與教學上之相關建議,期望能對現今國小英語教育有所助益。
The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of teacher’s intervention in decodable books teaching on fourth graders’ English word recognition. Participants included two classes of 49 fourth graders in an elementary school in Taoyuan City. They were divided in two groups. Two groups both received the same phonics teaching program, but one received decodable books teaching without teacher’s intervention and the other received decodable books teaching with teacher’s intervention. The experiment lasted for ten weeks in total, 30 minutes per week. The two groups had similar English achievement level, as well as the initial level of word recognition before the ten-week intervention. In this quasi-experimental study, pretest and posttest of English word recognition (word reading, word identification and word meaning identification via sound and print) were used as the instruments. The data were collected and analyzed with Independent-Sample t-test and Paired-Sample t-test.
The findings of the present study show that both groups made significantly improvement after the ten-week intervention, but there were no differences in English word recognition between the two groups. The results suggest that with or without teacher’s intervention in decodable books instruction could enhance fourth graders’ ability of English word recognition.
On the basis of the findings, some suggestions for implementing decodable books teaching and future research are provided.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 7
第三節 研究的重要性 8
第四節 名詞釋義 9
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 字母拼讀教學 11
第二節 可解碼讀本 19
第三節 可解碼讀本融入字母拼讀教學對認字能力之影響 24
第四節 教師介入與不介入之教學策略 26
第五節 英語認字能力 31
第三章 研究方法 37
第一節 研究架構與設計 37
第二節 研究場域與對象 41
第三節 研究步驟與時程 44
第四節 實驗教學設計 48
第五節 研究工具 58
第六節 資料分析 60
第四章 研究結果與討論 63
第一節 英語成就測驗組內分析結果 63
第二節 英語成就測驗組間分析結果 71
第三節 綜合討論 74
第五章 結論與建議 83
第一節 研究結論 83
第二節 研究限制 85
第三節 建議 87

參考文獻 91
一、中文部分 91
二、英文部分 94
附錄 103
附錄A 家長同意書 103
附錄B 學生英語學習背景資料調查表 104
附錄C 可解碼讀本 105
附錄D 教學活動設計 110
附錄E 英語唸字測驗 116
附錄F 英語認讀測驗 117

一、中文部分
王奎元(2015)。體育師資生應用合作學習策略之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
庄蘇(2011)。淺析大學英語自主學習與教師介入的關係。英語廣場,5,97-99。
朱敏菁(2011)。兩種字母拼讀教學法對台灣學童英語唸字及唸字信心之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
朱惠美(2003)。淺談字母拼讀教學。載於趙麗蓮(主編),兒童英語教學面面觀(91-126頁)。臺北市:書林。
朱薇、李敏杰(2009)。英語自主學習中的教師介入。河北理工大學學報(社會科學版),9,146-151。
宋佳芸(2017)。搭配可解碼讀本字母拼讀教學和搭配可預測讀本音韻覺知訓練與否對臺灣二年級學童英語認字效益之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
呂亦航(2017)。合作學習在體育課不同分組方式對動作技能學習成效與學習動機之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李秀玫(2011)。融入韻文歌謠之結合式字母拼讀教學對國小學童字母辨識與音韻覺識能力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
邱子榮(2015)。合成式與改良的嵌入式字母拼讀教學對國小五年級學童英語唸字能力與口語流暢度之效益比較(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
邱筠佳(2009)。可解碼故事書應用於英語補救教學之成效研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
林芳憶(2008)。融合「關鍵字學習法」及「字母拼讀法」之教學對於國小五年級學生學習英語單字之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
林玟君(2011)。英語補救教學對台南市國中低成就學生學習動機與認字能力影響之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
林彥良(2009)。字母拼讀法教學對臺灣國中英語低成就學生認字與閱讀理解之影響。慈濟大學教育研究月刊,5,293-355。
林進材(2004)。教學原理。臺北:五南。
林蕙蓉(2010)。國小英語字母拼讀教學。國教之友,61,31-37。
洪月女(2014)。兒童外語讀寫能力發展。王雅茵主編,讀讀、談談、寫寫:教兒童讀寫英語的概念、策略、活動(25-45頁)。臺北市:書林。
洪麗文(2011)。字母拼讀法在國小英語領域之課程設計與教學研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。
高一波(2015)。國內外語自主學習模式中的教師介入研究綜述。榆林學院學報,25,104-108。
高源令(2010)。發展理論。教育心理學。台北:心理出版社。
張玉成(1999)。教師發問技巧。臺北市:心理出版社。
張美倫 (2013)。可解讀文本教學對國小四年級EFL字彙學習之影響。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
張春興(1997)。教育心理學。臺北:東華書局。
胡潔芳(1999)。如何協助孩童發展英語音韻覺識。英語教學,23(3),7-14。
陳淳麗 (2001)。國小英語師資訓練手冊。臺北市:師德。
陳婷(2015)。小學英語閱讀遊戲教學中的教師中介。LAOQUJIANSHE,62-64。
陳瑤容(2003)。語音解碼訓練對台灣學童英文認字能力提昇之成效(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北市。
章菁(2003)。國小四年級學生英語認定與拼字能力發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北市。
郭雅筑(2011)。台灣以英語為外語的大一學生之內/外在動機與完美主義探究(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中市。
許炳煌、張淑美(2014)。新北市國小英語教師字母拼讀教學信念與教學行為之研究。國民教育,54(6),101-110。
黃素瑛(2012)。探討密集字母拼讀教學對EFL小五生唸字、拼字能力及英語學習態度的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
鄒文莉(2009)。兒童英語教學13堂課。臺北:三民書局。
楊佳勳(2011)。用故事書於字母拼讀教學對EFL初學者認字學習之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立南臺科技大學,臺南市。
鄭惠方(2015)。可解讀文本補救教學對新北市國小四年級學生音韻覺識能力影響之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
鄭錦桂(2006)。國小英語教科書之內容探究與省思,國教新知,53(3),15-22。
蔡怡汝(2015)。運用字母拼讀法教學結合英語圖畫書提升國小三年級學生音韻覺識能力之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
劉加裕(2016)。故事內含字母拼讀教學與直接字母拼讀教學對於台灣幼稚園學童音韻覺識發展與字彙學習的成效影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學英語教學研究所,新竹市。
戴煖妮(2018)。教師介入英語動畫教學與否對小一學童英語字彙能力的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。

二、英文部分
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Albert, E. (1994). Phonics for learning how to read. Retrieved December 12, 2010, From http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED370078&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live
Allington, R., & Woodside Jiron, H. (1998). Decodable text in beginning reading: Are mandates and policy based on research? ERS Spectrum, 16, 3-13.
Almasi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Kindergarten through grade 3. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
Bender, W. N. (2001). Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies. (4th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Bentin, S. (1992). Phonological awareness, reading, and reading acquisition: A survey and appraisal of current knowledge. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Phonology, Morphology, Orthography and Meaning. (pp. 193-210). Elsevier, North Holland.
Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Birch, B. M. (2007). English L2 reading: Getting to the bottom (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Blevins, W. (1997). Phonemic awareness activities foe early reading success. New York, NY: Scholastic.
Blevins, W. (2003). An evaluation of decodable text in Scholastic phonics readers. Retrieved January 25, 2014, from http://research.scholastic.com/sites/default/files/publications/ScholasticPhonicsReaders_EffectivenessReport_NY_Bevins_2003.pdf
Blevins, W. (2006). Phonics from A to Z. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Scholastic.
Brown, K. J. (1999). What kind of text-For whom and when? Textual scaffolding for beginning readers. Reading Teacher, 53(4), 292-307.
Bruner, J. S. (1973). The relevance of education. New York, NY: Norton.
California Department of Education (1996). Teaching reading: A balanced, comprehensive approach to teaching reading in prekindergarten through grade three. Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/cilbranch/teachtd.htm.
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Chard, D. J., & Osborn, J. (1999). Word recognition instruction: Paving the road to successful reading. Intervention in school & Clinic, 34(5), 27-33.
Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition process. Memory & Cognition, 28, 143-153.
Chu, M. C., & Chen, S. H. (2014). Comparison of the effects of two phonics training programmes on L2 word reading. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 272-291.
Clark, H. C. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York, NY: HBJ.
Classroom strategy: Choral reading. (2013, July). Reading Rocket. Retrieved from http://www.readingrockets.org/strategies/choral_reading/
Combs, A.W. (1962). Motivation and the growth of self:In perceiving, behaving, and learning. Association for supervision and curriculum development yearbook. Washington, D.C. National Education Association, pp.83-98.
Connelly, V., Johnston, R., &; Thompson, G. B. (2001). The effect of phonics instruction on the reading comprehension of beginning readers. Reading and Writing, 14(5-6), 423-457.
DeMoulin, D. F., & Loye, R. D. (1999). Helping children to learn to read. Education, 120(1), 40-43.
Donat, D. J. (2003). Reading their way: A balance of phonics and whole language. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Ehri, L. C., & Sweet, J. (1991). Fingerpoint-reading of memorized text: What enables beginners to process the print. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 442-462.
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163-179.
Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Literacy Research, 19(1), 5-31.
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1987). Cipher versus cue reading: An experiment in decoding acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 3-13.
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phase of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 116.
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essnewtial for learning to read words in English. In J. L Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds). Word recognition in beginning reading (pp. 289-314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167-188.
Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14(2), 135-164.
Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (2004). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 365-389. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Feuerstein, R. (1998). The theory of mediated learning experience: About human as a modifiable Being. Jerusalem: Ministry of Defense Publications.
Gough, P. B., & Juel, C. (1991). The first stages of word recognition. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 47-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Groff, P. (1999). Decodable words in reading textbooks: Why they are imperative. The National Right to Read Foundation. Available at http:==www.nrrf.org=27_decode_txtbooks.htm. Accessed October 20, 2004.
Gunning, T. G. (1996). Creating reading instruction for all children. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Harley, T. A. (2001). The psychology of language. New York, NY: Hove, East Sussex.
Harley, T. A. (2014). The psychology of language: From data to theory. New York, NY: Hove, East Sussex.
Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1990). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods (9th ed.). White Plains, NY: Lonman.
Hiebert, E. H. (1999). Text matters in learning to read. The Reading Teacher, 52(6),552-566.
Higgins, N., & Sullivan, H. (1983). Teaching for competence. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Hoffman, J. V., McCarthey S.J., Abbott, J., Christiani, C., Cormani, L., Curry, C.,
Dressman, M., Elliott, B., Manerme, D., & Stable, D. (1993). So what's new in the new basals'? A focus on first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 47-73.
Hoffman, J. V. (2002). WORDs (on words in leveled texts for beginning readers). In D. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch & J. V. Hoffan (Eds.), 51st yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 59-81). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading conference.
Honig, B. (2001). Teaching our children to read: The components of an effective, comprehensive reading program (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Huo, S. (2017). Influence of language immersion and phonological-based instruction on literary skills of English language learners in Xi’an, China. University of British Columbia. Retrieved from
https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0362561
Jenkins, J. R., Vadasy, P. F., Peyton, J. A., & Sanders, E. A. (2003). Decodable text—Where to find it. The Reading Teacher, 57, 185-189.
Juel, C., & Roper-Schneider, D. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 134–152.
Kamhi, A., Allen, J., & Catts, H. (2001). The role of the speech-language pathologist in improving decoding skills. Seminars in Speech and Language, 22, 175-185.
Kenneth S. Goodman (1967). Reading as a Psycholinguistic Guessing Game. Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (2nd ed.), 497–508.
Kim, M. (2002). The use of computer in developing L2 reading comprehension: Literature review and its implications. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED472671)
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kozulin, A. (2001). Interface between Vygotskian and mediated learning experience paradigms in teacher training. In Mediated Learning Experience in Teaching and Counseling. Jerusalem: ICELP.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York, NY: Longman.
Kurniasih, E. (2011). Teaching the Four Language Skills in Primary EFL Classroom: Some Considerations. Journal of English Teaching. 71-81.
Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20-34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, C. C. (1999). After alphabets and before spelling: A discussion of practice before phonics. English Teaching & Learning, 23, 15-21.
Lin, L. C. (2003). Teaching English grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Hsuan Chuang Humanities Journal, 1, 285-262.
Martin-Chang, S.Y., & Gould, O.N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 273-284.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Happer & Row.
Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of research on learning and instruction. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
Menon, S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1999). Literature anthologies: The task for first grade readers. (Ciera Rep. No. 1-009). Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. Retrieved February 10, 2011, from http://www.ciera.org/library/reports/inquiry-1/1-009/1-009.pdf
Menon, S., & Hiebert, E. H. (2005). A comparison of first graders’ reading with little books or literature-based anthologies. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 20-21.
Mesmer, H. A. (1999a). Scaffolding a crucial transition using text with some decodability. The Reading Teacher, 53, 130-142.
Mesmer, H. A. (1999b). Interfacing text and instruction: The effects of decodable text and matching instruction on the word recognition strategies of first grade readers. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Florida, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(1), 125.
Mesmer, H. A. (2001). Examining the theoretical claims about decodable text: Does text decodability lead to greater application of letter/sound knowledge in first grade readers? The Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 50, 444-459.
Mesmer, H. A. E. (2005). Text decodability and the first-grade reader. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 61-86.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165-178.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
O’Connor, R. E. (2006). Teaching word recognition: Effective strategies for students with learning difficulties. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Weaver, C. (2002). Reading process and practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computer, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Representations and awareness in acquisition of reading competence. In L. Rieben, & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.). Learning to read:Basic research and its applications (pp. 33-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Perfetti, C. A., & Dunlap, S. (2008). Learning to read: general principles and writing system variations. In K. Koda & A. M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development (pp. 13-38). New York, NY: Routledge.
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95-129.
Stoodt, B. D. (1989). Reading instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Stahl, S. A. (2001). Teaching phonics and phonemic awareness. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of Early Literacy Research (pp. 333-347). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Vadasy, P., Sanders, E., & Peyton, J. (2005). Relative effectiveness of reading practice or word-level instruction in supplemental tutoring: How text matters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38 (4), 364-380.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (2000). Psychology for language teachers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87-95.
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89-100.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, development dyslexia, and skilled reading across language: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3-29.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊