跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.82.133) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/07 18:02
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:曾裕淇
研究生(外文):Yu-Qi Zeng
論文名稱:世界工廠轉身超大城市:深圳資本積累與空間生產
論文名稱(外文):From World Factory to “Chaoda Chengshi”:Capital Accumulation and Production of Spaces in Shenzhen
指導教授:徐進鈺徐進鈺引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jinn-yuh Hsu
口試委員:林宗弘史宓洪廣冀夏鑄九
口試委員(外文):Thung-Hong LinMi Shihkuangchi HuangChu-joe Hsia
口試日期:2017-06-28
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:地理環境資源學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:地理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:160
中文關鍵詞:土地人口治理資本積累空間生產外資企業
DOI:10.6342/NTU201903671
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:926
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究探討深圳的資本積累與空間生產。對話對象為全球生產網絡與全球都市主義理論。本文指出不論是全球生產網絡理論當中的區域資產概念,或是全球都市主義研究中的聚集經濟概念都遺漏了思考區域資產跟聚集經濟一開始是如何形成。聚集經濟的運作取決於一個有穩定性和支持性機構的市場經濟,但是在許多發展中的經濟體,市場力量的運作受到國家政府操縱的影響。在深圳,國家和地方機構所形塑的遊戲規則,正在不斷地透過談判與爭議之後才能形塑市場。
本研究分析深圳的經濟發展建基在土地市場化、商品化與疊加土地價值推力中所形成。1. 2003年深圳關外土地統徵前,深圳資本積累依靠著全球製造業跨界到深圳進行製造出口進而帶動當地工業化。在這個過程中,從內陸湧進深圳打工的廉價勞動力和輕易可以取得的土地是企業與深圳耦合最重要的要素。低廉的勞工、土地生產要素克服了當時後進工業化國家的資本積累危機,維繫了企業的營運,同時也成功的讓深圳用地生錢、槓桿開發;2.1992年深圳關內全面城市化則是宣告深圳以城市現代化作為一種有利工具,地方政府從籌錢轉變為籌地,透過由上而下的法定圖則,地方政府與國家利用土地使用權的市場化和商品化獲取相應的利益;3. 2008年全球金融危機後,中央啟動經濟梯度轉移,開發內陸土地、升級已發展城市。此時,深圳透過舊城改造、都市更新、戶籍改革下的特大城市吸納與排除人口的治理方式意圖讓深圳從世界工廠轉向超大城市。
在上述的發展歷程之下,深圳產生三種空間型態:1.1986年深圳二線關設立,一方面管制人口流動,另外一方面則是打造關內成為花園城市,花園城市服務的是深圳關內的戶籍人口;2.2008年以前,深圳關外則因為地方政府規劃未到(86總規與96總規皆以關內作為都市規劃對象)形成一種「“未都市化”的工業化空間」狀態;3. 2008年以後,深圳二線關取消,關外站上地方政府法定圖則的舞台,基礎設施大力開發。而在既有工業化空間中,地方政府、村集體與資本家仍在協商利益的分配。在上述情境之下,生活在深圳關外的租客工人生活在隨時施工、道路系統不佳與缺乏公共設施的城市空間中。這樣的空間分離也間接打造了外來工人對大型工廠提供的再生產空間的製造甘願。
This dissertation explores capital accumulation and spatial production in Shenzhen, contributing to the theory of global production networks (GPN) and of global urbanism respectively. This study points out that the two theories pay less attention to how regional assets and agglomeration economies have initiated. Unlike the western countries whose agglomeration economies depend on a market economy, China the developing economic entity has greatly relied on the deployment from the state and the dynamic negotiations among the vertical (tiao) and horizontal (kuai) institutions. By adopting semi-structured interviews, participatory observations, and archival data, the dissertation elucidates how the land''s marketization, commodification, and values have shaped economic development and spatial arrangements in Shenzhen.

Three non-linear stages can be identified. Firstly, before the land acquisition in 2003, cheap labor force and land provided the primary solution to embark capital accumulation in Shenzhen. Taking the advantages of the two kernel elements, global manufacturing industries coupled with Shenzhen municipal government and facilitated industrialization. Land as leverage circularly generates capitals. Secondly, the commencement of comprehensive urbanization within Shenzhen Guannei since 1992 denoted that the municipal government has started to collect land simultaneously. The land itself as a commodity to create more capitals for more people. By promulgating top-down statutory plans and land user rights policies (of marketization and commodification), the state and the municipal government have accelerated urban modernization and obtained corresponding benefits. Thirdly, the financial crisis in 2008 triggered the state to launch economic gradient transfer; the state has gradually explored and expanded to inland spaces. Urban renewals and the household registration system act as a governance to transform Shenzhen from the world factory to megacities (chaoda chengshi). Land as a governance to regulate the “quality” of the city.

Three spatial arrangements have been shaped under such context and made versatile impacts on the city’s contour and disposition. The once dual administrative structure and limitation of population mobility created Guannei (the center of Shenzhen) a garden city and Guanwai (outskirt) an un-urbanized space. The outskirt land, wherein the local government, village collectives, and capitalists play different key roles in negotiating the distribution of interests, began to vigorously develop since 2008 when the cancellation of the dual administrative structure. The examination of the initiation of capital accumulation in Shenzhen and its spatial production also provide an understanding to see how people are stratifying in the process of urbanization; players in the table of the land game benefit while non-players are inevitably “manufacturing consent.”
口試委員會審定書i
謝誌ii
中文摘要iii
英文摘要iv
第一章 研究背景及目的1
1.1 研究契機與田野謎題1
1.2研究發問6
第二章 文獻回顧8
2.1全球生產網絡8
2.1.1區域資產與生產網絡的策略性耦合、區域制度作用8
2.1.2 鑲嵌性11
2.1.3 GPN框架下的社會問題13
2.1.4 小結14
2.2演化經濟地理學15
2.2.1 區域、產業和企業演進的多樣因果關係15
2.2.2 小結17
2.3全球都市主義18
2.3.1共同核心概念:聚集經濟18
2.3.2小結19
2.4中國大陸珠三角區域研究20
2.5 研究框架25
2.6 研究方法與進行步驟27
第三章 深圳經濟與城鎮化、都市化發展29
3.1 深圳經濟發展數據29
3.2 城鎮化率、都市化率數據33
3.3 中央政策演變36
3.3.1 經濟特區「姓社不姓資」36
3.3.2 深圳經濟跳躍式發展40
3.3.3 轉型時期:科學、效益與生態41
3.4 小結43
第四章 跨界生產網絡的起源、在地鑲嵌與演變45
4.1 跨界生產網絡的起源46
4.1.1 資本為何來? 46
4.1.2 土地、資源如何提供? 51
4.1.2.1 特區內:土地招投標制度下的三通一平52
4.1.2.2 特區外:有土地就好、地下水井與發電機54
4.2 地方土地尋租與關係建構(1979-1992) 57
4.3 第一次生產網絡升級:高新工業園區58
4.4零碎威權主義的國家力量呈現與資金外逃62
4.5 中國中央-地方政策與市場危機:生產網絡衰頹65
4.6 生產網絡的轉型與重生69
4.7 小結73
第五章 深圳資本積累要素:土地商品化、市場化76
5.1 用地生錢、槓桿開發76
5.2 制度化的資本積累77
5.2.1 產權國有與使用權拍賣的商品化:房地產證77
5.2.2 經濟發展方向的控制工具(籌錢到籌地):由上而下的法定圖則79
5.3 未規範的資本積累82
5.3.1深圳關內非農建設用地的資本積累82
5.3.2舊城改造的資本積累:深圳關外多方關係人的土地爭議83
5.4 土地開發先行下的深圳市都市規劃88
5.5 深圳超大都市規劃:現代性想像的愛爾蘭香儂模式89
5.6 從未“都市化”的工業化空間95
第六章 轉向超大城市與人口治理99
6.1戶籍地方化:積分入戶制度作為貫徹城市規劃的政策工具100
6.2深圳導向超大城市:高階人才準入制度105
6.3深圳超大城市新實驗場:吸引海(境)外人才與分級資助110
6.4公民經濟權利制度化118
6.4.1提升私有財產權位階119
6.4.2專業技術證照改革123
6.5打造高階人力的經濟主體意識:經濟自由等於權利獲得126
第七章 世界工廠轉身超大城市131
7.1理論貢獻131
7.2深圳的資本積累與空間生產133
7.3田野謎題解答137
7.4世界工廠轉身超大城市139
參考文獻141
附錄148
AP+E, Urban-Agency, and M Thompson (2016/01/26). Shan-Zhen: How a small Irish town Influenced the mega-City Shenzhen. Arch Daily. Retrieved from http://www.archdaily.com/780950/shan-zhen-the-unlikely-influence-of-a-small-irish-town-on-mega-city-shenzhen.
Bathelt, H and JS Boggs (2003). Towards a reconceptualization of regional development paths: Is Leipzig’s media cluster a continuation of or a rupture with the past? Economic Geography 79: 265-293.
Boschma, R (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies 38: 1001-1014.
Boschma, R and K Frenken (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 273-302.
Brenner N and N Theodore (eds)(2002). Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Malden, Mass; Oxford: Blackwell.
Brenner, N (2013). Theses on urbanization. Public Culture 25(1): 85-114.
Brenner, N and C Schmid (2012) Planetary urbanization. In: Gandy M (ed) Urban Constellations. Berlin: Jovis, 10-13.
Cairns, C and M Elfstrom (2014). Strikes, social media and the press: Why Chinese authorities allow or suppress new and old media coverage of labor disputes. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association of the 2014 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 28-31, 2014.
Chan, Kam-wing (1994). Cities with Invisible Walls: Reinterpreting Urbanization in Post-1949 China. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Chan, Kam-wing and Li Zhang (1999). The Hukou System and Rural-urban Migration: Processes and Changes. The China Quarterly 160(1): 818-855.
Chan, Kam-wing and W Buckingham (2008). Is China Abolishing the Hukou System? The China Quarterly 195: 582-606.
Chu, Wan-wen (2009). Can Taiwan''s second movers upgrade via branding? Research Policy 38: 1054-1065.
Coe, NM, Hess M, Yeung HW-C, Dicken P, and J Henderson (2004). Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29: 468-484.
Cooke, P and K Morgan (1998). The Associational Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dickson, B (2008). Wealth into Power: The Communist Party’s Embrace of China’s Private Sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Florida, RL (2005). Cities and the Creative Class. New York: Routledge.
Fuchs, G and P Shapira (eds)(2005). Rethinking Regional Innovation and Change: Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough? New York: Springer.
Gereffi, G (1994). The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks. In: Gereffi G and M Korzeniewicz (eds) Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport CT: Praeger, 95-122.
Gereffi, G (1996). Global commodity chains: New forms of co-ordination and control among nations and firms in international industries. Competition and Change 1: 427-439.
Gereffi, G and R Kaplinsky (eds)(2001). The value of value chains: Spreading the gains from globalization. IDS Bulletin 32(3).
Grabher, G (1993) The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In Grabher G (ed) The Embedded Firm: On the Socio-economics of Industrial Networks. London: Routledge, 255-277.
Hao, Zhi-dong (2014). The role of intellectuals in contemporary China’s labor movement: A preliminary exploration. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice 1: 239-225.
He, A Jing-wei and Geng-hua Huang (2014). Fighting for migrant labor rights in the world’s factory: Legitimacy, resource constrains and strategies of grassroots migrant labor NGOs in South China.” Journal of Contemporary China 93: 471-492.
Henderson, J, Dicken P, Hess M, Coe NM, and HW-C Yeung (2002). Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9: 436-464.
Hess, M (2004). ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography 28: 165-186.
Hsing, You-tien (2010). The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land & Property in China. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hudson, R (2006). On what’s right and keeping left: Or why geography still needs Marxian political economy. Antipode 38: 374-395.
Jones, M (2008). Recovering a sense of political economy. Political Geography 27: 377-399.
Karl, R (2010). The Flight to Rights: 1990s China and Beyond. Telos Summer 151: 87-104.
Kennard, M and C Provost (2016/04/19). Story of cities #25: Shannon – a tiny Irish town inspires China’s economic boom. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/apr/19/story-of-cities-25-shannon-ireland-china-economic-boom.
Li, Zhang, Zhang Lin, and Wan Fang (2010). Study on the effect of job insecurity on emotional exhaustion: An example of Foxconn jumping incidents. Paper presented at the 2010 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 24-26, 2010.
Lin, GCS (1997). Red Capitalism in South China: Growth and Development of the Pearl River Delta. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Lin, GCS (2014). China’s landed urbanization: State power reshuffling, land commodification, and municipal finance in the growth of metropolises. Environment and Planning A 46(8): 1814-1835.
Lin, GCS and Yi F F (2011). Urbanization of capital or capitalization on urban land? Land development and local public finance in urbanizing China. Urban Geography 32 50-79.
Lin, Thung-hong (forthcoming). Governing foreign capitalists in the name of workers: Foxconn as a case study of the implication of labor issues for China’s industrial policy.
Lin, Thung-hong, Lin Yi-ling, and Wei-lin Tseng (2016). Manufacturing suicide: The politics of a world factory. Chinese Sociological Review 48(1): 1-32.
MacKinnon, D, Cumbers, A, Pike, A, Birch, K, and R McMaster (2009). Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic Geography 85: 129-150.
MacLeod, G (2001). New regionalism reconsidered: Globalization and the remaking of political economic space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(4): 804-829.
Martin, R (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography – rethinking path dependency: beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography 86: 1-27.
Martin, R and P Sunley (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 395-437.
McGee, TG, Lin GCS, Marton AM, Wang MYL, and J Wu (2007). China’s Urban Space: Development under Market Socialism. London: Routledge.
Palpacuer, F (2008). Bringing the social context back in: Governance and wealth distribution in global commodity chains. Economy and Society 37(3): 393-419.
Peck, J and J Zhang (2013). A variety of capitalism … with Chinese characteristics? Journal of Economic Geography 13: 357-396.
Pun, Ngai (2005). Made in China: Women Factory Workers in a Global Workplace. Durham: Duke University Press.
Pun, Ngai and Hui-lin Lu (2010). Unfinished proletarianization: Self, anger, and class action among the second generation of peasant-workers in present-day China. Modern China 36(5): 493-519.
Pun, Ngai and J Chan (2012). Global Capital, the State, and Chinese Workers: The Foxconn Experience. Modern China 38(4): 384-410.
Pun, Ngai, J Chan, and M Selden (2013). Separate Dreams: Apple, Foxconn and a New Generation of Chinese Workers (in Chinese).
Scott, AJ (1988). New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe. London: Pion.
Scott, AJ (2001). Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shirk, SL (1993). The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Storper, M (1997) The regional world: territorial development in a global economy The Guilford Press, New York.
Tsui K Y (2011) China’s infrastructure investment boom and local debt crisis. Eurasian Geography and Economics. 52: 686-711.
Yang, C and H Liao (2010). Backward linkages of cross-border production networks of Taiwanese PC investment in the Pearl River Delta, China. Royal Dutch Geographical Society 101: 199-217.
Yang, D You-ren (2014). Social alienation and labor regime: A primary exploration of the new-generation migrant workers’ urbanism in Shenzhen’s Foxconn City. Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly In Social Studies 95: 57-108 (in Chinese).
Yang, D You-ren and NM Coe (2009). The governance of global production networks and regional development: A case study of Taiwanese PC production networks. Growth and Change 40: 30-53.
Yeung, HW-C (2009). Regional development and the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian perspective. Regional Studies 43: 325–351.
人民網中國經濟周刊(2008)〈中國改革開放30年最具影響力的30件大事(2)〉,《中國共產黨新聞網》。取自http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64162/134580/137248/。
中央委員會(2003)〈完善社會主義市場經濟體制若幹問題的決定〉,《中國共產黨歷次全國代表大會數據庫》。取自http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64162/64168/64569/65411/4429165.html。
中央委員會(2004)〈中共中央關於加強黨的執政能力建設的決定〉,《中國共產黨歷次全國代表大會數據庫》。取自http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64162/64168/64569/65412/6348330.html。
中國中共中央文獻研究室編(2008)《改革開放三十年重要文獻選編》。北京:中央文獻出版社。
全國人民代表大會(1979)〈中華人民共和國中外合資經營企業法〉,《中國中華人民共和國商務部》。取自http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/b/f/200207/20020700031141.shtml。
吳介民(2010)〈壓榨人性空間:身分差序與中國式多重剝削〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,第39期,頁1-44。
吳介民(2011)〈永遠的異鄉客?公民身分差序與中國農民工階級〉,《台灣社會學》,第21期,頁51-99。
李偉(2010)〈全球化競爭下的巨型企業調查:在富士康如何當工人〉,《三聯生活週刊》,總第581期。取自http://www.lifeweek.com.cn/2010/0617/28763.shtml。
兩岸三地高校富士康調研組(2010)〈”兩岸三地”高校富士康調研總報告〉,《苦勞網》。取自http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/55071。
柔然(2008)〈改革開放初期的幾場著名爭論〉,《中國共產黨新聞》。取自http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64162/64172/85037/85038/6820930.html。
國務院(1979)〈中共中央、國務院批轉廣東省委、福建省委關於對外經濟活動實行特殊政策和靈活措施的兩個報告〉,《中國改革信息庫》。取自http://www.reformdata.org/content/19790719/9635.html。
國務院(1979)〈關於大力發展對外貿易增加外匯收入若干問題的規定〉,《商務歷史》。取自http://history.mofcom.gov.cn/?datum=%E3%80%8A%E5%85%B3%E4%BA%8E%E5%A4%A7%E5%8A%9B%E5%8F%91%E5%B1%95%E5%AF%B9%E5%A4%96%E8%B4%B8%E6%98%93%E5%A2%9E%E5%8A%A0%E5%A4%96%E6%B1%87%E6%94%B6%E5%85%A5%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%97%AE%E9%A2%98。
國務院(1980)〈中華人民共和國廣東省經濟特區條例〉,《全國人大網》。取自http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/gongbao/2000-12/10/content_5009544.htm。
深圳市人力資源與保障局(2017)〈我想辦理人才引進(入戶深圳)〉。取自http://www.szhrss.gov.cn/ztfw/wx/wxblyj/。 
深圳市統計局(2014)《深圳統計年鑑2014》。取自http://www.sztj.gov.cn/xxgk/tjsj/tjnj/201503/t20150331_2836397.htm。
深圳市統計局(2016)《深圳統計年鑑2016》。取自http://www.sztj.gov.cn/xxgk/tjsj/tjnj/201701/t20170120_5943580.htm。
深圳特區報(1987)〈深圳經濟特區土地管理體制改革方案〉,《深圳市規劃和國土資源委員會(市海洋局)》。取自http://www.szpl.gov.cn/xxgk/gzdt/zwdt/200908/t20090825_46190.html。
陳波、張小勁(2017)〈城市戶籍制度改革的困境與突圍——來自深圳的經驗啟示〉,《深圳大學學報人文社會科學版》,第34期第3卷,頁38-45。
曾裕淇、林依陵(2010)〈全球商品鏈底層工作者,動態組織治理/在地制度共構:以富士康龍華廠工人訪調為例 〉,發表於2010年度台灣社會學會研討會,台北新莊:輔仁大學:台灣社會學會,2010-12-04 ~ 2010-12-05。
廣東省人大常委會(1981)〈廣東省經濟特區企業勞動工資管理暫行規定〉,《法律快車》。取自http://law.lawtime.cn/d535377540471.html。
廣東省委(1979)〈關於試辦深圳、珠海、汕頭出口特區的初步設想〉,《中國改革信息庫》。取自http://www.reformdata.org/content/19790505/16003.html。
潘毅(2006)《中國女工──新興打工階級的呼喚》,香港:明報出版社。
潘毅、許怡(2016)〈壟斷資本與中國工人〉,《每日頭條》。取自https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/other/om9laq.html。
鄭志鵬(2014)〈差序壓制型勞動體制:中國兩次勞動法在台資企業治理結果的政治經濟學分析〉,《台灣社會學刊》,第54期,頁75-129。
盧獲(2008)〈勇當改革開放的排頭兵(一):廣東省原省長劉田夫訪談錄〉,《百年潮》,第7期,頁57-62。
黨建文匯(2008)〈甘冒天下之大不韙—回憶任仲夷與廣東改革開放〉,《中國共產黨新聞》。取自http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/68742/114021/114023/7551131.html。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top