跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.122.214) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/12 23:39
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:葛伽利
研究生(外文):Galileo Flores Gaitan
論文名稱:政府規模與經濟成長:拉丁美洲國家之分析
論文名稱(外文):Government Size and Economic Growth: An Analysis of the Relationship for the Latin American Countries
指導教授:陸怡蕙陸怡蕙引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yir-Hueih Luh
口試委員:林佩蒨雷立芬
口試委員(外文):Pei-Chien LinLi-Fen Lei
口試日期:2019-07-22
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:農業經濟學研究所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:農業經濟及推廣學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:60
中文關鍵詞:經濟增長政府規模門檻回歸
DOI:10.6342/NTU201904033
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:91
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
The debate about the role of the government in the economy has been present in academic and political fields for over a hundred years. Many researchers have contributed with empirical analysis to determine whether government expenditure has a positive or negative effect on the growth rate. The studies on this topic are not yet conclusive and, for the case of the Latin American region, the literature is limited. This master thesis attempts to contribute to this analysis, by implementing an empirical model to find the relationship between government expenditure and the growth rate.
We found that the government expenditure has a negative effect on the growth rate. This means that the expansion of the government size will be detrimental for the economic growth. When the government expenditure is separated into consumption and investment, the category of government investment has no significant impact on economic growth rate. On the other hand, the government consumption has a negative and significant effect on growth. When government expenditure is separated into different sectors, most of the categories are not significant and the majority of the sectors have a negative effect on the growth rate.
Finally, by implementing a threshold regression, evidence of non-linear relationship among government size and economic growth was found for a single threshold. Thus, when the investment grows over 10% of the GDP, the negative effect of the government expenditure on the growth rate is reduced, but it is still negative. Prior to the empirical findings, the hypothesis was that the threshold existed for the variable government expenditure, which means that this variable was supposed to show two different regimes where different effects of the government expenditure are seen.
Acknowledgements i
ABSTRACT ii
Table of Contents iii
List of Figures iv
List of Tables iv
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Overview of the Latin American Region 2
1.3 Objectives 6
Chapter 2 Literature Review 8
2.1 Government Size and Growth 8
2.2 Government Expenditure Composition Matters 9
2.3 Non-linear Relationship between Government Size and Growth 11
2.4 Similar Studies Focused on the Latin America Region 14
2.5 Hypothesis 16
Chapter 3 Methodology 18
3.1 Theoretical Framework 18
3.2 Research Method 21
3.3 Empirical Model, Variables and Data 24
3.3.1 Government Size 27
3.3.2 Set of Control Variables 28
Chapter 4 Summary of Data and Discussion of Empirical Results 32
4.1 Descriptive Statistics of the Data 32
4.2 Functional Composition of the Government Expenditure 38
4.3 Sectorial Composition of the Government Expenditure 43
4.4 Non-Linear Analysis 46
4.5 Alternative Estimation 49
Chapter 5 Conclusions 53
5.1 Concluding Remarks 53
5.2 Limitations and Recommendations 54
References 56
Appendix 60
Afonso, A., & Furceri, D. (2008). Government Size, Composition, Volatility and Economic Growth. Retrieved from European Central Bank: http://www.ecb.europa.eu
Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is Public Expenditure Productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177-200.
Awaworyi, S., Ugur, M., & Yew, S. L. (2015). Does Government Size Affect Per-Capita Income Growth? A Hierarchical Meta-Regression Analysis. Retrieved from Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (GALA): http://gala.gre.ac.uk/14071/1/GPERC20_Churchill_Yew_UgurF.pdf
Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-125.
Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
Bergh, A., & Henrekson, M. (2011). Government Size and Growth: A Survey and Interpretation of the Evidence. Research Institute of Industrial Economics. Working paper No. 858.
Bojanic, N. Antonio (2013). The Composition of Government Expenditures and Economic Growth in Bolivia. Latin American Journal of Economics, 50(1), 83-105.
Cashin, P. (1995). Government Spending, Taxes and Economic Growth. IMF Staff Papers. 42, 237-269.
Clements, B., Bhattacharya, R. & Nguyen, T. (2003). External Debt, Public Investment, and Growth in Low- Income Countries. IMF Working Paper. 249, December.
Chamorro-Narvaez, R. A. (2014). A Functional Classification of Government Spending and Economic Growth in Latin American Countries. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(8), 125-150.
Chen, S. T., & Lee, C. C. (2005, August). Government Size and Economic Growth in Taiwan: a Threshold Regression Approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27(1), 1051-1066.
Easterly, W., & Rebelo, S. (1993). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 417-458.
Gupta, S., Clements, B., Baldacci, E., & Mulas-Granados, C. (2002). Expenditure Composition, Fiscal Adjustment, and Growth in Low-Income Countries. IMF Working Paper. 77, April.
Hansen E. B. (1999). Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference. Journal of Econometrics. 93(1) 345-368
Kneller, R., Bleaney, M. F. & Gemmel, N. (1999). Public Policy and the Government Budget Constraint: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 171-190.
Knight, M., Loayza, N. & Villanueva, D. (1993). Testing the Neoclassical Theory of Economic Growth. IMF Staff Papers. 40, (3), 512-541.
Kocherlakota, N. R. & Yi, K. (1997). Is There Endogenous Long-Run Growth? Evidence from the U.S. and the U.K. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 29, (2), 235-262.
Kormendi, R. C., & Meguire, P. G. (1985). Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16(1), 141-163.
Landau, D. (1985). Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in the Developed Countries: 1952-76. Public Choice, 47(3), 459-477.
Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. American Economic Review, 82(4), 942-963.
Nazmi, N. & Ramirez, M. D. (1997). Public and Private Investment and Economic Growth in Mexico. Contemporary Economic Policy. 15, 65-75.
Odedokun, M. O. (1997). Relative Effects of Public Versus Private Investment Spending on Economic Efficiency and Growth in Developing Countries. Applied Economics. 29, 1325-1336.
Ram, R. (1986). Government Size and Economic Growth: A New Framework and Some Evidence from Cross-Section and Time-Series Data. The American Economic Review, 76(1), 191-203.
Ramirez, M. D., & Nazmi, N. (2003). Public Investment and Economic Growth in Latin America: An Empirical Test. Review of Development Economics, 7(1), 115-126.
Sala-I-Martin, X. X. (1997). I Just Ran Two Million Regressions. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 178-183.
Shioji, E. (2001). Public Capital and Economic Growth: A Convergence Approach. Journal of Economic Growth. 6, 205-227.
Wijeweera, A., & Garis, T. (2009). Wagner''s Law and Social Welfare: The Case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 9(2), 200-2009.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top