臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來根據很多設計領域的研究顯示，在景氣低迷企業尋求創新之際，有許多吸引人的創新設計，多源自於願意協同合作與共同探討影響「設計過程和設計內容」等多因素的創新方法與過程。因此，參與式設計思考的共同設計研究應用，已引起相當多的關注。儘管共同設計是一項很重要的策略，然其背後隱藏的理念卻鮮少有認真的討論，作為共同設計概念被應用於服裝設計流程的更是少見。為了超越服裝設計的研究現況，本研究以共同設計對服裝設計應用至關重要的假設，以三個不同主題的實作規劃設計始末為研究樣本、經由實務「設計做研究」為取徑，作為研究的核心方法，從多方問題意識到「溯因推理」思考與實踐過程，基於共同設計相關利益者、問題觀、利益目標三構面與屬性，進行解析其實施內容，以作為後續教學及服裝設計研究的借鏡。成果整理如下：(1) 以共同設計構面三層次完成服裝設計應用的三流程；(2) 統整共同設計的實務驗證與操作六通則；(3) 架構共同設計互動整合與應用於服裝設計的策略模式。旨在為未來的共同設計應用於服裝設計開發奠下基礎，以供後續研究者參考，並期得到更多前瞻性的討論。

According to recent studies on design, as enterprises sought to innovate in the midst of the economic recession, the most innovative designs that drew attention were characterized by the willingness to collaborate and joint explorations of factors that affect design processes and contents. Therefore, research on co-design in participatory design has garnered widespread attention. Although co-design is a crucial design strategy, its latent concept has rarely been discussed; moreover, co-design has rarely been applied in fashion design. To generate a breakthrough in fashion design research, this study formulated a hypothesis that codesign crucially affects fashion design. Hence, we assume this study based on thoses designs case of clothes design. Especially, the design team adopts a model of three constructs developed by the study of co- design with the principle of co-design to work as a flowchart. The findings are the following: (1) Three processes for clothing design are completed with three levels of co-design; (2) Six- principles practice verification and operation for co-design; (3) Construct design interaction and integration, and application in fashion design . The aim is to lay the foundation for the future co-design to be applied to the design of clothing for reference by follow-up researchers, and to obtain more forward-looking discussions..

誌謝 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目次 IV
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 IX

第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究動機 3
1-3 研究目的 7
1-4 研究架構 9
1-5 研究範圍與限制 11

第二章 文獻探討 14
2-1 杜威的實用主義 14
2-1.1 參與溝通是經驗反思 15
2-1.2溯因推理與人本思考 15
2.1.3 參與設計與移情設計 16
2-2 共同設計 18
2-2.1 使用者為主體的思考 18
2-2.2 使用者是共同設計者 19
2-2.3共同設計演化創造力 20
2-2.4 感同理解與共同創新 20
2-2.5以人為本的感同體驗 21
2--2.6與用戶共學共習共設計 22
2- 2.7共同設計的構面與屬性 22
2-2.8使用者體驗預知的需求 24
2-2.9共同設計的價值目標 26
2-3 一致性理論與城市意象 27
2-3.1 基模意義與客戶評價 27
2-3.2 一致性理論與訊息認同 28
2-3.3 認知與溝通的一致性 29

第三章 研究方法 30
3-1共同設計構面與設計應用 31
3-1.1參與式設計思考理論基礎 32
3-1.2具同理心的人本思維 33
3-1.3從人性使用切入設計 34
3-1.4以體驗理解材質需求 34
3-1.5優化材質感與專業感 36
3-2 共同設計應用原則的建立 36
3-2.1參與體驗與共學共習 36
3-2.2參與空間與媒介功能 37
3-3 共同設計具多方利益 38
3-4 案例A. 39
3-4.1 三峽藍染工藝再生 39
3-4.2 打開〝沉澱〞的三峽藍染文化 40
3-4.3 一個攪動的發酵關係 42
3-4.4 藍染共習的體驗設計 42
3-4.5 多方利益者參與共創 43
3-4.6 推動策略 44
3-4.7 活動規劃 45
3-4.8 參與式共創架構 46
3-4.9 共創共學的分享回饋 50
3-5案例 B. 50
3-5.1探討共同設計原則與一致性服裝設計 50
3-5.2作為世界設計之都的專業團隊服裝 51
3-5.3城市精神的延伸 52
3-5.4服裝設計要素 53
3-5.5一致性工作服的設計原則 54
3-5.6一致性服裝研究方法與流程 56
3-5.7臺北市政府一致性服裝設計原則 58
3-5.8設計課題與服裝設計策略 72
3-6 共同設計導出一致性服裝設計認同. 81
3-6.1樣衣設計與材質需求對照 81
3-6.2一致性設計穿搭規劃體系 82
3-7案例 C 86
3-7.1數位即視化溝通 86
3-7.2多方即視化溝通；即時性回應需求 88
3-7.3設計打樣溝通與製程 90
3-7-4虛擬設計溝通與設計服務流程 91
3-7.5虛擬穿衣到展示的共同設計 93

第四章 結果分析與討論 97
4-1 共同攪動服裝設計的應用創新 97
4-1.1 共同設計流程與情境 97
4-1.2 參與體驗與共習思考 99
4-1.3 共同設計再生藍染服裝 100
4-2. 即時化數位製程探索設計需求 101
4-2.1 即時化多方溝通與修正 101
4-2.2 高度客製最適化與優化服務 102
4-2.3 即視有效的溝通效益 103
4-2.4 「一致性感同」的設計策略 104
4-2.5 共同設計的「一致性服裝」 106
4-2.6「一致性共同」設計實踐方面 108

第五章 結論 113
5-1 綜整與討論 113
5-1.1 共同設計導入服裝設計應用 113
5-2 發現與建議 119
5-3 未來導入共同設計的模組 120

參考文獻 125

一、英文文獻：

1.Alexander, T. M. (2012). John Deweys theory of art, experience, and nature: The horizons of
feeling. SUNYpress.
2.Banham, R., 1972. Alternative networks for the alternative culture? In: Design participation:
Proceedings of the design research society’s conference. UK: The Design Research
Society, 15–19.
3.Bucciarelli, L. L., & Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. MIT press. (Cambridge,
MA:MIT Press, 1994).
4.Buchanan, R., & Margolin, V. (Eds.). (1995). Discovering design: explorations in design studies. University
of Chicago Press.
5.Beerli, A., & Martin, J.D. (2004). Factors influencing destination image, Annals of Tourism
Research, 31(3), 657-681.
6.Beyer, J. (1981). Ideologies, values, and decision making in organizations. Handbook of
organizational design, 2,166-202. London, England: Oxford University Press.
7.Burgoon, J. K., & Saine, T. (1978). The unspoken dialogue: An introduction to nonverbal communication.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.Breen, D.E., House, D.H., Wozny, M.J.:Predicting the drape of woven cloth using interacting
particles. In: Comput. Graph.(Proceedings of SIGGRAPH’94), 32(4),365–372 (1994)
9.Brundtland, G.H., 1987. Our common future, world commission on environment and
development.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey: nature and cooperative intelligence. Open Court Publishing.
11.Chisholm, J. (2017, February 1). What is co-design? [Web blog message]. Retrieved from
http://designforeurope.eu/what-co-design
12.Coleman, R., 1994. The case for inclusive design—an overview. In: Proceedings of the 12th
triennial congress. International Ergonomics Association and the Human Factors
Association, Canada.
13.Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and he Social Orderrder . New York: Scribners.
14.C. S. Peirce, quoted in: Nigel Cross, “Discovering Design Ability” Discovering Design: Explorations in Design Studies, Richard Buchanan and Victor Margolin, eds., (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995), 110.
15.David Hildebrand, Dewey: A Beginner’s Guide (Oxford: Oneworld, 2008), 3.
16.De Couvreur, L., Detand, J., Grimonprez, B., & Mistiaen, B. (2009). Design for (every) one. In International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces DPPI09. UTC-Compiegne-France.
17.Dewey, Experience and Nature, 179.
18.Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature (Vol. 471). Courier Corporation.
19.Dewey, J., & Moore, A. W. (1917). Creative intelligence: Essays in the pragmatic attitude. H. Holt.
20.Dewey, Reconstruction in Philosophy, 156.
21..Dewey, J. (1957). Reconstruction in philosophy (Vol. 48). Beacon Press.
22.Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’and its application. Design studies, 32(6), 521-532.
23.Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka, eds., Participatory Design: Principles and Practices
(Hllsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993).
24.Elisabeth B. N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers, “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of
Design,” CoDesign 4, no. 1 (2008): 5-18; and Marc Steen, Tensions in
Human-Centred Design,” CoDesign 7, no. 1(2011): 45-60
25.Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., Kristensson, P., Magnusson, P., & Matthing, J. (Eds.). (2006).
Involving customers in new service development. London, England: Imperial College Press.
26.Fakeye, P. C., & Crompton, J. L (1991). Image Differences between Prospective, First-time, and
Repeat Visitors to the Lower Rio Grande valley. Journal of TravelResearch, 30 (2), 10-16.
27.Finke, R. A., & Freyd, J. J. (1994). Imagery. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
28.Forsythe, S. M. (1990). Effect of applicant’s clothing on interviewer’s decision to hire. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 20, 1579-1595.
29.Franke, & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and
sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32 (1), 157–178.
30.Franke, Keinz, P., & Schreier, M. (2008). Complementing mass customization toolkits with user communities:
how peer input improves customer self-design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(6),
546–559.
31.Fussell, P. (1983). Class. New York, NY: Baiiantine Books.
32.Hall, C. R., & Jenny, O. (2009). A Quantitative Analysis of Athletes Voluntary Use of Slow Motion, Real
Time, and Fast Motion Images. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(1), 15-30.
33.Hammersley, M. (2003). Dilemma Qualitative Method. Routledge.
34.Hildebrand, D. (2008). Dewey: A beginners guide. Oneworld publications..D. Hildebrand, Dewey (2008),
4-6.
35.Honegger, H. W., Dewey, E. M., & Ewer, J. (2008). Bursicon, the tanning hormone of insects:
recent advances following the discovery of its molecular identity. Journal of Comparative
Physiology A, 194(12),989-1005.
36.Horn, M. J. (1981). The second skin: An interdisciplinary study of clothing. Boston, MA:
Houghton-Mifflin.
37.Joseph, N. (1986). Uniform and nonuniforms: Communication through clothing. New York, NY:
Greenwood Press.
38.Hsu Chiui I, ,CROSS-CULTURAL DESIGN: METHODS, PRACTICE AND IMPACT, CCD
2015, PT I
39.Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user
communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science,
17(1),45–63.
40.John Dewey, Experience and Nature (La Salle: Open Court Publishing, 1965), 3-4.
41.John Dewey, Reconstruction in Philosophy (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1920), 78.
42.John Dewey, The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy, in Creative intelligence: Essays in the Pragmatic
Attitude, J. .Jones, J. C.(1980). Design methods-seeds of human future. New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
43.Dewey, ed. (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1917), 65.
44.Kankainen, A., Vaajakallio, K., Kantola, V., & Mattelmaki, T. (2010) Storytelling Group – a
co-design method for service design. Behaviour and Information Technology, 31(30), 221-230.
45.Kees Dorst, The Core of “Design Thinking” and its Application, Design Studies, vol. 32, no. 6 (2011):
521-32
46.Knippenberg, D. and E. Schie (2000). "Foci and correlates of organizational identification."
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology73(2): 137-147.
47.Kujala, S. (2003). User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour and
Information Technology, 22(1), 1-16.
48.Lafleur, B., Magnenat-Thalmann, N.,Thalmann, D.: Cloth animation with self-collision detection. In Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Modeling in Computer Graphics, pp. 179–197（1991）
49.Larry A. Hickman, Dewey’s Theory of Inquiry, in Reading Dewey, Larry A. Hickman, ed., (1998),166-86; and Hildebrand, Dewey (2008), 40-62.
50.Lawson, B. (2006). How Designers Think: the design process demystified. Oxford.
51.L.De Couvreur, R Goossens ,Co-creation as a bridge between universal design and rehabilitation engineering.,CoDesign 7 (2), 107-121
52.Lee, Y., Design participation tactics: involving people in the design of their built environment. Doctoral thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2007.
53.Lee, Y.K. and Jachna, T., 2004. Empowerment games: empathic design probes for user participation in community housing. In: Proceedings of the participatory design conference (PDC 2004). Toronto, Canada, 27–31 July.
54.Lefebvre, H., 1972, 2003. The urban revolution. USA: The University of Minnesota Press.
55.Louis Menand, The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America (New York: Farrar, Straus and
Giroux,(2001), 360, 322.
56.Lurie, A. (1981). The language of clothes. New York, NY: Random House.
57.Lyotard, J-F., 1979, 1984. The postmodern condition—A report on knowledge. Manchester:
Manchester University Press.
58.Mandel. N. (2003). Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self – construal priming
on cnsumer risk–taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 30-40.
59.Mansfeld, Y. (1992). From Motivation to Actual Travel. Annals of Tourism Research, 19,
399-419.
60.Marc Steen, “ DesignIssues,”, Volume 29, Number 2 Spring 2013
61.Marc Steen, Menno Manschot and Nicole De Koning, Benefits of Co-Design in Service Design
Prjects, International Journal of Design, vol. 5, no. 2 (2011): 53-60.
62.Mitchell, C.T., 1993. Redefining designing: From form to experience. New York: Van
Nostrand Reinhold.
63.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 1962, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith. Lon
don: Routledge.
64.Melles, G. (2008). New pragmatism and the vocabulary and metaphors of scholarly design
research. Design Issues, 24(4), 88-101.
65.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 1962, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith. London:
Routledge.
66.Morris, E. K. The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus,
and Giroux, 2001 by Louis Menand.
67.Muller, M. J. (2002). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.),
68.The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging
69.applications (pp. 1051-1068). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70.Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann，Pascal Volino ，Fromearly draping to haute couture modes:，
71.years of researchVisual Comput (2005) 21: 506–519 DOI10.1007/s00371-005-0347-6，Published
72.online:1 September 2005c Springer-Verlag 2005 Paul Ray（1998）.（The Cultural Creatives:How
73.50 Million People are Changing the World）
74.Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard business
review, 76, 97-105.
75.Pine, B. J., and J. H. Gilmore, “The experience economy : work is theatre and every
business a stage,” Harvard Business School Press, 1999.
76.Power J, Apeagyei P, Jefferson A. "Integrating 3D Scanning Data & Textile Parameters into
77.Virtual Clothing,"in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on 3D Body Scanning
78.Technologies, Lugano, Switzerland,2011
79.Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation.
Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
80.Qu, H., Kim, L. H., & Im, H. H. (2011). A model of destination branding: Integrating the concepts of the
branding and destination image, Tourism Management, 32(3), 465-476.
81.Rafaeli, A. & Pratt, M. G. (1993). Tailored meanings: on the meaning and impact of organizational dress.
Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 32-55.
82.Rittel, H. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. Developments in design methodology, 135-144.
83.Rosch, E. & Loyd, B. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
84.Roser, T., & Samson, A. (2009). Co-creation: New paths to value. London: Promise / LSE Enterprise.
85.Sanders, E.B.-N., 2006. Design research in 2006. Design research quarterly, 1 (1).
86.Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18.
87.Sanders, E.B.N., Stappers, P. J. (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign,
4(1), (5- 18). London: Taylor & Francis, Available at
http://www.maketools.com/pdfs/CoCreation_Sanders_Stappers_08_preprint.pdf [Accessed 15
March, 2010]
88.Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of marketing management, 15(1-3), 53-67.
89.Schuler & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. CRC Press.
90.Shuhua Mu，Weiqun Cao ，Virtual Fashion Design with CLO3D，Electronic Science &
Technology，Vol.02 No.03 May.2015
91.Sirgy, M. J., Self-Congruity: Toward a Theory of Personality and Cybernetics, New York:
92.Stanley King（1989）。Co-Design: A Process of Design Participation. Publisher: Van Nostrand
Reinhold
93.Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2),
16-28.Praeger, (1986): 93-110.
94.Sleeswijk Visser, F., Stappers, P. J., Van der Lugt, R., & Sanders, E. B. N. (2005).
Contextmapping: Experiences from practice. CoDesign, 1(2), 119-149.
95.Solomon, M. & Douglas, S. (1987). Diversity in product symbolism: The case of female
executive clothing. Psychology and Marketing, 4,184-212.
96.Tedeschi, J. (1981). Impression management theory and social psychological research. New
York, NY: Academic Press.
97.Vaajakallio, K., & Binder, T. (2008). Design dialogues: studying co-design activities in an
artificial environment. Danmarks Designskole.
98.VEAL, D. (1969). WH PERKIN:(1838–1907). In Mid-Nineteenth-century Scientists (pp.
173-190).
99.Vera, A. A. L. (2009). Co-designing interactive spaces for and with designers: supporting
mood-board making. Eindhoven, Nederland: Technische Universiteit Eidhoven.
100.Visser, F. S., Stappers, P. J., Van der Lugt, R., & Sanders, E. B. (2005). Contextmapping:
experiences from practice. CoDesign, 1(2), 119-149.
101.Volino, P., Magnenat-Thalmann, N.Developing simulation techniques for an interactive clothing
system.In:Proceedings of Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM’97). IEEE Press,
Geneva,pp. 109–118 (1997)
102.Volino, P., Magnenat-Thalmann, N.Implementing fast cloth simulation with collision response.
In:Proceedings of Computer Graphics International, pp. 257–266. IEEE Press, New York
(2000)
103.Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation.
Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55(1), 63-78.
104.Von Hippel, E. (2007). The sources of innovation. In Das Summa Summarum des Management
(pp. 111-120). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
105.Weigelt, K. & Camerer. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory
and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443-454.
106.Weinber, R. M., & Gould, D. (2002). Foundation of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Second
Edition.
107.Yang, Y., Magnenat-Thalmann, Y.: An improved algorithm for collision detection in cloth
animation with human body.Comput. Graph. Appl. (Proceedings of Pacific
Graphics’93), 1,237–251 (1993)
108.Zwass, V. (2010). Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective.
International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(1), 11-48.









二、中文文獻：

1.李正 (2007)。服裝學概論。北京：中國紡織出版社。
2.何偉新、葉建宏、范靜媛、洪國哲（2015）。皮革袋包開版技術分析之研究－以臺灣業界
3.作規格為例。第七屆全國紡織技術論文競賽優勝論文全輯
4.近江源太郎(2006)。造形心理學。台北縣：國立臺灣藝術大學。
5.吳政霖、古惠茹、黃世輝 (2012 )。創意生活產業體驗設計構成要素之研究一以新港香藝文化圈區為例。科技學刊,第 21 卷,人文社會類,1,25-35。
6.周欣諭，2009，《手感體驗設計導向之流行趨勢研究—以手作工藝為例》，臺中技術學院商業設計系碩士論文。
7.呂瑤、佘高紅 (2006)。夜間城市意象研究。建築科學與工程學報，23，90-94。
8.林炯任（1999）三峽早期染布業與今日社區藍染工藝再生，台灣工藝15期，30-43。
9.林炯任（2008）。藍金傳奇: 三角湧染的黃金歲月。臺灣書房出版。
10.邱扶東 與王書會 (2003)。自我及其相關概念的心理學研究。《安徽農業大學報 (社會科學版 )4,23。
11.洪崇喜(2003)：健身運動、情緒感受與心理健康。大專體育， 72，156-161。
12.洪國哲，2017，《工藝體驗設計之研究》，國立雲林科技大學工業設計系碩士碩士論文。
13.保羅．福塞爾Paul Fussell，2004，愛上制服:制服的文化與歷史，陳信宏譯，麥田，臺。
14.徐振源（2010）。流行快訊，紡拓會。29。
15.倪鳳祥 （2004）。構成藝術‧平面構成 河南： 河南大學出版社。
16.夏業良、魯煒譯，2008，《體驗經濟時代》，台北：經濟新潮社。B. Joseph Pine II & James
H. Gilmore原著
17.張希文、張勝善（2009）。交通用紡織品/產品技術。紡織綜合研究期刊，19(1)，1-5。
18.許淑惠(2006)。從金融機構人員金融機構從業人員在制服上的不一致對消費者購買意願影響之研究—以商業銀行為例。台北：國家。
19.張慧敏 (2010)。青島城市形象分析與品牌城市形象的塑造。管理研究，6，17-19。
20.馮維波、黃光宇 (2006)。基於重慶主城區居民感知的城市意象元素分析評論。地理研究，25，803-813。
21.葉立誠 (2000)。服飾美學。台北：商鼎文化。
22.黃惇勝 (1995)。台灣式KJ法原理與技術。台北：中國生產力雷兆玉 (2010)。以城市文化實力塑造中心城市形象。重慶社會主義學院學報，6，91-93。
23.凱文•林區 (Kevin Lynch) (2014)。城市的意象 (The Image of the City) (胡家璇譯)。台北：遠流。（原作1960年出版）
24.蒯光武、鮑忠暉 (2010)。以隱喻抽取技術探索高雄市的城市意象。傳播與管理研究，10，37-84。
25.趙聯賞 (2003)。服飾史話。台北：國家。
26.維基百科 (2017年1月29日)。官服。取自https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/官服。
Wikipedia (2017, January 29). Gwanbok. Retrieved from https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Gwanbok [in
Chinese, semantic translation]
27.錢玉芬(2007)。傳播心理學。臺北縣：威仕曼。
28.賴人豪，2016，《台灣飲食記憶之再體驗設計》，實踐大學工業設計學系碩士論文。
29.戴欽祥、陸欽、李亞麟 (1994)。中國古代服飾。台北：臺灣商務。
30.顧淑馨譯，2004，《顧客經驗管理：天衣無縫的整合式顧客經營》，台北：中國生產力中心。Bernd H. Schmitt原著。
31.Chris Anderson (2013)。自造者時代(連育德譯)。台北:天下遠見出版。
32.Emily Pilloton （2009）。 Design Revolution： 100 Products That Empower People. Metropolis Books
33.KOSKINEN（2011），移情設計：產品設計中的用戶體驗。中國：中國建築工業出版社。


三、網路資料：

34.Alphacamp（2015），你不可不知的使用者體驗設計兩大觀念，取自於：https://tw.alphacamp.co/2015/12/25/ux-design-hackathon-workshop/
35.Wei-Hsun Chen（2018）Participatory Design(參與式設計): 將使用者帶入設計流程，取自：https://medium.com/uxeastmeetswest/participatory-design-%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E5%BC%8F%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88-%E5%B0%87%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85%E5%B8%B6%E5%85%A5%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88%E6%B5%81%E7%A8%8B-da43f0d9fbbb
36.工藝社區扶植成果。台北市：文化部。取自：https://www.ntcri.gov.tw/communityinfo_190_57.html
37.林國源（2017），【投書】混齡教學，可以讓學習互動更有趣！，天下獨立評論，取自於：https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/5737
38.林柏寬（2016），偏鄉混齡教學，見樹不見林！想想論壇，取自於：http://www.thinkingtaiwan.com/content/5353
39.「社區營造」與「社區發展」工作的差別（2010），取自文化部台灣社區通：https://communitytaiwan.moc.gov.tw/Item/Detail/%E3%80%8C%E7%A4%BE%E5%8D%80%E7%87%9F%E9%80%A0%E3%80%8D%E8%88%87%E3%80%8C%E7%A4%BE%E5%8D%80%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E3%80%8D%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E7%9A%84%E5%B7%AE%E5%88%A5
40.思創生活團隊（2010），研究方法- 參與式設計，取自：http://lifeandidea.pixnet.net/blog/post/45841229-%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95--%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E5%BC%8F%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88
41.設計理念（2013），想成为优秀的用户体验设计师？-请先做好这5件事，取自於：
42.http://www.boxui.com/ued/design-idea/3405.html
43.不是「為長者而設計」，而是「和他們一起設計」：青銀跨代學習，才是銀髮設計的關鍵。取自：http://www.seinsights.asia/article/3291/3268/5515
44.From Money：「環保概念 更是巨大商機與投資的機會」 http://www.richage.net 11-26-2009
45.From ettoday：日刊工業新聞社（1999）。機能性纖維發展趨勢。Hight-Tech Fiber。
46.http://www.ettoday.net/news 。01-25-2015
47.From wiki：Maslow Needs Hierarchy Theoryhttp://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/
48.From The Femin：http://thefemin.com/ 2014/04/sports-x-fashion/
49.http://room715.hatenablog.com/entry/2015/12/31/040602
50.https://www.facebook.com/clo3d/videos/322895858294989/
51.https：//www.thefabricant.com/it-hong-kong
52.https://www.clo3d.com/promotion/5_0
53.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10157138197506683&set=a.412868891682&type=3&theater