( 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/19 15:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  


研究生(外文):Chun-Hsin Wu
論文名稱(外文):Applying the TAM Model to Study Factors Affecting EPC Company Procurement with Intelligent Assistants
指導教授(外文):Seng-Su Tsang
口試委員(外文):Woan-Yuh JangJa-Shen Chen
外文關鍵詞:EPC Company ProcurementIntelligent Procurement AssistantTechnology Acceptance Model
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:100
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:23
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
EPC(Engineering、Procurement、Construction)公司在現今新科技驅動的產業轉型與競爭下,引進智能助理成為重要的議題。本研究以科技接受模式(TAM)為研究之架構,加入安全性及便利性兩個構面探討採購同仁與智能助理協同工作的態度與配合意願,分析可能的影響因素。調查對象則為國內EPC公司相關採購同仁,蒐集94份有效問卷,以Smart PLS方法驗證假說。
In recent years, with the new technology, and the globalization increasingly complicate and tense up the international EPC company market. Thus there is a demand for the introduction and application of AI or intellectual assistants to meet the needs solve ensuring every problem. With TAM as a research model, the study will probe the attitudes and cooperation intentions of procurement in co-working with intelligent assistants in terms of information security and convenience. All possible influencing factors are also under analysis. The survey targets are procurements from EPC company, collecting 94 valid questionnaires, and verified the model by Smart PLS.
In summary, for the procurements, the willingness to co-work with intelligent assistants is significant. The influencing factors include perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, information security and convenience. The results of the study suggest possible enhancement of the above mentioned factors, so as to increase the willingness and the effectiveness of collaborative work with intelligent assistants.
中文摘要 II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
1. 緒論 1
1.1. 研究背景 1
1.2. 研究動機與目的 2
1.3. 研究流程 4
2. 文獻探討 6
2.1. 人工智慧的發展現況 6
2.2. EPC公司專案採購組織與人員的角色 9
2.3. 智慧化、智能化、數位化的採購趨勢 10
2.4. 公司採購引進智能助理案例 11
2.5. 科技接受模式(Technology Acceptance Model,TAM) 13
2.5.1. 知覺有用性(Perceived Usefulness, PU) 14
2.5.2. 知覺易用性(Perceived Ease of Use, PEOU) 14
2.5.3. 使用態度(Attitude Toward Using, AT) 14
2.5.4. 行為意向(Behavioral Intention to use, BI) 15
2.5.5. 實際使用(Actual System use) 15
2.6. 外在變數(External Variable) 15
2.6.1. 安全性 15
2.6.2. 便利性 16
3. 研究設計與方法 18
3.1. 研究架構與假說 18
3.2. 問卷內容設計 19
3.3. 抽樣設計方式 22
3.3.1. 研究對象 22
3.3.2. 施測期間 22
3.3.3. 抽樣方法 22
3.4. 統計分析方法 22
3.4.1. 敘述性統計分析(Descriptive Statistics Analysis) 23
3.4.2. 信度分析(Reliability Analysis) 24
3.4.3. 效度分析(Validity Analysis) 24
3.4.4. 結構模型分析 25
4. 研究分析與結果 27
4.1. 樣本特性說明與資料分析結果 27
4.2. 敘述性統計及測量模式分析 28
4.2.1. 信度及效度分析 30
4.2.2. 區別效度分析 32
4.3. 結構模式分析 33
5. 結論與建議 36
5.1. 結論 36
5.2. 學術貢獻 37
5.3. 管理意涵 38
5.4. 研究限制 41
5.4.1. 研究對象 41
5.4.2. 研究範圍 41
5.5. 未來研究方向與建議 41
參考文獻 43
Berry, L. L., Seiders, K., & Grewal, D. (2002). Understanding service convenience. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 1-17.
Bharadwaj, R. (2019, 19th, May). Artificial intelligence in supply chain management–current possibilities and applications. Retrieved from https://emerj.com/ai-sector-overviews/artificial-intelligence-in-supply-chain-management-current-possibilities-and-applications/
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 205-229.
Brown, L. G. (1989). The strategic and tactical implications of convenience in consumer product marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(3), 13-19.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research (pp. 307- 341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
Forum, W. E. (2018). The Future of Jobs 2018. World Economic Forum.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological forecasting and social change, 114, 254-280.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century: Macmillan.
Gollmann, D. (2010). Computer security. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(5), 544-554.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
Institute, P. M. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide).
Kwong, R., Kao, J. S., Manibog, C., & Nakanishi, T. (2017). Can a robot do your job. Financial Times. Retrieved October, 6, 2017.
Mankiya, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Batra, P., . . . Sanghvi, S. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages. Mcftinsey & Company.
Manyika, J., & Bughin, J. (2017). Harnessing automation for a future that works. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/digital-disruption/harnessing-automation-for-a-future-that-works
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. In: New York: McGraw-Hill.
Simson, G., & Gene, S. (1991). practical Unix security. In: O’Reilly & Associates Sebastopol, CA.
Tani, S. (2017). Is your job robot-ready? Nikkei Asian Review.
Von Solms, R. (1996). Information security management: The second generation. Computers & Security, 15(4), 281-288.
von Solms, R., Van Der Haar, H., von Solms, S. H., & Caelli, W. J. (1994). A framework for information security evaluation. Information & Management, 26(3), 143-153.
吳宗祐, & 鄭伯壎. (2006). 工作投入, 調節他人情緒能力與情緒勞動之交互作用對情緒耗竭的預測效果. 中華心理學刊, 48(1), 69-87.
李東峰. (2001). 企業資訊安全控制制度之研究. 二十一世紀台灣湧現中的資訊管理議題研討會暨第三屆全國資訊管理博士生聯合研討會, 中正大學.
林奇伯. (2017, 2017/01). 真人vs.機器人
當「人機飯碗大戰」成真,你得建立無法取代的價值!. Cheers.
洪新原, 梁定澎, & 張嘉銘. (2005). 科技接受模式之彙總研究. 資訊管理學報, 12(4), 211-234.
張忠謀. (2019, May 24). 數位時代的教育和社會. 經濟日報. Retrieved from https://udn.com/news/story/7240/3833080
許哲豪. (2018, Sep. 27th, 2018). 影像式AI虛擬助理真的要來了嗎?(下). Retrieved from https://makerpro.cc/2018/09/visiualized-ai-virtual-assistant-is-coming-part-two/
資誠聯合會計師事務所. (2017). 未來已來-機器人流程自動化(RPA)團隊成軍. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.tw/zh/news/press-release/press-20171215.html
蕭佑和. (2018, 8th, Apr.). 完整解析AI人工智慧:3大浪潮+3大技術+3大應用. Retrieved from https://dahetalk.com/2018/04/08/完整解析ai人工智慧%EF%BC%9A3大浪潮%EF%BC%8B3大技術%EF%BC%8B3大應用%EF%BD%9C/
蕭軒. (2017). 欠缺感受溫度 機器無法取代人工. Retrieved from https://www.epochtimes.com.tw/n226544/%E6%AC%A0%E7%BC%BA%E6%84%9F%E5%8F%97%E6%BA%AB%E5%BA%A6-%E6%A9%9F%E5%99%A8%E7%84%A1%E6%B3%95%E5%8F%96%E4%BB%A3%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5.html
羅清俊. (2016). 社會科學研究方法-打開天窗說量化 (3rd ed.): 楊智文化.

註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔