跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.82.133) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/21 01:33
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳玫蓉
研究生(外文):Mei-Rong Alice Chen
論文名稱:互動環景影像虛擬實境學習模式與認知風格對英語口語表達、口說焦慮、及學習動機之影響
論文名稱(外文):Effects of interactive spherical video-based virtual reality and cognitive styles on EFL learners’ English oral presentation, speaking anxiety, and learning motivation
指導教授:黃國禎黃國禎引用關係
指導教授(外文):Gwo-Jen Hwang
口試委員:蔡今中劉晨鐘楊接期黃武元
口試委員(外文):Chin-Chung TsaiChen-Chung LiuJie-Chi YangWu-Yuin Hwang
口試日期:2019-06-06
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:數位學習與教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:教育科技學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:虛擬實境認知風格情境式學習學習動機口說焦慮語步分析
外文關鍵詞:Virtual RealityCognitive StyleSituated LearningLearning MotivationSpeaking AnxietyMove Analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:378
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
外語溝通是培養學生應具備的重要技能之一。英語為非母語地區如台灣,為了協助學生掌握將來在職場上的國際溝通能力,於大學開設職場英語如餐旅英文課程主要是培養職場的英語能力,以因應未來工作中溝通需求。尤其口語更是被視為從業人員重要指標能力。外語學習中,情境是語言習得的重要因素,也就是提供學生有意義的語言培訓任務和在真實環境中練習的機會,但是一般課堂活動提供的情境卻是有限的。虛擬實境為科技運用中被公認能提供學習者豐富外語學習的情境。先前研究更是指出不同的認知風格會讓學生在運用科技學習語言上產生不一樣的表現,而且認知風格對於科技學習的研究於近年有增加的趨勢。然而,在虛擬實境中的研究卻鮮少探討此差異對數位科技英語口語表現之影響。本研究旨在探討不同認知風格的學生在互動環景影像虛擬實境中的口語表現、口語焦慮及學習動機。因此,在台灣北部一所科技大學餐旅英文課程,建置以互動環景影像虛擬實境工具呈現之英文數位教材,進行一個準實驗設計,由選修餐旅英文課程的兩個班級學生參與實驗。實驗組採用互動環景影像虛擬實境情境式學習;控制組使用一般多媒體教材進行學習。學生經由完成隱藏圖形辨認測驗,並透過口語報告、英語口說焦慮量表、及學習動機量表進行量化研究分析,從而檢視互動環景影像虛擬實境學習及一般多媒體學習對場域獨立及場域依賴的學習者之間的口語表現差異。本研究分析結果顯示,認知風格(場獨立與場依賴)和學習模式(互動環景影像虛擬實境學習模式與一般多媒體學習模式)之間與學習者口語表達、英語口說焦慮有交互作用影響。學生的口語表達中的語步及學習動機在互動環景影像虛擬實境學習模式較佳。本研究貢獻為使用虛擬實境工具作為數位語言教材融入課室教學,可以提供語言學習所需情境,了解不同認知風格的學生,藉以供研究虛擬實境工具之相關參考及外語學習及教學方法的一些未來改進策略。
In this study, the use of virtual reality (VR) as a learning mode has been adopted to provide realistic sociocultural contexts for language learning. Digital learning content was designed by using interactive spherical video-based virtual reality (ISVVR) in an English for Tourism and Restaurants course. To investigate the effects of the interaction between cognitive style and multimedia learning mode on students’ learning motivation, speaking anxiety, oral presentation and move analysis, a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was conducted. The student sample consisted of two classes of 93 students (59 males and 34 females). One class with 54 students (19 females, 35 males) was the experimental group, and the other class with 39 students (15 females, 24 males) was the control group. All of the students took the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) to identify whether their cognitive style was field dependent or independent. The results showed a significant effect for the interaction between the cognitive styles and the learning modes on the students’ oral presentation and speaking anxiety. The participants who learned with the ISVVR learning mode had better results than those who learned with the conventional multimedia mode in terms of increased learning motivation. Their move structures in oral presentations with the ISVVR learning mode showed more similar spoken genre patterns with TED speakers. Findings further support the benefit of incorporating cognitive styles into the ISVVR learning mode for EFL learners.
Contents
摘要 i
Abstract ii
Acknowledgments iii
Contents v
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
1. Introduction 1
1.1. Rationale and contributions of the research 3
1.2. Research questions 4
2. Literature review 6
2.1. Technology-Enhanced Foreign Language Learning 6
2.2. Situated language learning 7
2.3. Virtual Reality 9
2.4. Cognitive style 11
3. Instructional design 14
3.1. Instructional content 14
3.2. The ISVVR application 16
3.3. The features of the ISVVR 18
4. Experimental design 22
4.1. Participants 22
4.2. Experimental procedure 23
4.3. Instruments 26
4.3.1. The oral presentation rubrics 26
4.3.2. The coding scheme for assessing students’ oral presentations 28
4.3.3. The questionnaire of learning motivation 32
4.3.4. The EFL Speaking Anxiety Questionnaire 32
4.3.5. The Group Embedded Figures Test 32
4.4. Data collection and analysis 33
5. Results 33
5.1 Analysis of GEFT scores of the participants 33
5.2 Analysis of Oral presentation 35
5.2.1 Move analysis for assessing students’ oral presentation 38
5.2.2 Analysis of the move structures for the post-oral presentations 38
5.3 Analysis of speaking anxiety 43
5.4 Analysis of learning motivation 46
6. Discussion and conclusions 48
References 55
Appendixes 68
References

Akbari, Z. (2015). Current challenges in teaching/learning English for EFL learners: The case of junior high school and high school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 394-401.
Alharthi, S. A., Raptis, G. E., Katsini, C., Dolgov, I., Nacke, L. E., & Toups, Z. O. (2018). Toward Understanding the Effects of Cognitive Styles on Collaboration in Multiplayer Games. Paper presented at the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW'18).
Alrabai, F. (2015). The influence of teachers' anxiety-reducing strategies on learners' foreign language anxiety. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 163-190.
Astawa, I. N., Mantra, I. B. N., & Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2017). Developing Communicative English Language Tests for Tourism Vocational High School Students. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 58-64.
Belk, M., Fidas, C., Germanakos, P., & Samaras, G. (2017). The interplay between humans, technology and user authentication: A cognitive processing perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 184-200.
Braga, J., Gunter, G., & Carneiro, M. (2015). Strategies for Large Class Sizes in Online and Virtual Learning Environments. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Nevada, United States.
Bresciani, M. J., Oakleaf, M., Kolkhorst, F., Nebeker, C., Barlow, J., Duncan, K., & Hickmott, J. (2009). Examining Design and Inter-Rater Reliability of a Rubric Measuring Research Quality across Multiple Disciplines. Practical Assessment, 14(12), 1-7.
Calcaterra, A., Antonietti, A., & Underwood, J. (2005). Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 441-457.
Chang, Y.J., & Huang, H.T. (2015). Exploring TED Talks as a Pedagogical Resource for Oral Presentations: A Corpus-Based Move. Analysis. English Teaching & Learning, 39(4), 29-62.
Chapelle, C., & Green, P. (1992). Field independence/dependence in second-language acquisition research. Language learning, 42(1), 47-83.
Chen, C. M., Tan, C. C., & Lo, B. J. (2016). Facilitating English language learners’ oral reading fluency with digital pen technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1),96–118.
Cheng, A., Yang, L., & Andersen, E. (2017). Teaching language and culture with a virtual reality game. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Cheng, Y., & Wang, S.H. (2011). Applying a 3D virtual learning environment to facilitate student’s application ability–The case of marketing. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 576-584.
Chow, B., Chui, B., Lai, M. & Kwok, S. (2017). Differential influences of parental home literacy practices and anxiety in English as a foreign language on Chinese children's English development, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20 (6),625-637.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 19-36.
Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368-392.
Diseth, A., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195-207.
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. The handbook of second language acquisition, 589-639.
Ehrman, M., & Leaver, B. L. (2003). Cognitive styles in the service of language learning1. System, 31(3), 393-415.
El Masry, T., Saad, M., & Rashid, M. (2018). On the Cultivation of Their Community of Practice: A Case Study of EFL Malaysian Pre-Service Teachers. The Qualitative Report, 23(4), 952-977.
Ford, N. (2000). Cognitive styles and virtual environments. Journal of the American Society for information science, 51(6), 543-557.
Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A Literature Review on Immersive Virtual Reality in Education: State Of The Art and Perspectives. eLearning & Software for Education (1) 165-170.
Gavgani, A. M., Walker, F. R., Hodgson, D. M., & Nalivaiko, E. (2018). A comparative study of cybersickness during exposure to virtual reality and" classic" motion sickness: are they different? Journal of Applied Physiology. 125 (6), 1670-1680.
Gee, J. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of adolescent & adult Literacy, 44(8), 714-725.
Gee, J. P. (2012). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
Geng, J., Jong, M. S.-y., Luk, E., & Jiang, Y. (2018). Comparative Study on the Pedagogical Use of Interactive Spherical Video-Based Virtual Reality: The EduVenture-VR Experience. Paper presented at the 2018 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), Osaka, Japan.
Gogolin, I. (2002). Linguistic and cultural diversity in Europe: A challenge for educational research and practice. European Educational Research Journal, 1(1), 123-138.
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
Hansen, J., & Stansfield, C. (1981). The Relationship of field dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language learning, 31(2), 349-367.
Hardy, D. (2015). Introducing a stamp card system to monitor homework, broaden exposure to English outside of the classroom, and to promote autonomous learning. Journal of Tourism Studies, 75-97.
Heddy, B. C., Sinatra, G. M., Seli, H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & A. Mukhopadhyay, (2017). Making learning meaningful: Facilitating interest development and transfer in at-risk college students. Educational Psychology, 5(37), 565-581.
Helbig, C., Bauer, H.-S., Rink, K., Wulfmeyer, V., Frank, M., & Kolditz, O. (2014). Concept and workflow for 3D visualization of atmospheric data in a virtual reality environment for analytical approaches. Environmental earth sciences, 72(10), 3767-3780.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia. In J. Pearce, & A. Ellis (Eds.), Learning with technology. Parkville. Melbourne, Australia.
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Tam, K.-P., Lai, Y.-H., & Liu, L.-C. (2012). Effects of cognitive style on digital jigsaw puzzle performance: A GridWare analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 920-928.
Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 112–126.
Hsiao, I. Y., Lan, Y.-J., Kao, C.-L., & Li, P. (2017). Visualization analytics for second language vocabulary learning in virtual worlds. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 161-175.
Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327-336.
Hu, G., & Liu Y. (2018). Three minute thesis presentations as an academic genre: across-disciplinary study of genre moves. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 16-30.
Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182.
Huang, C. S., Yang, S. J., Chiang, T. H., & Su, A. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL Students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1).
Hung, D. (2001). Design principles for web-based learning: Implications from Vygotskian thought. Educational Technology, 41(3), 33-41.
Hung, I. C., Yang, X. J., Fang, W. C., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). A context-aware video prompt approach to improving students' in-field reflection levels. Computers and Education, 70(1),80-91.
Hwang, G.J., & Chang, H.F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
Hwang, G. J., Hsu, T. C., Lai, C. L., & Hsueh, C. J. (2017). Interaction of problem-based gaming and learning anxiety in language students' English listening performance and progressive behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 106, 26-42.
Hwang, G.J., & Wang, S.Y. (2016). Single loop or double loop learning: English vocabulary learning performance and behavior of students in situated computer games with different guiding strategies. Computers & Education, 102, 188-201.
Hwang, G.J., Yang, L.H., & Wang, S.Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, (69), 121-130.
Ince, M., & Akdemir, Ö. (2013). The investigations of using web 2.0 technologies on English writing skills of students with different learning styles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 93-106.
Juklová, K. (2013). How do university students learn: learning styles and approaches in the context of subjective quality of higher education teaching and learning effectiveness. New Educational Review, 33(3), 155-164.
Karia, A. (2013). How to deliver a great TED talk: Presentation secrets of the world’s best speakers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Klein, P. D. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: Alternatives tolearning styles and'multiple intelligences. Journal of curriculum studies, 35(1), 45-81.
Konak, A., Clark, T. K., & Nasereddin, M. (2014). Using Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories. Computers & Education, 72, 11-22.
Kovač, V. B., Lund, I., & Omdal, H. (2017). Learning Environment in Light of Positional, Institutional, and Cultural Interpretations: An Empirically-Based Conceptual Analysis. Educational studies, 53(1), 78-94.
Lan, Y.-J. (2015). Contextual EFL learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 16-31.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press. Cambridge, U.K.
Lee, E. A., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55, 1424–1442.
Leslie, D., & Russell, H. (2006). The importance of foreign language skills in the tourism sector: A comparative study of student perceptions in the UK and continental Europe. Tourism Management, 27(6), 1397-1407.
Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., Fu, Q. K., & Chen, J. F. (2018). A flipped contextual game-based learning approach to enhancing efl students’ english business writing performance and reflective behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 117-131.
Lin, C. H., & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (1996). Effects of linking structure and cognitive style on students' performance and attitude in a computer-based hypertext environment. Journal of educational computing research, 15(4), 317-329.
Lin, T. J., & Lan, Y. J. (2015). Language learning in virtual reality environments: past, present, and future. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4).
Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174-187.
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C.E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., González-Marrero, A., (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.;13(2),469-86.
Mayo, M. d. P. G., & Pica, T. (2000). Interaction among proficient learners: Are input, feedback and output needs addressed in a foreign language context? Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 272-279.
Moeller, A. K., & Catalano, T. (2015). Foreign language teaching and learning. International. Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, (9), 327–33
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40.
Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113.
Nomura, K., & Yuan, R. (2018). Long-term motivations for L2 learning: a biographical study from a situated learning perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1-15.
Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., Nakata, Y., Parker, P., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Motivating young language learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 140-150.
Ogata, H. and Yano, Y., (2004). Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning. The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education,. Proceedings., JungLi, Taiwan, 27-34.
Patel, C. (2018). Situated Learning. London: Macat Library.
Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2017). Challenges of second and foreign language education in a globalized world: studies in honor of Krystyna Droździał-Szelest: Springer.
Poulson, L. (2001). Paradigm lost? Subject knowledge, primary teachers and education policy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 49(1), 40-55.
Raptis, G. E., Fidas, C., & Avouris, N. (2018). Effects of mixed-reality on players’ behaviour and immersion in a cultural tourism game: A cognitive processing perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 114, 69-79.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
Reisoğlu, I., Topu, B., Yılmaz, R., Yılmaz, T. K., & Göktaş, Y. (2017). 3D virtual learning environments in education: a meta-review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(1), 81-100.
Richardson, S. (2008). Undergraduate tourism and hospitality students attitudes toward a career in the industry: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 8(1), 23-46.
Scott, T., & Pohl, A. (2010). Highly Recommended 2. Intermediate. Oxford University Press.UK.
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.-Y., & Huang, Y.-M. (2017). Review of research on mobile language learning in authentic environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), 284-303.
Skehan, P. (2014). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning: Routledge.
Stupar-Rutenfrans, S., Ketelaars, L. E., & van Gisbergen, M. S. (2017). Beat the Fear of Public Speaking: Mobile 360° Video Virtual Reality Exposure Training in Home Environment Reduces Public Speaking Anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(10), 624-633.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sung, W.T., & Ou, S.C. (2002). Web based learning in the computer-aided design curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 175-187.
Taguchi, N. (2016). Contexts and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities of the study abroad research. Language Teaching, 1-14.
Tardy, C. M. (2011). Genre analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 54-68).London, UK: Continuum.
Tinajero, C., & Páramo, M. F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: A re-examination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 199-212.
Wang, H. Y., Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). Integrating socio-cultural contexts and location-based systems for ubiquitous language learning in museums: A state of the art review of 2009–2014. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 653-671.
Willing, K., & Nunan, D. (1993). Learning styles in adult migrant education: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of educational research, 47(1), 1-64.
Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., Karp, S.A., (1971). Group Embedded Figures Test. Technical Report. Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto CA, USA.
Wong, L. H., Chai, C. S., Aw, G. P., & King, R. B. (2015). Enculturating seamless language learning through artifact creation and social interaction process. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 130-157.
Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and Speaking English as a Second Language. RELC Journal, 37(3), 308–328.
Wu, V., Yen, L. L., & Marek, M. (2011). Using online EFL interaction to increase confidence, motivation, and ability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 118.
Yang, J. C., Chen, C. H., & Jeng, M. C. (2010). Integrating video-capture virtual reality technology into a physically interactive learning environment for English learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1346-1356.
Zheng, D., & Newgarden, K. (2011). Rethinking language learning: Virtual worlds as a catalyst for change. International Journal of Learning and Media, 3 (2), 13-36.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
1. 行動學習環境偏好對不同背景及經驗之高中師生 行動學習自我效能所扮演的角色
2. 基於認知層級競爭策略的英文詞彙遊戲對學習成效、焦慮及行為之影響
3. 堅毅度及網路自我效能對證券從業人員網路學習態度之影響
4. 環景影像 VR 環境下使用同儕互評對 EFL學生英語口說表現的影響
5. 基於思維導圖的情境式遊戲學習模式在大學觀光英文課程對學生寫作表現、學習感知及行為之影響
6. 情境遊戲式學習模式對學生英語文法之學習表現、學習行為的影響
7. 翻轉教學策略與教學管理平台對英語學習成效、 行為、及感受之影響
8. 運用認知風格探討虛擬實境英語字彙教學學習成效與學習動機
9. 基於協作解題與組間競賽的翻轉活動設計模式對學生自我調節、群體效能、學習參與、互動表現以及學習意圖的影響
10. 探討沉浸式虛擬實境英語對話練習系統對學習動機、口說焦慮、學習行為與學習成效之影響-以五專護理科三年級為例
11. 堅毅度及網路使用自我效能對護理人員網路學習情意與行為之影響
12. 結合同儕互評的數位說故事學習模式對國小學童學習成就、動機、自我效能及批判思考傾向之影響
13. 結合小組領導促進機制的混合式學習模式對學生的高層次思考傾向及線上互動行為模式的影響
14. 社群媒體針對有效健康介入研究之模型設計:健康信念模型的延伸和糖類攝取行為風險之預測研究
15. 基於多層次概念構圖擬題引導策略之無所不在學習模式對學生學習表現及感受之影響