臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來台灣選擇創業的人越來越多，許多創業人才帶著自身專業技術與產品投入創業並設立公司，但公司的營運過程不能僅依靠單一的專業核心技術，而是要透過各專業領域的合作，並掌握外部環境機會的能力，才能在競爭激烈的市場上生存；此外，不論是在產品構想、研發或行銷等階段，新創公司必須積極探索外部資源，並針對其認知所訂定的階段目標採取行動，以達到各階段成果。因此，本研究將透過個案研究的方式，藉由實踐歷程來觀察組織對於外部環境的趨勢如何產生認知再訂定階段目標，以驅動組織審視自身所擁有之能力，將不足的能力以吸收能力與網絡拼湊來補足，並與組織所擁有之核心能力作配適，以達到目標產出。最後再依據研究之結果提出一套「拼湊式吸收之IT Artifact實踐歷程」之研究架構，說明其對於組織取得所需資源之重要性。

本研究探討之對象為台科三維科技，並將其歷程分為四階段，分別為行動化、產品發展、募資與生產，以及平台化；探討其開發過程中如何在各方資源與能力不足的情況下，積極的探索外部環境資源，以拼湊式吸收能力將組織所需資源帶入公司加以吸收，藉此強化組織內部的核心能力，並如期完成產品開發。經由這些階段歷程之分析，本研究提出一套「拼湊式吸收之IT Artifact實踐歷程」之架構，藉以作為其他新創公司於相同情況下發展之參考依據。

In Taiwan, there have been more and more people trying to start a business by themselves recently, and plenty of entrepreneurs establish a new company with professional skills and technical products. However, the operation of a company cannot solely rely on its core technology, startups should cooperate with specialists from other fields and master the opportunity from the external environment if they want to survive in this highly competitive market. In addition, whether in the stage of product conception, development or marketing, startups ought to achieve the goals of each stage by exploring the external resources positively and taking actions which are generated by the perceptions. Therefore, this study conducts case study to explore how the organization formulates the goals of each stage according to the change of external environment; how the organization examines its own capabilities and absorbs the lacking resources by network bricolage, and how the organization achieves the stage goals by well-distributed the core competencies and resources it owned. Finally, summarize and sort out the “The Bricolage Absorption based IT Artifact Enactment” to explain the importance of obtaining organization resource.

The company of this study is Taiwan 3D Tech, and the history of this case is divided into four parts, mobility, product development, crowdfunding and platformization. In this case, it discusses how the company obtains resources by exploring from the external environment. Absorbing the resources by network bricolage to reinforce the core competencies and develop the product as scheduled. Through the analysis of these stages, this study proposes a framework of “The Bricolage Absorption based IT Artifact Enactment” which is able to serve as a reference for other startups to develop under the same circumstances.

摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII

第一章、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究問題與目的 2
1.3 研究範圍與流程 4
1.4 論文架構 6

第二章、文獻探討 7
2.1 實踐歷程（Enactment） 7
2.2 網絡拼湊（Network Bricolage） 9
2.2.1 網絡之定義 9
2.2.2 拼湊之定義 9
2.2.3 網絡拼湊之定義 11
2.3 吸收能力（Absorptive Capacity） 12
2.3.1 吸收能力之定義 12
2.3.2 吸收能力之三大構面 13
2.4 核心能力（Core competencies） 14
2.5 IT Artifact 17
2.5.1 設計科學研究（Design Science Research, DSR） 17
2.5.2 IT Artifact之定義 17
 
第三章、研究方法與架構 19
3.1 研究方法 19
3.1.1 質性研究（Qualitative Research） 20
3.1.2 個案研究法（Case Study） 22
3.2 研究觀察重點 23
3.3 研究架構 24
3.4 研究對象 27
3.5 資料蒐集與分析 28

第四章、個案描述 31
4.1 個案背景描述 31
4.2 個案公司簡介 32
4.2.1 第一階段：行動化 34
4.2.2 第二階段：產品發展 35
4.2.3 第三階段：募資與生產 36
4.2.4 第四階段：平台化 37
4.3 個案分析 39
4.3.1 第一階段：行動化 39
4.3.2 第二階段：產品發展 47
4.3.3 第三階段：募資與生產 52
4.3.4 第四階段：平台化 60
4.3.5 分析總結 65

第五章、研究結論與建議 69
5.1 結論與研究貢獻 69
5.2 研究限制與未來研究方向 72

參考資料 73
中文部分 73
英文部分 73
網站部分 78

中文部分
1.吳思華(1996)。《策略九說》，台北：麥田出版公司。
2.沈介文(2002)。公關人員對專業核心能力認知之研究。新聞學研究，72，119-146。
3.周濟群. (2009). 利用 XBRL 技術設計可剖析的開放式企業報告架構. 會計學報, 1(2), 1-35.
4.林佩璇（2000）。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學主編，質的教育研究方法，頁239-262。
5.胡建波(2018)。供應鏈管理實務(第二版)。台灣﹕崧燁文化事業有限公司。
6.許淑梅(2018)。探討資訊科技賦能供應鏈控制能力之實踐歷程。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北。
7.郭良文、林素干(2001)。質化與量化研究方法之比較分析。資訊傳播與圖書館學，7(4)，頁1-14。
8.郭明德(1998)。質化研究的探討及省思。教育研究，6，153-178頁。
9.陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的硏究。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
10.葉乃嘉(2013)。研究方法的第一本書: 教育、人文與社會科學研究的入門書。台灣：五南圖書出版。
11.葉重新(2001)。教育研究法。臺北：心理出版社。

英文部分
1.Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T., (2003), “Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process”, Research Policy, Vol.32 (2), pp.255-276.
2.Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
 
3.Baker, T. (2007). Resources in play: Bricolage in the Toy Store (y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 694-711.
4.Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS quarterly, 183-194.
5.Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process.Journal of Business Venturing,1(1), 107–117.
6.Boudreau, M-C. and Robey, D. (2005). “Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective”, Organization Science, 16(1), 3-18.
7.Chan, C.M., Hackney, R., Pan, S.L. and Chou, T.C. (2011). “Managing e-Government system implementation: A resource enactment perspective”, European journal of information systems, 20(5), 529-541.
8.Cleven, A., Gubler, P., & Hüner, K. M. (2009). Design alternatives for the evaluation of design science research artifacts. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (p. 19). ACM.
9.Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
10.Collis, D. J. (1991). A resource‐based analysis of global competition: the case of the bearings industry. Strategic management journal, 12(S1), 49-68.
11.Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S., & Sun, J. (2006). Business research methods (Vol. 9). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
12.Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.
13.Cunha, M. P. (2005). Bricolage in organization ‘ FUENL Working Paper Series, No 474, Uninversidad Nova de Lisboam, Faculdada de Economia.
14.Danneels, E. (2003). “Tight–loose coupling with customers: The enactment of customer orientation”, Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 559-576.
15.De Leo, F (1994) Understanding the roots of your competitive advantage. From product/market competition to competition as a multiple-layer game. In: Hamel, G, Heene, A (eds) Competence-Based Competition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 35–55.
16.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
17.Fahey,L. (1999).Competitors: Outwitting, Outmaneuvering, and Outperforming. New York:John Wiley and Sons.
18.Fountain, J. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
19.Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS quarterly, 37(2).
20.Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1995). On some failures of nerve in constructivist and feminist analyses of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 20(3), 286-310.
21.Gulati, R., Casto, C., & Krontiris, C. (2014). How the other Fukushima plant survived. Harvard Business Review, 92(7/8), 111-115.
22.Hammersley, M. (1989). The dilemma of qualitative method: Hebert Blumer and the Chicago tradition. New York: Routledge.
23.Hart, S. L., & London, T. (2005). Developing native capability.Stanford Social InnovationReview,3(2), 28–33.
24.Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A criticalreview.Journal of Business Venturing,18(2), 165–187.
25.Holtz-Eakin, D., Joulfaian,D. and Rosen, H. S.(1994). Sticking it out: Entrepreneurial Decisions and Liquidity Constraints.Journal of Political Economy, 102:52-75.
26.Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?. Academy of management journal, 48(6), 999-1015.
27.Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization science, 9(4), 506-521.
28.Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic management journal, 19(5), 461-477.
29.Lanzara, G. F.,1999, Between transient con-structs and persistent struc-tures: Designing systems in action.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8: 331–349.
30.Lee, A. S., Thomas, M., & Baskerville, R. L. (2015). Going back to basics in design science: from the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact. Information Systems Journal, 25(1), 5-21.
31.Leonard‐Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125.
32.Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellspring of knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
33.Leonard-Barton, D. (1998). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Paperback ed. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
34.Lévi-Strauss, C.(1966).The Savage Mind.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 15(4), 251-266.
36.March, S. T., & Storey, V. C. (2008). Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS quarterly, 725-730.
37.Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information systems, 9(10), 5.
38.McKague, K., & Oliver, C. (2016). Network bricolage as the reconciliation of indigenous and transplanted institutions in Africa. Africa Journal of Management, 2(3), 300-329.
39.Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(2), 241-242.
40.Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information systems research, 12(2), 121-134.
41.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
42.Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3), 45-77.
43.Pennings, J. M., & Harianto, F. (1992). The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1), 29-46.
44.Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 1st, New York: Wiley.
45.Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation.
46.Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2010). Global village vs. small town: Understanding networks at the Base of the Pyramid. International Business Review, 19(2), 126-139.
47.Rindova, V. P., Becerra, M., & Contardo, I. (2004). Enacting competitive wars: Competitive activity, language games, and market consequences. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 670-686.
48.Saetre, A. S., Soernes, J. O., Browning, L. D., & Stephens, K. K. (2003). Organizational members’ enactment of organizational environments and media use: A study of ICT practices in Norway and the United States. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference Informing Science and Information Technology Education, Pori, Finland, June.
49.Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration, New York: Harper & Row.
50.Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. MIT press.
51.Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1990),Basics of qualitative research : grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, Calif. : Sage Publications.
52.Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 27-43.
53.Thompson, C. B., & Walker, B. L. (1998). Basics of research (part 12): qualitative research. Air medical journal, 17(2), 65-70.
54.Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (1990). Toward a theory of the deep structure of information systems. In ICIS (p. 3).
55.Weber, R. (1987). Toward a theory of artifacts: a paradigmatic base for information systems research. Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 3-19.
56.Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (Topics in social psychology series). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Humanities.
57.Weick, K.E. (1988). “Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations”, Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305-317.
58.Weick, K.E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford: Blackwell.
59.Wrigley, L. (1970). Divisional Autonomy and Diversification", Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Business School.
60.Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation practice, 15(3), 283-290.
61.Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 219.
62.Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203.

網站部分
1.台科三維科技官網：http://myt3d.com/
2.台科三維科技Kickstarter募資網頁：https://reurl.cc/NAk59
3.台科三維科技Facebook粉絲專業：https://reurl.cc/9GjdY
4.OLO Kickstarter募資網頁：https://reurl.cc/Er3q0
5.OLO Facebook粉絲專業：https://reurl.cc/e3e0K