臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

都市更新為就特定地區的經濟、社會、環境條件進行廣泛與持續性改善，都市更新的立論基礎繁多，以都市更新觀念、政策及名稱於各個時代有不同的概念轉變，例如:都市重建、都市復甦、都市復興、永續都市等等。
台灣雖有都市更新條例，然更新速度緩慢，且台灣大多數老舊建築物於防災、抗震等處能力不足，可見都更有龐大的潛在需求，並具有迫切性。人民對居住安全以及居住品質意識日漸抬頭，開始重視目前危險及老舊建築的改善。
2017年5月都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建條例通過後，對危險及老舊建築的改建帶來新契機，然而施行至今危老重建核准個案仍少。而我國老年人口比例在1993年超過7%，進入高齡化社會，而於2018年3月達14.05%，邁入高齡社會。預計在2026年，我國老年人口將超過20%，進入超高齡社會。加上近年來物聯網裝置的普及度皆快速成長，未來將結合智能務業管理建築，以公益導入危老重建概念，建構樂齡長照的友善社區，並同時獲取期望利潤甚為重要。
本論文的概念探討主軸，透過實務組織運作執行，整合危老重建共創樂齡住宅社區，是以公益為前提的FD公司核心價值，進而架構CORPS新思維。

Urban regeneration aims at extensive integration of economic and material conditions as well as social and environmental conditions in specific area for continuous improvement. There are different theoretical bases for urban regeneration. Different names and conceptual changes for the conception, policy and name of urban regeneration in all eras could be urban rebuilding, urban recovery, urban renaissance and sustainable city, etc. Although Statute for Renewal of Urban Planning exists in Taiwan, renewal rate is so inefficiency; meanwhile, most of old buildings in Taiwan lack anti-catastrophic and anti-seismic capacity. It can be seen that huge potential demand and urgency for urban regeneration holds great significance for people’s living safety, living quality, urban competitiveness and industry economic development. Start to pay attention to the improvement of current unsafe and old buildings.
Statute for Expediting Reconstruction of Urban Unsafe and Old Buildings passed on May, 2017 may even bring new opportunity for unsafe and old buildings. The problem is that the approval of cases is still too little so far. The proportion of elderly population in Taiwan in 1993, more than 7%, entered the aging society, and in March 2018 amounted to 14.05%, entered the aging society. Expected in 2026, Taiwan's elderly population will exceed 20%, into the super-aging society. In recent years, the popularity of the Internet of Things devices are rapidly growing. In the future, if we can combine 5G with Reconstruction Mechanism of Unsafe and Old Buildings of Welfare Smart Building, construction senior friendly community in long-term care, and at the same time get the expected profit is important. This paper is implemented through the operation of practical organizations, integrating the reconstruction of the elderly and creating a community of senior citizens. The core value of the old-age reconstruction team based on the public welfare, and then the new thinking of CORPS.

中文摘要: i
英文摘要: ii
目次 iii
表次 v
圖次 vi
第一章 研究背景與動機 1
第一節 背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與架構 2
第三節 研究流程 2
第二章 整合服務架構 4
第一節 奠基於CORPS的危老重建公司架構 4
第二節 危老重建導入樂齡長照概念 7
第三節 友善社區服務 10
第四節 物業管理服務 14
第五節 危老重建 19
第三章 規劃執行模式 34
第一節 公益信託都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建基金 34
第二節 危老重建服務團隊 38
第三節 智能物業管理 44
第四節 友善社區 46
第五節 對利害關係人的優劣點 49
第四章 當前執行問題與展望 50
第一節 法規限制與時間壓力 50
第二節 土地持分共有問題 50
第三節 產權不明持有人過多 51
第四節 委建與合建利益拉鋸 51
第五節 公益信託基金與危老重建公司未來展望 53
第五章 問題檢討改進 54
第一節 多元都市更新模式 54
第二節 價購國有房地 54
第三節 地籍清理團隊導入 55
第四節 公益信託核心 56
參考文獻 57
附件 法規資訊 61
都市危險及老舊都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建條例 61

表次
表 2- 1 房屋稅籍住宅類數量依屋齡區分說明表（臺北市） 20
表 2- 2 房屋稅籍住宅類數量依屋齡區分說明表（新北市） 20
表 2- 3 都市更新條例與危老重建條例差異表 28
表 3- 1 危老重建公司組織一覽表 39
表 3- 2 利害關係人優劣表 49

圖次
圖 1- 1 研究流程圖 2
圖 2- 1 CORPS 模式基本運作程序 4
圖 2- 2 危老重建公司架構流程圖 6
圖 2- 3 核心概念圖-1 7
圖 2- 4 核心概念圖-2 10
圖 2- 5 核心概念圖-3 14
圖 2- 6 核心概念圖-4 19
圖 2- 7 危老條例示意圖 26
圖 2- 8 智慧建築示意圖 31
圖 3- 1 執行流程圖 34
圖 3- 2 工程管理流程圖 41
圖 3- 3 信託管理流程圖 44
圖 3- 4 活力中心示意圖 47
圖 3- 5 共享餐廳示意圖 47
圖 3- 6 友善美髮示意圖 48
圖 4- 1 危老、都更合建比較圖 52

中文部分
1.內政部不動產資訊平臺，2018，〈住宅統計-統計資訊主題查詢-鄉鎮市區查詢，房屋稅籍住宅類數量依屋齡區分〉，http://pip.moi.gov.tw/V2/E/SCRE0402.aspx，2018/02/26。
2.中華電信智慧建築辦公室，2007，〈中華電信與智慧大樓〉，中華電信（股）公司。
3.司徒達賢，1999，《非營利組織的經營管理》，台北：天下文化。
4.吳詩賢，2014，〈應用模糊層級分析法建構住宿類智慧綠建築評估指標體系的研究〉，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所碩士論文，未出版。
5.姜廷宜，2015，〈推動都市更新事業與創新價值〉，「第19屆國土規劃論壇。-都更及危老重建的機會與挑戰」，成功大學，台南市。
6.國家發展委員會，2016，〈中華民國人口推估（105至150年）〉。
7.溫琇玲，2009，〈台灣智慧化居住空間發展願景〉，《電機月刊》，第219 期，頁76-81。
8.溫琇玲，2009，〈建築智慧化的規劃設計與導入機制〉，《電機月刊》，第 219期，頁101-112。
9.衛生福利部，2016，〈長期照顧十年計畫2.0（106~115年）〉。
10.蕭文雄、黃世孟、郭斯傑、王順治，2007，〈台灣當前建築使用階段的修繕法律課題研究-以探討公寓大廈修繕行為與建築法的關係為主軸〉，《建築學報》，第60期，頁153-176。

英文部分
1.Dawn, A., Phoebe,L., Jon,P., Tridib, B., and Choi, I. H., 2007, “Creating Elder-Friendly Communities: Preparations for an Aging Society.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49(1): 1-18.
2.Evashwick, C., 2005, The continuum of long-term care. Cengage Learning.
3.Feldman, P. H., and Oberlink, M. R., 2003, “The AdvantAge Initiative: Developing community indicators to promote the health and well-being of older people.” Family & Community Health, 26(4): 268-274.
4.Gilbert, K. M. L., 2009, Aging in place in suburbia: A qualitative study of older women. Unpulished doctoral dissertation, Antioch New England Graduate School,New Hampshire.
5.Gori, C., and Fernandez, J. L., 2016, Long-term care reforms in OECD countries. Policy Press.
6.Griffith, J. R., 1996,“Managing the transition to integrated health care organizations.” Frontiers of Health Services Management, 12(4): 4-50, 67-58.
7.Hadianfard M.A., M. Wassegh, M, and Soltani Mohammadi., 2012, “Linear and nonlinear analysis of progressive collapse for seismic designed steel moment frames.” 14th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Moscow, Russia, June 27~29.
8.Hanson, D. and Emlet, C.A., 2006, “Assessing a Community's Elder Friendliness A Case Example of The AdvantAge Initiative.” Family and Community Heatth.29(4): 266-278.
9.Hoatson, L., and Grace, M., 2002, “Public housing redevelopment: Opportunity for community regeneration? ” Urban Policy and Research, 20(4): 429-441.
10.Intille, S., Larson, K., Tapia, E., Beaudin, J., Kaushik, P., Nawyn, J., and Rockinson, R., 2006, “Using a live-in laboratory for ubiquitous computing research.” Pervasive Computing, pp.349-365.
11.Khandelwal, K., El-Tawil, S., Kunnath, S. K., and Lew, H. S., 2008, “Macromodel-Based Simulation of Progressive Collapse: Steel Frame Structures”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(7): 1070-1078.
12.Kidd, C., Orr, R., Abowd, G., Atkeson, C., Essa, I., MacIntyre, B. and Newstetter, W., 1999, “The aware home: A living laboratory for ubiquitous computing research.”, Cooperative buildings. Integrating information, organizations, and architecture, pp.191-198.
13.Kurland, B.F., Gill,T.M., Patrick, D.L. , Larson, E.B., and Phelan, E. A. , 2006, “.Longitudinal Change in Positive Affect in Community-Dwelling Older Persons.”, The American Geriatrics Society, 54(12):1846–1853.
14.Larson, K., and Stephen, I., 2005, MIT Open Source Building Alliance-A house_n initiative, Position Paper.
15.Livingston, E., Sasani, M., Bazan, M., and Sagiroglu, S., 2014, “Progressive collapse resistances of RC beams”, Engineering Structures, 95: 61-70.
16.Lloyd, J., and Wait, S., 2005, Integrated care: A guide for policymakers. WHO Consultant on Ageing and Life Course.
17.Morissette, T. M., 2009, “Elder friend lines and social participation of older adults living with in age-segregated retirement communities”, Unpublished Master dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
18.Murakami, K., Hasegawa, T., Kurazume, R., and Kimuro, Y., 2008, “A structures environment with sensor networks for intelligent robots.” In Sensors, 2008 IEEE, pp. 705-708.
19.Rosen, R., Mountford, J., Lewis, G., Lewis, R., Shand, J., and Shaw, S., 2011, Integration in action: Four international case studies. London: The Nuffield Trust.
20.Sakamura, K., 2005, Intelligent house in the age of ubiquitous computing. A House of Sustainability: PAPI,A+ U, 56-65.
21.Sato, T., Harada, T., and Mori T., 2004, “Environment-type robot system” RoboticRoom” featured by behavior media, behavior contents, and behavior adaptation.” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 9(3):529-534.
22.Scharlach,A.E., 2009, “Frameworks for Fostering Aging-Friendly Com-munity Change.” Generations, 33(2):71-73.
23.Sugiyamaô, T. and Thompson C.W., 2007, “Outdoor environments, activity and the well-being of older people: conceptualizing environmental support.” Environment and Planning, 39:1943-1960.
24.The AdvantAge Initiative, 2012, Creating an Age-Friendly NYCOne Neighborhood
at a Time. Retrieved from
http://www.vnsny.org/advantage/survey.html#back
25.The Buncombe County Board of Commissioners, 2008, Buncom-ecounty aging plan
2008-2012, Retrieved from
http://www.Buncombecounty.org/GOVERNING/commissioners/ArchivedAgenda/20080408/web_PDF/BuncombeCountyAgingPlanwrittenreport.pdf
26.Waseda University, 2017, Wabount House. Retrieved December 30, 2017, from http://www.wabot-house.waseda.ac.jp/html/
27.World Health Organization, 2002, Lessons for long-term care policy.
28.World Health Organization, 2007, Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide –World
Health Organization. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/ageing/AFCGuide_Chinese.pdf.