臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以個案分析方式，以共演化觀點探討機車零組件企業S公司如何面對產業環境變化進而提升產業競爭優勢。個案公司創業初期原先從事手工具製造，演化進入機車零組件製造產業，本研究發現企業要獲得可持續性競爭優勢，必須不斷培育和投資具有因果模糊性的企業獨有資源能力，如此既能夠不斷提高外部競爭者的模仿障礙，同時還能保持企業競爭優勢的可持續性。
另外，吸收能力與創新能力間具顯著之正向關係，吸收能力在企業的創新能力發展中，扮演非常重要的角色。知識存量和流量管理的綜合能力是構建企業競爭優勢的戰略性資源能力，為了適應變動複雜的市場環境，企業需要動態地調整它在市場中的位置，選擇合適的競爭戰略，並不斷地調整知識管理戰略、構築知識管理基礎設施和不同側重點的知識管理流程。
面對全球化環境的快速變遷，企業管理者必須注意外部環境變化所帶來的機會和威脅，更需重視與創造企業內部擁有的獨特資源優勢，以形成自己獨特的核心競爭能力。

關鍵詞：共演化、競爭優勢、因果模糊性、吸收能力

This study explores how the locomotive component company S can face the changes in the industrial environment and enhance the competitive advantage of the industry by means of case analysis. The case company was originally engaged in the manufacture of hand tools and evolved into the locomotive component manufacturing industry. This study found that in order to obtain sustainable competitive advantages, enterprises must continuously cultivate and invest in the unique resource capabilities of companies with causal ambiguity. Improve the imitation barriers of external competitors while maintaining the sustainability of the company's competitive advantage. In addition, there is a significant positive relationship between absorptive capacity and innovation capability. Absorptive capacity plays a very important role in the development of innovation capability of enterprises.

The comprehensive ability of knowledge stock and traffic management is a strategic resource capability to build competitive advantage. In order to adapt to the changing market environment, enterprises need to dynamically adjust their position in the market, choose the appropriate competitive strategy, and constantly adjust knowledge. Management strategy, building knowledge management infrastructure and different focused knowledge management processes.

To face the global environment to change dramatically business managers must pay attention to the opportunities and threats brought about by changes in the external environment, and more need to pay attention to and create unique resource advantages within the enterprise to form their own unique core competitiveness.

Keywords: Coevolutionary、Competitive advantage、Causal ambiguity、Absorptive capacity

目 次
頁次
中文論文摘要 I
英文論文摘要 II
目 次 III
表 次 IV
圖 次 V
第一章 緒 論 1
第一節、研究背景 1
第二節、研究動機 2
第三節、研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節、共演化的程序 4
第二節、共演化的動力和能力 11
第三節、競爭優勢 15
第三章 產業環境分析 17
第一節、機車整車與零組件產業範疇 17
第二節、全球機車產業發展現況與趨勢分析 18
第三節、台灣機車產業發展現況與趨勢分析 20
第四章 個案公司分析 30
第一節、個案公司介紹 30
第二節、經營情況分析 32
第五章 研究發現與命題 44
第一節、公司發展過程與共演化 44
第二節、研究發現與命題 47
第三節、研究結論與管理意涵 53
第四節、研究限制與未來研究方向 55
參考文獻 56

1.Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., Holm, U., 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal 23, 979–996.
2.Barney, J.B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99–120.
3.Barney, J.B., 2001. Is the resource-based dviewT a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review 26 (1), 41–56.
4.Bartholomew, S., 1997. National systems of biotechnology innovation: complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies 28, 241–266.
5.Bartlett, C.A., Ghoshal, S., 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
6.Bartlett, C.A., Ghoshal, S., 1993. Beyond the M-form: toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 14, 23–46 (Winter Special Issue).
7.Baum, J.A.C., 1999. Whole-part coevolutionary competition in organizations. In: Baum, J.A.C., McKelvey, B. (Eds.), Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Danald T. Campbell. Sage, London.
8.Baum, J.C., Singh, J.V., 1994. Organizational hierarchies and evolutionary processes: some reflections on a theory of organizational evolution. In: Baum, J.A.C., Singh, J.V. (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–20.
9.Baum, J.A.C., McKelvey, B., 1999. Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell. Sage Publications, CA, USA.
10.Birkinshaw, J., 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal 18 (3), 207–229 (March).
11.Birkinshaw, J., 2000. Entrepreneurship in the Global Firm. Sage, Thousand Oaks,CA.
12.
Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review 23 (4), 773–795.

13.Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., 2000. Characteristics of foreign subsidiaries in industry clusters. Journal of International Business Studies 31, 141–154.

14.Bourgeois, L.J., 1984. Strategic management and determinism. Academy of Management Review 9, 586–597.
15.Buckley, P.J., Casson, M., 1976. The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. Holmes & Meier Publishers, New York.
16.Burgelman, R.A., 1994. Fading memories: a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (1), 24–36.

17.Child, J., 1972. Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology 6,2–22.
18.
Clark, K.B., Fujimoto, T., 1991. Product Developement Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Harvard Business School Press Books, MA, USA.

19.Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1–25.
20.
Cyert, R.M., March, J.G., 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

21.Doz, Y., Santos, J., Williamson, P., 2001. From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
22.
Dunning, J.H., 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19 (1), 1–31 (Spring).
23.
Galunic, D.C., Eisenhardt, K.M., 1996. The evolution of intracorporate domains: divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organization Science 7, 255–282.
24.
Galunic, D.C., Eisenhardt, K.M., 2001. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal 44, 1229–1249.

25.Galunic, D.C., Weeks, J., 2002. Intraorganizational ecology. In: Baum, J.C. (Ed.), Blackwell’s Companion to Organizations. Blackwell, London.
26.
Gupta, A., Govindarajan, V., 2000. Knowledge flows within the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal 21, 473–496.
27.
Hamel, G., Prahalad, C.K., 1985. Do you really have a global strategy? Harvard Business view 63 (4), 139–148.
28.Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J., 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82, 929 – 964.
29.Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J.H., 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49, 149 – 164.

30.Knickerbocker, F., 1973. Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31.Kogut, B., 1985. Designing global strategies: profiting from operational flexibility. Sloan Management Review 27, 27–38.
32.
Kogut, B., Zander, U., 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24 (4), 625–646.

33.Kostova, T., 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review 24 (2), 308–324.
34.Lane, P., Lubatkin, M., 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 19, 461–477.
35.Lewin, A.Y., Volberda, H.W., 1999. Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science 10 (5), 519–531.
36.Lippman, S.A., Rumelt, R., 1982. Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics 13 (2).
37.Lord, M.D., Ranft, A.L., 2000. Organizational learning about new international markets: exploring the internal transfer of local market knowledge. Journal of International Business Studies 31 (4), 573–589 (4th Quarter).
38.Madhok, A., 1996. The organization of economic activity: transaction costs, firm capabilities and the nature of governance. Organization Science 7, 577–590.
39.Madhok, A., 1997. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal 18, 39–61.
40.March, J.G., 1994. The evolution of evolution. In: Baum, J.C., Singh, J.V. (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 39–49.
41.McKelvey, B., 1997. Quasi-natural organization science. Organization Science 8 (4), 352–380.

42.Miner, A.S., 1994. Seeking adaptive advantage: evolutionary theory and managerial action. In: Baum, J., Singh, J.V. (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 76–89.
43.
Mosakowski, E., 1997. Strategy making under causal ambiguity: conceptual issues and empirical evidence. Organization Science 8, 414–442.

44.Mudambi, R., 2002. Knowledge management in multinational firms. Journal of International Management 8, 1–9.
45.Porter, M.E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York.

46.Prahalad, C.K., Doz, Y.L., 1987. The multinational mission: balancing local demands and global vision.

47.Priem, R.L., Butler, J.E., 2001a. Is the resource-based dviewT a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review 26 (1), 22–40.

48.Priem, R.L., Butler, J.E., 2001b. Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: further comments. Academy of Management Review 26 (1), 57–66.

49.Reed, R., DeFillippi, R.J., 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 15 (1), 88–102 (January).
50.
Rugman, A., Verbeke, A., 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal 22 (3), 237–250.

51.Schulz, M., 2001. The uncertain relevance of newness: organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal 44, 661–681.

52.Szulanski, G., 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 27–43 (Special Issue).

53.Winter, S.G., 1988. On case, competence, and the corporation. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 4 (1), 163–180 (Spring).

54.Zaheer, S., 2002. A big tent on an island-building bridges and communities in international management research. Advances in International Management, vol. 14, pp. 69–81.

55.Zaheer, S., Westney, E., 2001. The multinational enterprise as an institution. In: Rugman, A., Brewer, T. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Business. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 349–379.

56.Zahra, S., George, G., 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27, 185–203.
57.經濟部2018汽機車產業年鑑 工研院IEK（2018/05）