臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

The racing pigeons are a kind of racing sport through pigeons. A group of players who are hidden in the streets of Taiwan and who live in the top floor of the pigeon loft, and the annual prizes of up to 100 million yen, make all the pigeons Crazy, trying to compete for the winners and high prizes of the champions, but this special sport is not currently in the category of competitive sports and leisure sports. This article aims to explore the study pigeon sport development of the choroid and its Bo Yi thing business development relationship two persons and facilitate governance theory in organizational governance take the path, to discuss the complex relationship between the relationship benefit victims after back those purposes.
According to the above-mentioned purpose, this study, we collect and sort through the documents, understand the evolution of racing pigeons sport development, and governance theory in organizational governance, through seven important elements of organizational governance, governance observe the status of pigeon sport and behind Relationship interests. By means of depth interviews with law, to obtain a race pigeons motion made relevant empirical owned materials exhibition choroid and game industry to understand race pigeon’s motion development of the choroid, and spy on its dorsal relationship benefit victims of human interaction process.

Keywords: Governance, Taiwanese Pigeon Gambling, Gambling Activities.

Abstract....................................................i
Chapter 1 Introduction......................................1
1.1 Research Background......................................1
1.2 Research Motive..........................................2
1.3 Research Target............................................7
1.4 Range of Research..........................................15
Chapter 2 Literature Review....................................16
2.1 Taiwanese Racing Pigeon Behavior Current Conditions...........16
2.2 Racing Pigeon Development.....................................18
2.3 The Racing Pigeon Rolls......................................20
2.4 The Racing Pigeons Clamping’s..................................23
Chapter 3 Study Tool and Analyze Frame Structure.........................25
3.1 Study Tool............................................................25
3.2 The Search Configures..........................................27
3.3 Research Object.......................................................28
3.4 The Quasi Structure Interviews......................................29
Chapter 4 Study Result..............................................30
4.1 The Racing Pigeons Kinetic Structure Analyses...............................30
4.1.1 The racing pigeon’s mobile rolls...........................................30
4.1.2 Wad..................................................................37
4.1.3 Cultivate..................................................................38
4.1.4 Train..........................................................40
4.1.5 Gamble...........................................................42
4.2 The Foreign and Taiwanese Bones Scheme Confronts...................................43
4.2.1 The platform faces the bonus scheme........................................43
4.2.2 The platform faced the colorful gold system................................44
4.2.3 The colorful gold shares.....................................................46
4.3 The Racing Pigeon Mobile Manages Analyze.......................................49
4.3.1 Party in the interest of racing pigeon campaign.............................49
4.3.2 Summarize briefly..............................................................51
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Discussion...............................................52
5.1 Conclusion.......................................................................52
5.2 Discussion..........................................................................56
References...............................................................................60

1.Anderson, Cameron and Robb Willer. 2014. “Do Status Hierarchies Benefit Groups? a Bounded Functionalist Account.” Pp. 44-70, in The Psychology of Social Status, edited by Joey T. Cheng, Jessica L. Tracy and Cameron Anderson. New York: Springer.
2.Anderson, Cameron, Sanjay Srivastava, Jennifer S. Beer, Sandra E. Spataro, and Jennifer A. Chatman . 2006. “Knowing your Place: Self-Perceptions of Status in Face-to-Face Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(6): 1091-1110.
3.Bandelj, Nina. 2012. “Relational Work and Economic Sociology.” Politics & Society 40(2): 175-201.
BBC News. 2013. “World record price paid for Belgian racing pigeon Bolt.” BBC News, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22613247 (Date visited: April 25, 2017).
4.Bloch, Herbert A. 1951. “The Sociology of Gambling.” American Journal of Sociology 57(3): 215-221.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. “Social Space and Symbolic Power.” Sociological Theory 7(1): 14-25.
5.Bourdieu, Pierre. 2011[1986]. “The Form of Capital.” Pp. 81-93 in Cultural Theory: An Anthropology, edited by Imre Szemen and Timothy Kaposy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
6.Bourdieu, Pierre. Richard Nice trans. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
7.Caillois, Roger. 1961. Man, Play, and Games. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
8.Cassidy, Rebecca. 2014. “‘A Place for Men to Come and Do Their Thing’: Constructing Masculinities in Betting Shops in London.” British Journal of Sociology 65(1): 170-91.
9.Cha, Youngjoo and Sarah Thebaud. 2009. “How Economic Context Shapes Men’s Gender Ideology.” Gender & Society 23(2): 215-243.
10.Connell, Raewyn. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11.Connell, Raewyn. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.Cook, Clarissa. 1997. “The Transformation of Trust?: Exploring the Utility of ‘Trust' as a Scientific Social Concept." Annual Review of Health Social Science 7(1): 1-10.
13.D’Agati, Marina. 2014. “‘I Feel Like I’m Going to Win’: Superstition in Gambling.” Qualitative Sociology Review 10(2): 80-101.
14.Eadington, Williams R. 2003. “Measuring Costs from Permitted Gaming: Concepts and Categories in Evaluating Gambling’s Consequences.” Journal of Gambling Studies 19(2): 185-213.
15.England, Paula and Nancy Folbre. 2005. “Gender and Economic Sociology.” Pp. 627-649 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology (2nd), edited by Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
16.Fligstein, Neil and McAdam Doug. 2012. A Theory of Field. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.Fligstein, Neil. 2002. “Agreements, Disagreements, and Opportunities in the ‘New Sociology of Markets.’” Pp. 61-78 in The New Economic Sociology: Development in an Emerging Field, edited by Mauro Guillén, Randal Collins, Paul England, and Marshall Meyer. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
19.Goodman, Jared S. 2014. “Illegal gambling and cruelty-to-animals in association with Taiwan pigeon races.” PETA, http://e-info.org.tw/files/PETA,%20Gambling%20and%20Cruelty%20to%20Animals%20in%20Association%20with%20Pigeon%20Races.pdf (Date visited: March 19, 2017).
20.Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481-510.
21.Hraba, Joseph and Gang Lee 1996. “Gender, Gambling and Problem Gamblers.” Journal of Gambling Studies 12(1): 83-101.
Jerolmack , Colin. 2013. The Global Pigeon. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22.Jones, Martin. 2007. “Pigeon Racing and Working-class Culture in Britain, 1870-1950.” Cultural and Social History 4(3): 361-83.
23.Ladd, George T. and Nancy Petry. 2002. “Gender Differences Among Pathological Gamblers Seeking Treatment.” Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 10(3): 302-309.
24.Lamont, Michele and Annette Lareau. 1988. “Cultural Capital: Allusions, Gaps and Glissandos in Recent Theoretical Developments.” Sociological Theory 6(2): 153-168.
25.Lewis, J. David and Andrew Weigert. 1985. “Trust as a Social Reality. ” Social Force 63(4): 967-985.
26.Massengill, Rebekah P. and Amy Reynolds. 2010. “Moral Discourse in Economic Contexts.” Pp. 485-501 in Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, edited by Steven Hitlin and Stephen Vaisey. New York: Springer.
27.Milkman, Ruth and Eleanor Townsley. 1994. “Gender and the Economy.” Pp. 600-619 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
29.Potenza, Marc N., Paul K. Maciejewski and Carolyn M. Mazure. 2006. “A Gender-Based Examination of the Correlates of Past-Year Recreational Gambling.” Journal of Gambling Studies 22(1): 41-64.
Puri, Stine Simonsen. 2013. “Betting on People: Bookmaking at Delhi Racecourse.” Pp. 140-155 in Qualitative Research on Gambling: Exploring the Production and Consumption of Risk, edited by Rebecca Cassidy, Andrea Pisac and Claire Loussouarn. Oxford: Routledge.
30.Reith, Gerda. 2002. The Age of Chance: Gambling and Western Culture. London: Routledge.
31.Rosecrance, John. 1988. “Professional Horse Race Gambling: Working Without a Safety Net.” Work and Occupations 15(2): 220-236.
32.Stobbe, Lineke. 2005. “Doing Machismo: Legitimating Speech Acts as a Selection Discourse.” Gender, Work and Organization 12(2): 105-123.
33.Townsend, Nicholas W. 2002. The Package Deal: Marriage, Work, and Fatherhood in Men's Lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
White, Harrison C. 1981. “Where Do Markets Come From?” American Journal of Sociology 87: 514-547.
34.Zelizer, Viviana. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money. New York: BasicBooks.
35.Zelizer, Viviana. 2012. “How I Become a Relational Economic Sociologist and What Does That Mean?” Politics & Society 40(2): 145-174.