(3.235.11.178) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/05 15:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳名莉
研究生(外文):Chen, Ming-Li
論文名稱:閱讀策略APP對學生閱讀能力與認知負荷之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of Reading Strategy APP on Students’ Reading Ability and Cognitive Load
指導教授:黃思華黃思華引用關係
指導教授(外文):Huang, Tzu-Hua
口試日期:2019-07-09
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:臺北市立大學
系所名稱:教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:146
中文關鍵詞:Oxford閱讀理解策略閱讀策略APP閱讀能力認知負荷
外文關鍵詞:Oxford reading comprehension stategyreading strategy APPreading abilitycognitive load
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:217
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:102
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要探討不同性別以及不同學習成就的六年級學生透過以Oxford 閱讀理解策略結合 APP 系統學習後,對於閱讀能力與認知負荷方面之影響。本研究實施時間共 5 週, 161 名學生 (11.8 歲 ~12.8 歲)先後完成了閱讀理解與認知負荷前、後測,系統滿意度量表以及使用閱讀策略 APP 進行學習活動。透過成對樣本 T 檢定與獨立樣本 T 檢定進行統計,並針對學生在 APP 中進行閱讀活動的資料進行分析。研究結果顯示,閱讀策略 APP 有助於提升低分組學生的整體閱讀能力,並且對於降低學生外部認知負荷有顯著差異。不同學習成就的男女生使用閱讀策略 APP 進行學習後,高分組學生在認知負荷方面有顯著差異。
This study focused on the impact of reading ability and cognitive load on sixth-grade students of different genders and abilities through the use of Oxford Reading Comprehension Strategies in conjunction with the APP system. The study was conducted for 5 weeks, and 161 students (11.8 years old to 12.8 years old) completed reading comprehension and cognitive load pre- and post- tests, as well as a system satisfaction scale. Students were also given access to a reading strategies APP. Statistics were performed on paired sample t-tests and independent sample t-tests, and data on students' reading activities in the APP were analyzed. The results of the study show that the reading strategy APP helped to improve the overall reading ability of the lower level students, and there was a significant impact in reducing students' external cognitive load. After the boys and girls of different reading abilities used the reading strategy APP to learn, the higher level group also showed significant differences in cognitive load.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4
第三節 名詞釋義 5
第四節 研究設計 6
第五節 研究範圍與研究限制 7
第二章.文獻探討 9
第一節 閱讀理解的理論與研究 9
第二節 閱讀理解策略 16
第三節 Oxford閱讀理解策略 21
第四節 數位閱讀 23
第三章 研究設計 27
第一節 研究架構 27
第二節 研究對象 29
第三節 研究方法 29
第四節 研究工具 30
第五節 研究流程 44
第六節 研究資料分析 47
第四章 研究結果與討論 49
第一節 閱讀能力成效分析 49
第二節 認知負荷分析 65
第三節 系統滿意程度分析 82
第五章 結論與建議 85
第一節 結論 85
第二節 建議 88
參考文獻 90
一、中文部分 90
二、英文部分 92
附錄一 前、後測文章與試題 99
附錄二 閱讀策略APP文章與試題 113
一、 中文部分
何嘉雯、李芃娟(2003)。交互教學法對國小閱讀理解困難學生教學成效之研究。特殊教育與復健學報,11,101-125。
余淑慧(2013)。「合作策略閱讀法」對國小六年級學童閱讀理解之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所,臺北市。
呂盈芝(2015)。PQRST閱讀策略融入行動載具教學對學生閱讀理解成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學資訊科學系,臺北市。
岳修平(譯)(1998)。教育心理學:學習的認知基礎(原作者E. D. Gagne, C. W. Yekovich, & F. R. Yekovich)。臺北市:遠流。(原著出版年:1993)
幸曼玲(2010)。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。臺北市:教育部。
林于弘(2007)。九年一貫國語課文文體量化統計與分布研究。國立編譯館館刊,35(1),3-14。
柯華葳(2009)。PIRLS2006結果說了甚麼。研習資訊,26 (6),3-9。
柯華葳(總策劃)(2011)。在職教師閱讀增能手冊。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學教育研究與評鑑中心。
柯華葳、詹益綾、丘嘉慧(2013)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養(PIRLS 2011報告)。臺北市:國家教育研究院。
柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅(2008)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養(PIRLS 2006 報告)。桃園市:國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
洪月女(譯)(1998)。談閱讀(原作者K. S. Goodman)。臺北市:心理。(原著出版於1996年)
祝新華(2005)。六層次閱讀能力系統及其在評估與教學領域中的運用。檢索自https://www.wendangxiazai.com/b-433360045a8102d276a22f89.html
張毓仁、柯華葳、邱皓政、歐宗霖、溫福星(2011)。教師閱讀教學行為與學生閱讀態度和閱讀能力自我評價對於閱讀成就之跨層次影響:以 PIRLS 2006 為例。教育科學研究期刊,56(2),1-105。
教育部(2011)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。檢索自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/data/files/class_rules/chinese.pdf
連啟舜(2002)。國內閱讀理解教學研究成效之統合分析研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
陳正治(2008)。國語文教材教法。臺北市:五南。
陳佳宜、楊淑華、黃慧文(2008)。國小中高年級國語文教材事理類說明文學習內涵之探究。課程研究,3 (2),93-116。
陳怡容、謝佩蓉(2011)。學習動機和有效認知負荷對外與學習表現之影響。教育研究與發展期刊,7(4),57-74。
陳欣希、柯雅卿、周育如、陳明蕾(2011)。問好問題。臺北市:小魯。
陳春蓮(2015)。國小高年級線上閱讀理解策略教學之實驗研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學教育學系,臺南市。
陳淑絹(1996)。「指導-合作學習」教學策略增進國小學童閱讀理解能力之實徵研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。
陸怡琮(2011)。摘要策略教學對提升國小五年級學童摘要能力與閱讀理解的成效。教育科學研究期刊,3(56),91-118。
游雅婷、賴筱婷(2015)。應用SQ4R學習策略與合作學習於網路教學系統對學生閱讀理解能力與閱讀動機之影響。教育科技與學習,3 (1),25-44。
黃思華、劉遠楨(2015)。互動式電子教科書對高中原住民專班閱讀理解成效影響之研究。教科書研究,8(2007),107-137。
黃瓊儀(2012)。臺灣近十年閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解策略教學成效之後設分析。東臺灣特殊教育學報,14,243-268。
賴郁璿(2016)。平衡取向多文本閱讀教學對提升國小四年級學生閱讀理解能力之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系,臺北市。
謝進昌、陳敏瑜、李漢岳(2013)。透過多媒介閱讀提昇學習成效之研究—以中學生為研究對象—閱讀研究議題五:不同策略與媒介於閱讀成效之系統性文獻回顧資料庫建置。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
藍慧君(1991)。學習障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀不同結構文章之閱讀理解與理解策略的比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所,臺北市。

二、 英文部分
Afsharrad, M., & Sadeghi Benis, A. R. (2017). Differences between monolinguals and bilinguals/males and females in English reading comprehension and reading strategy use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(1). 34-51. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1037238
Alexanderh, J. E., & Heathington, B. S. (1988). Assessing and correcting for classroom reading problems. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Başar, M., & Gürbüz, M. (2017). Effect of the SQ4R technique on the Reading Comprehension of Elementary School 4th Grade Elementary School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 131-144. http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2017_2_9.pdf.
Block, C., Gambrell, L. B., & Pressley, M. (2003). Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. Education Review/ Reseñas Educativas/Resenhas Educativas. doi:10.14507/er.v0.373
Burns, M. S., Griffin, P., & Snow, C. E. (1999). Starting Out Right: A Guide to Promoting Children's Reading Success. Specific Recommendations from America's Leading Researchers on How To Help Children Become Successful Readers. Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
Cassady, J. C., Smith, L. L., & Thomas, C. L. (2018). Supporting emergent literacy for English language learners with computer-assised instruction. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 250-369. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12110
Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003). The classic study on poor children’s fourth-grade slump. American Educator. 27(1), 14–15.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw Hill. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Chang, C. C., Liang, C., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 218-227. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.031
Chang, K. E., Lan, Y. J., Chang, C. M., & Sung, Y. T. (2010). Mobile‐device‐supported strategy for Chinese reading comprehension. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 69-84. doi:10.1080/14703290903525853
Chang, W. H., Huang, T. H., & Liu, Y. C. (2019). Influence of an interactive e-book on the reading comprehension of different ethnic groups using indigenous culture as content. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 323-332. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1543079
De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., & Vanderlinde, R. (2014). Strategies for promoting autonomous reading motivation: A multiple case study research in primary education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 83-102.
Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology: Some thing you should know. Learning and leading with Technology, 27(3),10-12.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D., (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of education, 189(1-2), 107-122. doi:10.1177/002257409189001-208
Ferretti, G., Mazzotti, S., & Brizzolara, D. (2008). Visual scanning and reading ability in normal and dyslexic children. Behavioural Neurology, 19(1-2), 87-92.
Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., & Stevens, J. (2004). The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 93-114. doi:10.3200/JEXE.72.2.93-114
Gagné, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 7(1), 6-10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
Greenall, S., & Swan, M. (1986). Effective reading: Reading skills for advanced students. Cambrige, UK: Cambrige University Press.
Grigg, W. S., Daane, M. C., Jin, Y., & Campbell, J. R. (2003). The nation’s report card 2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Grellet, F. (1986). Developing reading skills:A practical guide to reading comprehension excercises. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Harreveld, B., Baker, K., & Isdale, L. (2008). Teachers’ work in reading literacy across the curriculm in the senior phase of learning. The Curriculum Journal, 19(2), 105-118. doi:10.1080/09585170802079538
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.008
Jennings, J. H., Caldwell, J. S., & Lerner, J. W. (2013). Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Jones, T., & Brown, C. A. (2011). Reading engagement: A comparison between e-books and traditional print books in an elementary classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), 5-22.
Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving Adolescent Literacy: Effective Classroom and Intervention Practices. IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2008-4027. National Center for Education Evaluatin and Regional Assistance.
Klinger, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Reading, 29, 415-422. doi:10.1086/461914
Kolic-Vehovec, S., & Bajsanski, I. (2007). Comprehension monitoring and reading comprehension in bilingual students. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(2), 198-211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00319.x
Lee, Y. H. (2015). Facilitating critical thinking using the C-QRAC collaboration script: Enhancing science reading literacy in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 88, 182-191. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.004
Leeuw, L. D., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). The effect of student-related and textrelated characteristics on student’s reading behavior and text comprehension: an eye movement study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(3), 248-263. doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1146285
Lerner, J. W., Egan, R. W., & James, K. W. (1997). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis and teaching strategies. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Lin, C. C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers & Education, 78, 48-59.
Long, D., & Szabo, S. (2016). E-readers and the effects on students’ reading motivation, attitude and comprehension during guided reading. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1197818.
Luppescu, S., & Day, R. R. (1993). Reading, dictionaries, and vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(2), 263-279.
Magliano, J. P., Baggett, W. B., Johnson, B. K., & Graesser, A. C. (1993). The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences. Discourse Processes, 16(1-2), 35-53.
Matthew, K. I., & Kimbell-Lopez, K. (2003). Reading comprehension: Books and strategies for the elementary curriculum. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.
May, C. (2010). Explicit instruction of reading strategies that enable EFL learners to achieve comprehension in reading: The case of third year Lycée learners. Unpublished MA Thesis, Mentouri University-Constantine.
McCormick, S., & Zutell, J. (2015). Instructing students who have literacy problems(7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Newburg House/Harper & Row, New York. Now Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Paas, F. G. W. C., Ayres, P., & Pachman, M. (2008). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning: theory, methods and applications. In D. H. Robinson, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 11-35). (Current Perspectives on Cognition Learning and Instruction). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psycologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Payne, B. D., & Manning, B. H. (1992). Basal reader instruction: Effects of comprehension monitoring training on reading comprehension, strategy use and attitude. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(1), 29–38. doi:10.1080/19388079209558103
Payne, T. W., & Lynn, R. (2011). Sex differences in second language comprehension. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 434–436. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.026
Pearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
Pressley, M. (2000). Comprehension instruction in elementary school: A quarter-century of research progress. Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades, 2000, 32-51.
Saidi A. A., & AI-Mahrooqi R. (2012). The influence of gender on Omani college students’ English language learning strategies, comprehension and motivation. Internaitonal Journal of Applied Linquistics & English Literature, 1(4), 230-244. doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.ln.4p.230
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Souhila, R. (2014). The use of reading strategies in improving reading comprehension. Master of Thesis. University Kasdi Merbah Ouargla, Algeria.
Swaby, B. E. R. (1989). Diagnosis correction of reading difficulties. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185-233. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1
Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55-64.
Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Ciullo, S. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Read Writ, 23, 889-912.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔