跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.80) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 05:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡昀蓁
研究生(外文):Yun-Chen Tsai
論文名稱:運用壓傷應用程式於主要照顧者初次面臨壓傷照護自我效能與行為之成效探討
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Educational Program Using Mobile Application(APP) on Self-efficacy and Skill of Caregivers for the First Time to Care Pressure Injury
指導教授:李淑杏李淑杏引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中山醫學大學
系所名稱:護理學系
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:護理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:104
中文關鍵詞:行動醫療應用程式(APP)壓傷照護自我效能壓傷照護行為
外文關鍵詞:medical mobile applicationspressure injury care appself-efficacy of pressure injury careskill in pressure injury care
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:216
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
研究背景:壓傷為住院常見的合併症,常增加醫療費用及病人死亡率。病人出院返家若有壓傷情形,其主要照顧者對於壓傷處理的自我效能與行為將成為照護關鍵。過去對於壓傷照護較多以衛教單張的指導方式,本研究將發展創新資訊技術導入智慧手機,做為主要照顧者初次面臨壓傷照護自我效能與行為之介入。
研究目的:本研究探討運用壓傷照護應用程式Mobile Application(APP)衛教軟體於主要照顧者初次面臨壓傷照護自我效能、行為與使用滿意度之成效。
研究設計:本研究採單盲及隨機抽樣試驗。
研究方法:於2018.10.24~2019.10.23期間,以中台灣某教學醫學中心內科病房及高齡病房初次發生1、2級壓傷且即將出院病人的主要照顧者為對象,使用亂碼數分成實驗組及控制組。以「壓傷照護應用程式」作為實驗組介入措施,控制組則為傳統書面衛教措施。所有研究對象於出院前皆完成基本資料、「壓傷照護自我效能」及「壓傷照護行為」前測問卷,之後依據組別進行衛教介入,返家一週後,研究者利用電訪完成「壓傷照護自我效能」及「壓傷照護行為」後測問卷訪查。本研究收案共計102位(實驗組51位、控制組51位),實驗組排除10位,控制組排除12位,流失率共21.5%,總計實驗組納入41位及控制組納入39位。資料進行編碼,再以SPSS 19.0版進行統計分析。以卡方檢定及獨立T檢定進行敘述性分析,以Wilcoxon配對組符號等級檢定、曼惠特尼U檢定及共變數分析進行推論性分析。
研究結果:兩組在病人基本屬性、疾病特性、主要照顧者基本屬性、「壓傷照護自我效能」總分中位數、「壓傷照護行為」總分中位數之前測資料採用無母數統計均無顯著差異(p>.05),顯示兩組同質性高。分析兩組之間其後測的「壓傷照護自我效能」總分中位數,實驗組與控制組分別為49.83 vs.30.69,呈顯著差異(p<.01);「壓傷照護行為」則二組無顯著差異(p>.05)。以Wilcoxon配對組符號等級檢定進行兩組內配對,於「壓傷照護自我效能」及「壓傷照護行為」前、後測總分中位數皆呈顯著差異(p<.01);顯示兩組主要照顧者之壓傷照護自我效能及行為均顯著提升。實驗組主要照顧者使用壓傷照護應用程式之滿意度項目多數達95%。
結論:壓傷照護應用程式及傳統書面衛教介入後皆可提升主要照顧者壓傷照護自我效能及行為,觀察研究結果發現壓傷照護應用程式比傳統書面資料進步分數較高,顯示壓傷照護應用程式能讓主要照顧者提升其壓傷照護自我效能且滿意度高,但無法提升照護行為。病人出院後仍需專業人員定期訪查或提供居家服務,然壓傷照護應用程式具有潛在之功能,未來可建構社區健康照顧團隊及服務資源的網絡化,可提供更健全且有效率的社區健康服務。
Bacckground: Pressure injury is a common comorbidity in hospitals that often increases medical costs and patient mortality. After a patient is discharged from the hospital, the self-efficacy and skill of the caregiver are the key to care in the treatment of patients with pressure injury. Traditionally, health providers have used leaflets to provide guidelines for caring for patients with pressure injury before they are discharged. In this study, an innovative mobile application was developed for smart phones to evaluate the effects on the self-efficacy and skill of caregivers for the first time in caring for pressure injury.
Aim: To evaluate the effects of an educational program using a mobile application on the self-efficacy and skill of caregivers for the first time in caring for pressure injury
Design: This study had a single-blinded randomization design.
Methods: The study was conducted in a medical ward and senior ward of a medical center in Taiwan from October 24, 2018, to October 23, 2019. The participants were caregivers who were taking care of patients that had first and second-degree pressure injuries and were about to be discharged. The participants were randomized to divide them into experimental and control groups. The experimental groups used an education program through a mobile application for pressure injury care, and the control groups used routine health education methods. A total of 102 cases were collected. There were 10 cases that were excluded from experimental group, 12 cases were excluded from the control group, and the attrition rate was 21.5%. The experimental group comprised 41 cases, and the control group had 39 cases. Each caregiver completed a pre-test before the patient was discharged. Both groups also completed a post-test within 1 week after the patient was discharged. Data were coded, and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0. A descriptive analysis was performed using the chi-squared test and independent t-test, and an inferential analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon paired group symbol level test, Mann Whitney U test, and covariate analysis.
Results: The nonparametric statistics showed that there were no significant differences between the experimental and control groups in regard to the demographic data and disease characteristics of the patients, as well as the caregivers’ demographic data and median total scores on the pre-test. This shows that there was homogeneity between groups. The caregivers’ median total scores on the post-test were 49.83 vs. 30.69 in the experimental and control groups, respectively, which had statistical significance (p<0.01). The difference in median total scores on the post-test between the groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The Wilcoxon paired group symbol level test was used to perform pairing within the two groups, and there were significant differences in the median total scores from before and after the education for self-efficacy and skill for pressure injury care (p < 0.01). This shows that the self-efficacy and skill were significantly improved in both groups. The satisfaction rate reached 95% for the caregivers in the experimental group.
Conclusions: Both the experimental group and the control group showed improved self-efficacy and behavior in pressure injury care. However, the results showed that the experimental group had a higher improvement score in self-efficacy but not in skill for pressure injury care than the control group. The experimental group was also satisfied with using the pressure injury care application. Patients need regular visits or home services from professionals after discharge. In the future, a network of community healthcare teams and services using technology resources could be constructed to provide more complete and efficient community health services.
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機---------------------------------------------------1
第二節 研究目的------------------------------------------------------------5
第三節 研究問題或研究假說---------------------------------------------5
第四節 名詞定義------------------------------------------------------------5
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 壓傷之介紹--------------------------------------------------------7
第二節 預防壓傷照護----------------------------------------------------16
第三節 主要照顧者之壓傷照護現況及困難-------------------------19
第四節 主要照顧者壓傷照護自我效能、行為與壓傷關係 ----------------------------------------------------------------------20
第五節 智慧型手機程式對於居家壓傷照護之運用----------------21
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構----------------------------------------------------------25
第二節 研究對象----------------------------------------------------------26
第三節 研究工具----------------------------------------------------------26
第四節 研究工具的信度及效度----------------------------------------30
第五節 資料收集流程----------------------------------------------------31
第六節 倫理考量----------------------------------------------------------34
第七節 資料分析----------------------------------------------------------35
第四章 研究結果
第一節 壓傷個案的基本資料------------------------------------------37
第二節 主要照顧者基本資料------------------------------------------42
第三節 兩組壓傷風險因素評估---------------------------------------45
第四節 壓傷應用程式介入之成效------------------------------------46
第五節 介入後兩組壓傷之成效---------------------------------------69
第六節 實驗組運用壓傷應用程式滿意度---------------------------70
第五章 討論
第一節 壓傷個案、照顧者基本資料---------------------------------71
第二節 壓傷照護應用程式介入對主要照顧者壓傷照護自我效能
之影響--------------------------------------------------------------73
第三節 壓傷照護應用程式介入對主要照顧者壓傷照護行為之影
響--------------------------------------------------------------------76
第四節 壓傷照護應用程式介入對於壓傷癒合之影響------------78
第六章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論---------------------------------------------------------79
第二節 研究限制---------------------------------------------------------80
第三節 研究建議---------------------------------------------------------81
參考文獻--------------------------------------------------------------------------83
附錄一 Barbara Braden壓傷風險工具同意書-----------------------------91
附錄二 許美玉護理師使用壓傷分級辨識圖卡同意書-------------------92
附錄三 蔡宜貞督導引用問卷同意書----------------------------------------93
附錄四 壓傷個案基本資料----------------------------------------------------94
附錄五 居家主要照顧人口學-------------------------------------------------95
附錄六 居家照護個案壓傷發生危險因素量表----------------------------96
附錄七 主要照顧者壓傷照護自我效能量表-------------------------------97
附錄八 主要照顧者壓傷照護行為量表-------------------------------------98
附錄九 運用壓傷應用程式衛教軟體滿意度-----------------------------100
附錄十 臨床試驗許可書-----------------------------------------------------101
附錄十一 壓傷應用程式內容-----------------------------------------------102
中文部分
于博芮、李世代、林壽惠(2005).台灣醫療院所壓瘡風險評估工具之臨床效度.台灣老年醫學雜誌,1(2).79-88。doi:10.29462/tgg.200511.0004
田沁潔、賴惠玲、許文林、彭逸稘、李茹萍(2007).護理衛教對頭頸部癌症病人口腔照顧認知,健康信念及自我效能之成效.實證護理,3(3),215-224。
吳秀玲、莊秋萍、林麗華、鄒怡真、熊道芬、桑潁潁、周幸生(2017).探討壓瘡防治多元教學策略對護理人員認知及病人壓瘡發生率之影響.榮總護理,34(2), 118-129。doi:10.6142/vghn.34.2.118
吳肖琪(2017).我國長照政策之新契機.長期照護雜誌,21(1),1-7。
侯雅萍(2017).運用 Mobile Application (APP)衛教軟體於出院傷口照護知識、技能及換藥焦慮之成效探討.未發表的論文.輔英科技大學護理系研究所。
張美華、許麗齡(2010).多媒體教材介入對護理人員心電圖學習之成效.護理雜誌, 57(4),50-58。doi:10.6224/jn.57.4.50
張素惠、張彩秀、陳妮婉(2013).護理人員壓瘡預防行為之探討.弘光學報(69), 136-153。doi:10.6615/har.201303.69.11
曹文昱、葉麗月、陳玉如、洪弘昌、許美玉(2019).壓瘡病人主要照顧者居家傷口照護資訊需求探討.福祉科技與服務管理學刊,7(1),24-33。
許美玉、于博芮、蕭晴文、趙慧玲(2017).壓瘡名詞與分級系統變革.榮總護理, 34(2),110-117。doi:10.6142/vghn.34.2.110
陳文意、梁亞文、謝輝龍、蔡味娟、莊碧焜、林玉惠(2016).遠距健康照護對可避免住院與醫療利用之影響.台灣公共衛生雜誌,35(5),524-541。
陳瀅淳、邱艷芬(2002).壓瘡照護革命.護理雜誌,49(6),101-105。
童芊芊、吳孟凌、蔣佳祝(2016).提升居家護理個案壓瘡傷口癒合率.長期照護雜誌,20(1),71-88。doi:10.6317/ltc.20.71
黃金蓮(1993).某教學醫院住院病人發生壓瘡之相關因素探討.護理雜誌,40(4), 47-56。doi:10.6224/jn.40.4.47
葉昭君、曾夢如、黃惠珍、陳敏麗、黃惠玲(2010).提升居家主要照顧者壓瘡照護技能正確率改善專案.新臺北護理期刊,12(2),69-79。
靳燕芬、吳蕙菱、林淑眞、邱月璧(2006).某醫學中心住院病人壓瘡盛行率及發生壓瘡相關因素探討.長庚護理,17(1),11-21。
趙莉芬、劉雪娥(1994).認識壓瘡及其相關危險因子.護理雜誌,41(4),59-64。
趙莉芬、劉雪娥(1995)病人家屬對壓瘡預防措施及其危險因子認知程度的差異與相關因素之探討.護理研究,3(4),365-375。doi:10.7081/nr.199512.0365
蔡宜貞(2010).居家照護個案壓瘡發生相關因子之探討.未發表的碩士論文,高雄醫學大學護理學研究所。
謝佩芬(2006).影響主要照顧者對臥床病患壓瘡照護知識及自我效能之因素探討.未發表的碩士論文,慈濟大學護理學研究所。
謝昌成(2010).探討居家照護服務與個案照護結果之間的相關性.未發表的碩士論文,成功大學老年學研究所。
英文文獻
Agrawal, K., & Chauhan, N. (2012). Pressure ulcers: Back to the basics. Indian J Plast Surg, 45(2), 244-254. doi:10.4103/0970-0358.101287
Al-Hadithy, N., Gikas, P. D., & Al-Nammari, S. S. (2012). Smartphones in orthopaedics. International orthopaedics, 36(8), 1543-1547.
Ayello, E. A., Cordero, G. M., & Sibbald, R. G. (2017). Survey Results from Canada and Some Latin America Countries: 2016 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Changes in Terminology and Definitions. Advanced in Skin & Wound Care, 30(2), 71-76. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000511443.83861.d1
Ayello, E. A., Dowsett, C., Schultz, G. S., Sibbald, R. G., Falanga, V., Harding, K., Vanscheidt, W. (2004). TIME heals all wounds. Nursing2017, 34(4), 36-42.
Ball, E., Newton, S., Kahan, B. C., Forbes, G., Wright, N., Cantalapiedra Calvete, C., Dodds, J. (2018). Smartphone App Using Mindfulness Meditation for Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain (MEMPHIS): Protocol for a Randomized Feasibility Trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 7(1), e8. doi:10.2196/resprot.7720
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Banks, M. D., Ross, L. J., Webster, J., Mudge, A., Stankiewicz, M., Dwyer, K., Campbell, J. (2016). Pressure ulcer healing with an intensive nutrition intervention in an acute setting: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Journal of Wound Care, 25(7), 384-392. doi:10.12968/jowc.2016.25.7.384
Bauer, K., Rock, K., Nazzal, M., Jones, O., & Qu, W. (2016). Pressure Ulcers in the United States'' Inpatient Population From 2008 to 2012: Results of a Retrospective Nationwide Study. Ostomy Wound Manage, 62(11), 30-38.
Beeckman, D., Schoonhoven, L., Fletcher, J., Furtado, K., Gunningberg, L., Heyman, H., Defloor, T. (2007). EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(6), 682-691. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04474.x
Berke, C. T. (2015). Pathology and clinical presentation of friction injuries: case series and literature review. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 42(1), 47-61. doi:10.1097/won.0000000000000087
Bishop, S., Walker, M., Rogers, A., & Chen, W. (2003). Importance of moisture balance at the wound-dressing interface. Journal of wound care, 12(4), 125-128.
Bliss, M. (2009). Seating and pressure ulcers: draft clinical practice guideline for comment. Evidence supporting the use of two hourly turning for pressure sore prevention. Journal of Tissue Vaiability, 18(2), 55-56.
Bluestein, D., & Javaheri, A. (2008). Pressure ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management. American family physician, 78(10).
Bolton, L. (2008). Re: Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique? Advances in Skin Wound Care, 21(10), 450; author reply 450-452. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000323564.37014.5b
Borsting, T. E., Tvedt, C. R., Skogestad, I. J., Granheim, T. I., Gay, C. L., & Lerdal, A. (2018). Prevalence of pressure ulcer and associated risk factors in middle- and older-aged medical inpatients in Norway. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(3-4), e535-e543. doi:10.1111/jocn.14088
Braden, B. J., & Bergstrom, N. (1989). Clinical utility of the Braden scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Decubitus, 2(3), 44-46, 50-41.
Braden, B. J., & Maklebust, J. (2005). Preventing pressure ulcers with the Braden scale: an update on this easy-to-use tool that assesses a patient''s risk. Am J Nurs, 105(6), 70-72.
Bredesen, I. M., Bjoro, K., Gunningberg, L., & Hofoss, D. (2015). The prevalence, prevention and multilevel variance of pressure ulcers in Norwegian hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Internatinal Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(1), 149-156. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.005
. CADTH Rapid Response Reports. (2013). In Dressing Materials for the Treatment of Pressure Ulcers in Patients in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Review of the Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Chen, H. L., Cao, Y. J., Zhang, W., Wang, J., & Huai, B. S. (2017). Braden scale (ALB) for assessing pressure ulcer risk in hospital patients: A validity and reliability study. Applied Nursing Research, 33, 169-174. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2016.12.001
Chiang, H. C., Lin, F. Y., & Hwu, Y. J. (2013). Disability assessment: the efficacy of multimedia interactive nurse education. Journal of Nursing Research, 21(2), 83-93. doi:10.1097/jnr.0b013e3182921f5a
Clerencia-Sierra, M., Calderon-Larranaga, A., Martinez-Velilla, N., Vergara-Mitxeltorena, I., Aldaz-Herce, P., Poblador-Plou, B., Prados-Torres, A. (2015). Multimorbidity Patterns in Hospitalized Older Patients: Associations among Chronic Diseases and Geriatric Syndromes. PLoS One, 10(7), e0132909. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132909
Crow, R. A., & Clark, M. (1990). Current management for the prevention of pressure sores. In Pressure Sores-Clinical Practice and Scientific Approach (pp. 43-52): Springer.
Dealey, C. (1994). Monitoring the pressure sore problem in a teaching hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20(4), 652-659.
Defloor, T., De Bacquer, D., & Grypdonck, M. H. (2005). The effect of various combinations of turning and pressure reducing devices on the incidence of pressure ulcers. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42(1), 37-46.
Demarre, L., Van Lancker, A., Van Hecke, A., Verhaeghe, S., Grypdonck, M., Lemey, J., Beeckman, D. (2015). The cost of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: A systematic review. Internatinal Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(11), 1754-1774. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.06.006
Dhiliwal, S. R., & Salins, N. (2015). Smartphone applications in palliative homecare. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 21(1), 88-91. doi:10.4103/0973-1075.150199
Edsberg, L. E., Black, J. M., Goldberg, M., McNichol, L., Moore, L., & Sieggreen, M. (2016). Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System. Journal of Wound Ostomy &Continence Nursing, 43(6), 585-597.
Enoch, S., Grey, J. E., & Harding, K. G. (2006). ABC of wound healing. Non-surgical and drug treatments. Bmj, 332(7546), 900-903. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7546.900
Flattau, A., & Blank, A. E. (2014). Risk factors for 90-day and 180-day mortality in hospitalised patients with pressure ulcers. International Wound Journal, 11(1), 14-20. doi:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01032.x
Frantz, R. A. (2004). Evidence-based protocol: Prevention of pressure ulcers. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30(2), 4-9.
Gadd, M. M., & Morris, S. M. (2014). Use of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in a community hospital setting: the role of total score and individual subscale scores in triggering preventive interventions. Journal of Wound Ostomy &Continence Nursing, 41(6), 535-538.
Garcia-Fernandez, F. P., Pancorbo-Hidalgo, P. L., & Agreda, J. J. (2014). Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis. Journal of Wound Ostomy &Continence Nursing, 41(1), 24-34. doi:10.1097/01.WON.0000438014.90734.a2
Gillespie, B. M., Chaboyer, W. P., McInnes, E., Kent, B., Whitty, J. A., & Thalib, L. (2014). Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults. The Cochrane Library.
Gosnell, D. J. (1989). Pressure Sore Risk Assessment A Critique Parti the Gosnell Scale. Advances in skin & wound care, 2(3), 32-39.
Grey, J. E., Harding, K. G., & Enoch, S. (2006). ABC of wound healing: pressure ulcers. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 332(7539), 472.
Guise, J. M., Chang, C., Viswanathan, M., Glick, S., Treadwell, J., Umscheid, C. A., Trikalinos, T. (2014). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods for systematically reviewing complex multicomponent health care interventions. Journal Clinical Epidemiol, 67(11), 1181-1191. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.010
Hagisawa, S., & Ferguson-Pell, M. (2008). Evidence supporting the use of two-hourly turning for pressure ulcer prevention. Journal Tissue Viability, 17(3), 76-81. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2007.10.001
Hahnel, E., Lichterfeld, A., Blume-Peytavi, U., & Kottner, J. (2017). The epidemiology of skin conditions in the aged: a systematic review. Journal of tissue viability, 26(1), 20-28.
Hill, M. L., Cronkite, R. C., Ota, D. T., Yao, E. C., & Kiratli, B. J. (2009). Validation of home telehealth for pressure ulcer assessment: a study in patients with spinal cord injury. Journal Telemed Telecare, 15(4), 196-202.
Jaul, E., & Calderon-Margalit, R. (2015). Systemic factors and mortality in elderly patients with pressure ulcers. International Wound Journal, 12(3), 254-259. doi:10.1111/iwj.12086
Jaul, E., & Rosenzweig, J. P. (2017). A Retrospective Study of the Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Survival in Elderly Persons With Chronic Diseases. Ostomy Wound Manage, 63(5), 26-32.
Jung, H. Y., Seong, S. J., Choi, J. Y., Cho, J. H., Park, S. H., Kim, C. D., Kim, Y. L. (2017). The efficacy and stability of an information and communication technology-based centralized monitoring system of adherence to immunosuppressive medication in kidney transplant recipients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 18(1), 480. doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2221-z
Khor, H. M., Tan, J., Saedon, N. I., Kamaruzzaman, S. B., Chin, A. V., Poi, P. J., & Tan, M. P. (2014). Determinants of mortality among older adults with pressure ulcers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 59(3), 536-541. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2014.07.011
Koel, G., & Oosterveld, F. (2008). Reproducibility of current wound size surface measurement. Paper presented at the Conference proceedings, EWMA.
Koivunen, M., Hjerppe, A., Luotola, E., Kauko, T., & Asikainen, P. (2018). Risks and prevalence of pressure ulcers among patients in an acute hospital in Finland. Journal of Wound Care, 27(Sup2), S4-s10.
Laing, B. Y., Mangione, C. M., Tseng, C. H., Leng, M., Vaisberg, E., Mahida, M., Bell, D. S. (2014). Effectiveness of a smartphone application for weight loss compared with usual care in overweight primary care patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 161(10 Suppl), S5-12. doi:10.7326/m13-3005
Landis, E. M. (1934). Capillary pressure and capillary permeability. Physiological Reviews, 14(3), 404-481.
Lyder, C. H., & Ayello, E. A. (2008). Advances in Patient Safety
Pressure Ulcers: A Patient Safety Issue. In R. G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
Maklebust, J. (1987). Pressure ulcers: etiology and prevention. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 22(2), 359-377.
Maklebust, J. (2004). Take the load off by choosing the right support surface. Nursing2017, 34, 12-15.
Maklebust, J., & Sieggreen, M. (2001). Pressure ulcers: Guidelines for prevention and management: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
McGillicuddy, J. W., Gregoski, M. J., Weiland, A. K., Rock, R. A., Brunner-Jackson, B. M., Patel, S. K., Treiber, F. A. (2013). Mobile Health Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 2(2), e32. doi:10.2196/resprot.2633
McGinnis, E., Briggs, M., Collinson, M., Wilson, L., Dealey, C., Brown, J., Nixon, J. (2014). Pressure ulcer related pain in community populations: a prevalence survey. BMC Nursing, 13, 16. doi:10.1186/1472-6955-13-16
Moore, Z., Cowman, S., & Conroy, R. M. (2011). A randomised controlled clinical trial of repositioning, using the 30 degrees tilt, for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Journal Clinical Nursing, 20(17-18), 2633-2644. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03736.x
Norton, D. (1989). Calculating the risk: reflections on the Norton Scale. Decubitus, 2(3), 24-31.
O’Neil, C. K. (2004). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 17(2), 137-148.
Pancorbo‐Hidalgo, P. L., Garcia‐Fernandez, F. P., Lopez‐Medina, I. M., & Alvarez‐Nieto, C. (2006). Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing, 54(1), 94-110.
Peterson, C. B. (2015). Global, regional, and national age–sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet, 385(9963), 117-171.
Posthauer, M. E., Banks, M., Dorner, B., & Schols, J. M. (2015). The role of nutrition for pressure ulcer management: national pressure ulcer advisory panel, European pressure ulcer advisory panel, and pan pacific pressure injury alliance white paper. Advanced Skin Wound Care, 28(4), 175-188; quiz 189-190. doi:10.1097/01.asw.0000461911.31139.62
Quinn, E. M., Corrigan, M. A., O''Mullane, J., Murphy, D., Lehane, E. A., Leahy-Warren, P., Fulton, G. J. (2013). Clinical unity and community empowerment: the use of smartphone technology to empower community management of chronic venous ulcers through the support of a tertiary unit. PLoS One, 8(11), e78786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078786
Ricci, J. A., Bayer, L. R., & Orgill, D. P. (2017). Evidence-Based Medicine: The Evaluation and Treatment of Pressure Injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg, 139(1), 275e-286e. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002850
Rondinelli, J., Zuniga, S., Kipnis, P., Kawar, L. N., Liu, V., & Escobar, G. J. (2018). Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury: Risk-Adjusted Comparisons in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System. Nurs Res, 67(1), 16-25. doi:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000258
Saghaleini, S. H., Dehghan, K., Shadvar, K., Sanaie, S., Mahmoodpoor, A., & Ostadi, Z. (2018). Pressure Ulcer and Nutrition. Indian Journal Critical Care Medicine, 22(4), 283-289. doi:10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_277_17
Song, B., & Sacan, A. (2012). Automated wound identification system based on image segmentation and artificial neural networks. Paper presented at the Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2012 IEEE International Conference on.
Sprigle, S., & Sonenblum, S. (2011). Assessing evidence supporting redistribution of pressure for pressure ulcer prevention: a review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 48(3), 203-213. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2010.05.0102
Stotts, N. A., & Wu, H. S. (2007). Hospital recovery is facilitated by prevention of pressure ulcers in older adults. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 19(3), 269-275, vi. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2007.05.005
van Anholt, R. D., Sobotka, L., Meijer, E. P., Heyman, H., Groen, H. W., Topinkova, E., Schols, J. M. (2010). Specific nutritional support accelerates pressure ulcer healing and reduces wound care intensity in non-malnourished patients. Nutrition, 26(9), 867-872. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2010.05.009
VanGilder, C., Lachenbruch, C., Algrim-Boyle, C., & Meyer, S. (2017). The International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey: 2006-2015: A 10-Year Pressure Injury Prevalence and Demographic Trend Analysis by Care Setting. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 44(1), 20-18.
Varnfield, M., Karunanithi, M., Lee, C. K., Honeyman, E., Arnold, D., Ding, H., . Walters, D. L. (2014). Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial. Heart, 100(22), 1770-1779. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305783
Wang, L. H., Chen, H. L., Yan, H. Y., Gao, J. H., Wang, F., Ming, Y., Ding, J. J. (2015). Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice. International Wound Journal, 12(5), 590-594. doi:10.1111/iwj.12376
Waterlow, J. (1985). Pressure sores: a risk assessment card. Nursing times, 81(48), 49-55.
Whittington, K., Patrick, M., & Roberts, J. L. (2000). A national study of pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in acute care hospitals. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 27(4), 209-215. doi:10.1067/mjw.2000.107879
Wishin, J., Gallagher, T. J., & McCann, E. (2008). Emerging options for the management of fecal incontinence in hospitalized patients. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 35(1), 104-110.
Zhou, Q., Yu, T., Liu, Y., Shi, R., Tian, S., Yang, C., Hu, A. (2018). The prevalence and specific characteristics of hospitalised pressure ulcer patients: A multicentre cross-sectional study. Journal Clinical Nursing, 27(3-4), 694-704. doi:10.1111/jocn.14019
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top