跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.94.177) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/07/21 19:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡美芬
研究生(外文):Tsai, Mei-Fen
論文名稱:企業社會責任與員工建言行為之研究: 以組織承諾為中介影響
論文名稱(外文):Research on Corporate Social Responsibility and Voice Behaviors : Mediated by organizational commitment
指導教授:王興國王興國引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wang, Hsing-Kuo
口試委員:方彥博
口試日期:2020-06-12
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立金門大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:64
中文關鍵詞:企業社會責任組織承諾建言行為
外文關鍵詞:Corporate Social ResponsibilityOrganizational CommitmentVoicing Behaviors.
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:114
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
目錄 V
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第 壹 章 緒  論 1
第 一 節 研究背景與動機 1
第 二 節 研究目的與重要性 2
第 三 節 研究流程 4
第 四 節 研究問題 4
第 貳 章 文獻探討與研究假設 5
第 一 節 企業社會責任 5
第 二 節 組織承諾 17
第 三 節 員工建言行為 21
第 參 章 研究方法 25
第 一 節 研究架構 25
第 二 節 研究假設 25
第 三 節 研究對象與抽樣方法 25
第 四 節 研究工具 27
第 五 節 分析與統計方法 31
第 肆 章 資料研究結果與分析 34
第 一 節 樣本資料結構 34
第 二 節 信度分析 36
第 三 節 各變相間之相關分析 40
第 四 節 迴歸分析 41
第 五 節 驗證研究假設成立與否 44
第 伍 章 結論與建議 45
第 一 節 研究結論 45
第 二 節 管理意涵 46
第 三 節 研究限制 47
第 四 節 研究建議 48
參考文獻 49
附錄 54


參考文獻
一、中文部分:
1.方世榮、張文賢(2013)。統計學導論(第七版)。台北市: 華泰文化。
2.朱俞靜. (2006). 企業社會責任對企業競爭力影響之探討. (碩士). 大葉大學, 彰化縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9xv3f7
3.吳采蓉. (2016). 企業社會責任與雇主品牌對組織認同之研究. 中山大學人力資源管理研究所學位論文, 1-95.
4.周怡伶. (2015). 心理契約滿足對員工主動行為之影響-自我效能之中介效果. 中正大學勞工關係學研究所學位論文, 1-83.
5.周麗芳, 任金剛, & 組織與管理, 林. J. (2013). 轉型領導與建言行為: 文化價值觀的關鍵角色. 6(2), 115-159.
6.林宜諄, & 高希均. (2008). 企業社會責任入門手冊: 天下遠見出版公司.
7.林玫均. (2018). 員工企業社會責任認知對組織認同與組織公民行為之關聯性研究. (碩士). 國立宜蘭大學, 宜蘭縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mvk9mb
8.邱雯婷. (2014). 企業社會責任實施程度與員工組織承諾之關聯:以員工企業社會責任知覺為中介變數. (碩士). 國立中央大學, 桃園縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5869wy
9.翁望回. (1987). 企業正當性之實證研究:社會責任的觀點. (博士). 國立政治大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/532bry
10.陳建丞. (2008). 員工知覺的組織支持與工作績效間的中介模型研究. [Test of a Mediating Model Linking Perceived Organizational Support and Job Performance]. 管理學報, 25(3), 309-331. doi:10.6504/JOM.2008.25.03.03
11.黃蘭媖. (2012). 企業社會責任對員工的組織承諾之影響. (碩士). 東吳大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yjtf2e
12.楊美玉, & 臺大管理論叢, 柯. J. (2015). 人們為何能勇於建言? 建言自我效能與團隊建言行為的效果. 25(3), 39-66.
13.詹叡穎. (2012). 員工對企業社會責任的認知、工作滿足與組織承諾之關聯性. (碩士). 淡江大學, 新北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m4hhvc
14.劉玉雪. (2015). 企業社會責任對組織承諾的影響-以員工認知企業社會責任動機為調節. (碩士). 國立中山大學, 高雄市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/635n9x
15.潘珏汝. (2010). 探討員工企業社會責任之認知對組織公民行為之影響-以組織承諾為中介變項. (碩士). 國立中央大學, 桃園縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dxpua9

二、英文部分:
1.Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
2.Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. Voice and silence in organizations, 175-202.
3.Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 63-86.
4.Bettencourt, L. A. (2004). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors: The direct and moderating influence of goal orientation. Journal of Retailing, 80(3), 165-180.
5.Bowen, F., & Blackmon, K. (2003). Spirals of silence: The dynamic effects of diversity on organizational voice. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1393-1417.
6.Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman: University of Iowa Press.
7.Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 533-546.
8.Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505.
9.Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & society, 38(3), 268-295.
10.Chia, H., Landau, J., & Ong, J. S.-W. (2000). Predictors of voice: The moderating effect of the general economic climate. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 8(2), 3-28.
11.Choi, J. N. (2007). Change‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(4), 467-484.
12.Collins, J. (2001) Good to great–Why some companies make the leap and others don’t. New York, NY:Harper Business
13.Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California management review, 2(3), 70-76.
14.Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
15.Dodd, E. (1932). E. Merrick," For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?". Harv. L. Rev., 45, 1145.
16.Drucker, P. F. (1984). Converting social problems into business opportunities: The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review (pre-1986), 26(000002), 53.
17.Dundon, T., Wilkinson*, A., Marchington, M., & Ackers, P. (2004). The meanings and purpose of employee voice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6), 1149-1170.
18.Employment, E. C. D.-G. f. (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility: Green paper: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
19.Epstein, E. M. (1987). The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California management review, 29(3), 99-114.
20.Farrell, D. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of management Journal, 26(4), 596-607.
21.Frederick, W. C. (1983). Point of view: Corporate social responsibility in the Reagan era and beyond. California management review, 25(3), 145-157.
22.Frederick, W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & society, 33(2), 150-164.
23.Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13(1970), 32-33.
24.Gavin, J. F., & Maynard, W. S. (1975). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility. Personnel Psychology.
25.Goldberg, C. B., Clark, M. A., & Henley, A. B. (2011). Speaking up: A conceptual model of voice responses following the unfair treatment of others in non‐union settings. Human Resource Management, 50(1), 75-94.
26.Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25): Harvard university press.
27.Holme, L., & Watts, R. (2001). World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Making Good Business Sense.
28.Hopfenbeck, W. (1993). The green management revolution: Lessons in environmental excellence: Prentice Hall.
29.Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American sociological review, 499-517.
30.Keith, D., & Blomstrom, R. L. (1975). Business and society: Environment and responsibility. New York.
31.Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
32.MacGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society: Ardent Media.
33.Manne, H., & Wallich, H. (1972). The Modern Corporation and Social Responsibility (American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC). Google Scholar.
34.McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic management journal, 21(5), 603-609.
35.McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.
36.McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of management studies, 43(1), 1-18.
37.Millward, N., Bryson, A., & Forth, J. A. (2000). All change at work?: British employment relations 1980-1998, portrayed by the workplace industrial relations survey series: Taylor & Francis US.
38.Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of applied psychology, 76(6), 845.
39.Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2003). Speaking up, remaining silent: The dynamics of voice and silence in organizations. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1353-1358.
40.Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of management review, 8(3), 486-500.
41.Najam, A. (1999). World business council for sustainable development: the greening of business or a greenwash? Yearbook of international co-operation on environment and development, 2000, 65-75.
42.Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business & society, 43(3), 296-319.
43.Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59(5), 603.
44.Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous III, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
45.Sethi, S. P. (1979). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of management review, 4(1), 63-74.
46.Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative science quarterly, 143-150.
47.Turker, D. (2009a). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of business ethics, 89(2), 189.
48.Turker, D. (2009b). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of business ethics, 85(4), 411-427.
49.Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.
50.Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
51.Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of business ethics, 44(2-3), 95-105.
52.Wheeler, D., & Sillanpää, M. (1997). The stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value: Financial Times Management.
53.Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of management review, 7(3), 418-428.
54.Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of management review, 16(4), 691-718.
55.Wood, S. (1999). Human resource management and performance. International journal of management reviews, 1(4), 367-413.
56.Wu, W., Tang, F., Dong, X., & Liu, C. (2015). Different identifications cause different types of voice: A role identity approach to the relations between organizational socialization and voice. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 251-287.

三、網址:
中華民國企業永續發展協會
http://www.bcsd.org.tw/domain_node/domaintool/168/174
天下雜誌 天下企業公民
https://topic.cw.com.tw/csr/
華信航空Mandarin Airlines
https://www.mandarin-airlines.com

電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20250716)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊