臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文探討了全球金融市場在促進可持續性方面進行發展趨勢，以及由此現象引起的治理挑戰。透過新興的金融工具與策略的出現，不斷地激發市場上的投資者與公司轉以可持續性的商業手段，除了達成原本的目的外，也支持環境和社會往可持續性的方向進行成長。本文的重點介紹綠色債券，這是種債務融資的形式，將其收益專門用於環境、社會與人權的資產與商業活動。近來綠色債券的蓬勃發展，應對氣候變化來的生存威脅與巨大成本方面發揮不可或缺的作用。由於在綠色債券仍處於新生階段時，政府監管機構大為缺失，取而代之的是，主要由私人治理制度（例如投資標準，認證計劃，評級和第三方評估）決定，它們相互競爭或合作來採用市場的需求。與公共政策法規相比，私人治理通常實施起來更快，並且對市場參與者的需求更敏感，但是可能缺乏合法性，責任感和一致性。為了解決這些不足，本文分析綠色債券在可持續性金融市場中的治理屬性，由責任歸因框架進行分類公私監管政策，以連結市場中所有利益相關者的利益與關聯，並分析了中國與歐盟的綠色債券可持續金融市場中的治理，透過評估其公共政策優先制定事項對綠色債券政策的影響。本研究追蹤了歐盟與中國在綠色債券政策發展，以及相對強調諸如可得性、效率、可負擔性和環境因素等框架管理，探討適應性氣候變化指標框架，並透過其路線圖來進行自適應性途徑的轉換，了解中國與歐盟其規劃的綠色債券政策在社會、經濟和技術方面跟實現氣候目標之間的成效不一原因。根據台灣目前發展概況，提升台灣可持續性金融發展之潛在建議。

This article discusses the development trend of global financial markets in promoting sustainability and the governance challenges caused by this phenomenon. Through the emergence of new financial tools and strategies, investors and companies in the market are constantly inspired to switch to sustainable business methods. In addition to achieving their original goals, they also support environmental and social growth in a sustainable direction. This article focuses on green bonds, which are a form of debt financing, whose proceeds are dedicated to environmental, social and human rights assets and business activities. The recent vigorous development of green bonds has played an indispensable role in coping with the existential threats and huge costs of climate change. As green bonds are still in the nascent stage, government regulatory agencies are largely absent. Instead, they are mainly determined by private governance systems (such as investment standards, certification schemes, ratings, and third-party evaluations), and they compete or cooperate with each other to adopt the market Demand. Compared with public policies and regulations, private governance is usually faster to implement and more sensitive to the needs of market participants, but may lack legitimacy, responsibility, and consistency. In order to solve these deficiencies, this article analyzes the governance attributes of green bonds in the sustainable financial market, classifies public-private regulatory policies by the responsibility attribution framework to connect the interests and connections of all stakeholders in the market, and analyzes China and the EU By assessing the impact of its public policy priorities on green bond policies, this study tracks the development of green bond policies in the European Union and China, and relatively emphasizes issues such as availability, efficiency, and availability. Affordability and environmental factors and other framework management, explore the adaptive climate change indicator framework, and use its roadmap to transform adaptive approaches, understand the social, economic and technological realization of the green bond policies planned by China and the EU The effectiveness of climate goals varies. Based on Taiwan’s current development profile, potential suggestions to enhance Taiwan’s sustainable financial development.

摘要 I
Abstract III
誌 謝 V
目錄 VI
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景及動機 1
第二節 研究目的 8
第三節 研究架構與流程 9
第二章 文獻探討 10
第一節 綠色債券與相關研究 10
第二節 責任歸因框架 14
第三節 氣候變遷治理模式 16
第四節 能源政策框架 18
第五節 小結 19
第三章 研究方法與設計 20
第一節 研究內容 20
第二節 適應性政策比較框架設計 21
第三節 指標框架 24
一、 可持續性環境管理 24
二、 有效率發展可持續性金融工具 27
第四節 可持續性經濟指標框架 36
第四章 比較中國與歐盟可持續性金融政策發展 39
第一節 中國可持續性金融政策發展 39
第二節 歐盟可持續性金融政策發展 43
第三節 比較中國與歐盟可持續性金融政策發展 46
一、 責任歸因框架與氣候變遷治理模式 46
二、 適應性氣候變化指標框架 47
第四節 台灣可持續性金融發展與建議 50
一、 台灣可持續性金融發展現況 50
二、 提升台灣可持續性金融發展之潛在建議 57
第五章 結論與建議 58
第一節 研究結論 58
第二節 研究限制 59
第三節 研究建議 59
參考文獻 60
中文部份 60
英文部份 61
附錄一: 國際可持續性金融政策列表 66
附錄二: 台灣可持續性金融政策列表 122

中文部份
趙永茂（2018）。氣候變遷與地方治理，朝陽科技大學通識教育中心。止善學報，24，49-66。
錢雅萱（2015）。高雄市氣候變遷政策治理網絡之探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學，臺北市。

英文部份
Bachelet, MJ., Becchetti, L., & Manfredonia, S. (2019). The Green Bonds Premium Puzzle: The Role of Issuer Characteristics and Third-Party Verification. SUSTAINABILITY, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041098
Banga, J. (2019). The green bond market: a potential source of climate finance for developing countries. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 9(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/0.1080/20430795.2018.1498617
Baulkaran, V. (2019). Stock market reaction to green bond issuance. JOURNAL OF ASSET MANAGEMENT, 20(5), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-018-00105-1
Benford, R.D., & Snow, D.A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Broadstock, DC., & Cheng, LTW. (2019). Time-varying relation between black and green bond price benchmarks: Macroeconomic determinants for the first decade. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 29, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.006
Cosmas, NC., Chitedze, I., & Mourad, KA. (2019). An econometric analysis of the macroeconomic determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in Nigeria. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 675, 313-324. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.188
Elliott, C., & Zhang, LY. (2019). Diffusion and innovation for transition: transnational governance in China's green bond market development. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 21(4), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623655
Febi, W., Schafer, D., Stephan, A., & Sun, C. (2018). The impact of liquidity risk on the yield spread of green bonds. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 27, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.02.025
Ferguson, I., Levetan, L., Crossman, ND., & Bennett, LT. (2016). Financial Mechanisms to Improve the Supply of Ecosystem Services from Privately-Owned Australian Native Forests. FORESTS, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/f7020034
Gippner, O. (2014). Framing it right: China-EU relations and patterns of interaction on climate change. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748114500031
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gray, B. (Ed.), (2003). Framing of Environmental Disputes. Island Press, Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Hachenberg, B., & Schiereck, D. (2018). Are green bonds priced differently from conventional bonds? JOURNAL OF ASSET MANAGEMENT, 19(6), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-018-0088-5
Hope, M. (2010). Frame Analysis as a Discourse-Method: Framing ‘climate change politics’, Post-Graduate Conference on Discourse Analysis. University of Bristol, UK.
Huang, T., & Yue, QY. (2020). How the game changer was generated? An analysis on the legal rules and development of China's green bond market. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 20(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10784-019-09460-9
Kern, Kristine., & Alber, Gotelind. (2008). “Governing Climate Change in Cities: Modes of Urban Climate Governance in Multi-level Systems.” In Documentation Competitive Cities and Climate Change Conference. Milan, Italy.
McInerney, C., & Johannsdottir, L. (2016). Lima Paris Action Agenda: Focus on Private Finance - note from COP21. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 126, 707-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.116
Ng, AW. (2018). From sustainability accounting to a green financing system: Institutional legitimacy and market heterogeneity in a global financial centre. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 195, 585-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.250
Ng, TH., & Tao, JY. (2016). Bond financing for renewable energy in Asia. ENERGY POLICY, 95, 509-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.015
Ngwenya, N., & Simatele, MD. (2020). Unbundling of the green bond market in the economic hubs of Africa: Case study of Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2020.1725446
Paranque, B., & Revelli, C. (2019). Ethico-economic analysis of impact finance: The case of Green Bonds. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 47, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.12.003
Park, SK. (2018). INVESTORS AS REGULATORS: GREEN BONDS AND THE GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES OF THE SUSTAINABLE FINANCE REVOLUTION. STANFORD JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. 54(1), 1-47.
Pellizzoni, L. (2004). Responsibility and environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 541–565.
Reboredo, JC. (2018). Green bond and financial markets: Co-movement, diversification and price spillover effects. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 74, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.030
Reboredo, JC., & Ugolini, A. (2020). Price connectedness between green bond and financial markets. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 88, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236881
Schumacher, K., Chenet, H., & Volz, U. (2020). Sustainable finance in Japan. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 10(2), 213-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1735219
Snow, D.A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International social movement research, 1, 197–217.
Sovacool, B. K., & Brown, M. A. (2010). Competing dimensions of energy security: an international perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35,77–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042509-143035
Sovacool, B. K., & Mukherjee, I. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach. Fuel and Energy Abstracts, 36(8), 5343-5355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.043
Tripathy, A. (2017). Translating to risk: The legibility of climate change and nature in the green bond market. ECONOMIC ANTHROPOLOGY, 4(2), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12091
Tolliver, C., Keeley, AR., & Managi, S. (2019). Green bonds for the Paris agreement and sustainable development goals. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1118
Tolliver, C., Keeley, AR., & Managi, S. (2020). Drivers of green bond market growth: The importance of Nationally Determined Contributions to the Paris Agreement and implications for sustainability. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118643
Paranque, B., & Revelli, C. (2019). Ethico-economic analysis of impact finance: The case of Green Bonds. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 47, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.12.003
Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
Wang, QH., Zhou, YN., Luo, L., & Ji, JP. (2019). Research on the Factors Affecting the Risk Premium of China's Green Bond Issuance. SUSTAINABILITY, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226394
Wisniewski, M., & Zielinski, J. (2019). Green bonds as an innovative sovereign financial instrument. EKONOMIA I PRAWO-ECONOMICS AND LAW, 18(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/110.12775/EiP.2019.007
Zhang, Mingshun., & Lin, Tze-Luen. (2014). Eco-city and low-carbon city programs and networks in East Asia Country studies: Greater China. Seoul: ICLEI Global Report.
Zhou, XG., & Cui, YD. (2019). Green Bonds, Corporate Performance, and Corporate Social Responsibility. SUSTAINABILITY, 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236881