臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

過往以拼音文字為主要研究對象的文獻指出，語音為維持工作記憶的主要表
徵，而本實驗室過往的研究則指出：對中文刺激材料來說，因音旁相同所造成
的字形相似性也對中文短期記憶的表現有獨立的影響。在本研究中，為了更進
一步的了解中文語文工作記憶的機制，總共安排了四個系列的實驗。實驗1 主
要想釐清對於中文的工作記憶來說，共享音旁所觀察到的字形相似性效果，在
共享義旁的情況下是否仍舊可以被觀察到，因此針對義旁的位置、是否共享義
旁、以及義旁的透明度進行操弄，來闡明這三者變項與中文工作記憶之間的關
係。除了序列位置的新近效果以及語音抑制效果之外，此實驗的結果並沒有看
到任何達到顯著差異的效果，探究原因有可能是因為實驗刺激材料的操弄不夠
確實而導致。有鑒於此，實驗2 簡化了實驗1 操弄的變項，並且加強中文刺激
材料之間的的操弄，利用義旁相似性（共享義旁與否）以及義旁透明度來驗證
中文工作記憶的機制。從實驗結果中觀察到：字形相似性以及義旁透明度效果
的不穩定存在，兩者均是在沒有語音抑制的情況下才可以看到顯著差異，但是
增加了語音抑制的任務之後，兩者皆消失了。我們認為這是由於中文構字的特
殊性，使得共享義旁的字形相似性也會導致語義的相似，因而被語義相似性效
果所干擾。從此觀點出發，實驗3 則獨立操弄了共享義旁與否以及字義範疇相
似性，來探討是否中文工作記憶中存在有獨立的字形儲存系統和語義儲存系
統。且在實驗結果中同時觀察到字形相似性效果以及字義相似性效果，以及這
兩個變項與語音抑制的交互作用。進一步的事後檢定則發現，字義相似性效果
會因為同時進行語音抑制任務而增強，而字形相似性效果則不論有無語音抑制
皆被觀察到，但在無語音抑制的情況下，又和字義相似性有顯著的交互作用，
顯示這些效果間的複雜關聯。實驗4 則是確認中文工作記憶中的字形相似性是
有別於拼音文字中的視覺相似性，因此操弄了沒有共享任何中文部件的視覺相
似中文字，且安排了左右並排的中文字以及上下組成的中文字，來探討視覺相
似性以及字形組成方式與中文工作記憶的關係。實驗結果指出：對於中文使用
者來說，沒有分享任何語言表徵的部件所導致的單純視覺上的相似，有促進中
文工作記憶表現的效果，這點與拼音文字的研究發現正好相反。整體來說，本
研究四個系列實驗的結果顯示，因共享義旁所造成的字形相似性對於工作記憶
表現的影響並不穩定、也不獨立，反而會受到字義相似性、語音抑制與否等變
項的調節，和知覺層次的視覺相似性有本質上的不同。另外，字義相似性也在
有語音抑制的情況下輔助儲存短期記憶，影響對中文刺激材料的工作記憶表
現。將這些結果和因共享音旁所造成的字形相似性結果進行比較，可說明中文
部件中義旁和音旁之於工作記憶的不同重要性，以及中文工作記憶有別於拼音
文字工作記憶的獨特性。

The main research of alphabetic language (ex. English) pointed out that phonology was the main representation to maintain working memory. However, the previous research of Chinese stimuli in our laboratory had revealed that the orthographic similar caused by the shared phonetic radicals also affected Chinese verbal short-term memory independently. In this thesis, in order to further understand the mechanism about Chinese verbal working memory, four series experiments have examined. The experiment 1 focuses to clarify the similarity effect of orthography can also be found from the shared semantic radicals, not only from the shared phonetic radical. The position of semantic radical (left or right), shared semantic radicals, and the transparency of the semantic radical were manipulated in order to examine the relationship among these three variables and Chinese verbal working memory. There are not any other significant differences in addition to recency effect and the effect of articulatory suppression. One possibility was investicgated to cause this result might be because the manipulation of the Chinese stimuli was not efficient. Hence, the experiment 2 modified the manipulation of the stimuli to testified the Chinese verbal working memory mechamism between similarity of semantic radical and the transparency of the semantic radicals. It is observed from this experiment that the effect of orthographic similarity and the effect of semantic radical transparency are not stable. These two effect was observed under silent condition, but not under articulatory suppression condition. It is convinced that due to the particularity of Chinese word formation, the similarity of the orthographic by shared semantic radicals also leads to semantic similarity. Thus, the effect of similarity orthographic might be disturbed by the effect of semantic similarity. According to this, the experiment 3 independently manipulates the similarity of orthography (by shared semantic radicals) and the similarity of semantic categories in order to explore whether are there exist the orthographic and semantic storage system independently in the Chinese verbal working memory. The result of experiment 3 reveals that it is observed both the effect of orthographic and semantic similarity and the interaction between articulatory suppression and these two effects. Futher analysis tells that the effect of semantic similarity will strength under articulatory suppression condition while the effect of orthographic similarity can be observed whether under articulatory suppression condition or not. When this effect under silent condition, there is an interaction with the effect of semantic similarity. All these results can tell that there are complex relationships between the effect of seamantics and orthography. The experiment 4 aims to testify the effect of orthographic similarity in Chinese verbal working memory is different from the effect of visual similarity. Visual similarity without shard any radicals and vertical and horizontal Chinese words are manipulated in this experiment in order to explore the relationship between visual similarity effect, word formation and Chinese verbal working memory. This result points out that only visual similar (without shsre any linguistic radicals) may increase the performance of the Chinese verbal working memory, and this is different from the research about the alphabetic language. Overall, the results of these four series experiments reveals that the effect of orthographic similarity by shared semantic radical are not stable and not independent on verbal working memory. Instead, it will be adjusted by variables such as semantic similarity, with or without articulatory suppression condition, and visual similarity at the perceptual level. In addition, semantic similarity also assists the storage of short-term memory under the condition of articulatory suppression, which affects the working memory performance of Chinese stimuli. Comparing these results with the orthographic similarity by shared phonetic radicals, it can explain the different importance of semantic and phonetic radical to Chinese verbal memory, and the spaciality of Chinese verbal memory different from alphabetic ones.

一、 緒論 1
二、 背景說明 3
2-1 拼音語言的語文工作記憶中相似性實驗的研究 3
2-1-1 語音相似性效果研究 3
2-1-2 語義相似性效果研究 4
2-1-3 視覺相似性研究 6
2-1-4 字長效果(word length effect)、語音抑制效果(articulatory suppression effect) 10
2-2 中文工作記憶的研究 10
2-2-1 中文的特性 11
2-2-2 中文語文工作記憶的表徵研究 18
2-3 工作記憶生理機制的神經科學證據 23
2-4 研究目的 24
三、 實驗1 初探共享義旁的字形相似性效果 26
3-1 實驗方法 26
3-2 結果 29
3-3 討論 32
四、 實驗2 再探共享義旁的字形相似性效果 37
4-1 實驗方法 38
4-2 結果 41
4-3 討論 43
五、 實驗3 SSE語義相似性效果 47
5-1 實驗方法 47
5-2 結果 49
5-3 討論 51
六、 實驗4 VSE 視覺相似性效果 55
6-1 實驗方法 55
6-2 結果 57
6-3 討論 59
七、 綜合討論 61
八、 結論與後續發展 68
參考書目 70
附錄 79

Acheson, D. J., Postle, B. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 17–36.
Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 64–88.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In I. K. W. Spence (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1966a). The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 302-309
Baddeley, A. D. (1966b). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362-365.
Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The Psychology of Memory. New York: Basic Books.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423.
Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56(11), 851-864.
Baddeley, A. D., & Dale, H. C. A. (1966). The effects of semantic similarity on retroactive interference in long and short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 417–420.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psycholoigy of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 8, 47-90. New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., &Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 233–252.
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and structure of short-term-memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 575-589.
Bourassa, D.C., & Besner, D. (1994). Beyond the articulatory loop: A semantic contribution of serial order recall of subspan lists. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 122-125.
Chen, H. Y. (2007). The semantic and orthographic contribution to VSTM: Evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments. Master’s thesis. National Central University, Taiwan.
Chen, M. J., & Weekes, B. S. (2004). Effects of semantic radicals on Chinese character categorization and character decision. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 46, 179–195.
Chen, Y. P., & Allport, A. (1995). Attention and lexical decomposition in Chinese word recognition: conjunctions of from and position guide selective attention. Visual Cognition, 2, 235–268.

Connor, J.M., & Hoyer, R.G. (1976). Auditory and visual similarity effects in recognition and recall. Memory and Cognition, 4, 261-264.
Conrad, R. (1963). Acoustic confusions and memory span for word. Nature, 197, 1029-1030.
Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusion in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.
DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Della Sala, S., Gray, C., Baddeley, A., Allamano, N., & Wilson, L. (1999). Pattern span: A tool for unwelding visuo-spatial memory, Neuropsychologia, 37, 1189-1199.
Ding, G., Peng, D., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30 (2), 530-539.
Fan, K.Y., Gao, J. Y. & Ao, X. P.(1984). Pronunciation principle of the Chinese character and alphabet writing scripts. Chinese Character reform, 3, 19-22. Beijing: National Commission of Chinese Character Reform.
Fang, S. P., Horng, R. Y., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In H. S. R. Kao & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Linguistics, Psychology, and the Chinese Language, 11-21. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong Press.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. (1997). The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 776–781.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. (1999). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 559–576.
Feldman, L.B., & Turvey, M.T. (1980). Words written in Kana are named faster than the same words written in Kanji. Language and Speech, 23, 141–147.
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993) Working Mmemory and Llanguage. Psychology Press.
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 1-30.
Han, Z., Bi, Y., Shu, H., & Weekes, B. S. (2005). The interaction between semantic and sublexical routes in reading: Converging evidence form Chinese. Brain & Language, 95, 235-236.
Henson, R.N.A., Burgess, N., Frith, C.D. (2000). Recoding, storage, rehearsal and grouping in verbal short-term memory: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 38, 426–440.
Hitch, G. J., M. S. Halliday, A. M. Schaafstal and J. M. C. Schraagen, 1988. Visual working memory in young children. Memory and Cognition, 16, 120-132.
Hitch, G. J., Woodin, M. E., & Baker, S. (1989). Visual and phonological components of working memory in children. Memory & Cognition, 17, 175–185.
Hsiao, J. H. W., & Shillcock, R. (2006). Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: Implications for orthographic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 405–426.
Hsiao, J. H.W., Shillcock, R., & Lavidor, M. (2007). An examination of semantic radical combinability effects with lateralized cues in Chinese character recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(3), 338–344.
Hsu, C. H., Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. Y., &Tzeng, O. J. (2009). Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency Effects in Reading Chinese Phonograms: An Event-Related Potential Study. Brian and Language, 108, 56-66.
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1995). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73–98.
Hue, C. W. (1992). Recognition Processes in Character Naming. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language Processing in Chinese. Advances in Psychology (Vol. 90, pp. 93-107). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hue, C. W., & Erickson, J. R. (1988). Short-term memory for Chinese characters and radicals. Memory & cognition, 16(3), 196–205.
Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, G. D. A., Martin, S., & Stuart, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1217-1232.
Hung, Y. H., Hung, D., Tzeng, O., & Wu, D. (2014). Tracking the temporal dynamics of the processing of phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character recognition by MEG, Journal of Neurolingustics, 29, 42-65.
Larsen J. D., Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. D. (2000). Phonological similarity and irrelevant speech: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory. Memory, 8, 145-158.
Lai, C.-Y. (2008). Phonological and orthographic similarity affects verbal shortterm memory for Chinese characters. Master´s thesis. National Central University, Taiwan.
Leck, K. J., Weekes, B. S., & Chen, M. J. (1995). Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers. Memory and Cognition, 23, 468–476.
Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Su, E. C. I., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L. (2005). Consistency, regularity, and frequency effects in naming Chinese characters. Language and Linguistics, 6, 75–107.
Li, Yin-Chen. (2013). Behavioral and fMRI investigations on the effects of phonological and visual similarity of English words on short-term memory in unbalanced Chinese-English bilinguals. Master’s thesis. National Central University, Taiwan.
Lin, P. -H., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The influence of similarity on visual working memory representations. Visual Cognition, 17(3), 356–372.
Lin, Y.-C., Chen, H.-Y., Lai, Y. C., & Wu, D. H. (2015). Phonological similarity and orthographic similarity affect probed serial recall of Chinese characters. Memory and Cognition, 43, 538–554.
Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., Wynn, V., & Baddeley, A. D. (2000). Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(3), 626–646.
Logie, R. H,, Saito, S., Morita, A., Varma, S., Norris, D. (2016). Recalling visual serial order for verbal sequences. Memory and Cognition, 44, 590-607.
Majerus, S., D’Argembeau, A., Martinez Perez, T., Belayachi, S., Van der Linden, M., Collette, F., … Maquet, P. (2010). The commonality of neural networks for verbal and visual short-term memory. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 22(11), 2570–93.
Martin, R.C., Shelton, J.R., & Yaffee, L.S. (1994). Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological Evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 83-111.
Martin, R.C., Wu, D., Freedman, M., Jackson, E.F., & Lesch, M. (2003). An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological versus semantic short-term memory. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 341-360.
Monnier, C., & Syssau, A. (2008). Semantic contribution to verbal short-term memory: Are pleasant words easier to remember than neutral words in serial recall and serial recognition? Memory & Cognition, 36, 35–42.
Monnier, C., &Bonthoux, F. (2011). The semantic-similarity effect in children: Influence of long-term knowledge on verbal short-term memory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 929–941.
Mou, L. C., & Anderson, N. S. (1981). Graphemic and phonemic codings of Chinese characters in short-term retention. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17(6), 255-258
Murray, D. J. (1968). Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 679-684.
Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? Psychological Review, 115, 544-576.
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993). The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory, Nature, 362, 342-343.
Poirier, M., Saint-Aubin, J., Musselwhite, K., Mohanadas, T., & Mahammed, G. (2007). Visual similarity effects on short-term memory for order: The case of verbally labeled pictorial stimuli. Memory & Cognitin, 35, 711-723.
Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Pp. xlvi, 920.
Raser, G. A. (1972). Recording of Semantic and Acoustic Information n Short-term Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 692-697.
Saint-Aubin, J., Ouellette, D., & Poirier, M. (2005). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there an effect on all trials? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 171–177.
Saito, H. (1981). Use of graphemic and phonemic encoding in reading Kanji and Kana. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 52, 266–273.
Saito, S., Logie, R. H., Morita, A., & Lawb, A. (2008). Visual and phonological similarity effects in verbal immediate serial recall: A test with kanji materials. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 1–17.
Salmon, E., Van der Linden, M., Collette, F., Delfiore, G., Maquet, P., Degueldre, C., … Franck, G. (1996). Regional brain activity during working memory tasks. Brain, 119, 1617–1625.
Schroeder, P. J., Copeland, D. E., & Bies-Hernandez, N. J. (2012). The influence of story context on a working memory span task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 488-500.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The Time Course of Phonological Code Activation in Two Writing Systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
Shivde, G., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2004). Dissociating semantic and phonological maintenance using fMRI. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 10–19.
Shulman, H. G. (1970). Encoding and retention of semantic and phonemic information in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 499-508
Shulman, H. G. (1971). Similarity effects in short-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 399-415.
Shulman, H. G. (1972). Semantic confusion errors in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 221-227.
Sumiyoshi, C., Matsuo, K., Kato, C., Ozawa, F., Takehara, Y., Isoda, H., … Nakai, T. (2003). Orthography effect on brain activities in the working memory process for phonologically ambiguous syllables: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using Japanese speakers. Neuroscience letters, 336(1), 50–4.
Tse, C.S. (2010). A negative semantic similarity effect on short-term order memory: evidence from recency judgements. Memory (Hove, England), 18, 638–656.
Tse, C.S., Li, Y., & Altarriba, J. (2011). The effect of semantic relatedness on immediate serial recall and serial recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2425-2437.
Venezky, R. L. (1970). The Structure of English Orthography. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
Walker, P., Hitch, G.J., & Duroe, A. (1993). The effect of visual similarity on short-term
memory for spatial location: Implications for the capacity of visual short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 83, 203-224.
Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1256–1271.
Wang, M. (2006). Examining the bias for orthographic components using an apparent motion detection task. Psychologia, 49, 193–213.
Watkins, M. J., & Watkins, O. C. (1973). The postcategorical status of the modality effect in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 226-230.
Williams and Bright, The World's Writing Systems, Oxford, 1996.
Williams, C. & Bever, T. (2010). Chinese Character Decoding: A Semantic Bias? Reading and Writing, 23, 589-605
Wolford, G., & Hollingsworth, S. (1974). Evidence that short-term memory is not the limiting factor in tachistoscopic full-report procedure. Memory and Cognition, 2, 796-800.
Wu, Y., Wang, X., & Chen, H. (2015). ERP effects of radical combinability in Chinese character recognition, Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47, 157-166.
Yeh, S. L., & Li, J. L. (2002). Role of structure and component in judgments of visual similarity of Chinese characters. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 28(4), 933-947.
Yeh, S. L., Li, J. L., & Chen, I. P. (1997). The perceptual dimensions underlying the classification of the shapes of Chinese characters. Chinese Journal ofPsychology, 39(1), 47-74.
Yeh, S. L., Li, J. L., & Chen, K. M. (1999). Classification of the shapes of Chinese characters: Verification by different predesignated categories and varied sample sizes. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 41(1), 65-85.
Yik, W. F. (1978). The effect of visual and acoustic similarity on short-term memory for Chinese words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 487-494
Yun, H., Mauner, G., Roland, D., & Koenig, J. P. (2012). The effect of semantic similarity is a function of contextual constraint. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 34, 1191-1196.
Zhang, G. & Simon A. H. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 13, 193-201.
Zhou, Y. (1978). To what degree are the ‘‘phonetics’’ of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic? Zhongguo Yuwen, 146, 172–177.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. Ziegler,
李宜蓓、張葶葶、洪蘭、曾志朗、李俊仁（2006）。語文記憶中項目與項目位置訊息的單一運作系統。中華心理學刊，48，315-327。
李佳穎（2009）。中文識字的認知與神經基礎。基礎教育學報，18，63-85。
李軒、劉思耘（2012）。漢語短時序列回憶中的語音相似性和視覺相似性效應。心理學報，44，1571-1582。
陳湘淳、高于涵、李玉琇（2015）。作業間的語意關聯性對工作記憶的影響。中華心理學刊，27，177-194。
鄭昭明、吳淑杰（1994）。文字刺激的饜足與解體。In H.-W. Chang, J.-T. Huang, C.-W. Hue, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing, Vol. 1. (pp. 1-29). Taipei: Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University