( 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/08 19:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  


研究生(外文):Chia-Chun Li
論文名稱(外文):The Impact on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance by national institutions
指導教授(外文):Gee San
外文關鍵詞:corporate social responsibilityvarieties of the capitalisminstitutional theorystakeholder theory
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:105
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:47
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
依資本主義多樣性觀點將國家分為自由市場經濟 (加拿大與澳洲)、協調市場經濟 (德國、瑞典、芬蘭、丹麥、挪威與奧地利) 與國家主導型市場經濟 (法國),使用湯森路透Eikon with datastream資料庫和企業財務金融資料庫 (Compustat on S&P Capital IQ) 的資料,分析企業CSR績效與財務績效之間的影響。透過實證模型本文得到三個主要結果,第一,CSR績效與財務績效之間具有雙向之正向影響;第二,與自由市場經濟制度相比,協調市場經濟制度、國家主導型市場經濟制度對CSR績效、財務績效皆有更大的正向影響;第三,不同經濟制度之下,CSR績效與財務績效之影響程度有所不同,兩者之關聯性在自由市場經濟中最為強烈,協調市場經濟次之,國家主導型市場經濟最微弱。此結果可能是由於各國對於CSR制度化之程度差異所造成的,也就是說,CSR制度化不僅有利於提升CSR水平,也能提高企業的財務績效表現。
Extensive research has investigated the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on economic benefits, focusing on the analysis of factors of individual enterprise. However, the macroeconomic factors, such as the business organization and the motivation of manufacturers' behavior caused by the national cultures and institutions, are less discussed. In this thesis, we define CSR as the ability to manage stakeholders and analyze how aspects of motives for engaging in CSR affect the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance using the varieties of the capitalism (VOC) approach.

The study uses data from Thomson Reuters Eikon database and Compustat on S&P Capital IQ for a sample of firms from countries classified as liberal market economies (Australia and Canada), coordinated market economies (Germany, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway, and Austria), and state‐led market economies (France). Three main results are obtained in this thesis through the empirical model. First, there is a two-way positive effect between CSR performance and financial performance. Second, compared with liberal market economies, coordinated market economies and state‐led market economies have a greater positive impact on CSR performance and financial performance. Third, under different market economies, the degree of CSR performance and financial performance of the mutual influence is different. These results may be due to the differences in the level of institutionalization of CSR, that is, CSR institutionalization not only helps to raise CSR levels but also improves the financial performance of enterprises.
摘要 i
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2.1 CSR 4
2.2 財務績效與CSR之關聯性 6
2.3 制度對CSR之影響 10
第三章 研究方法與變數說明 14
3.1 研究方法 14
3.2 資料來源與變數說明 16
3.3 敘述統計分析 21
第四章 實證結果 25
4.1 單變數檢驗 25
4.2 聯立方程模型 27
4.3 本章小節 32
第五章 結論 34
5.1 實證結論與討論 34
5.2 研究限制與建議 36
參考文獻 37

Agudelo, M. A. L., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1.
Arrow, K. J. (1973). Social responsibility and economic efficiency. Public Policy, 21(3), 303-317.
Barkemeyer, R. (2007). Legitimacy as a key driver and determinant of CSR in developing countries. Paper presented at “the 2007 Marie Curie Summer School on Earth System Governance”, Amsterdam.
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of business ethics, 97(1), 71-86.
Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Moneva, J. (2008). Corporate Social Reporting and Reputation Risk Management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 337-361
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic management journal, 30(8), 895-907.
De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair‐trade coffee. Journal of consumer affairs, 39(2), 363-385.
Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional‐stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management studies, 43(1), 47-73.
Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business ethics quarterly, 409-421.
Gallego‐Álvarez, I., & Quina‐Custodio, I. A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility reporting and varieties of capitalism: An international analysis of state‐led and liberal market economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 478-495.
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 235-248.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Hall PA, Soskice D (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford; 1–68.
Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2012). Financial constraints on corporate goodness (No. w18476). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Rights and production functions: An application to labor-managed firms and codetermination. Journal of business, 469-506.
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 106(1), 53-72.
Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2012). Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 85-108.
Kao, E. H., Yeh, C. C., Wang, L. H., & Fung, H. G. (2018). The relationship between CSR and performance: Evidence in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 51, 155-170.
Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56-72.
Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20-46.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?. Strategic management journal, 21(5), 603-609.
—— (2001) ——Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of economic perspectives, 5(1), 97-112.
Pérez, A., & Del Bosque, I. R. (2013). Measuring CSR image: three studies to develop and to validate a reliable measurement tool. Journal of business ethics, 118(2), 265-286.
Preston, L. E., & O'bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419-429.
Schlierer, H. J., Werner, A., Signori, S., Garriga, E., von Weltzien Hoivik, H., Van Rossem, A., & Fassin, Y. (2012). How do European SME owner–managers make sense of ‘stakeholder management’?: Insights from a cross-national study. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 39-51.
Shiu, Y. M., & Yang, S. L. (2017). Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance‐like effects?. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 455-470.
Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274-1303.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), 303-319.
Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607-1616.
Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247-261.
Young, S., & Marais, M. (2012). A multi‐level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 432-450
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔