跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(2600:1f28:365:80b0:f3de:de2a:940c:ec8b) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 07:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳柏安
研究生(外文):Chen, Po-An
論文名稱:國籍低成本航空公司營運特質和方案對旅客忠誠度之影響
論文名稱(外文):Influence of Operation Characteristics and Alternatives on Passenger Loyalties for the Taiwan National Low-cost Carrier
指導教授:盧華安盧華安引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lu, Hua-An
口試委員:陳方元林秀芬
口試委員(外文):Chen, Fang-YuanLin, Hsiu-Fen
口試日期:2020-07-13
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣海洋大學
系所名稱:航運管理學系
學門:運輸服務學門
學類:運輸管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:79
中文關鍵詞:低成本航空公司營運特質和方案旅客滿意度旅客忠誠度偏最小平方法分群分析
外文關鍵詞:Low-cost CarriersOperation Characteristics and AlternativesPassenger SatisfactionPassenger LoyaltyPartial Least SquaresMulti-group Analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:235
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:15
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
低成本航空(Low Cost Carrier, LCC)經營模式日趨穩定,並擁有一定的市場佔有率和吸引力。本研究探討影響旅客選擇我國唯一國籍低成本航空,臺灣虎航之關鍵因素,首先從經營觀點切入,蒐羅票價促銷、費用組合、異業合作、航線航點、知覺感受、服務補救、滿意度與忠誠度等構面之相關文獻,並綜整臺灣虎航本身營運的基本層面特質,再將旅客實際會接觸到的方案融入調查問卷當中,透過臺灣虎航公司三位專業人士的檢視與建議,設計出為臺灣虎航量身打造的構面與問項。統計數據方面,本研究應用PLS-SEM 結構方程模式,剖析各構面和滿意度、忠誠度間的關聯性,並驗證評估模型的實用性與可行性,另就不同背景旅客進行分群分析,除了全體受訪者,更將資料以搭機經驗和是否為企業會員做更深入探討。

研究結果顯示,整體而言一般促銷的幅度有成功吸引大多數受訪者產生購買意願;除了注重較低的票價外,旅客也很留意服務失敗後虎航如何幫助旅客處理善後;虎航基本層面的班表、航點、起降時間與準點率並不會因為過往搭機次數多寡或是否為會員而有不同,代表只要是旅客,皆對航線航點底下的特質十分重視;一般大眾考量是否搭乘虎航的因素較多,航線航點、知覺感受及服務補救對滿意度皆有重大影響,意味著除了提供便宜的票價吸引更多旅客嘗試虎航外,也可以藉由提升空地勤服務、班機時間帶及獨家航點,創造非價格戰所產生的客源。
tiger club類群顯示其願意再度購買臺灣虎航之機票,往後虎航可在tiger club會員計畫中給予更多專屬方案,除提升旅客在行為忠誠上的黏著度外,也增加更多吸引旅客加入tiger club之誘因;六次LCC以上搭乘經驗者類群其航線航點會直接影響旅客忠誠度,藉此虎航可以再深入追蹤旅客偏好旅遊的目的地和起降時間,搭配本身現有航線的營運狀況和航班時刻表,評估是否需要做出航點或時間帶的調整,從而吸引競爭對手之顧客;六次虎航以上搭乘經驗類群與眾不同之處為費用組合對滿意度有正向顯著影響,顯示該類群旅客會衡量自身需求選擇購買不同項目,藉此虎航可以進一步調查偏好購買的單項或組合,比對目前上市的商品是否符合其實際需求,評估有無需要改善之處,進而保留現有客群。此研究結果可提供臺灣虎航公司瞭解實際營運層面的調整與推出的特殊方案對旅客產生之效果為何,以利後續進行差異行銷運用和規劃改善策略時之參考。
Low-cost Carriers (LCCs) has been a stable business model with a certain market share and attractiveness. This study aims to explore if the operation characteristics and alternatives of Tigerair Taiwan influence passengers’ satisfaction and further affect the passengers’ loyalties. Firstly, conducts literature review is about the critical factors of LCCs, including “price promotion”, “combo fare”, “cross-industry cooperation”, “flight schedule and route”, “perceived value”, “service failure and recover”, “satisfaction” and “loyalty”. Secondly, use the actual scheme into the questionnaire. Through the inspection and suggestions of three managers from Tigerair Taiwan, the specialized dimensions and questions were used in the structural equation model (SEM) and the partial least squares method were used to analyze data from 500 passengers. In addition, the data will be divided into multi groups by different fly experience and whether tiger club membership or not.

The promotion has successfully attracted the majority of passengers to purchase flight tickets. In addition to focus on lower fares, passengers are also aware of how Tigerair Taiwan helps them handle their trips after service failures. And all of them attach importance to the flight route, schedule and punctuality rate. General public will consider many reasons about fly with Tigerair Taiwan, such as “flight schedule and route”, “perceived value” and “service failure and recover”. These three operation characteristics influence passengers’ satisfaction a lot. That’s means in addition to offering cheaper tickets to attract more passengers, it can also create new customer by improving service, flight schedules and exclusive destinations. The tiger club group is willing to buy Tigerair Taiwan tickets again. Tigerair Taiwan can offer more exclusive programs in the tiger club membership in the future. In addition to enhancing the behavioral loyalty of passengers, it also adds more incentives to attract passengers to join the tiger club. Loyalty will be directly affected by the flight schedule and route of the passengers with more than six LCCs experience. Satisfaction will be directly affected by the combo fare of the passengers with more than six Tigerair Taiwan experience. These results provide Tigerair Taiwan to understand the effect of special program on the passengers in the actual operation. And the findings of this research could be beneficial for airlines setting up their differentiated marketing strategies in the future.
謝辭 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目次 IV
圖目次 VI
表目次 VII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 3
1.3研究方法與流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1航空公司服務品質要素 5
2.2選擇搭乘低成本航空之影響因素 7
2.3航空公司營運特質 9
2.3.1票價促銷 12
2.3.2異業合作 14
2.3.3費用組合 14
2.3.4航線航點 15
2.3.5知覺感受 17
2.3.6服務補救 18
2.4旅客滿意度與忠誠度 19
第三章 研究設計 21
3.1研究架構與假設 21
3.2研究變項與問卷設計 22
3.3抽樣與問卷回收 25
3.4信效度分析 29
3.5結構方程模式與偏最小平方法 31
第四章 實證分析與討論 35
4.1敘述性統計 35
4.2研究假設驗證 44
4.2.1 PLS Algorithm計算 44
4.2.2 PLS Bootstrapping計算 47
4.3中介效果暨影響強度 49
4.4綜合討論 50
第五章 分群分析 52
5.1 tiger club 52
5.2擁有六次以上臺灣虎航搭乘經驗 56
5.3擁有六次以上LCC搭乘經驗 60
5.4小結 64
第六章 結論與建議 67
6.1研究結果與實務意涵 67
6.2未來研究建議 70
參考文獻 71
附錄 77
一、中文部分

1.丁嵩斌(2012),「航空公司哩程酬賓計畫會員之認知價值、知覺公平對滿意度影響之研究」,國立高雄應用科技大學觀光與餐旅管理研究所碩士論文。
2.王月香(2014),「廉價航空服務品質、顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度之研究」,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
3.牛詩淵(2016),「旅客對航空公司環境保護作業知覺之實證研究」,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系博士論文。
4.沈志紜(2012),「航空旅運流程服務滿意度評量之研究」,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
5.吳忠霖(2014),「考量時間帶變動下航空公司飛航排程暨班次表建立之研究」,國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
6.李佳穎(2016),「航空公司免費託運行李及超額收費旅客認知之研究」,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
7.吳振榮(2013),「國際航空公司品牌滿意度與忠誠度之研究」,開南大學商學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。
8.李清財(2010),「消費者對低成本航空購買決策過程影響因素之研究」,德明財 經科技大學服務業經營管理研究所碩士論文。
9.邱皓玫(2011),「當PLS遇上SEM:議題與對話」,αβγ量化研究學刊,第三卷,第一期,頁20-53。
10.何雍慶、蔡青姿(2009),「運用PLS方法探討價值創新導入新產品開發之調節角色」,中華管理評論國際學報,第十二卷,第二期,頁1-25。
11.卓沅威(2014),「家庭出國旅遊航空公司選擇決策之研究」,國立高雄海洋科技大學航運管理研究所碩士論文。
12.周儀婷(2014),「從服務失誤、服務補救與品牌形象探討顧客滿意度與再購意圖之關係‐以C航空集團為例」,逢甲大學景觀與遊憩碩士學位學程碩士論文。
13.侯心雅(2014),「五流管理、來源國形象、延伸性產品與顧客忠誠度之關係的研究-以台灣黑貓宅急便為例」,文藻外語大學國際事業暨文化交流研究所碩士論文。
14.姚憲天(2013),「亞洲低成本航空佈局之探究」,國立交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士論文。
15.陳佳均(2015),「探討潛在與現有旅客選擇廉價航空意願的關鍵因素之研究」,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
16.陳威豪(2018),「探討旅行社與低成本航空業者合作之利基」,國立高雄科技大學航運管理研究所碩士論文。
17.許悅玲、王鼎鈞(2019),低成本航空經營與管理,初版,台北:揚智文化。
18.許悅玲(2018),「航空業服務創新策略與模式之研究‐以航空公司為例」,財團法人中華航空事業發展基金會委託研究計畫報告書。
19.黃士芸(2014),「服務失誤、服務補救、情緒知覺與行為意圖關係之研究‐航空客運服務」,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
20.黃沛芊(2018),「航線航班預測模式之建構與應用」,國立交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士論文。
21.黃怡文(2014),「影響旅客選擇搭乘廉價航空關鍵要素之研究」,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
22.詹雁茹(2015),「航空業的服務品質、公司聲譽與顧客滿意度關係之探討」,國立屏東大學國際貿易學系碩士班碩士論文。
23.劉宗哲、郭嶷(2009),「線上購物中服務品質與計算滿意度對顧客忠誠的影響」,電子商務學報,第十一卷,第三期,頁639-672。
24.劉俊邑(2019),「體驗行銷、體驗價值對行為意圖之影響‐以精品航空公司為例」,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
25.蕭文龍(2018),統計分析入門與應用‐ SPSS + Smart PLS 3(PLS-SEM),二版,台北:碁峰資訊。
26.賴昭蓉(2019),「探討低成本航空消費者產品選擇之研究:框架效果與時間壓力之影響」,國立交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士論文。
27.蕭湘軒(2017),「服務或品牌?低成本航空顧客購買行為的探索‐依附理論的應用」,國立高雄應用科技大學觀光管理系觀光與餐旅管理碩士班碩士論文。
28.謝依靜、邱瓊惠(2007),「航空業促銷方案對顧客利益與顧客行為關聯性之研究」,顧客滿意學刊,第三卷第二期,頁1-30。
29.羅雪雲(2007),「台灣旅行社經營策略與航空公司之競合關係‐以可樂旅遊公司為例」,國立中山大學高階經營碩士班(EMBA)碩士論文。
30.蘇奕豪(2016),「亞洲低成本航空網路佈局與經營模式分析」,國立交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士論文。

二、英文部分

1.Akamavi, R.K., Mohamed, E., Pellmann, K. and Xu, Y. (2015), “Key Determinants of Passenger Loyalty in the Low-cost Airline Business,” Tourism Management, Vol. 46, pp. 528-545.
2.Alderighi, M. and Gaggero, A. A. (2018), “Flight Availability and International Tourism Flows,” Annals of Tourism Research
3.Chang, L.Y. and Hung, S.C. (2013), “Adoption and Loyalty Toward Low Cost: The Case of Taipei Singapore Passengers,” Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 29-36.
4.Chen, L., Li, Y. Q. and Liu, C. H. (2019), “How Airline Service Quality Determines the Quantity of Repurchase Intention - Mediate and Moderate Effects of Brand Quality and Perceived Value,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 75, pp. 185-197.
5.Chiu, S. C., Liu, C. H. and Tu, J. H. (2016), “The Influence of Tourists' Expectations on Purchase Intention: Linking Marketing Strategy for Low-cost Airlines,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 53, pp. 226-234.
6.Cho, S. H., Ali, F. and Manhas, P. S. (2018), “Examining the Impact of Risk Perceptions on Intentions to Travel by Air: A Comparison of Full-service Carriers and Low-cost Carriers,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 71, pp. 20-27.
7.Chou, P. F. (2015), “An Analysis of the Relationship between Service Failure, Service Recovery and Loyalty for Low-cost Carrier Travelers,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 47, pp. 119-125.
8.Daft, J., and Albers, S. (2013), “A Conceptual Framework for Measuring Airline Business Model Convergence,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 28, pp. 47-54.
9.Daraban, B. (2012), “The Low Cost Carrier Revolution Continues: Evidence from the US Airline Industry,” Journal of Business & Economics Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 37-44.
10.Farooqa, M. S., Salam, M., Fayolle, A., Jaafar, N. and Ayupp, K. (2018), “Impact of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in Malaysia Airlines: A PLS-SEM Approach,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 67, pp. 169-180.
11.Ferrer-Rosell, B., Martínez-Garcia, E. and Coenders, G. (2014), “Package and No-frills Air Carriers as Moderators of Length of Stay,” Tourism Management, Vol. 42, pp. 114-122.
12.Forgas, S., Moliner, M.A., Sanchez, J. and Palau, R. (2010), “Antecedents of Airline Passenger Loyalty: Low-cost Versus Traditional Airlines,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 229-233.
13.Haenlien, M. and Kaplan, A. M. (2004), “A Beginner’s Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis,” Understanding Statistics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 283-297.
14.Harcar, T., Kara, A., and Kucukemiroglu, O. (2006), “Consumer’s Perceived Value and Buying Behavior of Store Brands: An Empirical Investigation,” The Business Review, Vol. 5, No 2, pp. 55-62.
15.Huang, L. C. and Shiau, W. L. (2017), "Factors affecting creativity in information system development: Insights from a decomposition and PLS-MGA,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 117, pp. 496-520.
16.Jiang, H. (2013), “Service Quality of Low-cost Long-haul Airlines the Case of Jetstar Airways and AirAsia X,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 20-24.
17.Kaiser, H. F., (1974), “An index of factorical simplicity,” Psychometrica, Vol. 39, pp. 31-36.
18.Klein, K., Albers, S., Allroggen, F., and Malina, R. (2015), “Serving vs. Setting: What Drives the Establishment of Low-cost Carrier’s Foreign Bases,” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 79, pp. 17-30.
19.Koklic, M. K., Kukar-Kinney, M. and Vegelj, S. (2017), “An Investigation of Customer Satisfaction with Low-cost and Full-service Airline Companies,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 80, pp. 188-196.
20.Kurtulmusoğlu, F. B., Can G. F. and Tolon M. (2016), “A Voice in the Skies: Listening to Airline Passenger Preferences,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 57, pp. 13-15.
21.Lee, C. K. M., Ng, K. K. H., Chan, H. K., Choy, K. L., Tai, W. C. and Choi, L. S. (2018), “A Multi-group Analysis of Social Media Engagement and Loyalty Constructs between Full-service and Low-cost Carriers in Hong Kong,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 73, pp. 46-57.
22.Lerrthaitrakul, W. and Panjakajornsak, V. (2014a), “The Impact of Electronic Word-of-mouth Factors on Consumer’s Buying Decision-making Processes in the Low-cost Carriers: A Conceptual Framework,” International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 142-146.
23.Lin, H. F. and Huang, Y. W. (2015), “Using Analytic Network Process to Measure the Determinants of Low-cost Carriers Purchase Intentions: A Comparison of Potential and Current Customers,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 49, pp. 9-16.
24.Lin, W.B., Wang, M.K., and Hwang, K.P. (2010), “The Combined Model of Influencing Online Consumer Behavior,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 3236-3247.
25.Martinez-Garcia, E. and Royo-Vela, M. (2010), “Segmentation of Low-cost Flights Users at Secondary Airports,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 234-237.
26.Medina-Muñoz, D. R., Medina-Muñoz, R. D., and Suárez-Cabrera, M. A. (2018), “Determining Important Attributes for Assessing the Attractiveness of Airlines,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 70, pp. 45-56.
27.Meleddu, M., Paci, R., & Pulina, M. (2015), “Repeated Behaviour and Destination Loyalty,” Tourism Management, Vol. 50, pp. 159-171.
28.Mikulic, J. and Prebezac, D. (2011), “What Drives Passenger Loyalty to Traditional and Low-cost Airlines? A Formative Partial Least Squares Approach,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 17, No 4, pp. 237-240.
29.Milioti, C. P., Karlaftis, M. G. and Akkogiounoglou, E. (2015), “Traveler Perceptions and Airline Choice: A Multivariate Probit Approach,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 49, pp. 46-52.
30.Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.Pan, J. Y. and Truong, D. (2018), “Passengers’ Intentions to Use Low-cost Carriers: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 69, pp. 38-48.
32.Park, J. W. (2007), “Passenger Perceptions of Service Quality: Korean and Australian Case Studies,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 238-242.
33.Park, J.W., Robertson, R., and Wu, C.L. (2004), “The Effect of Airline Service Quality on Passenger’s Behavioral Intentions: A Korean Case Study,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 435-439.
34.Pirouz, D.M. (2006), "An Overview of Partial Least Squares,"Business Publications, Vol. 24.
35.Reibstein, D. (2002), “What Attracts Customers to Online Stores and What Keeps them Coming Back,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 465-473.
36.Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. and Straub, D. W. (2012), “A Critical Look at the Use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 2-14.
37.Saha, G.C. and Theingi. (2009), “Service Quality, Satisfaction, and Behavioural Intentions a Study of Low-cost Airline Carriers in Thailand,” Managing Service Quality, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 350-372.
38.Sandada, M. and Matibiri, B. (2016), “An Investigation into the Impact of Service Quality, Frequent Flier Programs and Safety Perception on Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in the Airline Industry in Southern Africa,” South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 11, pp. 41-53.
39.Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J. and Ringle, C. M. (2011), “Multigroup Analysis in Partial Least Square (PLS) Path Modeling: Alternative Methods and Empirical Results,” Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 22, pp. 195-218.
40.Sihite, J., Harun, T. W. and Nugroho, A. (2015), “The Low-cost Airline Consumer Price Sensitivity. An Investigation on the Mediating Role of Promotion and Trust in Brand,” International Research Journal of Business Studies, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 199-211.
41.Suki, N. M. (2014), “Passenger Satisfaction with Airline Service Quality in Malaysia: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach,” Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 10, pp. 26-32.
42.Urbach, N. and Ahlemann, F. (2010), “Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares,” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol. 11, pp. 5-40.

三、網頁部分

1. 交通部民用航空局,中華民國108年民航統計年報https://www.caa.gov.tw/Article.aspx?a=1092&lang=1
2.Boeing(2019). Commercial Market Outlook 2019-2038 https://www.boeing.com/commercial/market/commercial-market-outlook/
3.Pirouz, D. M. (2006). An overview of partial least squares.http://www.merage.uci.edu/~dpirouz04/research/pls/PLS.pdf
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊