臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

由於未來汽車產業將朝向車聯網、自動駕駛、車輛共享、電動化等方向發展，特別是在車電產值方面，全球汽車電子市場也都逐年的成長。車輛電子產業也為台灣3C 產業帶來了創造高利潤的想像空間，成為另一個令眾人有興趣的第4C（Car）產業。另外，國外原廠對於其零組件合作的廠商的公司治理及企業社會責任也都相當重視，願意嘗試購買使用電動車之消費者對於環保議題也會相對重視，因此開啟了我研究的動機。

本研究以台灣上市公司之電子業為研究對象，並劃分為二個族群，一組為已投入車用電子產業之電子公司，另一組為一般電子公司，研究期間為 2018年，採用獨立樣本T檢定來分析探討，比較分析二個族群在公司治理及社會責任方面的表現是否有所差異。實證結果發現，已投入車用電子產業之電子公司在公司治理、公司績效及人權議題方面的表現優於一般電子業，也證明從事相關多角化的企業會更重視公司治理及企業社會責任。

未來半導體與汽車的產業鏈的連結將越來越緊密，且車用電子產業與國外廠商合作的機會越來越多，欲加入車用電子產業的公司，也應該重視公司治理及企業社會責任。

The global automotive electronics market is also growing year on year as the future automotive industry will move towards vehicle interconnection, self-driving, vehicle sharing, electrification, etc., especially in terms of automotive electronics output value. The vehicle electronics industry has also brought to Taiwan's 3C industry the imagination of creating high profit margins, becoming another interesting 4C (Car) industry. In addition, foreign OEMs also pay a lot of attention to the corporate governance and corporate social responsibility of their component partners, and consumers who are willing to try to buy electric vehicles also pay a lot of attention to environmental issues. Thus opening my motivation for research.
In this study, the electronics industry of listed companies in Taiwan is studied and divided into two groups, one group is the electronics companies that have entered the automotive electronics industry and the other group is the general electronics companies. The study period is 2018, and the independent sample t-test was used to analyze whether there is a difference in the performance of the two ethnic groups in terms of corporate governance and social responsibility. The empirical results show that the performance of the electronics companies that have entered the automotive electronics industry is better than that of the general electronics industry in terms of corporate governance, corporate performance and human rights issues, which also proves that the companies that are involved in the related diversification will pay more attention to corporate governance and corporate social responsibility.
In the future, the semiconductor and automotive industry chains will become more and more closely linked, and the automotive electronics industry will have more and more opportunities to cooperate with foreign companies, companies that want to join the automotive electronics industry should also pay attention to corporate governance and corporate social responsibility.

第一章　緒論
第一節　研究背景
第二節　研究動機
第三節　研究目的
第四節　章節流程
第二章　文獻探討及假說之建立
第一節　車輛電子產業的現況與未來發展
第二節　公司治理及公司績效
第三節　企業社會責任
第四節　多角化
第五節　假說之建立
第三章　研究方法
第一節　研究架構
第二節　資料定義及變數定義
第三節　分析方法
第四章　實證結果與分析
第一節　獨立樣本T檢定結果分析
第二節　假設檢定
第五章　結論與建議

一、中文部份
1.王言、張佑廷、柯俊禎、張阜民(2017)，善盡企業社會責任對公司治理、獲利能力關係之探討，財金論文叢刊，27，34-49。
2.王綺楓、翁鶯娟(2013)，總經理雙元性、家族控制與研發投資，5(3)，153-168。
3.王建安（2002）。公司治理的模式與評估。台灣金融財務季刊，3(3)，159-187。
4.王祝三、莊雅雪和郭勁甫（2009），公司治理、投資與公司價值之關聯性。東吳經濟商學學報，66，69-114。
5.朱榮貴(2013)，第4C_車用電子之產業營運策略族群分析。
6.呂柏賢，(2019)，公司治理、環境績效與公司財務績效及價值相關性之研究。
7.李馨蘋、陳治豪、程心瑤(2015)，公司策略與公司績效之研究—公司治理之調節效果，中華管理評論國際學報，18(1)。
8.林文玲、傅鍾仁(2011)，企業社會責任之揭露對會計資訊價值攸關性－以台灣資訊電子業上市公司為例，商管科技季刊，12(2)。
9.林宜欣（2001）。台灣企業公益行為之研究。南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
10.林欣亭 (2004)，「企業創新力，創新認知程度，經營績效」，政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
11.林妙雀、顏怡音和陳雪芳（2008），公司治理與財務健全度對企業價值影響之研究－多元適應性雲形迴歸之運用。中山管理評論，16(4)， 787-822。
12.林瑩滋（2000），台灣企業贊助藝文活動的動機與決策模式之研究。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
13.林建煌（2002），管理學。台北：智勝。
14.陳智惠(2011)，企業履行企業社會責任對消費者購車意願之影響。
15.陳一如(2009)，創新能力與公司治理程度對多角化公司價值的影響：以台灣 電子業為例，管理評論，28(2)。
16.陳光榮（1996）。企業的社會責任與倫理。經濟情勢暨評論季刊，1(4)，150-158。
17.郭憲章、葉立仁和王麗惠（2016）。公司治理特性對於研究發展與企業財務績效關聯性之影響：以U-shape法檢定研發投入之非線性關係。證券市場發展季刊，28（4），1-38。
18.張英陣（1999）。企業與非營利組織的夥伴關係。社區發展季刊，85，62-69。
19.張凱鈞 (1998)，「集團企業跨業多角化與知識管理關連之研究」，政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
20.康峰菁(2010)，企業社會責任的整體認知與實際作為之研究：以台灣服務業為例，企業管理學報，86，75-114。
21.張育琳(2019)，節能減碳、企業綠色環境管理策略與公司績效之關連性，中山管理評論，27(2)，279-326
22.黃振豐、孔繁華和周純伊（2019）。環境策略、環境管理、公司治理關聯性之研究－以台灣上市櫃製造業為例。商略學報，11（2），151-168。
23.黃啟瑞、林婷鈴、劉恆逸(2018)，中小企業也能善盡社會責任？－社會資本觀點，企業管理學報，118，1-34。
24.黃營杉、齊德彰(2005)，企業倫理、社會責任與慈善公益作為之研究－以台灣高科技電子產業為例，人文暨社會科學期刊，1(2)。
25.楊炳韋（1995）。企業贊助公益活動行為之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
26.梁馨予、陳郁汶(2019)，董事會結構與企業社會責任報告書：以電腦及週邊產業與半導體公司為例，商略學報，11(1)，1-26。
27.廖學隆、楊家豪、黃隆洲，車輛電子產業的現況與未來發展，財團法人車輛研究中心
28.趙永祥、王建民、陳旭播(2007)，國際化程度與產品多角化策略對公司價值與財務績效影響之研究－以台灣電子業上市公司爲例，育達學院學報，14，17-42。
29.劉念寧（1990）。大型企業贊助公益活動之研究。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。
30.劉美纓、丁碧慧、朱奐聿(2014)，企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究，17，17-30。
31.賴丞坡和李昇倫（2012）。公司治理對產險公司經營績效影響之研究。保險專刊，28（2），169-185。
32.簡揆岳(2012)，企業社會責任與智慧資本對企業多角化之影響。
二、英文部份
1.Aguilera, R.V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G.(2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475-492.
2.Aguilera, R.V., Desender, K., Bednar, M.K., & Lee, J.H.(2015). Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 483-573.
3.Aoki, M.(2000). Information, corporate governance, and institutional diversity: Competitiveness in Japan, the USA, and the transnational economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.Becht, Marco, Patrick Bolton and Ailsa Röell (2002), “Corporate Governance and Control,” Working paper, ECGI.
5.Berle, A., & Means, G.(1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
6.Berger, Philip and Eli Ofek (1995), “Diversification's Effect on Firm Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 37, 39-65.
7.Bettis, R.A.and V,Mahajan, 1985, “ Risk / Return Performance of Diversified Firms. ” ,Management Science , Vol. 31, pp.785-799.
8.Booz Allen and Hamilton (1985), “Diversification: A Survey of European Chief Exectives”, Booz, Allen and Hamilton, Inc., NY.
9.Brown, W.O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K.(2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855-877.
10.Buallay, A., Hamdan, A., & Zureigat, Q.(2017). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), 78-98.
11.Burlingame, D. F., & Frishkoff, P. A. (1996). How does firm size affect corporate philanthropy. Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads (pp. 86-104). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University.
12.Cardinal, Laura and Tim C. Opler (1995), “Corporate Diversification and Innovative Efficiency: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 365-381.
13.Carroll, A. B. (1995). Business and xociety: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
14.Denis, David, Diane Denis and Atulya Sarin (1997), “Agency Problems, Equity Ownership and Corporate Diversification,” Journal of Finance, 52, 135-160.
15.Elkington, J.(2006). Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 522-529.
16.Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Professional networks and the institutionalization of a single mind Set. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 639-658.
17.Galaskiewicz, J. (1989). Corporate contributions to charity: nothing more than a marketing strategy? Philanthropic Giving-Studies in Varieties and Goals, 29(1), 246-260.
18.Gill, A.(2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26(2), 452-478.
19.Goold, M. and J. J. Quinn, “The Paradox of Strategic Controls”, Strategic Management Journal, 1990, pp. 43-57.
20.Grahn, J. L., Hannaford, W. J., & Laverty, K. J. (1987). Corporate philanthropy and marketing strategy: A review and directions for research in AMA educators proceeding. (Series53). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
21.Griffin, R. W. (1999). Management (6th ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
22.Harvey, J. W., & McCrohan, K. F. (1988). Strategic issues for charities and philanthropies. Long Range Planning, 21(6),44-45.
23.Hitt, M.A., R.E.Hoskisson and R.Duane Ireland, 1994, “ A Mid-Range Theory of the Interactive Effects of International and Product Diversification on Innovation and Performance. ”,Journal of Management,Vol.20 , pp.297-326.
24.Holmes, S. L. (1978). Adapting corporate structure for social responsibility. California Management Review, 1, 25-30.
25.Hoskisson, R. E. & M. A. Hitt (1990) “Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of Diversification: A Review and Critique of Theoretical Perspectives.”,Journal of Management, Vol.16, pp. 461-509.
26.Hussain1, N., Rigoni1, U., & Orij, R.P.(2018). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411-432.
27.Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H.(1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
28.Lang, L.H.P. et al., and R.M.Stulz, 1994 , “ Tobin’s q , Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance, Journal of Political Economy”, Vol. 102, No. 6, pp. 1248-1280.
29.Grant, R.M.and Azar P.J, 1988, “ Performance Differences Between The Wrigley / Rumel Strategic Categories. ”, Strategic Management Journal ,Vol. 9, pp.333-346.
30.Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C.(2015). Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(15), 1777-1790.
31.Marx, J. D. (1999). Corporate philanthropy: What is the strategy? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2),185-198.
32.Masher, P. (1984).What corporations get by giving. Business Marketing, Dec., 80-89.
33.Matsusaka, John (2001), “Corporate Diversification, Value Maximization and Organizational Capabilities,” Journal of Business, 74(3), 409-431.
34.Mitchell, R., Weaver, G., Agle, B., Bailey, A., & Carlson, J.(2016). Stakeholder Agency and Social Welfare: Pluralism and Decision Making in The Multi-Objective Corporation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 252-275.
35.Ncube, M.(2006). Corporate governance, firm valuation and performance. In Paper presented at a Conference on Can Africa Claim the 21st Century, 22, 24.
36.Ntim, C.G., & Soobaroyen, T.(2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468-494.
37.Rajan, Raghuram, Henri Servaes and Luigi Zingales (2000), “The Cost of Diversity: the Diversification Discount and Inefficient Investment,” Journal of Finance, 55(1), 35-80.
38.Rowe, W. G. and P. M. Wright, “Related and Unrelated Diversification and Their Effect on Human Resource Management Controls”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 1997, pp.329-338.
39.Rumelt, R. P., 1974, “ Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance” Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston.
40.Scharfstein, D. S., and Stein, J. C.. “The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets: Divisional Rent Seeking and Inefficient Investment.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 2537–2564.
41.Seel, K. (1995). Managing corporate and employee volunteer programs. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The volunteer management handbook (pp. 259-289). JohnWiley & Sons,Inc.
42.Shan, Y.G.(2015). Value relevance, earnings management and corporate governance in China. Emerging Markets Review, 23, 186-207.
43.Shleifer, Andrei and Robert W. Vishny (1986), “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.
44.Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W.(1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
45.Tirole, Jean (2001), “Corporate Governance,” Econometrica, 69(1), 1-35.
46.Useem, S. L. (1988). Market and institutional factors in corporate contributions. California Management Review, 2,77-88.
47.Villalonga, Belén (2004a), “Does Diversification Cause the 'Diversification Discount?,” Financial Management, 33(2), 5-27.
---- (2004b), “Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series,” Journal of Finance, 59(2), 475-502.
48.Walls, J., Berrone, P., & Phan, P.(2012). Corporate Governance and Environmental Performance: Is There Really a Link?. Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885-913.
49.Windsor, D.(2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93-114.
50.Yoshikawa, T., Zhu, H., & Wang, P.(2014). National Governance System, Corporate Ownership, and Roles of Outside Director: A Corporate Governance Bundle Perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 252-265.