跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.174) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/03 19:11
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:梁浩文
研究生(外文):Hao-Wen Liang
論文名稱:股票流動性對崩盤風險之影響—以電子業為例
論文名稱(外文):Stock Liquidity and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Taiwan Electronics Stocks
指導教授:周佩儀周佩儀引用關係
指導教授(外文):Pei-I Chou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺中科技大學
系所名稱:財務金融研究所碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:28
中文關鍵詞:崩盤風險股票流動性電子業
外文關鍵詞:Crash RiskStock LiquidityElectronics Stocks
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:136
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
有鑑於金融風暴爆發之前,各國股票指數及週轉率都異常增加甚至創新高之現象,以及金融風暴時股價發生崩盤,致使許多投資人血本無歸,因此本研究利用週轉率作為股票流動性的衡量指標,並以臺灣上市電子類股作為研究對象,探討股票流動性與崩盤風險之間的關係。本研究之實證結果發現,股票流動性並不會有穩定股價的作用,反而會促使股價發生崩盤風險。本研究豐富了股票流動性及股價崩盤風險之相關文獻,並從微觀經濟視角瞭解股票流動性對股價崩盤風險的影響。
In the past, the global stock market has experienced a phenomenon of "skyrocket and drop sharply". Many people''s property has disappeared overnight. This article observes that before the outbreak of the financial turmoil, the stock index and turnover rate of various countries have increased abnormally or even reached new highs. The reason for the crash risk is the liquidity of the stock and there is a positive relationship between the two. This study uses the turnover rate as a measure of stock liquidity, and uses Taiwan-listed electronic stocks as the research object to explore the impact of stock liquidity and crash risk. The empirical results show that the liquidity of the stock will not have the effect of stabilizing the stock price, but will cause the stock price to collapse. After adding other control variables for testing, the results of this study remain unchanged. This empirical results of this study enriches the relevant literature on stock liquidity and stock price crash risk, and understands the effect of stock liquidity on stock price crash risk from a microeconomic perspective.
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
目次 iv
圖目次 vi
表目次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 7
第三節 研究架構及流程 8
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 股票流動性 9
第二節 股票流動性與崩盤風險之關係 11
第三章 研究方法 13
第一節 研究樣本及資料來源 13
第二節 研究假說 13
第三節 變數定義 14
第四章 實證結果 17
第一節 敘述統計 17
第二節 皮爾森相關分析 19
第三節 實證結果 21
第五章 結論與建議 24
第一節 結論 24
第二節 建議 25
參考文獻 26
中文部分
林永堅,曹國華,沉華玉 (2018),「股票流動性與潛在崩盤風險:公司治理和短期行為視角」,重慶大學學報社會科學版,第24卷,第2期,頁47-65。
胡星陽 (1998),「流動性對台灣股票報酬率的影響」,中國財務學刊,第5卷,第4期,頁1-19。
郎偉芳 (2011),「此次金融危機的影響及各國因應措施之探討」,行政院經濟建設委員會綜合計劃處,頁165-202。
郭秋榮 (2009),「全球金融風暴之成因對我國影響及因應對策之探討」,經濟研究,第9 期,頁59-89。
陳美菊 (2009),「全球金融危機之成因影響及因應經濟研究」,經濟研究年刊,第9期,頁261-296。
詹場、胡星陽 (2001),「流動性衡量方法之綜合評論」,國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,第11卷,第3期,頁205-221。
鄒萍 (2015),「貨幣政策、股票流動性與股票價格暴跌風險」,南方經濟,第33卷,第7期,頁29-46。
蕭翠玲 (2009),「國際因應次貸危機措施對國內改進流動性管理之借鏡」,國際金融參考資料,第57期,頁46-94。
戴馨 (2018),「股票流動性與股價崩盤風險關係的研究」,哈爾濱工業大學碩士論文。

英文部分
Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-section and Time-series Effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), pp. 31-56.
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1989). The Effects of Beta, Bid-Ask Spread, Residual Risk, and Size on Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 44(2), pp. 479-486.
Andreou, P., Antoniou, C., Horton, J., & Louca, C. (2016). Corporate Governance and Firm-specific Stock Price Crashes. European Financial Management, 22(5), pp. 916-956.
Black, F. (1971). Toward a Fully Automated Stock Exchange. Financial Analysts Journal, 27(4), pp. 28-44.
Callen, J., & Fang, X. (2013). Institutional Investor Stability and Crash Risk: Monitoring Versus Short-termism? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(8), pp. 3047-3063.
Chang, X., Chen, Y., & Zolotoy, L. (2017). Stock Liquidity and Stock Price Crash Risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(4), pp. 1605-1637.
Chang, Y. Y., Faff, R., & Hwang, C. Y. (2010). Liquidity and Stock Returns in Japan: New evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18(1), pp. 90-115.
Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2001). Market Liquidity and Trading Activity. The Journal of Finance, 56(2), pp. 501-530.
Datar, V., Naik, N., & Radcliffe, R. (1998). Liquidity and Stock Returns: An Alternative Test. Journal of Financial Markets, 1(2), pp. 203-219.
Demsetz, H. (1968). Why Regulate Utilities? The Journal of Law & Economics, 11(1), pp. 55-65.
Engkuchik, E., & Kaya, H. (2012). The Impact of the Asian Crisis on Stock Market Liquidity: Evidence from the Malaysian Stock Exchange. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), pp. 120-127.
Fang, V., Tian, X., & Tice, S. (2014). Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? The Journal of Finance, 69(5), pp. 2085-2125.
Grossman, S., & Miller, M. (1988). Liquidity and Market Structure. The Journal of Finance, 43(3), pp. 617-633.
Haugen, R., & Baker, N. (1996). Commonality in the Determinants of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), pp. 401-439.
Henry, L., & Michael, S. (2004). Bid–ask Spreads in Commodity Futures Markets. Applied Financial Economics, 14(13), pp. 923-936.
Hutton, A., Marcus, A., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque Financial Reports, R2, and Crash Risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), pp. 67-86.
Joel, H., & Robert A., S. (1988). Liquidity and Execution Costs in Equity Markets. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 14(3), pp. 10-16.
Lippman, S., & McCall, J. (1986). An Operational Measure of Liquidity. The American Economic Review, 76(1), pp. 43-55.
Martin, P. (1975). Analysis of the Impact of Competitive Rates on the Liquidity of NYSE Stock. Economic Staff Paper 75-3. Securities and Exchange Commission.
O''Hara, M. (1995). Market Microstructure Theory. Blackwell, Cambridge.
Tinic, S., & West, R. (1972). Competition and the Pricing of Dealer Service in the Over-the-Counter Stock Market. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7(3), pp. 1707-1727.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20250722)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top