臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

「共享經濟」一詞在現代的社會逐漸普及化，食衣住行育樂各種的網路peer-to-peer平台相應而生，在線共享與協作消費這種新概念正在不斷擴展，而主要推手都是源於科技的進步以及信息通訊技術的普及化，創造了一個新的競爭環境與服務方式。然而在新的概念不斷擴張的同時，既有的相關產業必然會受到一定的影響，進而產生利益上的拉鋸戰。除了新舊產業間的相互競爭之外，政府與法律同時也擔任了相當重要的角色，既有的法律可能尚未規範到新生產業，使得新生產業有極大的商業優勢，造成舊產業無法與之競爭的情況。亦可能套用既有的法律造成新生產業寸步難行。目前在營建相關產業尚未出現規模較大的共享經濟平台，故以描述一個擴張相當快速的P2P平台 – 優步為範例，文旨在通過案例研究方法和計量實證分析方法，在市場上如何取得大眾認同度與生存方式。該分析有助於理解該平台的主要特徵和功能，並探討其面對台灣法規的應變能力與經營模式之變更。結果表示，優步在用戶方面仍然在快速增長，面對監管問題以及傳統通勤市場的挑戰具有非常快速的應變與適應能力，相信在其經營的策略以及現代通訊設備與軟體發達有顯著的關係，然而當前以及未來仍有諸多需要考慮的潛在風險。

The term "sharing economy" is gradually becoming more popular in modern society. Various online peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms for food, clothing, housing, transportation, and entertainment have emerged accordingly. The new concepts of online sharing and collaborative consumption are constantly expanding. The main drivers are the advancement of technology and the popularization of information and communication technology, creating a new competitive environment and service methods. However, while the new concepts continue to expand, the existing related industries will inevitably be affected to some extent, and then there will be a tug of war on interests. In addition to the competition between the old and new industries, the government and the law have also played a very important role. Existing laws may not yet regulate the new industry, which makes the new industry have great commercial advantages and prevents the old industry from competing with it. Case. The government may also apply existing laws to make it difficult for new industries to move forward. This article aims to describe a fairly rapidly expanding P2P platform, Uber, through case study methods and Econometrics analysis methods, and is currently the leader in dispatching commuting in Taiwan. This analysis is helpful to understand the main features and functions of the platform, and to explore its adaptability to changes in Taiwan's laws and changes in its business model. The results show that Uber is still growing rapidly in terms of users. It has very rapid adaptability in the face of regulatory issues and the challenges of the traditional commuter market. We believe it has a significant relationship in its business strategy and the development of modern communication equipment and software However, there are still many doubts that need to be considered at present and in the future.

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
目錄 III
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究範圍 2
1.4 研究方法與流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2.1 共享經濟與優步發展 4
2.2 企業認同度因子 13
第三章 優步個案研究 16
3.1 政府對優步的規範與主張 16
3.2 優步公司兩次營運模式的原因分析 21
第四章 優步消費者認同度實證研究與策略意涵 26
4.1 假說與模型建立 26
4.2 計量分析結果 33
4.3 小結 41
第五章 結論 42
參考文獻 43
附件 45

陳姿妙，2015，UBER 經營模式與法律關係之探究，國立政治大學科技管理與 智慧財產研究所學位論文。
蔡世宏，2020，台灣 UBER 公司之營業型態在行政法之適法性問題 ，國立雄大學財經法律學系研究所碩士論文。
李兆晉，2017，共享經濟下人民使用自用汽車為營業行為之自由-交通法對Uber 駕駛職業選擇自由之規範，東吳大學法律學系碩士班碩士論文。
沈怡伶，2016，網路運輸業興起對臺灣汽車運輸業管理架構之影響，《月旦法 學雜誌第 248 期》，頁 107-121。
工商登記公示資料查詢服務網，https://findbiz.nat.gov.tw/fts/query/QueryBar/queryInit.do，2013至2020工商登記資料。
中華民國交通部新聞稿查詢系統，https://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=14&parentpath=0,2，2013至2020新聞稿。
Benjamin G. Edelman & Damien Geradin (2016). “Efficiencies and Regulatory Shortcuts: How Should We Regulate Companies Like Airbnb and Uber?”, 19 Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 293-328.
Georgios Zervas, Davide Proserpio, John W. Byers (2016). “The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry.” Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 687-705.
Benjamin Edelman & Michael Luca (2014). “Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com”, Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 14-054
Gurvich, I., M. Lariviere, A. Moreno-Garcia (2015). “Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. ” Sharing Economy, 249-278, Northwestern University.
Morgan Stanley: Internet, Lodging, Leisure and Hotels (2015). Global Insight: Who Will Airbnb Hurt More - Hotels or OTAs?
Santi, P., G. Resta, M. Szell, S. Sobolevsky, S. H. Strogatz, C. Ratti. (2014). “Quantifying the benefits of vehicle pooling with shareability networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(37), 13290–13294.
Sarah Cannon and Lawrence H. Summers, (2014) “How Uber and the Sharing Economy Can Win Over Regulators” Harvard Business Review.
Hannah A. Posen (2017). “Ridesharing in the Sharing Economy: Should Regulators Impose Uber Regulations on Uber?” 101 Iowa L. Rev., 405-433.
Guenzi, P., & Troilo, G. (2006). “Developing marketing capabilities for customer value creation through Marketing-Sales integration.” Industrial Marketing Managment (35), 974-988.
Huber, F., Herrmann, A., & Morgan, R. (2001). “Gaining competitive advantage through customer value-oriented management.” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (1), 41-53.
Kriston, A., Szabo, T., & Inzelt, G. (2010). “The marriage of car sharing and hydrogen economy: A possible solution to the main problems of urban living.” International Journal of Hydrogen
Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2007). “Growth in Worldwide Carsharing: An International Comparison.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 81-89.
Hamari, J., & Ukkonen, A. (2013). “The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption.” Helsinki Institute for Information Technology.