跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.175) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/09 21:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:葉哲愷
研究生(外文):Chekai Yeh
論文名稱:產品屬性與購買動機對水產品消費意願的影響
論文名稱(外文):Impact of product attributes and purchase motivations on the consumption intention of aquaculture products
指導教授:梁朝雲梁朝雲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chaoyun Liang
口試委員:王俊豪陳炤堅
口試委員(外文):Juin-Hao WangChao-chien Chen
口試日期:2020-05-20
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:農業經濟及推廣學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:71
中文關鍵詞:水產品市場研究消費意願產品屬性購買動機
外文關鍵詞:Aquaculture productsMarket researchConsumption intentionProduct attributesPurchase motivation
DOI:10.6342/NTU202001072
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:308
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著社會變遷,消費者的生活飲食習慣及生活型態也跟著轉變。在水產品的購買行為方面,也隨著養殖技術的進步、保鮮技術的發展,以及近海和遠洋漁業的轉變而有所變化。目前在學術界上,比較缺乏針對消費市場之基礎概念—產品屬性、購買動機,與消費意願—進行整合探索的研究,此一缺口便是本研究的動機。
基於此一缺口和動機,本研究將先理解水產品的產品屬性及消費者購買水產品的動機,進而分析這些產品屬性與購買動機對消費意願的綜合影響。本研究也將探究,不同的人口變項對消費意願所產生的差異。本研究文獻探討的主題包括有:(一)臺灣的漁業和養殖漁業、(二)產品屬性和消費意願,以及(三)購買動機和消費意願。
本研究以有食用及購買水產的消費者為研究對象,問卷收集採用網路問卷方式,共計有1,309人進入問卷網站,共回收738份問卷,剔除回答不全、呈規律性填答、回答內容衝突,有效樣本數為676份。研究者運用SPSS for Windows 21進行統計分析,以敘述統計進行人口變項的分析,再進行平均數、標準差、因素負荷量、t檢定、變異數分析(ANOVA),以及迴歸(regression)等統計分析。
本研究結果顯示,水產品可區分為三大屬性分別為:實用屬性、享樂屬性,與象徵屬性等三種屬性,而水產品購買動機亦可區分為三項動機:理性動機、情緒動機,與惠顧動機等三類動機。調查研究總結,理性動機、惠顧動機,與享樂屬性皆會顯著地影響水產品的消費意願。其中,惠顧動機是影響水產品消費意願最強的因素,其次是享樂屬性和理性動機。
本研究結果在學術上有三項貢獻:確認了水產品之產品屬性和購買動機的因素結構;確認水產品之產品屬性和購買動機對消費意願的影響;以及點出未來更有價值的市場研究方向。本研究結果另有兩項實務貢獻:可為水產品供應商及通路商提供嶄新的思考方向與行銷策略;也能為水產品供應商提供更適合消費者的產品及銷售環境之建言。
As society changes, consumers’ eating habits and lifestyles also change. The purchase behavior of aquaculture products has also switched with the advancement of aquaculture technology, the development of fresh-keeping techniques, and the developmental trends of offshore and ocean fisheries. At present, there is a lack of academic research on the integration of basic concepts of the consumer market, such as product attributes, purchase motivation, and consumption intention. This gap needs to be filled and further motivates the present study.
Based on the gap and motivation, the researcher study first explored the product attributes of aquaculture products and consumers’ motivation to purchase these products. The researcher then analyzes the impact of these product attributes and purchase motivations on consumption intention. Furthermore, the differences in consumption intention caused by different demographic variables were also examined in the current study. The topics covered in the literature review of this study include: (1) Taiwan’s fisheries and aquaculture products, (2) product attributes and consumption intention, and (3) purchase motivation and consumption intention.
The current study was targeted on the consumers who have eaten aquaculture products or have related purchase experiences. The questionnaires were collected through an online survey. A total of 1,309 people entered the questionnaire website, and a total of 738 questionnaires were collected. Excluding the irregular samples, such as incomplete questionnaires, indifferent fill-outs, and conflicting answers, the number of valid samples is 676. The researcher then used SPSS for Windows 21 to perform statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics was performed to analyze the demographics, and means and standard deviations were then sum up and averaged. In addition, factor analysis, t test, ANOVA, and multiple regression were also conducted to answer correspondent research hypotheses and questions.
The results revealed that the attributes of aquaculture products can be divided into three types, namely utilitarian, hedonic, and symbolic, and that purchase motivations can be categorized into three types, namely rational, emotional, and patronage-based motivations. The results continually indicated that the patronage motivation, hedonic attribute, and rational motivation positive affected the consumption intention of aquaculture products. Among them, the patronage motivation exerted the strongest influence on the consumption intention of aquaculture products, followed by the hedonic attribute and rational motivation. The results have their academic contributions and practical implications.
The research outcomes have three academic contributions. They confirm the factor structures of aquaculture product attributes and purchase motivation; determine the influence of the product attributes and purchase motivation on consumption intention, and point out the future direction of market research in aquaculture products. The results also have two practical implications. They provide marketing strategies for aquaculture product suppliers; and offer aquaculture product distributors suggestions regarding the way to make their product stand out in a retail environment.
目錄---------------------------------------------------------------------------------I
圖目錄----------------------------------------------------------------------------IV
表目錄-----------------------------------------------------------------------------V
誌謝-------------------------------------------------------------------------------VI
中文摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------VII
Abstract--------------------------------------------------------------------------IX
第一章 緒論---------------------------------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究背景---------------------------------------------------1
第二節 研究動機---------------------------------------------------3
第三節 研究目的---------------------------------------------------4
第四節 研究貢獻---------------------------------------------------5
第五節 名詞釋義---------------------------------------------------6
第二章 文獻探討---------------------------------------------------------------7
第一節 臺灣的漁業和養殖漁業---------------------------------7
第二節 產品屬性和消費意願-----------------------------------12
第三節 購買動機和消費意願-----------------------------------16

第三章 研究方法與設計-----------------------------------------------------21
第一節 調查研究方法--------------------------------------------21
第二節 研究架構--------------------------------------------------23
第三節 研究假設與問題-----------------------------------------24
第四節 研究對象--------------------------------------------------25
第五節 研究工具--------------------------------------------------26
第六節 調查過程--------------------------------------------------27
第七節 分析方法--------------------------------------------------28
第四章 研究結果與分析-----------------------------------------------------31
第一節 描述性統計-----------------------------------------------31
第二節 因素分析--------------------------------------------------34
第三節 T檢定-----------------------------------------------------40
第四節 變異數分析-----------------------------------------------42
第五節 迴歸分析--------------------------------------------------45
第五章 研究討論--------------------------------------------------------------47
第一節 人口變項--------------------------------------------------47
第二節 產品屬性--------------------------------------------------50
第三節 購買動機--------------------------------------------------51
第四節 研究限制與未來研究-----------------------------------52
第六章 結論與建議-----------------------------------------------------------55
第一節 研究結論--------------------------------------------------55
第二節 研究建議--------------------------------------------------57
參考文獻--------------------------------------------------------------------------59
附錄--------------------------------------------------------------------------------67

圖目錄
圖1 近十年各項漁業生産量----------------------------------------10
圖2 三大漁業產量(a)與產值(b)比例----------------------10
圖3 臺灣養殖漁業重鎮----------------------------------------------11
圖4 研究架構----------------------------------------------------------23

表目錄
表1 2017年漁戶數、漁戶人口數及漁業從業人數--------------9
表2 人口變項敘述統計結果----------------------------------------33
表3 產品屬性之因素分析、平均值、標準差與α值----------35
表4 購買動機之因素分析、平均值、標準差與α值----------38
表5 性別之獨立樣本t檢定-----------------------------------------40
表6 主要採購者之獨立樣本t檢定--------------------------------41
表7 學歷對各變項之獨立樣本ANOVA檢定-------------------42
表8 年齡對各變項之獨立樣本ANOVA檢定-------------------43
表9 居住區域對各變項之獨立樣本ANOVA檢定-------------44
表10 消費意願之迴歸分析-------------------------------------------46
中文參考書目
李武忠(2005)。台灣水產養殖發展策略:水產養殖科技園區設立芻議。水試專訊,9,18-23。
余銘忠、黃瑞成(2011)。探討冷凍水產品專賣店經營之關鍵成功因素。檢自:http://dba.kuas.edu.tw/files/archive/169_4d20e21b.pdf
林生傳(2003)。教育研究法:全方位的統計與分析。臺北市:心理。
林隆儀、許慶珍(2007)參考群體與消費態度在消費動機對購買意圖影響的干擾效果:以老年消費者購買保健食品為例。行銷評論,4(4),421-448。
邱皓政(2002)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南。
胡興華(2006)。臺灣漁業的歷史與文化。海洋文化學刊,2,25-48。
徐承堉(2018)。失落十年的水產養殖王國如何再起?臺灣養殖漁業的永續之路。檢自:https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/104163/
張文寧(2018)。從歐盟給台灣的「黃牌」了解台灣遠洋漁業管理。檢自:https://taiwanuscomment.wordpress.com/2018/03/30/......
張景盛、藍宜亭、陳卜僑、黃俊英(2011)。產品屬性、知覺風險與知覺利益之關係:以網路通路為例。行銷評論,8(1),125-148。
許士軍(1987)。管理學。臺北市:東華書局。
黃登福、陳建宏(2018)。海鮮水產品的保鮮與實用風險。料理 . 台灣,12。檢自:http://ryoritaiwan.fcdc.org.tw/article.aspx?websn=6&id=560
黃鴻燕(2018)。中華民國漁業簡介。臺北市:行政院農業委員會漁業署。
葉志洋(2014)。我國主要漁業縣市水產生物養殖及專區發展概況。主計月刊,706,56-62。
農傳媒(2017)。你所不知道的臺灣養殖漁業。檢自:https://www.agriharvest.tw/theme_data.php?theme=article&sub_theme=article&id=400
榮泰生(1999)。消費者行為。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
廖淑伶、沈永正、朱家賢(2008)。提醒式衝動購買決策—特性及促銷、產品與人格因子的影響。交大管理學報,28,131-162。
漁業署(2019)。漁業統計年報。統計與出版品。檢自:https://www.fa.gov.tw/cht/index.aspx。
蕭堯仁、林奇恩、歐慶賢(2015)。臺灣石斑魚產銷班經營關鍵成功因素之探討。農業推廣文彙,60,155-175。
蘇偉成、劉富光(2005)。台灣水產養殖的永續經營。科學發展,385,42-49。


外文參考書目
Brunsø, K., Verbeke, W., Olsen, O. S., & Jeppesen, F. L. (2009). Motives, barriers and quality evaluation in fish consumption situations: Exploring and comparing heavy and light users in Spain and Belgium. British Food Journal, 111, 699-716.
Casini, L., Rungie, C., & Corsi, M. A. (2009). How loyal are Italian consumers to wine attributes? Journal of Wine Research, 20(2), 125-142.
Chen, C.-C., Yueh, H.-P., & Liang, C. (2016). Strategic management of agribusiness: Determinants and trends. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 12(4), 69-97.
Chou, Y.-C. & Liang, C. (2013). The influences of virtual experiences and purchase situations on consumer behavior: A case study of online apparel shopping. 2013 e-CASE & e-Tech International Conference, Japan, Kitakyushu, April 3-5.
Danso, G. K., Otoo, M., Linh, N. D., & Madurangi, G. (2017). Households’ willingness-to-pay for fish product attributes and implications for market feasibility of wastewater-based aquaculture businesses in Hanoi, Vietnam. Resources, 6(3), article 30.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
Dommeyer, C. J., & Moriarty, E. (2000). Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: Embedded vs. attached. International Journal of Market Research, 42(1), 39-50.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior (8th ed.), Orlando Florida: Dryden Press.
Everard, A., & Galletta, D. F. (2006). How presentation flaws affect perceived site quality, trust, and intention to purchase from an online store. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 56-95.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Hofstede, F. T., Wedel, M., & Steenkamp, J. B. (2002). Identifying spatial segments in international markets. Marketing Science, 21(2), 160-177.
Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., & Olsen, S. O. (2006). Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(5), 420-430.
Honkanen, P., & Young, J. A. (2015). What determines British consumers’ motivation to buy sustainable seafood? British Food Journal, 117(4), 1289-1302.
Horváth, C., & Adıgüzel, F. (2018). Shopping enjoyment to the extreme: Hedonic shopping motivations and compulsive buying in developed and emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 86, 300-310.
Kaser, K. (2013). Advertising and sales promotion. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Korn, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Thinking aloud about sustainable aquaculture products: Consumer perceptions and barriers to communication. In G. Rahmann & U. Aksoy (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th ISOFAR Scientific Conference at the Organic World Congress 2014, 13-15 Oct., Istanbul, Turkey.
Korzaan, M. L. (2003). Going with the flow: Predicting online purchase intentions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(4), 25-31.
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management. River, NJ: Pearson.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Krystallis, A., Maglaras, G., & Mamalis, S. (2008). Motivations and cognitive structures of consumers in their purchasing of functional foods. Food Quality and Preference, 19(6), 525-538.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 37-96.
MBA Research and Curriculum Center (2012). What’s the motive? LAP-SE-109-SP. Retrieved from: http://www.pendleton.k12.ky.us/userfiles/116/Classes/5438/LAP-SE-109%20Buying%20Motives.pdf
McElroy, T., & Conrad, J. (2009). Thinking about product attributes: Investigating the role of unconscious valence processing in attribute framing. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 157-161.
Mesnildrey, L., Lesueur, M., & Gouin, S. (2010). Motivations and needs of consumers of fresh seafood. Proceedings of 15th Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade Conference (IIFET 2010), Montpellier, France.
Moon, M. A., Khalid, M. J., Awan, H. M., Attiq, S., Rasool, H., & Kiran, M. (2017). Consumer’s perceptions of website’s utilitarian and hedonic attributes and online purchase intentions: A cognitive-affective attitude approach. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 21(2), 73-88.
Moon, M. A., Javaid, B., Kiran, M., Awan, H. M., & Farooq, A. (2018). Consumer perceptions of counterfeit clothing and apparel products attributes. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(7), 794-808.
Netzer, O., & Srinivasan, V. S. (2011). Adaptive self-explication of multi-attribute preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 140-156.
Oded, L. (2010). Heterogeneity in consumer sensory evaluation as a base for identifying drivers of product choice. Journal of Business & Management, 16(1), 37-50.
Park, C.W, Jaworski, B. J., & Maclnnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept: Image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
Pieniak, Z., Vanhonacker, F., & Verbeke, W. (2013). Consumer knowledge and use of information about fish and aquaculture. Food Policy, 40(6), 25-30.
Richter, I. G. M., & Klöckner, C. A. (2017). The psychology of sustainable seafood consumption: A comprehensive approach. Foods, 6(10), article 86.
Shan, L., Henchion, M., De Brún, A., Murrin, C., Wall, P. & Monahan, F. (2017). Factors that predict consumer acceptance of enriched processed meats. Meat Science, 133, 185-193.
Sheth, J. N. (1983). An integrative theory of patronage preference and behavior. In Darden, W. R., & R. F. Lusch (Eds.), Patronage behavior and retail management (pp.9-28). New York, NY: North-Holland.
Stanton, William J., & Etzel, Michael J. (1991). Fundamentals of marketing (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Stanton, W. J., Etzel, M. J., & Walker, B. J. (2007). Fundamentals of marketing (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Swanson, K. K., & Horridge, P. E. (2004). A structural model for souvenir consumption, travel activities, and tourist demographics. Journal of Travel Research, 42(4), 372-380.
Tauber, E. M. (1972). Marketing notes and communications: What do people shop? Journal of Marketing, 36, 45-59. 
Thomas, J. E. (2017). Exploring buyer motivation to improve management, marketing, sales, and finance practices in the martial arts industry. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 9(2), 12-35.
Wang, E. S. T. (2017). Different effects of utilitarian and hedonic benefits of retail food packaging on perceived product quality and purchase intention. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23(3), 239-250
Westbrook, R. A., & Black, W. C. (1985). A motivation-based shopper typology. Journal of Retailing, 61(1), 78-103.
Whitley, S. C., Trudel, R., & Kurt, D. (2018). The influence of purchase motivation on perceived preference uniqueness and assortment size choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(4), 710-724.
Wilkie, W. L. (1994). Consumer behavior (3rd ed.), New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Witte, J, C., Amoroso, L. M., & Howard, P. E. N. (2000). Research methodology: Method and representation in Internet-based survey tools: Mobility, community, and cultural identity in Survey2000. Social Science Computer Review, 18(2), 179-195.
Wood, L. (2007). Functional and symbolic attributes of product selection. British Food Journal, 109(2), 108-118.
Yang, H., Stamatogiannakis, A., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2015). Pursuing attainment versus maintenance goals: The interplay of self-construal and goal type on motivation. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 93-108.
Zamalloa, O. L. (2017). Development of new products from aquaculture fish species. A doctoral dissertation from University of Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊