臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

產品多樣性是吸引消費者的重要因素，而過去亦已有許多研究討論實體零售店面如何透過產品擺放設計來影響消費者對該產品的知覺多樣性、相關效果以及行為意圖。本研究將過去關於實體店面商品陳列方式之理論及研究延伸至網路廣告，討論以水平或垂直方向陳列廣告產品圖片時對廣告效果的影響。
本研究採用受測者間實驗設計法，以「產品圖片陳列方向」作為主要自變數，「產品態度」、「產品興趣」、「購買意願」、「送禮意願」、「廣告態度」、「處理流暢性」及「知覺多樣性」作為依變數，探討廣告產品圖片的排法差異如何透過處理流暢性的中介影響消費者對該產品的知覺多樣性，並再進一步透過知覺多樣性的中介影響廣告效果。共進行三項實驗，透過實驗一推論出使用裝置螢幕方向的不同可能會影響處理流暢性及知覺多樣性，實驗二將使用裝置之螢幕方向納入考量，實驗三則討論在各種產品圖片陳列方向及螢幕方向組合時，廣告篇幅的長短(正常版vs.加長版)對廣告效果的影響。
研究結果指出:
一、廣告產品圖片陳列方向對於處理流暢性、知覺多樣性的影響會因為使用裝置之螢幕方向(橫向/直向螢幕)而有所差異
二、當螢幕為橫向時，在廣告效果方面，廣告產品圖片陳列方向會影響消費者態度，並在特定情況下亦會影響消費者的行為意向
三、中介效果會因為廣告篇幅(正常/加長版)以及廣告圖片陳列方向(水平/垂直陳列)的不同而有所差異
四、廣告篇幅(正常/加長版)對於處理流暢性和知覺多樣性的影響方向相反

Assortment variety is an important factor in attracting consumers. This research extends the theory of product display design from the field of physical retail to online advertisements, discussing the advertising effectiveness of horizontal versus vertical product image display.
The present study conducts three between-subject experiments, with “Product image display” serves as the main independent variable and “Product attitude”, “Product interest”, “Purchase intention”, “Gift-giving intention”, “Attitude toward the ad”, “Process fluency” and “Perceived variety” serve as dependent variables. We discuss how different product image displays affect consumers'' perceived variety through the mediation of process fluency, and then further affect the advertising effectiveness through the mediation of perceived variety.
Through experiment one, we infer that the orientation (portrait/landscape) of the device screen may affect consumers’ process fluency and perceived variety. In experiment two, we take “screen orientation” into consideration. In experiment three, we discuss the effect of the length (normal/extended ver.) of advertisement on advertising effectiveness under different combinations of product image displays and screen orientations.
The results indicate:
I.The effect of product image display on process fluency and perceived variety varies due to different screen orientations (portrait/landscape).
Ⅱ.When the screen is in landscape orientation, product image display (horizontal/vertical display) in an advertisement will affect consumer attitude and in certain cases affect consumer behavioral intention.
Ⅲ.The mediating effect varies depending on the length of the advertisement (normal/extended ver.) and the product image display.
Ⅳ.The length of the advertisement (normal/extended ver.) has opposite effects on process fluency and perceived variety.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究範圍 5
第二章 文獻探討與研究假設 6
第一節 知覺多樣性 6
第二節 水平vs.垂直陳列之訊息處理流暢性 8
第三節 廣告效果 10
第四節 研究架構 11
第三章 實驗一 12
第一節 研究設計 12
第二節 自變數與衡量變項 13
第三節 實驗方法 15
第四節 樣本結構 17
第五節 信度分析 18
第六節 假設檢定 19
第五節 實驗一結論 21
第四章 實驗二 23
第一節 實驗目的 23
第二節 實驗方法 24
第三節 樣本結構 27
第四節 信度分析 28
第五節 假設檢定 29
第六節 實驗二結論 39
第五章 實驗三 40
第一節 實驗目的 40
第二節 實驗方法 41
第三節 樣本結構 44
第四節 信度分析 45
第五節 正常版廣告之假設檢定 46
第六節 廣告篇幅長短對廣告效果之影響 64
第六章 結論與建議 76
第一節 研究結論 76
第二節 研究討論 80
第三節 行銷實務意涵 83
第四節 研究限制 86
第五節 未來研究建議 88
參考資料 91
附錄 94

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Broniarczyk, S. M., Hoyer, W. D., & McAlister, L. (1998). Consumers'' Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 166-176. doi:10.2307/3151845
Broniarczyk, S. M., & Hoyer, W. D. (2006). Retail Assortment: More ≠ Better. In M. Krafft & M. K. Mantrala (Eds), Retailing in the 21st Century (pp. 225-238). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Chae, B. G., & Hoegg, J. (2013). The Future Looks“Right”: Effects of the Horizontal Location of Advertising Images on Product Attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 223-238. doi:10.1086/669476
Deng, X., Kahn, B. E., Unnava, H. R., & Lee, H. (2016). A“Wide” Variety: Effects of Horizontal versus Vertical Display on Assortment Processing, Perceived Variety, and Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 682-698. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0151
Gilchrist, I. D., & Harvey, M. (2006). Evidence for a Systematic Component within Scan Paths in Visual Search. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 704-715. doi:10.1080/13506280500193719
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Model Templates for PROCESS for SPSS and SAS [White paper]. Retrieved from http://afhayes.com/index.html
Hoch, S. J., Bradlow, E., & Wansink, B. (1999). The Variety of an Assortment. Marketing Science, 18(4), 527-546. doi:10.1287/mksc.18.4.527
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995-1006. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618031.017
Kahn, B. E. (1995). Consumer Variety-Seeking among Goods and Services: An Integrative Review. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2(3), 139-148. doi:10.1016/0969-6989(95)00038-0
Kahn, B. E., & Lehmann, D. R. (1991). Modeling Choice among Assortments. Journal of Retailing, 67(3), 274-299. doi:10.2307/3152215
Kahn, B. E., & Wansink, B. (2004). The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (4), 519-533. doi:10.1086/380286
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218. doi:10.2139/ssrn.452084
Mazuryk, T., & Gervautz, M. (1996). Virtual Reality History, Applications, Technology and Future (TR-186-2-96-06). Retrieved from Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Computer Graphics website: https://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at/research/publications/1996/mazuryk-1996-VRH/TR-186-2-96-06Paper.pdf
Menon, S., & Soman, D. (2002). Managing the Power of Curiosity for Effective Web Advertising Strategies. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 1-14. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673672
Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., & Iyengar, S. S. (2008). The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Mere Presence of Categories Increases Consumers’ Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 202-215. doi:10.1086/588698
Neboit, M., & Richardson, J. (1987). Eye Movement Recording in Ergonomics and Applied Research. In J. K. O''Regan & A. Lévy-Schoen (Eds), Eye Movements: From Physiology to Cognition (pp.551-553). North-Holland, Holland: Elsevier Science.
Ojanpää, H., Näsänen, R., & Kojo, I. (2002). Eye Movements in the Visual Search of Word Lists. Vision Research, 42(12), 1499-1512. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00077-9
Pessemier, E. (1978). Stochastic Properties of Changing Preferences. American Economic Review, 68(2), 380-385.
Phillips, M. H., & Edelman, J. A. (2008). The Dependence of Visual Scanning Performance on Search Direction and Difficulty. Vision Research, 48(21), 2184-2192. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.025
Raju, P. S. (1980). Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics, and Exploratory Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 272-282. doi:10.1086/208815
Shi, S. W., Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. (2012). Information Acquisition during Online Decision-Making: A Model-Based Exploration Using Eye-Tracking Data. Management Science, 59(5), 1009-1026. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1625
Simonson, I. (1990). The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety Seeking Behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 150-162. doi:10.2307/3172842
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66. doi:10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
Tatler, B. W., & Vincent, B. T. (2008). Systematic Tendencies in Scene Viewing. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2), 1-18. doi:10.16910/jemr.2.2.5
Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. E. (2014). The“Visual Preference Heuristic": The Influence of Visual versus Verbal Depiction on Assortment Processing, Perceived Variety, and Choice Overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 993-1015. doi:10.1086/673521
Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (2001). Entropy and Variability Discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27(1), 278-293. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.27.1.278