臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

背景：外銷食品證明為許多國家對進口食品之管制措施之一，近年我國政府大力推動及輔佐外銷產業，如何能保證外銷食品衛生安全品質的同時，又加快外銷食品英文證明文件之核發，是影響我國外銷產品競爭力之重要環節。
目的：核發外銷食品證明之流程經過多次簡化措施，多數業者仍期望改善。本研究之目的即為探討對於申辦業者而言，如何真正達到實際「改善」申辦流程，並進一步成為外銷食品業者之助力。
方法：本研究先蒐集相關文獻作為實證之基礎，探討提升本研究個案行政效能以達到民眾需求之可行方法，接著針對個案之客觀資源，及將歷年業者說明會中業者提問與建議做系統化分析整理後，擬定質性研究之深度訪談（in-depth interview）方向，並設計半結構式訪談大綱，針對申辦過外銷食品英文證明之業者作深度訪談。
結果：本研究將2014年至2018年業者說明會中，業者於綜合討論時段提出之提問或建議中，經本研究分類為「核發流程建議及時效問題」之反映事項作分析探討，並對四位有足夠申辦經驗之業者作個別深度訪談。就2014年至2018年業者於業者說明會提出之三大層面共33項建議，被提出最多次為「簡化核發流程縮短作業時間」層面之「縮短發證時間」分類，另包括：「簡化流程或文件」、「同一商品再次申請之簡化」、「評估線上申辦省時效果」、「查廠簡化為每1-2年1次」、「多階段審查同時進行」、「簡化繳費領證程序」、「簡化查廠頻率」、「合併驗證及證書核發之查核程序」及「增加第三方驗證取代實地查核」等分類建議也與縮短發證時間之訴求相關；深度訪談四位受訪者中有三位都提及有感受到加快取得證書的時間，主要建議為避免過度制式化要求文件為官方證明，應以合理可連結為目的；查廠模式建議可適度依產品性質、產品製程、業者規模及業者管理品質等角度評估是否有查廠必要，並期望改善申辦系統「上傳空間不足」之問題。
結論：本研究發現多數業者建議已納入改善措施，公告作業天數已全面縮短2工作天；多數受訪者對食藥署實施之多次簡化措施持正面觀感，主要對簡化申辦應備文件感受較明顯，且受訪者中多數有感受到加快取得證書的時間。未來建議將重點著眼於改進線上申辦平台之上傳空間、加速入帳確認及電子證明之核發等改善措施。

Background：To check the export proof document is one of the control measures for imported food in many countries. In recent years, Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) promotes many ways to reduce the processing time of export proof document applications for domestic processed food manufacturers. How to ensure the hygiene and safety of exported food while accelerating the processing time for export proof document could be an important impact factor of product competitiveness.
Purpose：The main purpose of this study is to find out how to really "improve" the application process of export proof documents to meet the needs of our food exporters, and what other approaches can be taken in the future.
Methods：This study categorized and organized the suggestions made by participants in past explanation conferences at first. After that, this study conducted semi-structured interviews to collect data from the experienced applicants.
Results：A total of 33 recommendations on the three major concepts were proposed by participants in past explanation conferences from 2014 to 2018. The most frequently mentioned is the category of "To shorten the processing time" at the concept of "To simplify the issuance process and to shorten the operation time". Categories such as "To simplify process or required documents", "To simplify reapplication process of the same product", "To evaluate of time-saving effect of online application", "To reduce the factory inspection to once every 1-2 years", "Multi-stage reviewing at the same time", "To simplify the procedures for paying for and receiving the certificate ", "To reduce the frequency of factory inspection", "To combine the procedures for verification and the issuance process " and "To replace the on-site inspection with the third-party verification " are also related to the demand for shortening the processing time. Three of the four interviewees mentioned the accelerated time to receive the certificates in their in-depth interviews. Three major recommendations were proposed: (1) to avoid requiring excessive formalized documents, which should be reasonable and flexible. (2) To evaluate whether it is necessary to inspect the factory from the perspectives of product classification, product manufacturing process, size of the manufacturer, and management quality of the manufacturer. (3) To improve the insufficient upload space in the application system.
Conclusions：This study found that most of the interviewees had a positive view of the simplification measures implemented by TFDA. They mainly felt the simplification of the documents required for application, and most of the interviewees felt the accelerated time to receive the certificates. In the future, the recommendations are as follows: "to make efforts to improve the uploading space of the online application system", "to accelerate the time to confirm the payment has been received, and "to issue electronic certificates".

序言 I
中文摘要 II
Abstract III
目 錄 V
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 公共管理（Public Management） 6
第二節 改變促進組織進步的概念 8
第三節 電子化政府 11
第四節 改善服務策略探討 12
第五節 質性研究方法 17
第三章 研究方法 19
第一節 研究架構 19
第二節 受訪對象與資料收集 19
第三節 研究倫理 22
第四章 個案研究 23
第一節 個案簡介 23
第二節 個案問題分析 30
第三節 深度訪談 44
第四節 討論與分析 68
第五節 研究限制 78
第五章 結論與建議 79
第一節 結論 79
第二節 建議 80
參考文獻 81
附錄一 IRB審查通過證明 87
附錄二 受訪者說明及同意書 91

Balabonienė, I., & Večerskienė, G. (2015). The aspects of performance measurement in public sector organization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 314-320.
Barnes, M., & Prior, D. (1995). Spoilt for choice? How consumerism can disempower public service users. Public Money & Management, 15(3), 53-58.
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
David, O., & Ted, G. (1992). Reinventing Government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector: Prentice Hall of India.
The Deming Prize and Development of Quality Control/Management in Japan. Retrieved from http://www.juse.or.jp/deming_en/award/03.html
Galland, J.-P. (2017). Big Third-Party Certifiers and the Construction of Transnational Regulation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 263-279. doi:10.1177/0002716217694589
Hartley, J., & Downe, J. (2007). The shining lights? Public service awards as an approach to service improvement. Public Administration, 85(2), 329-353.
Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., & Busch, L. (2005). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30(3), 354-369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.05.006
Hatanaka, M., & Busch, L. (2008). Third-Party Certification in the Global Agrifood System: An Objective or Socially Mediated Governance Mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), 73-91. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00453.x
Havinga, T., & Verbruggen, P. (2017). Understanding Complex Governance Relationships in Food Safety Regulation: The RIT Model as a Theoretical Lens. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 58-77. doi:10.1177/0002716216688872
Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction.
Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance: John Wiley & Sons.
Lindgreen, A., Hingley, M., Trienekens, J., & Sodano, V. (2008). The usefulness of social capital in assessing the welfare effects of private and third‐party certification food safety policy standards. British Food Journal.
Meacham, S., Rath, P., Moharana, P., Phalp, K. T., & Park, M. S. (2019). One-stop shop e-government solution for South-Korean government multi-ministry virtual employment-welfare plus center system.
Melão, N. F., Maria Guia, S., & Amorim, M. (2017). Quality Management and Excellence in the third sector: examining European Quality in Social Services (EQUASS) in non-profit social services. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(7/8), 840-857. doi:10.1080/14783363.2015.1132160
Mohammed, K. N. (2017). Continuous Improvement Strategies for Nonprofit Organizations.
National Institute of Standards and Technology, N. (2017, November o7). Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/baldrige/baldrige-award
Ocampo, L., Alinsub, J., Casul, R. A., Enquig, G., Luar, M., Panuncillon, N., . . . Ocampo, C. O. (2017). Public service quality evaluation with SERVQUAL and AHP-TOPSIS: A case of Philippine government agencies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2012). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158. doi:10.1177/0275074012466935
Pfeil, H., Schott, B., & Agarwal, S. (2017). Recent Developments and Key Considerations Impacting the Operations of One-Stop Shops for Citizens.
Pimentel, L., & Major, M. (2016). Key success factors for quality management implementation: evidence from the public sector. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(9-10), 997-1012.
Potter, J. (1994). Consumerism and the public sector: how well does the coat fit? Public sector management: Theory, critique and practice, 250-265.
Powell, M., Greener, I., Szmigin, I., Doheny, S., & Mills, N. (2010). Broadening the focus of public service consumerism. Public Management Review, 12(3), 323-339.
Prybutok, V., Zhang, X., & Peak, D. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award model with municipal government. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(3), 118-129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2010.12.003
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 549-568. doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & 藍毓仁. (2008). 質性研究方法. 臺北市: 巨流.(原著出版年: 2003 年).
Satoh, Y., Nagata, H., Kytömäki, P., & Gerrard, S. (2005). Evaluation of the university library service quality: analysis through focus group interviews. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 6(3), 183-193. doi:10.1108/14678040510636748
Schaefer, C. (2016, October 21). Improving Government Performance: The Great Promise of the Baldrige Excellence Framework. Retrieved from http://patimes.org/improving-government-performance-great-promise-baldrige-excellence-framework/
Silvia, Suhardi, & Yustianto, P. (2016, 24-27 Oct. 2016). Business process improvement of district government innovation service: Case study Cimahi Tengah District of Cimahi. Paper presented at the 2016 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI).
Sommerbakk, R., Haugen, D. F., Tjora, A., Kaasa, S., & Hjermstad, M. J. (2016). Barriers to and facilitators for implementing quality improvements in palliative care – results from a qualitative interview study in Norway. BMC Palliative Care, 15(1), 61. doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0132-5
Uygur, A., & Sümerli, S. (2013). EFQM excellence model. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(4), 980.
Van de Walle, S. (2018). Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services. In E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (pp. 227-241). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
van den Bekerom, P., Torenvlied, R., & Akkerman, A. (2016). Constrained by Red Tape: How Managerial Networking Moderates the Effects of Red Tape on Public Service Performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(3), 300-322. doi:10.1177/0275074015623856
丘昌泰（2010）。公共管理（再版）。臺北市: 智勝文化。
台灣優良食品發展協會（2018）。外銷食品衛生證明業者說明會。擷取日期：2019 年3月9日，取自：http://www.tqf.org.tw/tw/event/event_list_detail.php?class_type_id=51
吳欣玲（2015）。經濟部智慧財產局改善專利積案之政策分析（碩士論文）。取自華藝線上圖書館系統。（系統編號U0001-1808201521460300）doi:10.6342/NTU.2015.01835
林公孚（2006）。歐洲品質獎之探索。品質月刊， 42（5），頁50-55。 doi:10.29999/qm.200605.0012
林耀南、李燕美、詹家祥（2018）。服務創新對服務品質、體驗價值及顧客忠誠度之影響－以新北市政府為例。創造學刊，9（1），頁26-42。
財團法人食品工業發展研究所。（2017）。2017年食品產業年鑑。
國家發展委員會。標竿學習。擷取日期：2020年5月29日，取自：https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=75CDA1900F405FB4
許明滿、胡幼圃、康照洲（2013）。台灣食品藥物管理制度之演進與展望（一）：組織及管理制度面。醫學與健康期刊，2（2），頁11-21。
許明滿、康照洲、胡幼圃（2014）。台灣食品藥物管理制度之演進與展望（二）：人力及資源面。醫學與健康期刊，3（1），頁1-9。
葉嘉楠、彭裔茗（2016）。公部門創新服務之研究－以新竹市稅務局為例。中華行政學報，（18），頁7-32。doi:10.6712/JCPA.201606_(18).0001
齊力、林本炫編（2005），「質性研究方法與資料分析」，南華大學教育社會學研究所。
劉鶴群、林秀雲、陳麗欣、胡正申、黃韻如。（2010）。社會科學研究方法。台北：雙葉。（原書 Earl Babbie.[2010]. The practice of Social Research, 12e, Calif: Wadsworth Cengage.
蔡季容、張梅英（2016）。網路申報土地增值稅流程改造之個案研究。土地經濟年刊，（27），117-147。
衛生福利部。（2018年11月5日）。細說從頭。擷取日期：2019年11月1，取自：https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-7-7-1.html
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。食品第二級品管。擷取日期：2020年6月1日，取自：https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/site.aspx?sid=7886
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署（2019a）。外銷食品（添加物）英文衛生證明、加工衛生證明、檢驗報告、自由銷售證明申辦表單。擷取日期：2019年4月16日，取自：https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteContent.aspx?sid=9686
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署（2019b）。輸入業者座談會。擷取日期：2019年 10月22日，取自：https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteContent.aspx?sid=2897
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署（2020）。108年度衛生福利部食品藥物管理署單位決算。擷取日期：2020年4月30日，取自： https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteListContent.aspx?sid=7689&id=32688
謝富雄（2015）。我國公部門創新服務態樣之分析─以政府服務品質獎為例。長榮大學，取自華藝線上圖書館系統。