跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.247.184) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/02/06 11:42
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳姿安
研究生(外文):Zih-An Chen
論文名稱:微課程對認知負荷與學習保留影響效果—以注意力為中介變項
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Micro-Courses on Cognitive Load and Memory Retention:Attention as a Mediator
指導教授:黃博聖黃博聖引用關係
指導教授(外文):Po-Sheng Huang
口試委員:陳學志陳秀玲
口試委員(外文):Hsueh-Chih ChenHsiu-Ling Chen
口試日期:2020-07-01
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:數位學習與教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:教育科技學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:126
中文關鍵詞:片段式課程注意力微課程傳統線上課程認知負荷學習保留
外文關鍵詞:attentioncognitive loadfragmented-courseslearning retentionmicro-coursestraditional-online-courses
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:201
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
中文摘要
Abstract
誌謝
目錄
表目錄
圖目錄
第一章 緒論
第一節、研究背景與動機
第二節、研究問題
第三節、名詞釋義
第二章 文獻探討
第一節、微學習
第二節、微課程
第三節、小結
第三章 研究方法
第一節、研究架構
第二節、研究流程
第三節、研究對象
第四節、研究工具
第五節、研究設計與研究程序
第六節、資料處理與分析
第四章 研究結果
第一節、量化資料分析
第二節、質性資料分析
第五章 綜合討論
第一節、研究結果意涵與討論
第二節、教學實務建議
第三節、研究限制與未來研究建議
第四節、總結
參考文獻
附錄一 課程教案
傳統線上課程教案
片段式課程教案
微課程教案
三種課程教案比較表
附錄二 專家評分表
中文文獻
王淳民(2018)。微學習時代的契機與反思。T&D飛訊,244,1-17。
林玉雯、黃台珠、劉嘉茹(2010)。課室學習專注力之研究-量表發展與分析應用。科學教育學刊,18(2),107-129。
陳嘉揚(2018)。大學生微學習模式的研究與應用—以南昌市高校為例。現代信息科技,6,137-139。
黃國禎(2018)。行動科技時代下的微課程發展與應用。T&D飛訊,244,1-29。
張宏亮(1997)。集中注意力的外在因素策略,中華體育,11(2),22-28。
張春興(2013)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華。
張振虹、楊慶英、韓智(2013)。微學習研究:現狀與未來。中國電化教育,322,12-20。
張基成、林冠佑(2016)從傳統數位學習到遊戲式數位學習—學習成效、心流體驗與認知負荷。科學教育學刊,24(3),221-248.
鄭昭明(2006)。認知心理學。桂冠圖書公司,台北市。
蔡進雄(2018)。微學習時代的來臨:淺談微學習對教育人員的專業成長。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(2),90-92。

英文文獻
Alipour, S., Moini, A., Jafari-Adli, S., Gharaie, N., & Mansouri, K. (2012). Comparison of Teaching about Breast Cancer via Mobile or Traditional Learning Methods in Gynecology Residents. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13(9), 4593-4595.
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). “Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes”. In Spence, K. W., & Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol 2, pp.89-195). New York: Academic Press.
Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 811-820. doi: 10.1002/acp.1351
Bunce, D. M., Flens, E. A., & Neiles, K. Y. (2010). How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1438-1443. doi: 10.1021/ed100409p
Burnik, U., Zaletelj, J., & Košir, A. (2017). Video-based learners’ observed attention estimates for lecture learning gain evaluation. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(13), 16903-16926. doi: 10.1007/s11042-017-5259-8
Chen, C.-M., & Wang, J.-Y. (2017). Effects of online synchronous instruction with an attention monitoring and alarm mechanism on sustained attention and learning performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(4), 427-443.
Cheng, P.-Y., Chien, Y.-C., & Huang, Y.-M. (2017). The Design and Implementation of a Real-Time Attention Recognition/Feedback System in Online Learning Course. 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT). doi: 10.1109/eitt.2017.59
Cheng, P.-Y., Huang, Y.-M., Shadiev, R., Hsu, C.-W., & Chu, S.-T. (2014). Investigating the Effectiveness of Video Segmentation on Decreasing Learners’ Cognitive Load in Mobile Learning. New Horizons in Web Based Learning, 122-129. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-13296-9_14
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
Cooper, G. (1990). Cognitive load theory as an aid for instructional design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 108-113.
Cowan, N. (2010). The Magical Mystery Four. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51-57. doi: 10.1177/0963721409359277
DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 223-234.
De Weerd, P. (2006). Attention, Neural Basis of. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. doi: 10.1002/0470018860.s00382
D. Shieh. (2009). These lectures are gone in 60 seconds. Chronicle Higher Edu, 6, A1-A13.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory. A contribution to experimental psychology. Teachers College Columbia University, New York.
Emerson, L. C., & Berge, Z. L. (2018). Microlearning: Knowledge management applications and competency-based training in the workplace. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 10(2), 125-132.
Fang, X., & Liu, R. (2017). Determinants of Teachers’ Attitude toward Microlecture: Evidence from Elementary and Secondary Schools. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 5597-5606. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.01013a
Fields, R. D (2005). Making Memories Stick. Scientific American, 292(2), 75-81.
Frydenberg, M., & Andone, D. (2016). Creating micro-videos to demonstrate technology learning and digital literacy. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(4), 261-273.
Fyfe, E. R. (2016). Providing feedback on computer-based algebra homework in middle-school classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 568-574.
Gabrielli, S., Kimani, S., & Catarci, T. (2006). The Design of Microlearning Experiences: A Research Agenda. In: T. Hug, M. Lindner, & P. A. Bruck, (Eds.), Microlearning: Emerging Concepts, Practices and Technologies after E-Learning: Proceedings of Microlearning Conference 2005: Learning & Working in New Media (pp. 45-53). Innsbruck, Áustria: Innsbruck University Press.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference
Hart, S.G., and Staveland, T.E., Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, Eds. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp139-178 ,1988.
Huang, L. H., & Gui, B. (2014). On the Design and Development of Micro-Course. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 599-601, 2052-2055. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.599-601.2052
Hong, J., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2016). Learning declarative and procedural knowledge via video lectures: cognitive load and learning effectiveness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 74-81. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1237371
Hug, T. (2005). Microlearning: A new pedagogical challenge (Introductory Note).Paper presented at the Microlearning 2005, Austria.
Hug, T., Lindner, M., & Bruck, P. A. (2005). Microlearning: Emerging concepts, practices and technologies after e-learning (Vol. Proceedings of Microlearning 2005). Austria, Innsbruck: Innsbruck university press.
Ji, Y., & Han, Y. (2019). Monitoring Indicators of the Flipped Classroom Learning Process based on Data Mining – Taking the Course of “Virtual Reality Technology” as an Example. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(03), 166. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i03.10105
Kahneman D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kamilali, D., & Sofianopoulou, C. (2015, March). Microlearning as innovative pedagogy for mobile learning in MOOCS. Paper session presented at 11th International Conference Mobile Learning, Funchal, Portugal.
Kelleci, O., Kulaksiz, T., & Pala, F. K. (2018). The effect of social network-supported microlearning on teachers' self-efficacy and teaching skills. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 10(2), 115-129.
Kuo, Y,-C., Chu, H -C., & Tsai, M,-C. (2017). Effects of an integrated physiological signal-based attentionpromoting and English listening system on students' learning performance and behavioral patterns. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 218-227.
Lindner, M. (2006). Use These Tools, Your Mind Will Follow. Learning in Immersive Micromedia & Microknowledge Environments, Research Paper for ALT-C 2006: The Next Generation.
Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2013). The Analysis on Systematic Development of College Microlecture. Higher Education Studies, 3(6). doi: 10.5539/hes.v3n6p65
Long, T., Logan, J., & Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ Perceptions of the Value of Using Videos as a Pre-class Learning Experience in the Flipped Classroom. TechTrends, 60(3), 245-252. doi: 10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4
Matheson, C. (2008). The educational value and effectiveness of lectures. The Clinical Teacher, 5(4), 218-221. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498x.2008.00238.x
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Meissner, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2012). Science teaching based on cognitive load theory: Engaged students, but cognitive deficiencies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(3-4), 127-134.
Microsoft Canada. (2015). Microsoft attention spans research report. Retrieved from http://dl.motamem.org/microsoft-attention-spans-research-report.pdf
Milani, R.V., Lavie, C.J., & Cassidy, M.M. (1996). Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs on depression in patients after major coronary events, American Heart Journal, 132(4), 726-732.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
Motallebzadeh, K., Beh-Afarin, R., & Rad, S. D. (2011). The Effect of Short Message Service on the Retention of Collocations among Iranian Lower Intermediate EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1514-1520.
Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL, 20(1). doi: 10.1017/s0958344008000219
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-Based micro-Learning and Assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 269-278. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12240
Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-Load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133.
Paul, K. (2008). Spaced Learning: A Harbinger of a Paradigm Shift in Education. Education Today, 59(2), 3-6.
Penrose, D. (2008). Micro lecture. Retrieved from http://baike.baidu.com/view/8495108.htm?fr=aladdin
Shao, L-N., Qiu, L-H., Zhan, F-L., & Xue, M. (2018). Application of micro-lecture in standardized training of endodontic residents. Shanghai journal of stomatology, 27(2), 221-224.
Small, G. W., Moody, T. D., Siddarth, P., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2009). Your Brain on Google: Patterns of Cerebral Activation during Internet Searching. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(2), 116-126.
Souza, M. I. F., & Amaral, S. F. (2014). Educational Microcontent for Mobile Learning Virtual Environments. Creative Education, 5, 672-681.
Sun, G., Cui, T., Guo, W., Beydoun, G., Xu, D., & Shen, J. (2015). Micro Learning Adaptation in MOOC: A Software as a Service and a Personalized Learner Model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 174-184. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_16
Surjono, H. D., & Muhtadi, A. (2017). The Effects of Various Animation-Based Multimedia Learning in e-Learning Course. Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers - ICETC 2017. doi: 10.1145/3175536.3175558
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123-138.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217-228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00129.x
Wang, L., & Fan, M. (2016). How Micro-courses can Improve the Effectiveness of Ideological and Political Theories Curriculum Teaching through Teaching Design in China. Asian Social Science, 12(8), 219-229.
Weigel, M., Straughn, C., & Gardner, H. (2010). New Digital Media and Their Potential Cognitive Impact on Youth Learning. New Science of Learning, 3-22. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_1
Wen, C., & Zhang, J. (2015). Design of a Microlecture Mobile Learning System Based on Smartphone and Web Platforms. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(3), 203-207. doi: 10.1109/te.2014.2363627
Wirth, J., Künsting, J., & Leutnerc, D. (2009). The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load. Computer in Human Behavior, 25(2), 299-305.
Yang, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Effects of Different Video Types about Procedural Knowledge on Cognitive Load, Learning Flow, and Performance. 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT). doi: 10.1109/eitt.2015.44
Yu, K. (2016). Design and Application of Micro-video Course Recording in “General City Planning” Course. iJET, 11(5), 16-21.
Zhang, X., & Ren, L. (2011). Design for application of micro learning to informal training in enterprise. 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC). doi: 10.1109/aimsec.2011.6011235
Zhang, X., & Xu, J. (2015). Integration of Micro Lectures into the Blended Learning Discourse in Tertiary Education. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 10(2), 13-28.
Zhao, D. (2018). Teaching practice of Internet information technology in College English Course. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 322, 1-5. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/322/5/052017
Zhu, Q.-T., & Zhu, M. (2017). The C programming Micro lecture designing mode study in mobile learning circumstance. ITM Web of Conferences, 12, 01028. doi: 10.1051/itmconf/20171201028
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20250718)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
1. 學生使用線上微課程之狀況與其學習動機和學習成效之關係
2. 不同課後活動方式對學習動機、同儕互動、自主學習及學習成效之影響
3. 線上運動與心靈慰藉課程對民眾的運動行為與幸福感之影響
4. 問題導向學習之設計與成效:以研究所學術研究倫理課程為例
5. 以目的感為核心之生涯微課程的建立及其影響研究
6. 設計與實作一磨課師微課程學習資源交換與整合之框架
7. 素養導向地理教學對國中學生學習成效、 學習動機及多元文化素養之影響
8. 以數位敘事法融入專題導向課程探討五大人格特質對學習動機、學習投入與地方依附之影響
9. 高等教育學生新媒體素養與資訊搜尋策略關聯性之探討
10. 探討有無提示在程式積木學習中對於國小學童程式自我效能、運算思維之影響:以Hour of Code課程為例
11. 不同觀點敘述方式對於讀者情緒、情緒理解、 閱讀動機、閱讀理解與閱讀體驗之影響
12. 以基於設計的學習融入國小學生視覺化程式設 計創客課程探討運算思維概念、問題解決能力 與學習態度之研究
13. 使用互動式電子書和手機遊戲的空間能力教育訓練結果之比較
14. 專家與生手的滯後序列行為空間模式分析:以數位五連方積木拼圖遊戲為例
15. 評估問題解決導向運算思維模式對師資培育生問題解決能力和問題解決態度之影響