跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.251.236) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/08 10:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:羅天祥
研究生(外文):LO, TIEN-HSIANG
論文名稱:科學技術基本法與大學在國家創新系統 的角色轉換:以臺灣高科技產業為例
論文名稱(外文):Fundamental Science and Technology Act and The Transition of Universities in National Innovation System: The Evidence of Taiwan’s High-tech Industry
指導教授:蔡林彤飛蔡林彤飛引用關係紀慧如紀慧如引用關係
指導教授(外文):TSAI-LIN, TUNG-FEICHI, HUI-RU
口試委員:蔡林彤飛紀慧如陳旻男
口試委員(外文):TSAI-LIN, TUNG-FEICHI, HUI-RUCHEN, MIN-NAN
口試日期:2020-06-12
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立聯合大學
系所名稱:經營管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:80
中文關鍵詞:科學技術基本法大學國家創新系統高科技產業共整合分析
外文關鍵詞:Fundamental Science and Technology ActUniversityNational Innovation SystemHi-tech IndustriesCointegration Analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:159
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 1
第三節 研究問題 3
第四節 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 國家創新系統與大學角色 6
第二節 國家科技政策的變革:從美國拜杜法案到科學技術基本法 8
第三節 科學技術基本法對大學在國家創新系統角色轉換的影響 11
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節 臺灣科技研發創新活動與分工 15
第二節 研究個案選擇 19
第三節 資料收集 19
第四節 變數編譯 26
第五節 分析方法 27
第四章 研究結果 30
第一節 敘述統計 30
第二節 單根檢定 31
第三節 共整合檢定 32
(一)臺灣高科技整體產業創新與自主研發創新的關係 32
(二)臺灣高科技產業自主研發與大學技術創新的關係 37
(三)大學與企業技術創新的關係 41
(四)大學與政府技術創新的關係 46
(五)大學與個人技術創新的關係 50
第五章 討論 55
第一節 科技基本法前後大學角色在國家創新系統的轉換 55
第二節 大學與國家創新系統參與者的互動 56
第三節 大學在個別產業國家創新系統的表現 58
(一)生物科技 58
(二)醫藥品 59
(三)儀器1-光學 60
(四)儀器1-量測 61
(五)儀器1-半導體 62
(六)基本電子電機元件 63
(七)半導體 64
(八)基本電子電路;通信 65
(九)資訊 66
第六章 結論與建議 69
參考文獻 72

洪世章, & 林于婷. (2003). 國家創新系統: 概念, 成因與效果. 研考雙月刊, 27(4), 24-33.
科技部(2018),科學技術統計要覽-全國科技動態調查,臺北:科技部。
張紹勳. (2016). STATA在財務金融與經濟分析的應用 (1 ed.). 臺北市: 五南.
經濟部智慧財產局(2019) 107 年智慧財產局年報,臺北:經濟部智慧財產局。
Archibugi, D., & Filippetti, A. (2018). The retreat of public research and its adverse consequences on innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 97-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.022
Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., . . . Wessner, C. (2002). The Economics of Science and Technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(2), 155-203. doi: 10.1023/a:1014382532639
Blackburne III, E. F., & Frank, M. W. (2007). Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. The Stata Journal, 7(2), 197-208.
Branstetter, L., & Chen, J.-R. (2006). The impact of technology transfer and R & D on productivity growth in Taiwanese industry: Microeconometric analysis using plant and firm-level data. Journal of the Japanese and international Economies, 20(2), 177-192.
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
Chang, Y.-C., Chen, M.-H., Hua, M., & Yang, P. Y. (2005). Industrializing academic knowledge in Taiwan. Research-Technology Management, 48(4), 45-50.
Chang, Y.-C., Chen, M.-H., Hua, M., & Yang, P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a ‘scientific–economic’ framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(2), 199-213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.004
Chang, Y.-C., & Chen, M.-N. (2011). On transformation of public sector research: A preliminary post-STBL assessment in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(3), 498-513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.020
Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research policy, 38(6), 936-946. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.005
Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., Martin, B. R., Chi, H.-R., & Tsai-Lin, T.-F. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis. Technovation, 54, 7-21.
Chen, S.-H., Egbetokun, A. A., & Chen, D.-K. (2015). Brokering knowledge in networks: institutional intermediaries in the Taiwanese biopharmaceutical innovation system. IJTM, 69(3/4), 189-209.
Chung, S. (2002). Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems. Technovation, 22(8), 485-491.
Dahlstrand, Å. T. L., Smith, H. L., & Baines, N. (2016). Academic Entrepreneurship: Spin-offs in Sweden and the UK University evolution, entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness (pp. 127-150): Springer.
David, P. A., Mowery, D., & Steinmueller, W. E. (1992). Analysing the economic payoffs from basic research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2(1), 73-90.
Dodgson, M., Mathews, J., Kastelle, T., & Hu, M.-C. (2008). The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks. Research policy, 37(3), 430-445.
Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, organisations and institutions. London: Pinter.
Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B.-A. (1993). Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis, 265-298.
Eisenberg, R. S. (1996). Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government--Sponsored Research. Va. L. Rev., 82, 1663.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy, 32(1), 109-121.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix-University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 9-14.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4
Franzoni, C., & Scellato, G. (2011). Academic Patenting and the Consequences for Scientific Research. Australian Economic Review, 44(1), 95-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2010.00624.x
Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new National Innovation Systems? In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (Eds.), Technology and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers.
Freeman, C. (1989). Technology policy and economic performance: Pinter Publishers Great Britain.
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research policy, 35(6), 790-807. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2011). Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research policy, 40(8), 1068-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.008
Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(4), 476-501.
Granger, C. W. (1988). Some recent development in a concept of causality. Journal of econometrics, 39(1-2), 199-211.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research policy, 40(8), 1045-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005
Gustafsson, R., & Autio, E. (2011). A failure trichotomy in knowledge exploration and exploitation. Research policy, 40(6), 819-831. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.007
Hall, B., Link, A., & Scott, J. (2001). Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 87-98. doi: 10.1023/A:1007888312792
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
Hsu, D. W., Shen, Y.-C., Yuan, B. J., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25-39.
Hsu, D. W. L., & Yuan, B. J. C. (2013), “Knowledge Creation and Diffusion of Taiwan's Universities: Knowledge Trajectory from Patent Data”, Technology in Society, Vol.35(3), pp.172-181.
Huang, C. Y. (2018). How background, motivation, and the cooperation tie of faculty members affect their university–industry collaboration outputs: An empirical study based on Taiwan higher education environment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(3), 413-431.
Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. International journal of industrial organization, 21(6), 849-880.
Ibata-Arens, K. (2008). Comparing National Innovation Systems in Japan and the United States: Push, Pull, Drag and Jump Factors in the Development of New Technology. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(3), 315-338. doi: 10.1080/13602380802116765
Kitagawa, F., & Oba, J. (2010). Managing differentiation of higher education system in Japan: connecting excellence and diversity. Higher Education, 59(4), 507-524. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9262-5
Lee, T.-L., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2005). A dynamic analytic approach to national innovation systems: The IC industry in Taiwan. Research policy, 34(4), 425-440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.009
Levin, A., & Lin, C.-F. (1993). Unit root tests in panel data: new results. University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279-286.
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2010). The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh–Dole effect. Scientometrics, 83(2), 355-362.
Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 87-102. doi: 10.3152/095820208x287171
Lo, C.-C., Wang, C.-H., & Huang, C.-C. (2013), “The National Innovation System in The Taiwanese Photovoltaic Industry: A Multiple Stakeholder Perspective”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.80(5), pp.893-906.
Lo, S.-c. S. (2012). Innovation and patenting activities at universities in Taiwan: After Bayh-Dole-like acts. World Patent Information, 34(1), 48-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2011.10.001
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publication.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2016). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, 85.
Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., & Phan, P. H. (2008). Full-time faculty or part-time entrepreneurs. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 55(1), 29-36.
Mathews, J. A., Hu, M.-C., & Wu, C.-Y. (2011). Fast-Follower Industrial Dynamics: The Case of Taiwan's Emergent Solar Photovoltaic Industry. Industry and Innovation, 18(2), 177-202. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2011.541104
Mazzoleni, R. (2005). University patents, R&D competition, and social welfare. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(6), 499-515. doi: 10.1080/1043859042000269124
Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy, 30(1), 99-119.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2004). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2), 115-127.
Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh–Dole act in the United States. Research policy, 31(3), 399-418. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00116-0
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis: Oxford University Press.
Oh, S.-H., & Lee, K.-J. (2013). Governance system of governmental R&D programs: Formation and transformation of the Framework Act on Science and Technology in Korea. Science and Public Policy, 40(4), 492-503.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). National innovation systems: why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(1), 77-95.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the american statistical association, 94(446), 621-634.
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262.
Senker, J. (1996). National systems of innovation, organizational learning and industrial biotechnology. Technovation, 16(5), 219-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)00069-0
Shane, S. (2004). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127-151.
Shi, T., Chang, X., Tang, J., & Zheng, Z. (2016). Driving force from authorities: the evolution of innovation system for biomedical industry in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(10), 1210-1224.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington,D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Tseng, A. A., & Raudensky, M. (2015). Performances of technology transfer activities of US universities after Bayh-Dole Act. J. Economics, Business & Management, 3(6), 661-667.
Van Der Steen, M., & Enders, J. (2008), “Universities in Evolutionary Systems of Innovation”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.317(4), pp.281-292.
Walrave, B., & Raven, R. (2016). Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Research policy, 45(9), 1833-1844.
Wang, C.-T., & Chiu, C.-S. (2014) “Competitive Strategies For Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry in A New World Economy”, Technology in Society, Vol.36, pp.60-73.
Wang, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2012). Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation—A theoretical analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 419-428.
Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature. Research policy, 44(8), 1407-1418.
Wong, C.-Y., & Salmin, M. M. (2015). Attaining a productive structure for technology: The Bayh–Dole effect on university–industry–government relations in developing economy. Science and Public Policy, 43(1), 29-45. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv018
Wong, P.-K., Ho, Y.-P., & Singh, A. (2011). Contribution of universities to national innovation systems in Asia: Technology commercialization and academic entrepreneurship. Academic entrepreneurship in Asia: The role and impact of universities in national innovation systems, 1-28.
Yuan, B., & Lin, M. B. (2009). Incubation policy on innovation and entrepreneurship in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 23-36.

電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20250703)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top