臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資訊系統整合產業，係指提供企業資訊系統整合服務之加值型資訊產品代理或經銷等通路廠商所組成，主要業務是針對企業客戶對於資通訊系統功能的需求，將各式資訊系統軟、硬體產品進行必要的系統整合規劃、配置、安裝與測試等整合服務。台灣地區資訊系統整合產業的發展，與上游產品供應商、下游加值型經銷商以及資訊通路代理商有著密不可分的關係。面對著產業快速變化，創新生態系統與數位轉型的議題持續受到重視，資訊通路代理商在經營策略上需要透過不同的觀點與新的思維來探討。
本研究以資訊系統整合產業鏈中之資訊通路代理商為研究對象，運用創新生態系統之觀點，以價值網參與者為參考原型，探討資訊通路代理商與其生態系統中，包含產品的供應商或原廠、產品的通路代理商、產品的加值經銷商或系統整合商等生態成員，這些生態系統中相關行動者在科技創新與商業模式、市場間的相互作用；並運用創新生態系統的觀點探討經營策略、強化和服務創新等不同面向間的互動與連結，彙整案例以及與案例有商業互動的企業資訊蒐集，並透過專家訪談來說明生態系統中每個參與者與核心成員的經營策略與背後所產生的循環與回饋，以系統思考方式說明促進科技創新、商業模式、市場間相互聯結所產生的各種正向循環，在創新生態系統的觀點下，解剖其經營策略，進而提升科技創新產業的競爭力，以代理超過數十種資訊軟硬體產品的通路代理商S公司為案例，透過訪談設計訪談案例中之經營主管與專業經理人，以系統思考分析方法對案例資料進行分析，研究結果顯示在創新生態系統的觀點下，個案從三個不同策略的因果環路圖中，在商業模式創新、技術創新、市場在創新生態系統上具有緊密連結的關係，並在個別不同的驅動因素下，皆產生了提升產業價值的正向循環。

The IT distribution channel industry has played a key role in Taiwan’s IT industry. In particular, the construction of IT infrastructure must rely on the continuous industrial interactions from suppliers, agents to value-added distributors, which has a great influence on Taiwan and its enterprises. From the perspective of innovation ecosystems, the systems thinking is adopted in this study to explore the IT distributors and their ecosystem, including product manufacturers, channel distributions, value-added distributions, and competitive-cooperative companies. Based on the business strategies in the case analysis, the interaction and connection of relevant actors in the ecosystem in the dimensions of technological innovation, business models, and market are investigated in order to promote the possibility of various positive cycles arising from the connection of technological innovation, business models, and market, and further enhance the competitiveness of the technological innovation industry through the integrity of the innovation ecosystem.
The case presented in this study, Company S, is an IT distributor in Taiwan. Its business strategies for the past few years are analyzed. Then, through expert inter-views and data analysis, the interacting manufacturers at three different levels in the ecosystem are analyzed, including the value-added distributors interacting in the creation of new business models, the product suppliers interacting in the change of product distribution attributes, and the competitive and cooperative companies interacting in the technological cooperation to promote business mergers. Next, the causal loop diagram of the innovation ecosystem from the three business strategies is drawn, which shows that technological innovation, business model, and market are closely connected. The case analysis of this study shows that a more advantageous corporate strategy can be evolved from the innovation ecosystem development strategy, which verifies the empirical and theoretical research significance of this study. The purpose of this research is to explore the interaction between information distributors in technological innovation, business models, and markets; and to use the perspective of the innovation ecosystem to explore the interaction and connection between different aspects of corporate strategies, strengthening and service innovation, so as to play a comprehensive role Efficiency, promote the possibility of various positive cycles generated by the interconnection of scientific and technological innovation, business models, and markets, and improve the competitiveness of the scientific and technological innovation industry through the integrity of the innovation ecosystem.

中文摘要　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． iii
英文摘要　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． v
誌謝辭　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． vii
內容目錄　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． viii
表目錄　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． x
圖目錄　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． xi
第一章　　緒論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 1
　　第一節　　研究背景與動機．．．．．．．．．．． 1
　　第二節　　研究目的．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 6
　　第三節　　研究範圍．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 6
　　第四節　　研究流程．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 7
第二章　　文獻探討．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 9
　　第一節　　經營策略．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 9
　　第二節　　系統思考．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 14
　　第三節　　創新生態系統．．．．．．．．．．．． 20
　　第四節　　賽局理論與價值網．．．．．．．．．． 27
第三章　　研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 30
　　第一節　　研究架構．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 31
　　第二節　　研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 31
　　第三節　　系統思考工具．．．．．．．．．．．． 34
　　第四節　 個案簡介與訪談設計．．．．．．．．． 39
第四章　　研究分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 47
　　第一節　　個案生態系統描述．．．．．．．．．． 47
　　第二節　　商業模式驅動之循環．．．．．．．．． 49
　　第三節　　技術創新驅動之循環．．．．．．．．． 53
　　第四節　　市場創新驅動之循環．．．．．．．．． 56
第五章　　結論與建議．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 59
　　第一節　　結論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 59
　　第二節　　管理意涵．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 59
　　第三節　　實務意涵．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 61
　　第四節　　後續研究建議．．．．．．．．．．．． 61
參考文獻．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 63

參考文獻

一、中文部分

Sherwood, D. (2004)，系統思考(邱昭良，劉昕譯)，中國：機械工業出版社，(原文於2002年出版)。

王錦泰，陳明儀，管孟忠 (2007)，以系統動態學模式建置專案管理決策支援系統之分析，2007資訊管理學術與實務研討會，開南大學資管系。

司徒達賢(1995)，策略管理，台北：遠流出版社。

朱柔若（譯）（2000），社會研究方法：質化與量化取向（原作者： Neuman, W. L.），台北：揚智出版社。

吳建昌（2004），以交易成本理論探討資訊代理商之通路經營策略，中山大學企業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。

吳思華(2000)，策略九說－策略思考的本質(3版)，台北：臉譜出版社。

袁方 (編) (2002): 社會研究方法，台北：五南出版社。

許士軍(1995)，管理學(10版)，台北：東華書局。

陳雅文（1995）。內容分析法。在胡述兆主編，圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（頁323），臺北市：漢美出版社。

黃光玉、劉念夏、陳清文譯 (2004) : 媒介與傳播研究方法：質化與量化研究，台北：風雲論壇。

屠益民，張良政(2010)，系統動力學:理論與應用，台北：智勝出版社

經濟部統計處(2020)，電腦資訊及專業技術服務業統計調查，來源: https://dmz26.moea.gov.tw/GMWeb/investigate/InvestigateEB.aspx。

簡國明、湯凱傑、吳松澤、黃意植、葛孟堯、 邱錦田、王玳琪、蕭喆鴻、馮馨儀(2015)，創新生態系統發展策略，台北：國研院科技政策中心

二、英文部分

Aaker, D. A. (1998). Strategy Market Management, 5th ed. , N. Y. : John Wiley & Sons.

Beal, R. M. (2000). Competing effectively: Environmental scanning, competitive strategy, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(1), 27-47.

Brandenburger, A. M. & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995), The Right Game : Use Game Theory to Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Re-view, 73(4), 57-71.

Donella H. M. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics, Cambridge, Mass: The M. I. T. Press.

Forrester, J. W. (1968). Industrial Dynamics – after the first decade. Management Science, 14(7),398-415.

Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System dynamics review, 10(2-3), 245-256.

Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGrawHill Book.

Matsuno, K., & Mentzer, J. T. (2000). The effects of strategy type on the market orientation-performance relationship. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 1-16.

Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems; New York: Harper Collins.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, New York: The Free Ex-press.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage, New York: The Free Express.

Porter, M. E. (1996). What is Strategy?, Harvard Business Re-view.,74(6),1996,pp.61-78.

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2004). Sustaining the Nation’s Innovation Ecosystem: Maintaining the Strength of Our Science & Engineering Capabilities, Washington, DC: Author.

Richmond, B. (1997). The Thinking. In systems thinking: How can we make it easier to master?, The System Thinker, 8(2), 1-5.

Sherwood, D. (2002). Seeing the forest for the tree: a manager’s guide to applying system thinking. London, England: Nicho-las Brealey.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline; The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

Senge, P. (1994). The fifth discipline field book; Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Crown Publishers.

Senge, P. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: system thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin McGrawHill.

Tansley, A. G. (1935). The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology, 16, 3, 1935, pp. 284-307.

Tzuo, T., & Weisert, G. (2018). Subscribed: Why the Subscription Model Will Be Your Company’s Future-And What to Do About It. U.K.: Portfolio Penguin.

Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd rev. ed.). Princeton University Press.

Yan, M. R., & Chien, K. M., Hong, L. Y., & Yang, T. N. (2018). Evaluating the collaborative ecosystem for innovation-driven economy: A systems analysis and case study of science parks. Sustainability, 10(3), 887.

Yang,T. K., & Yan, M. R. (2019). Exploring the enablers of strategic orientation for technology-driven business innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 11, 5779

Yang, T.K., & Yan, M. R. (2020). The Corporate Shared Value for Sustainable Development: An Ecosystem Perspective. Sustainability, 12, 2348.

Yin, R.K., (1994). Case Study Research：Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA：Sage Publications.

Yun, J. J., Won, D., Jeong, E., Park, K., Yang, J., & Park, J. (2016). The relationship between technology, business model, and market in autonomous car and intelligent robot industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Chang, 103, 142-155