跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.80) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/25 23:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:賴嘉瑩
研究生(外文):LAI, CHIA-YING
論文名稱:董事會性別多樣性、企業不當行為與企業社會責任之關聯性
論文名稱(外文):A Study of the Relationships among Board Gender Diversity, Corporate Misconduct and Corporate Social Responsibility
指導教授:李佳蓉李佳蓉引用關係
指導教授(外文):LEE, CHIA-JUNG
口試委員:李振宇劉佳怡
口試委員(外文):LEE, CHENG-YULIU, CHIA-YI
口試日期:2020-07-23
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:國際經營與貿易學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:董事會性別多樣性企業不當行為企業社會責任
外文關鍵詞:Board Gender DiversityCorporate MisconductCorporate Social Responsibility
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:253
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:17
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究旨在探討董事會成員性別對於企業道德行為—企業不當行為與企業社會責任
之關聯,本研究主要針對台灣證券交易所2015年至2016年上市上櫃公司,其實證結果顯
示令人感到有趣的發現。首先,董事會性別多樣性與企業不當行為之間並無相關聯;第二
,董事會性別多樣性也與自願性揭露企業社會責任為顯著正相關,意即性別多元與否與企
業行為具有相關性;第三,企業不當行為與企業社會責任兩者具有顯著關係;最後本研究
發現,當女性董事越多時並不會強化企業不當行為與自願性揭露企業社會責任之間的關聯
;但當女性獨立董事個數越高時,越會企業不當行為與自願性揭露企業社會責任之間的關
聯。由此可解釋,女性獨立董事是具有危機處理能力,能降低企業面臨危機負面訊息。
This study examines the relationship between the board gender composition and the
behavior of business ethic, Corporate Misconduct and Corporate Social Responsibility. The
sample of this study consists of the firms Listed and OTC-companies on the Taiwan Stock
Exchange from 2015 to 2016. The regression analysis revealed four findings of particular
interest. First, the empirical result of this study shows that the single gender boards are not related
with corporate misconduct. Second, the single gender boards are significantly positive-related
with voluntary disclosure corporate social responsibility reporting. Both of them mean that male
directors have an influence on the behaviors of firms. Third, we find a significant association
between corporate misconduct and corporate social responsibility, implying that when a company
voluntary disclosure the CSR report. Finally, the number of female directors can’t strengthen the
connection between corporate misconduct and voluntary disclosure of corporate social
responsibility, but female independent directors can. This fact can be explained that female
independent directors have the ability to deal with crises and decreasing the negative effect for
the firm crisis.
目錄
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究流程圖 5
第貳章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 公司治理與企業不當行為 6
第二節 公司治理與企業社會責任 9
第三節 企業不當行為與企業社會責任 11
第四節 女性董事影響力 13
第五節 假說架構圖 15
第參章 研究方法 16
第一節 樣本選取與變數衡量 16
第二節 研究模型 20
第肆章 實證結果與分析 21
第一節 敘述性統計 21
第二節 相關係數分析 23
第三節 迴歸分析結果 25
第伍章 結論 32
第一節 研究結論 32
第二節 研究貢獻與研究限制 34
參考文獻 38
一、中文文獻

王茂昌, 戴伶娜, & 周盛德. (2013). 台灣電子業的績效指標, 董事會特徵與管理階層薪酬關連性. 企業管理學報, (99), 75-94.
朱文莉, & 邓蕾. (2017). 女性高管真的可以促进企业社会责任履行吗?——基于中国 A 股上市公司的经验证据. 中国经济问题, (4), 119-135.
吳幸蓁, 廖蕙儀, 顧廣平, 董澤平, 廖志峰, 陳振遠, ... & 蕭瑞麟. (2017). 自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果. Sun Yat-sen Management Review, 25(1), 13-62.
吳芷柔. (2017). 女性董事與企業社會責任報告書可讀性之關聯─ 英國上市公司之實證分析. 臺灣大學會計學研究所學位論文, 1-44.
李秀英, 劉俊儒, & 楊筱翎. (2011). 企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性. 東海管理評論第 13 卷第一期, 77-112.
李春安, & 徐傳瑛. (2010). 董事會獨立性與企業財務危機關係之研究. 管理與系統, 17(3), 467-499.
林宗輝. (2004). 公司治理與企業績效關聯性之研究.
林欣美, 郭麗華, & 蘇迺惠. (2008). 國際化程度, 董事會結構, 精練法人監督對盈餘管理之影響: 以台灣資訊電子業爲例. 臺大管理論叢, 19(1), 157-186.
林煜恩, 尚鐸, 喬子漢, & 池祥萱. (2017). 獨立董事特徵對公司決策的影響. 兩岸金融季刊, 5(4), 31-58.
洪雪卿, 陳薇如, & 傅雁鈴. (2013). 影響企業社會責任績效之重要因素為何?. Commerce & Management Quarterly, 14(4), 405-441.
高蘭芬, 盧正壽, 黃冠智, & 陳安琳. (2012). 公司治理, 公司績效與投資策略. 中山管理評論, 20(3), 851-880.
郭敏華, 郭迺鋒, 邱耀初, & 范秉航. (2005). 性別與投資行為: 以台灣股票市場為例. 財務金融學刊, 13(2), 1-28.
陳振遠, 王健聰, & 洪世偉. (2017). 公司治理對於企業社會責任, 公司價值之影響. 中山管理評論, 25(1), 135-176.
彭禎伶,(工商時報),載於:https://m.ctee.com.tw/livenews/aj/a91617002019073013284399(最後瀏覽日2020.07.12)
黃英忠, 陳淑玲, 施智婷, & 童冠燁. (2004). 性別歧視知覺對組織承諾干擾效果之研究—以台灣南部女性主管為例. 臺大管理論叢, 15(2), 71-98.
劉美纓, 丁碧慧, & 朱奐聿. (2014). 企業社會責任與公司治理, 公司績效之關連性研究. 科際整合管理研討會, 17-30.

二、英文文獻

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The journal of finance, 62(1), 217-250.
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94(2), 291-309.
Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter?. Management science, 58(2), 219-235.
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 377-397.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of management journal, 39(1), 123-148.
Ayuso, S., & Argandoña, A. (2009). Responsible corporate governance: towards a stakeholder board of directors?.
Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploringthe relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41(3), 292-318.
Barnett, M. L., Jermier, J. M., & Lafferty, B. A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate reputation review, 9(1), 26-38.
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of business ethics, 97(2), 207-221.
Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting review, 323-349.
Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of business ethics, 113(2), 185-197.
Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press.
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 125(3), 367.
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 38(1), 33-53.
Chaganti, R. S., Mahajan, V., & Sharma, S. (1985). Corporate board size, composition and corporate failures in retailing industry [1]. Journal of management studies, 22(4), 400-417.
Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2011). Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 1158-1175.
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2005). An exploratory study of stakeholder emotions: Affect and crises. Research on emotion in organizations, 1(5), 263-280.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta‐analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic management journal, 19(3), 269-290.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991.
Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of corporate finance, 7(3), 209-233.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723-759.
Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325-1359.
Du, K., & Wu, S. J. (2019). Does External Assurance Enhance the Credibility of CSR Reports? Evidence from CSR-Related Misconduct Events in Taiwan. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(4), 101-130.
Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009). The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance.
Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 522-529.
Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate governance: An international review, 11(2), 102-111.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2016). Leading at the top: Understanding women's challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 51-63.
Gray, E. R., & Balmer, J. M. (1998). Managing corporate image and corporate reputation. Long range planning, 31(5), 695-702.
Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Tay, L., Donnellan, M. B., Harms, P. D., Robins, R. W., & Yan, T. (2015). Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 141(2), 261.
Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices?. Journal of accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314-338.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206.
Helgesen, S. (1995). The female advantage: Women's ways of leadership. Broadway Business.
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede's culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach's value survey. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 15(4), 417-433.
Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. D. (1986). The glass ceiling: Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from the top jobs. The Wall Street Journal, 24(1), 1573-1592.
Ibarra, H. (2012). Despite quotas, there’s rough road ahead for women in Europe. Harvard Business Review Blog Network, 14.
Jackson, J. C. (2001). Women middle managers’ perception of the glass ceiling. Women in management review.
Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, And Ownership Structure. Economics Social Institutions, 163–231.
Jordan, J., Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2013). Someone to look up to: Executive–follower ethical reasoning and perceptions of ethical leadership. Journal of management, 39(3), 660-683.
Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 125(4), 470.
Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational dynamics, 37(2), 145-164.
Kosnik, R. D. (1987). Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative science quarterly, 163-185.
Krüger, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and the board of directors. Job Market Paper. Toulouse School of Economics, France.
Lang, M. H., & Lundholm, R. J. (1996). Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. Accounting review, 467-492.
Laufer, D., & Coombs, W. T. (2006). How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues. Business Horizons, 49(5), 379-385.
Lee, C. J., Wang, R., Lee, C. Y., Hung, C. C., & Hsu, S. C. (2018). Board structure and directors’ role in preventing corporate misconduct in the construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(2), 04017067.
Levin, I. P., Snyder, M. A., & Chapman, D. P. (1988). The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risky decision-making task. The Journal of Psychology, 122(2), 173-181.
Liao, P. C., Xia, N. N., Wu, C. L., Zhang, X. L., & Yeh, J. L. (2017). Communicating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of international contractors: Content analysis of CSR reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 327-336.
Löve, J., Hagberg, M., & Dellve, L. (2011). Balancing extensive ambition and a context overflowing with opportunities and demands: A grounded theory on stress and recovery among highly educated working young women entering male-dominated occupational areas. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 6(3), 5904.
Luan, C. J., & Tang, M. J. (2007). Where is independent director efficacy?. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 636-643.
Mackenzie, C. (2007). Boards, incentives and corporate social responsibility: The case for a change of emphasis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 935-943.
Martin, A. D., Nishikawa, T., & Williams, M. A. (2009). CEO gender: Effects on valuation and risk. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 23-40.
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. B. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 108(1), 1-13.
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
McKendall, M. A., & Wagner III, J. A. (1997). Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality. Organization Science, 8(6), 624-647.
McKendall, M. A., Sinchez, C. M., & Sicilian, P. (1996, July). Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. In Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society (Vol. 7, pp. 167-178).
Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management studies, 46(5), 755-786.
Moore, D. A., Tetlock, P. E., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of management review, 31(1), 10-29.
Nguyen, D. D., Hagendorff, J., & Eshraghi, A. (2016). Can bank boards prevent misconduct?. Review of Finance, 20(1), 1-36.
Palmer, D. (2012). Normal organizational wrongdoing: A critical analysis of theories of misconduct in and by organizations. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Palvia, A., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2015). Are female CEOs and chairwomen more conservative and risk averse? Evidence from the banking industry during the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 577-594.
Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of management studies, 29(4), 411-438.
Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of management review, 23(1), 59-76.
Richardson, A. J., Welker, M., & Hutchinson, I. R. (1999). Managing capital market reactions to corporate social resposibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(1), 17-43.
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over‐represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of management, 16(2), 81-90.
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549-572. 
Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Conflict in organizational decision making: An exploratory study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. Management Science, 36(4), 436-448.
Sims, R. (2009). Toward a better understanding of organizational efforts to rebuild reputation following an ethical scandal. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 453.
Siomkos, G. (1989). Managing product-harm crises. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 3(1), 41-60.
Siomkos, G. J., & Kurzbard, G. (1994). The hidden crisis in product‐harm crisis management. European journal of marketing.
Smith, P. L., & Oakley, E. F. (1997). Gender-related differences in ethical and social values of business students: Implications for management. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 37-45.
Szwajkowski, E. (1985). Organizational illegality: Theoretical integration and illustrative application. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 558-567.
Wahid, A. S. (2019). The effects and the mechanisms of board gender diversity: Evidence from financial manipulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 705-725.
Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of business Ethics, 11(10), 771-778.
Wartick, S. L. (2002). Measuring corporate reputation: Definition and data. Business & Society, 41(4), 371-392.
Watson, J., & McNaughton, M. (2007). Gender differences in risk aversion and expected retirement benefits. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(4), 52-62.
Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms' board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 255-277.
Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1-10.
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top