臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

因隨著經濟發展的快速變化而帶動人們提升生活水準及品質，人們開始重視生活的質量，過去就有學者提出主觀生活評價無法利用消費多寡或人民所擁有的財富來衡量，也開始有學者想要量化這些看不到的數值—所謂的「幸福」，並且在國內，一例一休制度從2016年提出，到2018年三讀通過修正案，從1111人力銀行2016年公布「上班族工時暨加班現況調查」中調查結果顯示，有接近半數41.6%的上班族認為本身工時過長，並且滿意目前的工作狀態。
本研究想藉由國內數據來探討過去文獻所顯示工作時數與幸福感之關聯，是否我國也與過去文獻的研究結果方向一致；也因為台灣的地理位置地狹人稠，隨著科技的變遷，台灣的交通發展成熟度之高，讓許多現代人選擇在非居住地跨縣市就職，藉此探討工作時數是否如文獻所顯示對於幸福感的負向影響與其他因素也有相關性；例如：可支配所得。然而在過去文獻中工作時數與幸福感之間的關係，似乎未提及地理位置的不同所帶來的影響，故本研究想使用空間分析來驗證是否加入了空間因素會影響工作時數與台灣人民幸福的關係，造成與過去文獻的結果不同，因此本研究將使用空間計量方法來進行分析。
實證結果與過去的文獻結果類似，工作時數對於台灣人民幸福感是負向且顯著的影響，其次，台灣人的可支配所得對於幸福感在本研究影響成果並不顯著，從過去的文獻中可知收入與幸福感在部分文獻裡是正向且顯著的；而交乘項平均工作時數乘可支配所得的結果為顯著，表示工作時數雖然對人民幸福感為負向關係，但乘上可支配所得後，能降低對幸福感的負向影響，再者，加入了空間權重矩陣之後，在先前跑一般追蹤迴歸分析所得到的結果大部分都在空間計量迴歸結果中，便為顯著，也就是說對於身心健康、教育程度以及老年人口等會因為鄰近縣市的位置而使得台灣人民幸福感有所變動。

As the rapid changes in economic development have driven people to improve their living standards and quality, people have begun to attach importance to the quality of life. In the past, scholars suggested that subjective life evaluation cannot be measured by the amount of consumption or wealth owned by the people. Scholars also began thinking to quantify these unseen values, the so-called "happiness". Furthermore, in Taiwan, the “one rest day one day off” system was proposed in 2016, and the amendment passed through the third reading in 2018. From 1111 Manpower Bank''s 2016 announcement of "office worker’s working hours and overtime”, the results of the survey in the "Current Situation Survey" show that 41.6% of office workers believe that their working hours are too long and are however satisfied with their current working conditions.
This study wants to use domestic data to explore the relationship between working hours and well-being shown in the past literature. Whether Taiwan is also in the same direction as the research results of the past literature; also because Taiwan’s geographical location is small and densely populated, as technology changes, Taiwan’s transportation development is so mature that many people choose to work in non-residential areas across counties and cities. We like to explore whether the negative impact of working hours on happiness is related to other factors as shown in the literature; for example, disposable income. However, the relationship between working hours and well-being in the past literature does not seem to mention the impact of different geographical locations. Therefore, this study wants to use spatial analyses to verify whether the addition of spatial factors will affect the relationship between working hours and the Taiwanese people''s happiness, which is different from the results in the past literature. This study will use spatial measurement methods to analyze.
We begin with the empirical estimations, which are similar to those in the past literature. Working hours have a negative and significant impact on the happiness of Taiwanese people. Then disposable income has no significant impact on happiness in this research. From the past literature, it can be seen that income and well-being are positive and significant in some literatures; and the result obtained by the average working hours multiplied by the disposable item is significant, which means that although working hours have a negative relationship with people’s well-being, it can be multiplied. After dominating the income, it can reduce the negative impact on happiness. Moreover, after adding the spatial factors, most of the results obtained from the previous general tracking regression analysis are similar to the spatial measurement regression results. This means that the physical and mental health, education level, and the elderly population will change the happiness of Taiwanese people due to the location of neighboring counties and cities.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 工作時數相關文獻 5
一、 台灣工作時數定義 5
二、 台灣工作時數演進 5
第二節 幸福感相關文獻 7
第三節 空間計量相關文獻 8
第三章 資料來源與分析 10
第一節 資料來源 10
第二節 變數定義 10
第三節 變數敘述統計與分析 15
第四章 研究方法與模型探討 19
第一節 追蹤資料分析法 19
第二節 空間計量分析法 20
第五章 實證結果 24
第一節 追蹤資料迴歸結果與分析 24
第二節 空間自相關分析檢驗結果 27
第三節 空間計量迴歸結果 30
第六章 結論 35
參考文獻 37

圖目錄
圖 1-1研究架構流程 4
圖 5-1 QGIS軟體實作 28
圖 5-2 GeoDa軟體實作 28

表目錄
表2- 1先進國家法定工時比較 6
表3- 1變數之敘述統計與代號 16
表3- 2台灣人民幸福感基本統計：依年度區分 17
表3- 3平均每人每年工作時數基本統計：依年度區分 18
表5- 1追蹤迴歸結果 26
表5- 2　Moran’s I檢定值 29
表5- 3空間自迴歸模型分析 33
表5- 4空間誤差模型分析 34

1.王仁敏 (2019)，” 探討不同的工作時數與工作薪資對生理指標及心理指標之影響”， 國立台北護理健康大學運動保健研究所論文
2.王建楠、李璧依 (2015)，” 輪班工作之健康效應: 系統性回顧與統合分析”， 中華職業醫學雜誌22(3)：155-165, 2015
3.吳雅婷 (2014)，” 影響台灣幸福感之主客觀因素研究—以2005 年與2010 年為例”， 中正大學經濟系國際經濟研究所學位論文
4.李君如、張芸愷 (2007)，” 國際航線女性空服員身心健康與工作壓力之研究”， 健康管理學刊 ； 5卷1期 (2007 / 06 / 01) ， P1 – 23
5.林國榮、李秉正、徐世勛(1998)，” 縮減工時對台灣經濟衝擊之一般均衡分析”， 《 台灣經濟學會年會論文集》
6.邱芷綾（2016），”上班族加班及工時調查”，111人力銀行，發表於《產經新聞網》
7.黃瑄筑 (2017)，”上班族工作時數與個人身心幸福感之關聯性”， 元智大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文
8.趙小美 (2014)，”臺灣地區幸福感定位之研究”， 育達科技大學企業管理系碩士論文
9.Anselin, L. (1988), Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10.Anselin, L.（1999）, “Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis,” Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Technical and Issues, 253-266.
11.Blanchflower, D. G., and Oswald, A. J. (2004). “Well-being over time in Britain and the USA.”, Journal of public economics, 88(7), 1359-1386.
12.Crouter (1999),” Linking parents'' work pressure and adolescents'' well being: Insights into dynamics in dual earner families.”, Developmental Psychology, 35(6), 1453–1461.
13.Easterlin, R. A. (1974), “Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence.”, Nations and households in economic growth, 89, 89-125.
14.Easterlin, R. A. (1995), “Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of All?”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35-48.
15.Ed Diener and Martin E.P. Seligman(2004), Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being, First Published Jul 1, 2004; pp. 1–31.
16.Elhorst (2014),” Spatial econometrics: from cross-sectional data to spatial panels” ,Springer.
17.Frey, Bruno S., and Stutzer, A. (2002), “What can economists learn from happiness research?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402-435.
18.Geary, R. C. (1954), “The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping.”, The incorporated statistician, 5(3), 115-146.
19.Gillian Weston, Afshin Zilanawala, Elizabeth Webb, Livia A Carvalho, Anne McMunn, “Long work hours, weekend working and depressive symptoms in men and women: findings from a UK population-based studya”, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health: first published as 10.1136
20.Golden and Wiens (2006) ,“To your happiness? Extra hours of labor supply and worker well-being”, The Journal of Socio-Economics Volume 35, Issue 2, April 2006, Pages 382-397.
21.Helliwell, J., Layard, R. and Sachs, J. (2018), WORLD HAPPINESS REPORT 2018 UPDATE. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, and The Earth Institute Columbia University.
22.Hsiao (1985),” Benefits and limitations of panel data”, Published online: 21 Mar 2007 Pages 121-174.
23.MacCulloch and Oswald (2001), “Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness”, The American Economic Review, vol. 91 no. 1,336-341.
24.Moran, P. A. (1950), “Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena.”, Biometrika, 37(1/2), 17-23.
25.Pouwels, Siegers, Vlasblom (2008), Income, working hours, and happiness, Economics Letters, Volume 99, Issue 1, April 2008, Pages 72-74.
26.Richard Wilkinson, Kate Pickett，譯者：溫澤元 (2019), “收入不平等：為何他人過得越好，我們越焦慮？The Inner Level: How More Equal Societies Reduce Stress, Restore Sanity and Improve Everyone’s Well-being” ，時報出版。
27.Shields (1999),” Long working hours and health”, health report 82-003.
28.Stanca, L. (2010), “The Geography of Economics and Happiness: Spatial Patterns in the Effects of Economic Conditions on Well-Being.”, Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 115-133.
29.Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J. P. (2009), “The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited.”, Reflections and overview. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris.
30.Taylor and Böheim (2004), ” Actual and Preferred Working Hours”, Volume42, Issue1 March 2004Pages 149-166.
31.W. R. Tobler (1970), ” A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region”, Economic Geography, Volume 46:234-240.
32.Wooldridge,J.M. (2010), ” Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data”, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.