跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(100.28.0.143) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/07/13 16:39
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳韻竹
研究生(外文):CHEN, YUN-JHU
論文名稱:從華人文化觀點探究「反擊型」男性親密暴力者
論文名稱(外文):Exploring the Male Intimate Partner Perpetrators of "Violent Resistance" from Chinese Cultural Perspectives
指導教授:邱獻輝邱獻輝引用關係陳巧雲陳巧雲引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHIOU,HSIEN-HUEICHEN, CHIAO-YUN
口試委員:鄭瑞隆詹盛如
口試委員(外文):CHENG, JUI-LUNGCHAN, SHENG-JU
口試日期:2021-12-15
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:犯罪防治研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:綜合社會及行為科學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2022
畢業學年度:110
語文別:中文
論文頁數:202
中文關鍵詞:反擊型建構主義典範敘事研究華人文化親密暴力
外文關鍵詞:Chinese cultureConstructivism paradigmintimate partner violencenarrative researchviolent resistance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:313
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:64
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
現有國內外親密暴力者分類學,即便已發展出許多分類架構,仍有不足之處。像是近來在實務上不乏在家中處於弱勢、遭到女性伴侶暴力對待,在超出忍耐範圍後爆發「反擊」之男性親密暴力者。由於「反擊型」男性親密暴力者目前極少受到文獻的關注,且相左於傳統女性主義觀點:親密暴力肇因於男性的父權思維、且僅有女性會成為受暴者,顯示有必要深入此類型進行探究。考量親密暴力具有豐富的文化意涵,因此本研究擬從華人文化的觀點出發,採取建構主義典範作為科學哲學的基礎,並採用敘事研究的方式進行探究。邀請兩位平時無暴力傾向、與伴侶互動相對處於弱勢地位之男性親密暴力者擔任研究參與者,接受個別深度訪談。藉由探討「反擊型」男性親密暴力者的生命經驗,瞭解其對於施暴事件的想法與感受,從而探索文化價值與信念在其親密暴力行為模式中的意涵。另外,本研究以判決書和社工訪談紀錄作為輔助文本,並在資料分析的過程,邀請一位進行相關領域研究的研究生擔任協同分析者,協助從文化觀點進行分析。
研究結果顯示,「反擊型」男性親密暴力者與伴侶的互動過程,呈現諸多的文化意涵,共可以整理出四個議題:其一,兩位受訪者採取「忍」的策略因應伴侶衝突議題,然隱藏真實想法、忍而不語,導致伴侶間缺乏溝通,影響著雙方的關係與互動;其二,即使衝突不斷、且認定伴侶「不貞」,為維持「和諧」關係,選擇以忍而不發來應對,長期未解的問題使得關係逐漸惡化;其三,傳統華人之「相依我」特徵顯著,例如秉持「緣分」信念而難以割捨感情、顧及子女照顧與長輩期待而行事,以致於親密關係陷入僵局;其四,與伴侶衝突令受訪者感到不光彩,為維護「臉面」而不願向外求助。長期百般忍讓身心俱疲,且加上酒精/毒品催化,最後積累已久的憤恨爆發,導致反擊型親密暴力事件。後續根據研究結果與其意涵進行討論,並得出結論與提供建議。

The typology of intimate partner perpetrators has developed many classification frameworks at home and abroad. However, the classifications are still inadequate. Recently in practice, it has occurred that males with inferior family status commits resistant violence (RV) against his female partners’ initial maltreatment, including physical or psychological, which has been unbearable. RV has received few attentions in previous literature, and it contradicts to the stereotype that the male perpetrators occupy superior status at home. According to Feminism, intimate partner violence (IPV) is caused by Patriarchy, so the victims were purely supposed to be females. Hence, it is necessary to investigate this type of perpetrator in depth. On account of the rich cultural connotations of intimate partner violence, this research intends to proceed from the Chinese cultural point of view. The paradigm of Constructivism was adopted as the scientific philosophic basis, and narrative inquiry method was implemented in this study. Two male RV perpetrators were invited as the participants to received individual in-depth interviews. According to relevant records, they had no violent tendency initially and occupied inferior positions when they interacted with their partners. This research was intended to explore the life-course of RV perpetrators, through analyzing perpetrators’ thoughts and feelings in RV events, explore the underlying meanings of cultural values and beliefs. In addition, written verdicts and social workers’ records were also included as auxiliary text for data analysis. Furthermore, during the data analysis, one graduate student studying similar topic was recruited as the co-analyst.
The result implies that rich cultural influences were shown in the interactions between male RV perpetrators and their partners. Four issues found through analytic process are as follows: First, the participants adopted a tolerating strategy to cope with their couple conflicts. However, tolerating cannot actually solve the couple conflicts completely. The lack of communication between male RV perpetrators and their partners, which affects their relationship and interaction. Second, even if constant relationship conflicts, and both participants accused their partners of infidelities. Due to maintain a harmonious relationship, instead of communicating, they did nothing more than tolerating. The long-term unsolved problems worsened their relationship. Third, participants showed obvious features of “interdependent self”. They suppressed themselves to maintain couple relationships because of traditional considerations such as serendipity beliefs, children raising, or elders’ expectations. It made the intimate relationship come to a deadlock. Fourth, the participants cared about reputation more than the couple conflicts. Their ego did not allow them to reveal family shames to outsiders. In addition to the influence of alcohol/drug useing, physical exhaustion and emotional resentment accumulated. Finally, any petty thing may become the last straw that broke the camel’s back. Furies erupted. RV occurred. In the following discussion, basing on the result of the research and their implications, making the conclusions and providing suggestions.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景
第二節 研究動機
第三節 研究目的與研究問題
第四節 名詞解釋
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 暴力者類型學
第二節 個人內在與社會心理觀點
第三節 華人文化觀點
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究方法的選擇
第二節 研究參與者
第三節 研究工具
第四節 資料蒐集與分析
第五節 研究品質檢核與研究倫理
第四章 研究結果
第一節 受訪者A之生命敘說
第二節 受訪者B之生命敘說
第三節 受訪者A、B之跨個案分析
第五章 研究討論
第一節 鑑古觀今:文獻對話
第二節 時過境遷:文化演變
第三節 親密暴力:正義思辨
第四節 研究者:共鳴省思
第六章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論
第二節 未來建議
第三節 研究限制
參考文獻
附錄一:訪談大綱
附錄二:訪談筆記
附錄三:文本分析札記
附錄四:研究結果內容回饋單
中文文獻
方永泉(2000)。典範Paradigm。國家教育研究院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1306168/
王美懿、林東龍、王增勇(2010)。「病人」、「犯人」或「個人」?男性家暴「加害人」之再認識。社會政策與社會工作學刊,14(2),147-193。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.201012.0147
王珮玲(2012)。臺灣親密暴力危險評估表(TIPVDA)之建構與驗證。社會政策與社會工作學刊,16(1),1-58。https:// doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.201206.0001
王珮玲(2017)。求助有用嗎?受暴婦女遭跟蹤騷擾的因應與困境。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集(20),225-248。臺北市:法務部。
王樂民(2011)。婚姻暴力加害人施暴原因、類型與防治效能之研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文,嘉義縣。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/73s9tn
王鍾和(2001)。父母如何幫助孩子因應挫折情境。學生輔導,76,82-87。
全國法規資料庫(2020年1月27日)。家庭暴力防治法。2021年7月10日,取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0050071
朱瑞玲(1991)。「面子」壓力及其因應行為。載於楊國樞、黃光國(主編),中國人的心理與行為,177-212。臺北市:桂冠。
朱群芳(2016)。修復式司法在家庭暴力案件的應用:以西歐國家為例。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集(19),183-200。臺北市:法務部。
朱儀羚、吳芝儀、蔡欣志、康萃婷、柯嬉慧(譯)(2004)。敘事心理與研究:自我、創傷與意義的建構(原作者:M.-L. Crossley)嘉義市:濤石。(原著出版年:2000)
何明修(2006)。台灣工會運動中的男子氣概。臺灣社會學刊,36,65-108。https://doi.org/10.6786/TJS.200606.0065
余一鳴(2015)。關係與貪瀆:華人關係文化脈絡下的公務員倫理行為。行政暨政策學報,60,1-40。
余民寧、許嘉家、陳柏霖(2010)。中小學教師工作時數與憂鬱的關係:主觀幸福感的觀點。教育心理學報,42(2),229-251。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20090604
冷則剛、任文姍(譯)(1998)。政治學方法論(原作者:J.-B. Manheim & R.-C. Rich)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:1995)
利翠珊(2012)。夫妻關係間的忍與婚姻滿意度之關連。中華心理衛生學刊,25(3), 447-475。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201209_25(3).0005
利翠珊、蕭英玲(2008)。華人婚姻品質的維繫:衝突與忍讓的中介效果。本土心理學研究,29,77-116。https://doi.org/10.6254/2008.29.77
吳志文、葉光輝(2011)。雙元自主性的共存與範疇優勢性運作機制:以訊息區辨表現降低共同方法變異。中華心理學刊,53(1),59-77。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2011.5301.04
吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(2008)。質性研究與評鑑(原作者:M.-Q. Patton)。嘉義市:濤石。(原著出版年:2002)
李素卿(譯)(2002)。感性與理性:了解我們的情緒(原作者:Lazarus, R.-S. & Lazarus, B.-N.)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:1994)
李御儂、賴念華(2019)。文化心理劇:「景觀人,人觀景」用於變遷中的華人家庭關係議題。中華輔導與諮商學報,54,123-157。https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862019010054005
李敏龍、楊國樞(2005)。忍的心理與行為。載於楊國樞、黃國光、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(下),599-629。臺北市:遠流。
沈慶鴻、郭豐榮(2005)。強制戒癮家暴加害人飲酒經驗、戒癮態度及暴力行為之研究。中華心理衛生學刊,18(4),31-53。http://dx.doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.200512_18(4).0002
沈瓊桃(2013)。大專青年的約會暴力經驗與因應策略初探。中華心理衛生學刊,26(1),1-31。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201303_26(1).0001
沈瓊桃、童伊迪(2018)。婚暴併兒虐家庭之多元模式與發生情境。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,14(2),73-104。
林世棋(2006)。家庭暴力相對人之流行病學特徵。國立陽明大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/y6zude
林世棋、陳筱萍、孫鳳卿、周煌智(2007)。家庭暴力加害人處遇計畫執行現況。臺灣精神醫學,21(3),208-217。https://doi.org/10.29478/TJP.200709.0007
林以正、黃金蘭、李怡真(2011)。進退之間的拿捏:忍的情境變異性與心理適應。本土心理學研究,35,57-100。https://doi.org/10.6254/2011.35.57
林怡君、趙梅如(2007)。親密信任之內涵建構及量表編製。中華輔導學報,21,1-32。https://doi.org/10.7082/CARGC.200703.0001
林明傑(2009)。家庭暴力案件危險評估與危險分級之進階實務。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,5(2),305-316。https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.200912.0019
林明傑(2011)。男性婚姻暴力加害人之致命危險評估:DA量表與CTS量表在我國適用之再研究。犯罪學期刊,14(1),31-68。https://doi.org/10.29607/ZHWHGX.201106.0002
林明傑、吳啟安(2018)。高致命危險案件之快速篩檢指標與分類研究。犯罪學期刊,20(2),53-76。
林明傑、沈勝昂(2004)。婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究。中華心理衛生學刊,17(2),67-92。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.200406_17(2).0003
林明傑、簡蕾如、蔡宗晃、王家駿(2007)。有無邊緣型人格傾向之男性婚姻暴力加害人在暴力行為嚴重性之比較。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,3(1),27-55。https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.200706.0002
林盈秀、童伊廸、鍾道詮(2015)。親密關係中的受暴經驗-以未成年階段懷孕女性為例。臺灣社會工作學刊,15,51-79。
林美珠、溫錦真(2018)。臺灣心理與諮商敘事研究之回顧與展望。中華輔導與諮商學報,53,81-116。
林惠彥、陸洛、陸昌勤(2014)。人際壓力與工作滿足及身心健康之關聯:以華人因應策略為調節變項。商略學報,6(1),57-72。
林曉青(2012)。男性婚姻暴力者夫妻溝通經驗之研究。國立中正大學罪防治研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t36kk4
邱獻輝(2009)。從「權威關注」到「自我關注」:遊療師的生命轉換經驗及其在專業實踐之文化考量。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6n5et3
邱獻輝(2012)。探究男性親密暴力之文化意涵。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,8(1),27-49。https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.201207.0002
邱獻輝(2013)。男性的夫妻角色期待與實踐:親密暴力者vs.無親密暴力者。犯罪學期刊,16(2),61-92。
邱獻輝(2016)。從關係主義文化變遷觀點建構男性親密暴力者的分類架構。中華輔導與諮商學報,46,93-126。
邱獻輝(2017a)。新移民親密暴力發生與停止之對偶敘說探究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,13(2),27-54。
邱獻輝(2017b)。社區強制諮商團體對預防再犯親密暴力的成效探究。教育心理學報,49(2),163-192。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201712-49(2).0001
邱獻輝(2017c)。酒精使用改變量表(親密暴力版)編製研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊,21,33-65。
邱獻輝(2018)。從角色默契消失到敵意湧現的惡化歷程:認定伴侶不貞的男性親密殺人心理探究。教育心理學報,49(3),461-486。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201803_49(3).0006
邱獻輝、葉光輝(2012)。從傳統華人貞節觀念探討男性殺妻。本土心理學研究,38,43-100。https://doi.org/10.6254/2012.38.43
邱獻輝、葉光輝(2013)。失根的大樹:從文化觀點探究親密暴力殺人者的生命敘說。中華輔導與諮商學報,37,89-123。
邱獻輝、葉光輝(2014)。臉面在教唆殺妻歷程的心理意涵:華人臉面理論的應用。人文及社會科學集刊,26(3),483-523。
邱蘭媚(2015)。男性親密暴力者「忍」之敘事研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9vga66
金耀基(1988)。「面」、「恥」與中國人行為之分析。載於楊國樞(主編),中國人的心理,319-345。臺北市:桂冠。
洪宗言(2008)。諮商師對家暴加害人抗拒行為之理解。中國文化大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/56t85c
洪莉竹、陳秉華(2005)。臺灣諮商人員對西方諮商與華人文化信念衝突的轉化經驗。教育心理學報,37(1),79-98。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20050818.2
胡幼慧(1995)。三代同堂:迷思與陷阱。臺北市:巨流圖書。
范國勇、韋愛梅、王伯頎(2015)。大數據運用在親密關係暴力犯罪防治分析之探討。法務部委託研究報告(PG10404-0067)。臺北市:法務部。
修慧蘭(2002)。大學生約會暴力行為之研究。行政院國科會委託研究報告(PF9007-0292)。臺北市:行政院國科會。
唐文慧、廖珮如(2015)。超越「加害人」的觀點:婚暴處遇男性的建制民族誌分析。台灣社會學,29,133-178。https://doi.org/10.6676/TS.2015.29.133
唐淑華(2004)。情意教學:故事討論取向。臺北市:心理。
徐欣萍(2012)。華人關係互動中的緣分運作及其心理適應歷程。本土心理學研究,37,57-97。https://doi.org/10.6254/2012.37.57
徐欣萍、黃國光(2013)。大學生緣觀構念研究與對本土化諮商的啟示。教育心理學報,45(2),241-259。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20130603
涂懿文、唐文慧(2016)。家庭關係與男子氣概的建構:一個漁村男性的遷移傳記。人文及社會科學集刊,28(2),215-258。
高旭繁(2008)。華人在傳統與現代生活情境中的傳統與現代行為:人境互動論的觀點。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所博士論文,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hqhed7
高旭繁(2012)。當新好男人遇上新時代女性?夫妻在不同生活情境中的決策與適應後果。行政院國科會委託研究報告(PF10107-0175)。臺北市:行政院國科會。
高旭繁、陸洛(2006)。夫妻傳統性/現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究,25,47-100。https://doi.org/10.6254/2006.25.47
高旭繁、楊國樞(2011)。華人心理傳統性與心理現代性研究之回顧與前瞻。彰化師大教育學報,19,1-11。https://doi.org/10.6769/JENCUE.201106.0003
高鳯霞、鄭伯壎(2019)。華人組織中的人際壓力源:主位與客位構念之比較。中華心理學刊,61(2),73-95。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.201906_61(2).0001
高鳳仙(2018)。家庭暴力防治法規專論。臺北市:五南。
國立彰化師範大學研究倫理審查委員會(2019)。研究參與者同意書(範本)。http://rec.ncue.edu.tw/ploy/ploy_detail.asp?id=731&ClassID=506&KeywordID=all&SearchString_Data=&page=1&lastpage=10。
張思嘉、周玉慧(2004)。緣與婚前關係的發展。本土心理學研究,21,85-123。https://doi.org/10.6254/2004.21.85
張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。
張祜銘、黃名琪(2018)。藥物濫用成因與臨床表徵。載於李明濱(主編)藥物濫用對健康與社會之衝擊:問題與對策(80-100頁)。苗栗縣:國家衛生研究院。
教育部家庭教育資源網(2021年6月3日)。全國家庭教育諮詢專線簡介。取自https://familyedu.moe.gov.tw/docDetail.aspx?uid=8846&pid=8844&docid=182729
許詩淇、葉光輝(2019)。華人人際及群際關係主題研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,51,33-88。https://doi.org/10.6254/IPRCS.201906_(51).0002
郭為藩(1996)。自我心理學。臺北市:師大書苑。
陳又敬、鄧煌發、董道興(2019)。親密關係暴力之理論探討。台灣性學學刊,25(1),61-100。https://doi.org/10.3966/160857872019052501003
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市 : 五南。
陳伯偉、唐文慧、王宏仁(2014)。男性家暴者的諮商經驗:階級差異如何再製。臺灣社會學刊,55,227-273。
陳秀峯(2010)。台灣家庭暴力防治之現狀與未來-從被害人保護及加害人處遇角度觀察。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,6(1),187-210。
陳依芬、黃金蘭、林以正(2011)。忍的情緒調控策略與心理適應之關聯。本土心理學研究,35,3-56。https://doi.org/10.6254/2011.35.3
陳怡青、李維庭、張紀薇、李美珍(2012)。婚姻暴力加害人處遇成效評估研究之初探。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,8(2),17 - 53。https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.201212.0002
陳秉華(2003)。重建台灣/華人諮商倫理的文化思考。亞洲諮商學報,10(1),11-32。
陳秉華、李素芬、林美珣(2008)。諮商中伴侶關係的自我協調歷程。本土心理學研究,29,117-182。https://doi.org/10.6254/2008.29.117
陳秉華、李素芬、林美珣(2009)。人我關係協調之伴侶諮商研究。教育心理學報,40(3),463-487。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20080910
陳金定(2004)。兩性關係與教育。臺北市:心理。
陳高凌(2001)。義與面子在華人家庭暴力裡的運作及其對治療之啓示。本土心理學研究,15,63-111。https://doi.org/10.6254/2001.15.63
陳筱萍、周煌智、吳慈恩、黃志中(2004)。裁定前鑑定家庭暴力相對人特徵與施暴的心理社會歸因。中華輔導學報,16,149-181。https://doi.org/10.7082/CARGC.200409.0149
陳慧女、林明傑(2016)。家庭暴力者對參與整合式矯正團體輔導及其改變內涵之看法。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,12(2),1-31。
陳謙仁、葉光輝(2019)。護親護面型毆妻男性個案多元自我衝突調整理論與介入方案研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,55,59-95。https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862019050055003
陳顧遠(1992)。中國婚姻史。新北市:臺灣商務印書館。
陸洛(2003)。人我關係之界定-“折衷自我”的現身。本土心理學研究,20,139-207。https://doi.org/10.6254/2003.20.139
陸洛、李惠美、謝天渝(2005)。牙醫師職業壓力與身心健康及職業倦怠之關係:以高雄市牙醫師為例。應用心理研究,27,59-80。
陸洛、高旭繁、陳芬憶(2006)。傳統性、現代性、及孝道觀念對幸福感的影響:一項親子對偶設計。本土心理學研究,25,243-278。
陸洛、張婷婷、張妤玥(2012)。工作與家庭的意義對因應職家衝突的影響-華人雙文化自我觀之展現。本土心理學研究,37,141-189。https://doi.org/10.6254/2012.37.141
程婉若(2019)。超越「危險」與「安全」:從個案抗拒探討親密伴侶暴力防治建制。輔導與諮商學報,41(2),1-23。
費孝通(1948)。鄉土中國。上海:觀察社。
鈕文英(2019)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
黃心怡、楊愉安、溫筱雯、林良穗、沈瓊桃(2016)。都是權控惹的禍?多元化親密伴侶暴力型態之服務挑戰-以大台北地區聲請保護令案件為例。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,12(2),85-112。
黃光國(1988)。中國人的權力遊戲。臺北市:巨流。
黃光國(2001)。儒家關係主義的理論建構及其方法論基礎。教育與社會研究,2,1-34。https://doi.org/10.6429/FES.200106.0001
黃光國(2005a)。華人關係主義的理論建構。載於楊國樞、黃國光、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上),216-245。臺北市:遠流。
黃光國(2005b)。儒家關係主義:文化反思與典範重建。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
黃光國(2017)。儒家文化系統的主體辯證。臺北市:五南。
黃翠紋(2005)。婚姻暴力加害人危險評估量表建構之研究-從警察分局家庭暴力防治官的觀點。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集(8),209-234。臺北市:法務部。
黃翠紋、林淑君(2014)。不同類型家庭暴力事件成因及特性之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,10(2),91-130。
黃翠紋、林淑君(2016)。高危機親密暴力事件特性與處遇作為之分析。犯罪學期刊,19(1),20-58。
黃韞臻、林淑惠(2013)。大學生人際挫折容忍力量表之發展。中華輔導與諮商學報, 35,147-173。
黃寶園(2009)。工作壓力對工作滿足、職業倦怠影響之研究:統合分析取向。教育心理學報,40(3),439-461。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20080618
黃囇莉(2006)。人際和諧與衝突。新北市:揚智文化。
黃囇莉、鄭琬蓉、黃光國(2008)。邁向發聲之路:上下關係中“忍”的歷程與自我之轉化。本土心理學研究,29,3-76。https://doi.org/10.6254/2008.29.3
楊知勇(2000)。家族主義與中國文化。昆明:雲南大學出版社。
楊國樞(1992年12月)。父子軸家庭與夫妻軸家庭:運作特徵、變遷方向及適應問題。「家庭與心理衛生國際研討會」發表之論文,臺北市。
楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。載於楊國樞、余安邦(主編),中國人的心理與行為-理念及方法篇(一九九二),87-142。臺北市:桂冠。
楊國樞(1996)。父子軸家庭與夫妻軸家庭的運作特徵與歷程---夫妻關係。行政院國科會委託研究報告(PC8501-1201)。臺北市:行政院國科會。
楊國樞(2004)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究,22,11-80。
楊國樞(2005)。華人社會取向的理論分析。載於楊國樞、黃國光、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上),174-213。臺北市:遠流。
楊國樞、劉奕蘭、張淑慧、王琳(2010)。華人雙文化自我的個體發展階段:理論建構的嘗試。中華心理學刊,52(2),113-132。
楊聰財、張敏(2003)。自殺企圖者之絕望感與生活壓力及因應模式之關係。台灣精神醫學,17(1),41-49。
葉光輝(1997)。親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式:孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,82,65-114。
葉光輝(2009a)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,32,101-148。https://doi.org/10.6254/2009.32.101
葉光輝(2009b)。台灣民眾的代間交換行為:孝道觀點的探討。本土心理學研究,31,97-141。https://doi.org/10.6254/2009.31.97
葉光輝、黃宗堅、邱雅沂(2006)。現代華人的家庭文化特徵:以台灣北部地區若干家庭的探討為例。本土心理學研究,25,141-195。
葉明華、楊國樞(1998)。中國人的家族主義:概念分析與實徵衡鑑。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,83,169-225。
賈紅鶯(2011)。家族治療的文化脈絡與靈性議題:家暴的困境、轉變與反思。中華輔導與諮商學報,30,124-149。https://doi.org/10.7082/CJGC.201108.0124
翟學偉(1993)。中國人的臉面觀:有關其向度中的若干假設。本土心理學研究,2,338-348。https://doi.org/10.6254/1993.2.338
翟學偉(2015)。關係與謀略:中國人的日常計謀。載於喬健、葉一璋(主編),謀略與關係:當代華人的管理思維,67-90。新北市:華藝學術。
臺灣精神醫學會(譯)(2014)。DSM-5精神疾病診斷準則手冊(原作者:American Psychiatric Association)。香港:合記經銷。(原著出版年:2013)
潘淑滿、游美貴(2012)。親密暴力問題之研究。內政部委託之專題研究成果報告(編號:PG10005-0292)。臺北市:內政部。
衛生福利部心理及口腔健康司(2017a年1月25日)。家暴加害人認知及親職教育輔導處遇要點、執行人員資格條件及訓練課程標準。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOMHAOH/cp-464-1717-107.html
衛生福利部心理及口腔健康司(2017b年7月5日)。「男性關懷專線」-專人守候,話解渡過。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-36734-1.html
衛生福利部保護服務司(2021年4月23日)。家庭暴力通報事件被害人案件類型及性別統計。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/cp-1303-59327-105.html
鄧心怡、何柔萱(2015)。未被看見的傷口—男性受暴者諮商的倡導。諮商與輔導,353,35-39。
鄭青玫(2010)。男性婚暴加害人處遇團體療效因素變化歷程之初探研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,6(1),239-252。https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.201007.0011
鄭瑞隆(2004)。親密暴力:成因、後果與防治。嘉義市:蜂鳥。
鄭瑞隆、王文中(2001)。家庭暴力加害人特質與處遇評估工具之研究。內政部委託研究報告(PG9012-0080)。臺北市:內政部。
賴文璇、黃英哲(2008)。認知評估之中介效應在社會支持與能力知覺對競賽壓力因應策略的影響。臺灣運動心理學報,12,1-24。https://doi.org/10.6497/BSEPT.20080501_(12).0001
戴世玫(2016)。臺灣婚姻暴力圖像:從父權家族系統受暴網的觀點出發。社會政策與社會工作學刊,20(2),43-82。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.201612_20(2).0002
戴谷霖、陳慶福、黃素雲(2014)。兒時目睹家暴之受暴婦女在諮商中所知覺重要事件之研究。教育心理學報,45(3),367-391。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20130701
謝毓雯(1998)。青少年挫折經驗與挫折容忍度之關係研究:建設性思考與社會支持的角色。國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文,臺北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s92w8x。
韓貴香、李美枝(2008)。捨近求遠的求助模式:“面子威脅”對華人選擇求助對象的影響。中華心理學刊,50(1),31-48。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2008.5001.03
簡晉龍、陳貽照、鍾昆原、許詩淇(2017)。儒教「尊尊」的體現:權威敏感之運作與社會適應。本土心理學研究,48,121-165。https://doi.org/10.6254/2017.48.121
蘇昭月、陳筱萍、周煌智、吳慈恩、黃志中(2005)。運用敘說探究探索家庭暴力施暴者的成長歷程與婚姻經驗。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,1(1),1-26。https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.200512.0001
蘇珊筠、黃光國(2003)。退休老人與大學生在生活場域中的關係與面子。中華心理學刊,45(3),295-311。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2003.4503.06
蘇盈瑜、朱惠瓊(2021)。適婚男女親密關係暴力行為與關係承諾相關之研究-以關係滿意度為中介變項。中華輔導與諮商學報,60,37-72。https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862021010060002

外文文獻
Ali, P. A., Dhingra, K., & McGarry, J. (2016). A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.06.008
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001
Bateson, G. (1941). IV. The frustration-aggression hypothesis and culture. Psychological Review, 48(4), 350-355. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055948
Berkowitz, L. (1988). Frustrations, appraisals, and aversively stimulated aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:1<3::AID-AB2480140103>3.0.CO;2-F
Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59
Bertsch, K., Florange, J. & Herpertz, S. C. (2020). Understanding brain mechanisms of reactive aggression. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22, 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01208-6
Birkley, E. L., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2015). Anger, hostility, internalizing negative emotions, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 37, 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.002
Bohall, G., Bautista, MJ., & Musson, S. (2016) Intimate partner violence and the Duluth Model: An examination of the model and recommendations for future research and practice. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 1029-1033.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Breuer, J., & Elson, M. (2017). Frustration-Aggression Theory. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Violence and Aggression (pp. 1-12). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057574.whbva040
Cafferky, B. M., Mendez, M., Anderson, J. R., & Stith, S. M. (2018). Substance use and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Violence, 8(1), 110-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000074
Capaldi, D. M., Knoble, N. B., Shortt, J. W., & Kim, H. K. (2012). A systematic review of risk factors for intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 231-280. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.231
Chang, K., & Lu, L. (2007). Characteristics of organizational culture, stressors and wellbeing: The case of Taiwanese organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(6), 549-598. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710778431
Chen, P. H. (2009). A counseling model for self-relation coordination for Chinese clients with interpersonal conflicts. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 987-1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009339975
Chérrez-Bermejo C, Alás-Brun R. (2014). A descriptive study of substance abuse and mental health disorders in intimate partner violence abusers in prison. Rev Esp Sanid Penit, 61(2), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1575-06202014000200002
Conroy, A. A. (2014). Marital infidelity and intimate partner violence in rural Malawi: A dyadic investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(7), 1303-1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0306-2
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cordeiro, P., Paixão, P., Lens, W., Lacante, M., & Luyckx, K. (2016). The Portuguese validation of the basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration scale: Concurrent and longitudinal relations to well-being and ill-being. Psychologica Belgica, 56(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.252
Corvo, K. (2014). The role of executive function deficits in domestic violence perpetration. Partner Abuse, 5(3), 342-355. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.5.3.342
Crane, C. A., Godleski, S. A., Przybyla, S. M., Schlauch, R. C., & Testa, M. (2016). The proximal effects of acute alcohol consumption on male-to-female aggression: A meta-analytic review of the experimental literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(5), 520-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015584374
Crane, C. A., Licata, M. L., Schlauch, R. C., Testa, M., & Easton, C. J. (2017). The proximal effects of acute alcohol use on female aggression: A meta-analytic review of the experimental literature. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31(1), 21-26.
Crane, C. A., Oberleitner, L. M. S., Devine, S., & Easton, C. J. (2014). Substance use disorders and intimate partner violence perpetration among male and female offenders. Psychology of Violence, 4(3), 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034338
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Curtis, A., Vandenberg, B., Mayshak, R., Coomber, K., Hyder, S., Walker, A., Liknaitzky P., & Miller, P. G. (2019). Alcohol use in family, domestic and other violence: Findings from a cross-sectional survey of the Australian population. Drug and Alcohol Review, 38(4), 349-358.
Das, T. K., Alam, M. F., Bhattacharyya, R., & Pervin, A. (2015). Causes and contexts of domestic violence: Tales of help-seeking married women in Sylhet, Bangladesh. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 9(2), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12055
Day, A., & Bowen, E. (2015). Offending competency and coercive control in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 20, 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.12.004
Dempsey, B., & Day, A. (2011). The identification of implicit theories in domestic violence perpetrators. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(3), 416-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x10363448
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Derefinko, K., DeWall, C. N., Metze, A. V., Walsh, E. C., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). Do different facets of impulsivity predict different types of aggression? Aggressive Behavior, 37(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20387
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (2011). What were they thinking? Men who murder an intimate partner. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210391219
Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dutton, D. G. (1988). Profiling of wife assaulters: Preliminary evidence for a trimodal analysis. Violence and Victims, 3(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.3.1.5
Dutton, D. G. (1995). Male abusiveness in intimate relationships. Clinical Psychology Review, 15(6), 567-581.
Dutton, D. G., & Corvo, K. (2007). The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(6), 658-667.
Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11), 743-756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6
Dyjakon, D. (2019). Model of psychotherapy for intimate violence perpetrators – A case study. Psychoterapia, 188(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.12740/PT/101668
Feingold, A., Washburn, I. J., Tiberio S. S., & Capaldi, D. M. (2015). Changes in the associations of heavy drinking and drug use with intimate partner violence in early adulthood. Journal of Family Violence, 30(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9658-6
Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 839-852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992-1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992
Foran, H. M., & O'Leary, K. D. (2008). Alcohol and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(7), 1222-1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.05.001
Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: the social construction of preferred realities. New York: Norton.
Gondolf, E. W. (1999). Characteristics of court-mandated batterers in four cities: Diversity and dichotomies. Violence Against Women, 5(11), 1277-1293.
Gondolf, E. W., & Wernik, H. (2009). Clinician ratings of batterer treatment behaviors in predicting reassault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(11), 1792-1815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508325493
Grahame, K. M. (2003). "For the family": Asian immigrant women's triple day. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30(1), 65-90.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Han, K. H. (2016). The feeling of “Face” in Confucian society: From a perspective of psychosocial equilibrium. Front. Psychol. 7:1055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01055
Harris, B. A., & Woodlock, D. (2019). Digital coercive control: Insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 530-550. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy052
Hines, D. A. & Douglas, E. M. (2012). Alcohol and drug abuse in men who sustain intimate partner violence. Aggressive Behavior, 38(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20418
Ho, D. Y. F.(1998)。Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 1-16.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batters: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476-497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2003). Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), 728-740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.728
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 1000-1019.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). A hypothesis on kinship and culture. In F. L. K. Hsu (Ed.), Kinship and culture (pp. 3-29). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. J. Marsella, G. Devos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self: Asian and western perspectives (pp. 24-55). New York: Tavistock.
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974.
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Lebanon, New Hampshire: Northeastern University Press.
Johnson, M. P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 289-296.
Kaufmann, V. G., O’Farrell, T. J., Murphy, C. M., Murphy, M. M., & Muchowski, P. (2014). Alcohol consumption and partner violence among women entering substance use disorder treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(2), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034971
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x
Kraanen, F. L., Vedel, E., Scholing, A., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2014). Prediction of intimate partner violence by type of substance use disorder. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(4), 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.010
Langenderfer, L. (2013). Alcohol use among partner violent adults: Reviewing recent literature to inform intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.013
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Leonard, K. E., & Quigley, B. M. (2016). Thirty years of research show alcohol to be a cause of intimate partner violence: Future research needs to identify who to treat and how to treat them. Drug and Alcohol Review, 36(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12434
Leone, R. M., Crane, C. A., Parrott, D. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2016). Problematic drinking, impulsivity, and physical IPV perpetration: A dyadic analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(3), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000159
Lickley, R. A., & Sebastian, C. L. (2018). The neural basis of reactive aggression and its development in adolescence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(3), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2017.1420187
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1065-1122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The constructivist credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Lu, L. (2008). The individual-oriented and social-oriented Chinese bicultural self: Testing the theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(3), 347-373. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.3.347-374
Lu, L., & Yang, K. S. (2006). Emergence and composition of the traditional-modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(3), 167-175.
McGinn, T., McColgan, M., & Taylor, B. (2020). Male IPV perpetrator’s perspectives on intervention and change: A systematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017742167
Miller, J., Flory, K., Lynam, D., & Leukefeld, C. (2003). A test of the four-factor model of impulsivity-related traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(8), 1403-1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00122-8
Miller, N. E., Sears, R. R., Mowrer, O. H., Doob, L. W., & Dollard, J. (1941). I. The frustration-aggression hypothesis. Psychological Review, 48(4), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055861
Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 214-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.002
Moore, K. E., Tull, M. T., & Gratz, K. L. (2017). Borderline personality disorder symptoms and criminal justice system involvement: The roles of emotion-driven difficulties controlling impulsive behaviors and physical aggression. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 76, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.03.008
Murphy-Geiss, G. E., Roberts, W. T., & Miles, D. J. (2015). One size does not fit all: A case study of an alternative intimate partner violence court. Feminist Criminology, 10(4), 348-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085114554258
Pawliczek, C. M., Derntl, B., Kellermann, T., Gur, R. C., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2013). Anger under control: Neural correlates of frustration as a function of trait aggression. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e78503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078503
Pichon, M., Treves-Kagan, S., Stern, E., Kyegombe, N., Stöckl, H., & Buller, A. M. (2020). A mixed-methods systematic review: Infidelity, romantic jealousy and intimate partner violence against women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682
Rakovec-Felser, Z. (2014). Domestic violence and abuse in intimate relationship from public health perspective. Health Psychology Research, 2(3), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.4081/hpr.2014.1821
Renzetti, C. M., Lynch, K. R., & DeWall, C. N. (2015). Ambivalent sexism, alcohol use, and intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(2), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515604412
Reyes, H. L. M., Foshee, V. A., Bauer, D. J., & Ennett, S. T. (2011). The role of heavy alcohol use in the developmental process of desistance in dating aggression during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(2), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9456-4
Roy, V., Brodeur, N., Labarre, M., Bousquet, M. A., & Sanhueza, T. (2019). How do practitioners and program managers working with male perpetrators view IPV? A quebec study. Journal of Family Violence, 35, 877-888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00104-9
Saunders, D. G. (2001). Developing guidelines for domestic violence offenders: What can we learn from related fields and current research? In R. A. Geffner & A. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Domestic violence offenders: Current interventions, research, and implications for policies and standards (pp. 235-248). New York: Haworth.
Shorey, R. C., Stuart, G. L., McNulty, J. K., & Moore, T. M. (2014). Acute alcohol use temporally increases the odds of male perpetrated dating violence: A 90-day diary analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 39(1), 365-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.025
Slavin, L. A., Rainer, K. L., McCreary, M. L., & Gowda, K. K. (1991). Toward a multicultural model of the stress process. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70(1), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01578.x
Smith, P. H., Homish, G. G., Leonard, K. E., & Cornelius, J. R. (2012). Intimate partner violence and specific substance use disorders: Findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(2), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024855
Starratt, V. G., Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). Men’s partner-directed insults and sexual coercion in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 315-323.
Stuart, G. L., Moore, T. M., Kahler, C. W., & Ramsey, S. E. (2003). Substance abuse and relationship violence among men court-referred to batterers' intervention programs. Substance abuse, 24(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897070309511539
Stuart, G. L., Temple, J. R., Follansbee, K. W., Bucossi, M. M., Hellmuth, J. C., & Moore, T. M. (2008). The role of drug use in a conceptual model of intimate partner violence in men and women arrested for domestic violence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.22.1.12
Sun, C. R. (2017). An examination of the four-part theory of the Chinese self: The differentiation and relative importance of the different types of social-oriented self. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 1106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01106
Tiwari, A., Chan, K. L., Cheung, D. S. T., Fong, D. Y. T., Yan, E. C. W., & Tang, D. H. M. (2015). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence on mental health outcomes among abused Chinese women: A mixed-method study. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-12.
Vîslă, A., Flückiger, C., Grosse Holtforth, M., & David, D. (2016). Irrational beliefs and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441231
Wagman, J. A., Donta, B., Ritter, J., Naik, D. D., Nair, S., Saggurti, N., & Silverman, J. G. (2016). Husband’s alcohol use, intimate partner violence, and family maltreatment of low-income postpartum women in Mumbai, India. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(14), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515624235
Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39(9), 955-969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.955
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 669-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00064-7
Whiting, J. B., Oka, M., & Fife, S. T. (2012). Appraisal distortions and intimate partner violence: Gender, power, and interaction. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00285.x
Williamson, E. (2010). Living in the world of the domestic violence perpetrator: Negotiating the unreality of coercive control. Violence Against Women, 16(12), 1412-1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210389162
Yang, K. S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In T. Y. Lin, W. S. Tseng & E. K. Yeh (Eds.), Chinese societies and mental health (pp. 19-39). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Zajenkowska, A., Jasielska, D., & Melonowska, J. (2017). Stress and sensitivity to frustration predicting depression among young adults in Poland and Korea - psychological and philosophical explanations. Current Psychology, 38, 769-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9654-0

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊