跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.201.92.114) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/03/31 07:57
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳冠霖
研究生(外文):WU,GUAN-LIN
論文名稱:ESG績效會強化公司財務績效及價值嗎?-台灣市場為例
論文名稱(外文):Does ESG Performance Enhance Financial Performance and Firm Value ?-Evidence from Taiwan
指導教授:康淑珍康淑珍引用關係
指導教授(外文):KANG,SHU-ZHEN
口試委員:康淑珍張倉耀劉峰旗
口試委員(外文):KANG,SHU-ZHENZHANG,CANG-YAOLIU,FENG-QI
口試日期:2021-06-10
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:逢甲大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:43
中文關鍵詞:ESG公司價值財務績效環境敏感性產業集團
外文關鍵詞:ESGFirm valueFinancial PerformanceEnvironmentally Sensitive IndustriesBusiness Groups
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:1304
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:5
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
2020~2021年無疑是人們展現永續意識覺醒的重要時刻。在2021年第一季全球以永續發展為重點的基金累計資產規模逼近2兆美元,全球投資市場以真實數字呈現了大眾對ESG基金的熱愛。這意味著大眾對永續的追求從「理想」逐步落實成「行為」,更因此重新詮釋了人類與財富的關係。但過去學者之研究,有關企業投入ESG投資活動對其財務績效及公司價值的影響尚無定論,由於ESG投資對台灣是一個開始關注的議題,如何讓資本市場中投資人與企業在永續議題中創造雙贏值得繼續探究。本研究乃以2017年至2020年台灣上市公司為樣本,以被選入ESG投資基金(包含富邦臺灣公司治理100基金、元大臺灣ESG永續基金及國泰台灣ESG永續高股息基金)之公司分類為投入ESG活動績效樣本,來探究ESG績效能否強化公司財務績效與公司價值。實證結果發現,ESG績效與公司績效及公司價值之間的關聯性,呈正向顯著相關,代表ESG績效確實對公司財務績效及價值有好的影響效果,此研究結果與Clark et al.,(2015)相一致。本研究進一步發現,具有環境敏感性產業或集團特性的公司其ESG績效對財務績效及公司價值亦有提升效果。在目前氣候變遷與疫情多重影響下,兼顧環境與投資獲利的新永續時代,本研究可作為企業在評估是否投入ESG投資活動之決策的參考,期使投資人與企業雙方用投資讓世界變美好。
It is undoubtedly an important moment for people to show their awareness of sustainability in 2020 to 2021. In the first quarter of 2021, the cumulative asset scale of the global sustainability-focused funds approached 2 trillion U.S. dollars. The global investment market shows the public's interest in ESG funds with real numbers. This means that the public's pursuit of sustainability has gradually been implemented from "ideal" to "behavior", which reinterprets the relationship between people and wealth. However, in the past scholars’ research, the impact of ESG investment activities by companies on their financial performance and company value is still inconclusive, and since ESG investment is a topic of initial concern for Taiwan, how to make investors and companies in the capital market create a win-win situation in sustainability issues is worth continuing to explore. and uses com-panies that have been selected as ESG investment funds (including Fu-bon TWSE Corporate Governance 100 ETF, Yuanta FTSE4Good TIP Taiwan ESG ETF and Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF) as a sample of ESG activity performance to explore whether ESG performance can enhance the company's financial performance and company value. The empirical results found that the correlation between ESG performance and company perfor-mance or company value is positive and significant, indicating that ESG perfor-mance does have a good effect on the company’s financial performance and value, this research result is consistent with the study of Clark et al., (2015). This study further found that the ESG performance of companies with environmentally sensi-tive industries or group characteristics also has an effect on financial performance and company value. Under the multiple impacts of the current climate change and the epidemic, a new sustainable era that balance the environment and investment profitability, This research can be used as a reference for companies in evaluating whether to invest in ESG investment activities, and hopes that investors and com-panies can use investment to make the world a better place.
封面
誌謝 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機及背景 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究架構與流程圖 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 ESG概念 7
第二節 ESG投資 9
第三節 文獻與假說發展 13
第三章 研究設計與實施 20
第一節 樣本選取與資料來源 20
第二節 實證模型 22
第三節 變數定義 24
第四章 實證結果與分析 27
第一節 敘述性統計 27
第二節 相關係數 29
第三節 迴歸分析結果 31
第五章 結論與建議 37
參考文獻 40
一、中文部份
王育偉, & 鄭揚耀. (2013). 公司治理, 資本支出決策與公司價值. 管理與系統, 20(4), 665-695.
林燕瑜(2017)。ESG投資導向分析-以MSCI ESG Index系列為例。
林俊傑, 劉梧柏, & 黃華瑋. (2018)。公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討: 以台灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例. 商略學報, 10(1), 23-46.
周宣萱(2019)。台灣高ESG指數股票是否具有顯著超額報酬? 以MSCI ESG評等為例。
韋敦平,2005,企業環境資訊揭露行為之實證研究—成本效益觀點分析,東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
洪榮華, 陳香如, & 王玉珍. (2005). 公司內部治理機制與公司績效之關係-股權結構與董事會特性的觀點. 輔仁管理評論, 12(3), 23-40.
陳思羽(2017)。台灣 ESG 投資組合的建構與績效衡量。
張元. (2011). 社會責任公司有較高的股票報酬嗎?. 輔仁管理評論, 18(1), 79-118.
楊紫涵. (2010). 社會責任指數與環境, 社會及公司治理之關聯性分析-以 FTSE4Good 系列指數為例 (Doctoral dissertation, National Central University).
葉銀華, & 邱顯比. (1996). 資本結構, 股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究: 代理成本理論.
翁霓, & 蕭運炎. (2008). 財務報表環境資訊揭露品質影響因素之探討-以國內上市公司為例. 東吳經濟商學學報, (61), 1-30.
二、英文部份
Alexander, G. J., & Buchholz, R. A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management journal, 21(3), 479-486.
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
Bajic, S., & Yurtoglu, B. (2018). Which aspects of CSR predict firm market value?. Journal of Capital Markets Studies.
Bosworth, D., & Rogers, M. (2001). Market value, R&D and intellectual property: an empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record, 77(239), 323-337.
Boyle, E. J., Higgins, M. M., & Rhee, G. S. (1997). Stock market reaction to ethical initiatives of defense contractors: Theory and evidence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8(6), 541-561.
Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. (1972). Is pollution profitable. Risk management, 19(4), 9-18.
Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial management, 35(3), 97-116.
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132.
Choi, J. J., Park, S. W., & Yoo, S. S. (2007). The value of outside directors: Evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, 941-962.
Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial management, 70-74.
Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281.
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial management, 5-14.
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of political economy, 93(6), 1155-1177.
Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225-3268.
Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of international business studies, 11(1), 9-31.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial economics, 101(3), 621-640.
Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182-192.
Fisher-Vanden, K., & Thorburn, K. S. (2011). Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth. Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 62(3), 430-445.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Friedman, M. (1962). The role of government in education. Capitalism and Freedom.
Friedman, M. (1970). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 193-238.
Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Horváthová, E. (2010). Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecological economics, 70(1), 52-59.
Jacobs, B. W., Singhal, V. R., & Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 430-441.
Kim, E. H., & Lyon, T. P. (2015). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26(3), 705-723.
King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance: An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105-116.
Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value (Vol. 17). FSG.
Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of financial economics, 115(2), 304-329.
Lin, C. S., Chang, R. Y., & Dang, V. T. (2015). An integrated model to explain how corporate social responsibility affects corporate financial performance. Sustainability, 7(7), 8292-8311.
Lyon, T., Lu, Y., Shi, X., & Yin, Q. (2013). How do investors respond to Green Company Awards in China?. Ecological Economics, 94, 1-8.
Malik, M. (2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419-438.
Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good... and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. And does it matter.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?. Strategic management journal, 21(5), 603-609.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.
Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Valente Gonçalves, L. M. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574.
Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92.
Preston, L. E., & O'bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419-429.
Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of management Review, 31(3), 540-558.
Vance, E. F. (1975). Shielding effectiveness of braided-wire shields. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, (2), 71-77.
Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility.
Wright, P., & Ferris, S. P. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic management journal, 18(1), 77-83.
Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635.
三、網路資料
經濟日報(2020)ESG成顯學勤業眾信:應把握時機加速轉型。上網日期:2020年10月28日,檢自https://money.udn.com/money/story/11799/4969242
哈佛商業評論 全球繁體中文版(2021)【HBR導師講座】如何推動ESG成為現代企業成長的契機?上網日期:2021年2月18日,檢自https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0010256.html
黃正忠(2015)。CSR 的真面目─ESG。證券櫃檯 NO.178
S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. (2020) 市場熱話 如何以更有意義的方式參與ESG議題。檢自 https://www.tchinese.spindices.com/indexology/main/talking-points-how-to-engage-esg-in-more-meaningful-ways
BARRON'S (2020) U.S. Sustainable Investments Jumped to $17.1 Trillion in 2020, Up 42% from 2018. Retrieved Nov. 16, 2020, from https://www.barrons.com/articles/u-s-sustainable-investments-jumped-to-17-1-trillion-in-2020-up-42-from-2018-51605528060
GSIA (2018) Trends Report. from http://www.gsi-alliance.org/trends-report-2018/
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊