跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.86.95) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/21 09:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:許家綺
研究生(外文):Chia-Chi Hsu
論文名稱:著作權網路跨境侵權與救濟之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Cross Border Online Copyright Infringement and Its Remedies
指導教授:高玉泉高玉泉引用關係
指導教授(外文):Bernard Y. Kao
口試委員:蘇義淵廖宗聖
口試日期:2021-03-06
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:全球事務研究跨洲碩士學位學程
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:國際事務學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:英文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:版權智慧財產權數位版權網路數位化跨國禁令
外文關鍵詞:CopyrightIntellectual Propertydigital copyrightInternetdigitalizationcross-borderinjunction
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:100
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
This thesis provides a study on cross border online copyright infringement and its remedies. It first offers an overview on traditional copyright law. It is argued that in this digital era, traditional copyright protection is inadequate when facing cross border infringement. As the EU legislation and court cases have shown, enforcing injunctions by blocking those illegal websites which infringe copyright seem to be an effective way of remedying the situation. Nevertheless, these new rules and practices are not seen in Taiwan. Although Taiwan’s copyright law has been largely amended over the years in order to fill the needs of internationalization, its current practices do not provide blocking of websites. This study also elaborates the lack of the current policy of copyright in Taiwan. This thesis analyzes in detail the EU rules and concludes that it can be a good example for Taiwan’s future amendments to its Copyright Act.
Acknowledgements i
Abstract ii
Table of Contents iii
List of Figures v
List of Abbreviations vi
I. Introduction 1
1.1 Research Purposes and Objectives 1
1.2 Scope 1
1.3 Methodology 2
1.4 Structure 2
II. Nature and Scope of Copyright Protection 4
2.1 Origins of Copyright 4
2.1.1 Rationale of Copyright Law 6
2.1.2 Elements of Copyright Law 8
2.1.3 Scope of Copyright Law 8
2.1.4 Orphan Works 9
2.2 Digital Copyright Protection 10
2.2.1. Scope of the Digital Copyright 12
2.3 International Treaties 14
III. EU Cross Border Digital Copyright Protection 16
3.1 Traditional Remedies of Copyright Infringement 16
3.2 Special Protective Measures: Injunctions and Blocking 20
3.3 Application of the Principle of Proportionality: public interest vs. owner’s rights 23
3.3.1 The Right to Freedom of Expression 24
3.3.2 Internet Access Provider’s Freedom to Conduct a Business 33
IV. Taiwan’s Current Law 41
4.1 Before and After Taiwan Joined WTO 41
4.2 Cross Border Copyright Protection Issue in Taiwan 46
V. Conclusion 49
Bibliography 50
Articles and Journals
Abrams, H. B. (1992). Originality and Creativity in Copyright Law (1992), https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4136&context=lcp (last visited Oct 17, 2020).

Arnold, J. Cartier international AG v British Sky Broadcasting LTD (2014).

Chang, I. M. The Ten Major Construction Projects Encyclopedia of Taiwan (2009), 張怡敏, 十大建設, 文化部國家文化資料庫 (2009), http://nrch.culture.tw/twpedia.aspx?id=3933 (last visited Nov 3, 2020).

Chiu, C. Y. Viewing Taiwanese Literature Publishing from Copyright Disputes, 2 Bulletin of NCL Taiwan Branch (1995). 邱炯友, 從著作權糾紛看台灣的文學出版 (1995).

Chu, Yung-Fa. Comparison of Copyright Legislation between Taiwan and the U.S. (2000). 朱永發, 中美著作權立法之比較. (2000).

De Beer, J., & Clemmer, C. Global Trends in Online Copyright Enforcement: A Non-Neutral Role for Network Intermediaries? 49 Jurimetrics 375–409 (2009).

Voorhoof, D. Het Europese ‘First Amendment’: de vrijheid van expressie en informatie en de rechtspraak van het EHRM betreffende art. 10 EVRM (1994-1995), Mediaforum (Amsterdam) 11 (1995).

EBrems, E., Lavrysen, L. 15 Don’t Use a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut’: Less Restrictive Means in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights Human Rights Law Review 139–168 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu040 (last visited Nov 8, 2020).

Geiger, C., & Izyumenko, E. 43 The Role of Human Rights in Copyright Enforcement Online: Elaborating a Legal Framework for Website Blocking American University International Law Review (2016), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2805572 (last visited Mar 24, 2021).

Frankenberg, G. Critical Comparisons: Rethinking Comparative Law, 26 Harvard International Law Journal 411–416 (1985).

Kastenmeier. Rep. No. 1476, 94th Cong., 2d Sess.1 61, reprinted in 1976 U.S. Code Cong. &Ad. News at 5674. (1976). https://law.resource.org/pub/us/works/aba/ibr/H.Rep.94-1476.pdf (Last visited Jan 12, 2021).

Hu, J. L., Chang, T. P., Yeh, F. Y., & Yang, T.C., The Linkage between Imported Energy and Trade in Taiwan, 2012 ISRN Economics 1–11 (2012).

Izyumenko, E. The Freedom of Expression Contours of Copyright in the Digital Era: A European Perspective, 19 The Journal of World Intellectual Property 115–130 (2016).

Gerards, J. How to improve the necessity test of the European Court of Human Rights, 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 466–490 (2013).

Leaffer, M. A. (2010). Understanding Copyright Law (2010).
Leiner, B. M., Cerf, V. G., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D. C., Postel, J., Roberts, L. G., Wolff, S. Brief History of the Internet. (2020). https://www.internetsociety.org/internet/history-internet/brief-history-internet/ (last visited Oct 20, 2020).

Netanel, N. W. Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society, 106 The Yale Law Journal 283–387 (1996).

Patterson, L. R. Copyright in Historical Perspective (1968).

Pedley, P. Digital copyright (2007).

Tang, R. N. 29 The Journal of Asian Studies 938–939 (1970).

Renda A., Simonelli F., Mazziotti G, Bolognini A. The Implementation, Application and Effects of the EU Directive on Copyright in the Information Society, CEPS Special Report, Thinking Ahead of Europe, No.120. (2015). https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SR120_0.pdf (Last visited Jan 14, 2021).

Schechter, R., & Thomas, J. Principles of copyright law (2010).

Stokes, S. (2009). Digital copyright (2009).

James, S. Digesting Lush v Amazon and UPC Telekabel: Are We Asking Too Much of Online Intermediaries? 25 Ent. L. Rev. 175, 177 (2014)

Su, S. H., Copyright Development and Changes in Taiwan (1999). 蘇世賢,我國著作權政策的發展與變遷. (1999).

Tsai, P. L. Explaining Taiwan’s Economic Miracle: Are the Revisionists Right? 6 Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform (1999).

Court Cases
8 Anne, c. 19 (1710).

Assessment Technologies of WI, LLC v. Wiredata, Inc., 361 F.3d 434 (2004). https://cite.case.law/f3d/361/434/ (Last visited Oct 20, 2020)

Ahmet Yildirim v. Turkey (No. 3111/10), CE: ECHR:2012:1218 JUD000311110, The European Court of Human Rights.

Bundesgerichtshof [German Federal Supreme Court of Justice], I ZR 3/14, Nov. 26, 2015.

Constitutional Council., Decision no. 2009-580 DC of June 10, 2009 Conseil constitutionnel (2009), https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/en/decision/2009/2009580DC.htm (last visited Oct 23, 2020).

High Court of Justice (Chancery Division), Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v British Telecommunications Plc Oup Academic (2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcr021 (last visited Nov 6, 2020).

InfoCuria, Case-law, Judgment in SABAM v. Netlog, C-360/10 CURIA (2012), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=119512&doclang=EN (last visited Nov 7, 2020).

InfoCuria, Judgment in FIFA v. Commission, C-204/11 P. CURIA (2013), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-204/11&language=EN (last visited Nov 5, 2020).

InfoCuria, Judgment in Deckmyn, C-201/13 CURIA (2014), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=157281&mode=lst&pageIndex=1&dir=&occ=first&part=1&text=&doclang=EN&cid=9385689N (last visited Oct 23, 2020).

InfoCuria, Case-Law, Judgment in UPC Telekabel Wien, C-314/12 CURIA (2014), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=149924&doclang=EN (last visited Oct 23, 2020).

Judgment in Sky Österreich [2013], C-283/11, EU:C:2013:28, Court of Justice of the European Union.

Judgment in Mc Fadden, C-484/14, CURIA (2016), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=183363&doclang=EN&mode=lst&occ=first (last visited Oct 23, 2020).

Magyar Tartalomszolgáltatók Egyesülete and Index.hu Zrt v. Hungary (No. 22947/13), CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD002294713., ECtHR.

No. 13478/2014, Dec. 22, 2014, District Court of Athens.
Öztürk v. Turkey [GC] (No. 22479/93), CE: ECHR:1999:0928 JUD002247993, ECtHR,

Sø- og Handelsretten [Maritime and Commercial Court in Copenhagen], Fritz Hansen A/S and Others v. Telia Danmark.

Supreme Court of Canada, Supreme Court Judgments, Théberge v. Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain inc Supreme Court of Canada (2012), https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1973/index.do (last visited Nov 4, 2020).

Supreme Court Judgments, Supreme Court of Canada, Supreme Court Judgments, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada Supreme Court of Canada (2012), https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2125/index.do (last visited Nov 4, 2020).

Supreme Court of Canada, Alberta (Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) Supreme Court of Canada Supreme Court of Canada (2012), https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/9997/index.do (last visited Nov 7, 2020).

Warner Bros. Entertainment Norge AS and Others v. Telenor Norge AS and Others, No. 15-067093TVI-OTIR/05, Sept. 1, 2015, Oslo Tingrett [Oslo District Court].

Government Publications
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, A guide to copyright Canadian Intellectual Property Office (2019), https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/h_wr02281.html (last visited Oct 17, 2020).
Copyright Act. Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China. (2018). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawParaDeatil.aspx?pcode=J0070017&bp=18 (Last visited Oct 21, 2020).

Council of the European Union Presidency Paper on Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, 501st Sess., Doc. No. 13076/14 (2014).

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law. Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market ('Directive on electronic commerce'). (2000). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32000L0031 (Last visited Oct 20, 2020).

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law. (2007). Commission staff working document - Accompanying document to the Proposal for a Council Framework Decision amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism Summary of the impact assessment {COM(2007) 650 final} {SEC(2007) 1424} /* SEC/2007/1425 final */. (2007). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52007SC1425 (Last visited Oct 20, 2020).

EUR-Lex, Access to European Union law. (2001). Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. (2001). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32001L0029 (Last visited Jan 12, 2021).

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law. (2007). Commission staff working document - Accompanying document to the Proposal for a Council Framework Decision amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism Summary of the impact assessment {COM(2007) 650 final} {SEC(2007) 1424} /* SEC/2007/1425 final */. (2007). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52007SC1425 (Last visited Oct 20, 2020).

European Parliament, The Exception for Text and Data Mining (TDM) in the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Legal Aspects, Legal Affairs. In-Depth Analysis, For the JURI committee (2018).

EUR-Lex Access to European Union Law, Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón in UPC Telekabel, EUR (2013), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62012CC0314 (last visited Nov 5, 2020).

Ministry of Justice, Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act, The R.O.C Laws & Regulations Database (2014), https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030215 (last visited Jan 6, 2021).

Ministry of Justice, Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Rules, The R.O.C Laws & Regulations Database (2014), https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030222 (last visited Jan 7, 2021).

Ministry of Justice, Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure, The R.O.C Laws & Regulations Database (2018), https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=B0010001 (last visited Oct 16, 2020).

Ministry of Justice, Copyright Act, The R.O.C Laws & Regulations Database (2019), https://db.lawbank.com.tw/Eng/FLAW/FLAWDAT0201.aspx?lsid=FL011264 (last visited Oct 16, 2020).

National Research Council et al., The digital dilemma: intellectual property in the information age (2000).

Ofcom, “Site Blocking” to reduce online copyright infringement (2011).

Ofcom, What is Ofcom? Ofcom (2021), https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/what-is-ofcom (last visited Jan 15, 2021).

Republic of China (Taiwan), Executive Yuan, History Exhibit, Ten Major Construction Projects underway, Photos-Ten Major Construction Projects underway - Executive Yuan History Exhibit (1978), https://history.ey.gov.tw/En/Item/PhotoDetail/fbf76def-f780-4d3f-91d7-1df4dc4fb216 (last visited Nov 3, 2020).

Taiwan International Property Office, Explanations and Responses to the Expansion of Copyright Protection after Taiwan's Entry into the World Trade Organization, Taiwan International Property Office (2019), 經濟部智慧財產局, 我國加入世界貿易組織後關於著作權擴大保護之說明與因應. (2019), https://www.tipo.gov.tw/tw/cp-180-219582-313a4-1.html (last visited Oct 16, 2020).

The American Institute in Taiwan and the Coordination Council for North American Affairs (CCNAA) & The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), Agreement for the Protection of Copyright between the American Institute in Taiwan and the Coordination Council for North American Affairs (1993).

United Nations, 20th session of the Human Rights Council (18 June - 6 July 2012) OHCHR (2012), https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session20/Pages/ResDecStat.aspx (last visited Oct 20, 2020).

The U.S. Copyright Office, Celebrating World Intellectual Property Day 2012 (2012), https://www.copyright.gov/docs/wipo2012.html (last visited Oct 17, 2020).

World Intellectual Property Organization, Orphan Works, WIPO Seminar – May 2010 Lecture Summary (2010).

World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO), What is copyright? (n.d.), https://www.wipo.int/ip-outreach/en/ipday/2016/ip_digital.html#accordion__collapse__09 (last visited Oct 17, 2020).

Others
Angelopoulos, C. MTE v Hungary: New ECtHR Judgment on Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression, Kluwer Copyright Blog (March 5, 2016). http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/03/05/mte-v-hungary-new-ecthr-judgment-on-intermediary-liability-and-freedom-of-expression/ (Last visited Feb 24, 2021).

Cornell Law School. 17 U.S. Code § 503. Remedies for infringement: Impounding and disposition of infringing articles. (2018). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/503 (Last visited Oct 20, 2020).

Cornell Law School. 17 U.S. Code § 504. Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits. (2018). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/504 (Last visited Oct 20, 2020).

Cornell Law School. 17 U.S. Code § 505.Remedies for infringement: Costs and attorney’s fees. (2018). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/505 (Last visited Oct 20, 2020).

Cornell Law School. 17 U.S. Code § 506. Criminal offenses. (2018). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/506 (Last visited Oct 21, 2020).

Columbia University, Cengiz v. Turkey Global Freedom of Expression (2019), https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/cengiz-v-turkey/ (last visited Oct 23, 2020).

Cornell Law School, 17 U.S. Code § 102 - Subject matter of copyright: In general Legal Information Institute (n.d.), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/102# (last visited Oct 18, 2020).

Dinwoodie, G. B. Lecture within the framework of the CEIPI Research Seminars: A Comparative Analysis of the Liability of Intermediaries for Facilitating Trade Mark Infringement Piece of news-CEIPI - University of Strasbourg (2021), http://www.ceipi.edu/en/news/piece-of-news/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=7849&cHash=d6822a166fcae3c9359d6ccbe95a068d (last visited Jan 13, 2021).

Feiler, L. (2012). Website Blocking Injunctions Under EU and U.S. Copyright Law--Slow Death of the Global Internet or Emergence of the Rule of National Copyright Law? (2012).

Idemitsu. The First Oil Crisis and Advancing Overseas: History, Idemitsu Kosan Global (n.d.), https://www.idemitsu.com/company/history/9.html (last visited Nov 3, 2020).
Jütte, B. J. The Beginning of a (Happy?) Relationship: Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Europe European Intellectual Property Review (1970), https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/22589 (last visited Nov 5, 2020).

King's College London Law School. The Impact of the Information Society Directive on UK Copyright Law, Research Paper No. 2019-16. (2018). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3250388(Last visited Jan 14, 2021).

Lee, H. T. 1976 Building the Future: Ten Major Construction Projects Taiwan Panorama Magazine An international, bilingual magazine for Chinese people around the world (2015), https://www.taiwan-panorama.com/en/Articles/Details?Guid=55e423d1-c5c2-4222-b8aa-bdbd01081c08&CatId=9 (last visited Nov 3, 2020).

Leiner, M. B., Cerf, G. V., Clark, D. D., Kahn, E. R., Kleinrock Leonard, Lynch, C. D., Postel Jon, Roberts, G. L., Wolff Stephen., Internet Society. Brief History of the Internet. (2020). https://www.internetsociety.org/internet/history-internet/brief-history-internet/ (last visited Oct 20, 2020).

Lorna Woods, Freedom of Expression and Liability for Internet Comments: A Key New ECHR Judgment, EU Law Analysis (Feb. 21, 2016), http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.fr/2016/02/freedom-of-expression-and-liability-for.html(Last visited 02/24/21).

Maxwell A. News Site Blocked by ISPs For Embedding Official YouTube Videos, TorrentFreak, Go to TorrentFreak. (2016), https://torrentfreak.com/news-site-blocked-by-isps-for-embedding-youtube-videos-160129/ (last visited Nov 8, 2020).
McFadden, C. The Invention and History of the Printing Press Interesting Engineering (2020), https://interestingengineering.com/the-invention-and-history-of-the-printing-press (last visited Oct 16, 2020).

Old Dominion University. History of the Internet. (2015). https://www.cs.odu.edu/~tkennedy/cs300/development/Public/M02-HistoryOftheInternet/index.html (last visited Oct 20, 2020).

Onion, A., Sullivan, M., & Mullen, M. Printing Press—HISTORY. HISTORY.Com. (2018), https://www.history.com/topics/inventions/printing-press (last visited Oct 16, 2020).

Schlackman, S. How Mickey Mouse Keeps Changing Copyright Law: Artrepreneur Art Law Journal (2020), https://alj.artrepreneur.com/mickey-mouse-keeps-changing-copyright-law/ (last visited Oct 18, 2020).

Van der Sar, E. Court Orders ISPs to Unblock "Pirate" Site, TorrentFreak, Go to TorrentFreak. (2014), https://torrentfreak.com/court-orders-isps-to-unblock-pirate-site-140403/ (last visited Nov 5, 2020).

Wile, R. Take A Tour of Taiwan Before Its Economy Went Boom Business Insider (2013), https://www.businessinsider.com/incredible-photos-from-pre-boom-taiwan-2013-5 (last visited Nov 3, 2020).
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊