跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.104.206) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/28 12:35
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:許芷瑜
研究生(外文):Shiu, Jr-Yu
論文名稱:不同圖文出題條件之線上學生出題活動對國小英語科學習成效影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Pictorial and Text Conditions for Online Student Question-Generation on Elementary School Student English Learning
指導教授:于富雲于富雲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yu, Fu-Yun
口試委員:吳純萍洪素蘋
口試委員(外文):Wu, Chun-PingHung, Su-Pin
口試日期:2021-08-23
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:190
中文關鍵詞:多媒體國小英語學習圖文出題條件網路學生出題活動學習成效
外文關鍵詞:learning effectmultimediaEnglish learningonline student question-generationpictorial and text conditions
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:126
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
表目錄 XII
圖目錄 XIV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 10
第三節 研究問題 11
第四節 名詞釋義 12
第五節 研究貢獻 16
第二章 文獻探討 18
第一節 台灣國小英語學習現況與困境 18
第二節 學生出題重要性與相關實證研究 28
第三節 圖文條件對學習成效影響之理論與實證基礎 36
第三章 研究方法 59
第一節 研究假設 59
第二節 研究設計、研究架構與實驗組別 60
第三節 研究對象 64
第四節 實驗程序 65
第五節 教學設計 69
第六節 線上出題系統 74
第七節 研究工具 78
第八節 資料分析 88
第四章 研究結果 89
第一節 不同圖文出題條件於學業成就之結果 89
第二節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科出題品質之結果 90
第三節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科學力提升之結果 92
第四節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科學習動機之結果 93
第五節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科正向學業情緒之結果 95
第六節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科負向學業情緒之結果 96
第七節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科認知負荷之結果 98
第八節 小結 99
第五章 討論與結論 101
第一節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科學業成就之影響 101
第二節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科出題品質之影響 112
第三節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科學力提升、學業動機、正向學業情緒之影響 115
第四節 不同圖文出題條件於英語科負面學業情緒、認知負荷之影響 119
第五節 結論 121
第六節 研究限制 122
第七節 建議 123
參考文獻 125
中文文獻 125
西文文獻 131
附錄 144
附錄一、2017-2021國內外出題實證研究摘要表 145
附錄二、學生出題學習手冊 153
附錄三、學生出題活動說明簡報 161
附錄四、學生出題回饋簡報 163
附錄五、學生出題構想範例 164
附錄六、109學年度第二學期第一次段考內容 167
附錄七、研究者自編字彙測驗 169
附錄八、成就測驗之雙向細目表 173
附錄九、測驗難度、鑑別度分析 174
附錄十、出題得分範例 179
附錄十一、學力提升量表 183
附錄十二、學習動機量表 185
附錄十三、 學業情緒量表 187
附錄十四、 認知負荷量表 190
于富雲(2020年9月12-16日)。網路學生出題2.0 — 教與學的再精進(專題演講)。第24屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會( The 24th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education) ,中國,蘭州。
于富雲(2009)。網路學生出題系統之建置、運用與影響分析(NSC96-2520-S006-002-MY3)。行政院國家科學委員會。取自http://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/139458
于富雲、賴奕嬛(2014)。網路多元學生出題策略對國小學生認知策略與學習成就之影響。教育資料與圖書館學, 51(4),1-33。
王昭傑、陳美芳(2015)。圖像式情境脈絡數學教材對國小資優生學習成效與基模影響之實驗研究。特殊教育研究學刊,40(3),59-88。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201511.4003003
王麗雲(2014)。基本能力的雙峰現象及因應建議。教育人力與專業發展,31(1),1-4。
台南市教育局(2015年11月23日)。104學年度國中英語字彙1,500字暨國小英語字彙220字之字彙表。取自http://mini.yzes.tn.edu.tw/news_content.asp?id=724
台南市教育局(2016年10月13)。國小英語教育向下延伸之現況與規劃。取自http://www3.tn.edu.tw/first_grade_english/index.html
安蓮心(2011)。網路學生出題策略輔助外籍生華語學習之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
朱志青(2010)。示意圖結合多媒體教學對國小六年級學習槓桿原理之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立交通大學,新竹市。
行政院國家發展委員會(2018年12月10日)。2030雙語國家政策發展藍圖。取自行政院網站:https://www.ey.gov.tw/
吳宛珊(2015)。網路學生出題結合回饋設計對國中國文科學習成效探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
吳珮綺(2017)。網路學生出題圖文回饋設計對國中英語科學習成效之影響 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
呂毓婕(2015)。漫畫融入英語教學對國小六年級學生學習動機與學習成就影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
呂鳳琳(2010)。幾何證明不同文本呈現方式對學生認知負荷與閱讀理解影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
李怡慧(2019)。網路學生出題與練習對成人華語學習之成效分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
李明桓(2010)。線上學生出題題型在國小社會學習領域學習效果之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
李惠婷(2018)。網路回饋式選擇題學生出題與練習活動之學習成效探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
林至誠(2011)。多媒體輔助字彙學習:文獻回顧。師大學報:語言與文學類,56(1),1-20。
林宜篇(2011)。網路學生出題融入生命教育教學對國小學生學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
林美智(1990)。空中大學師生互動與學生學習滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
林原宏、許淑萍(2002)。乘除擬題能力測驗編製及其實證研究。測驗統計年刊,10(0),135-171。
施宥廷(2016)。英語學習動機與學習困擾:理論的觀點。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(7),111-128。
洪琮琪(2002)。網路出題與合作學習對學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
洪琮琪、于富雲、程炳林(2005)。網路出題與合作學習策略運用對學力提昇與學習焦慮之影響。新竹師院學報,(20),219-244。
張武昌(2006)。臺灣的英語教育:現況與省思。教育資料與研究雙月刊,69,129-144。
張育綾(2008)。學生網路出題於國小英語學科對學習成效的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學教育研究所,台南市。
張家瑜(2016)。程式設計課程中圖文教學策略對認知負荷與學業情緒的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。
張培寧(2015)。 英語視覺字教學對於國小四年級學童英語閱讀能力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
教育部(2008年 9月)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(英語)。取自: https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=9&mid=231
教育部(2018 a)。十二年國民基本教育。取自十二年國民基本教育網站:https://12basic.edu.tw/12about.php
教育部(2018 b)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校—英語文領域。取自教育部與學前教育署網站: https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=5867
梁育維、陳芳慶(2015)。資訊融入教學對學習態度影響之後設分析。中等教育,66(2),100-125。
郭玳均(2018)。 圖解識字教學應用在國小識字困難學生學習成效與學習興趣之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
陳巧宜(2018)。線上練習題庫教師與學生回饋訊息設計對學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
陳怡君(2010)。學生網路出題結合練習活動對國小學童社會學習領域學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
陳明鴻、張恬君(2005)。圖解設計類型與圖片真實性對國中生物教學適當性之影響—以遺傳單元為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
陳欣怡(2019)。圖解識字教學運用於環境主題詞語之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
陳黎枚(2003)。國小自然科學教科書圖解設計類型之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林縣。
游淑梅(2017)。運用桌上遊戲複習英語字彙對提昇國小五年級學童英語拼字能力的效益研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
程炳林(2015年10月31日)。國中生課業情緒的測量、發展與領域特定性(NSC102-2410-H006-108-MY2)。科技部。取自https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=8123909
廖彥棻(2019)。英文能力分級教學的成效與省思。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(2),100-108。
廖彥棻(2019)。英語文適性教學的發展脈絡與實施原則。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(11),160-169。
管曼君(2016)。網路學生出題不同學習輔助設計與認知風格對國小學童自然科學學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
潘冠蓉(2012)。線上學生出題關鍵詞提示策略對國中生公民學習成效影響之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
潘宣融(2016)。圖像注釋及字義注釋對於英語為第二外語學生的單字學習及閱讀理解之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem-solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford University Press.
Bai, Y., Zhao, F., & Li, Z. (2019, Dec 17-19). Study on the teaching mode and effect of technical support for English words in primary schools. 2019 International Joint Conference on Information, Media and Engineering (IJCIME).
Baumann, J. F. (2014). Vocabulary and reading comprehension: The nexus of meaning. (1st ed, pp. 347-370). Routledge.
Boers, F., Warren, P., He, L., & Deconinck, J. (2017). Does adding pictures to glosses enhance vocabulary uptake from reading? System, 66, 113-129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.017
Brown, C., & Payne, M. E. (1994, March 8-12). Five essential steps of processes in vocabulary learning. [Conference presentation]. TESOL 1994 Convention, Baltimore, Md, USA.
Cappello, M., & Walker, N. T. (2016). Visual thinking strategies: Teachers' reflections on closely reading complex visual texts within the disciplines. The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 317-325.
Carpenter, S. K., & Geller, J. (2020). Is a picture really worth a thousand words? Evaluating contributions of fluency and analytic processing in metacognitive judgements for pictures in foreign language vocabulary learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(2), 211-224. doi:10.1177/1747021819879416
Chapelle. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA, Language Learning & Technology, 2(1).22-34.
Chen, F., Kao, S.-M., & Tsou, W. (2020). Toward self-informed bilingual education in Taiwan: Addressing incongruity between policy and practice. English Teaching & Learning, 44(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00055-1.
Christidamayani, A. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2020). The effects of problem posing learning model on students' learning achievement and motivation. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 2(2), 100-108.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational psychology review, 3(3), 149-210.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153-170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003
Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2008). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. TESL-EJ, 11(4).
Darhim, D., Prabawanto, S., & Susilo, B. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning and mathematical problem posing in improving student’s critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13, 103-116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1347a
Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 411-430.
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 28, 48-63.
Elgort, I. & Nation, P. (2010). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Familiar answers to new questions. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising ‘learning’ in applied linguistics (pp. 89-104). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289772_6
Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Garcia, F. C., Garcia, A., Berben, A. B. G., Pichardo, M. C., & Justicia, F. (2014). The effects of question-generation training on metacognitive knowledge, self regulation and learning approaches in Science. Psicothema, 26(3), 385-390. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.252
Geçici, M. E., & Aydın, M. (2020). Determining the geometry problem posing performances of eighth grade students in different problem posing situations. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.575063
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Gu, Y. (2019). Vocabulary Learning Strategies. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1-7). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1329.pub2
Halwani, N. (2017). Visual aids and multimedia in second language acquisition. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 53-59.
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Advances in psychology, Vol. 52, (pp. 139-183). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
Jiang, N. (2018). Second language processing: An Introduction (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315886336
Kapur, M. (2018). Examining the preparatory effects of problem generation and solution generation on learning from instruction. Instructional Science, 46(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9435-z
Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057123
Khawaja, M. A., Chen, F., & Marcus, N. (2014). Measuring cognitive load using linguistic features: Implications for usability evaluation and adaptive interaction design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(5), 343-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.860579
Kim, B. G., & Shim, H. R. (2019). Chunk meets image: the effects of chunking and imagery on mobile-based self-learning of English as a foreign language. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2019010105
Kopparla, M., Bicer, A., Vela, K., Lee, Y., Bevan, D., Kwon, H., Caldwell, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). The effects of problem-posing intervention types on elementary students’ problem-solving. Educational Studies, 45(6), 708-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509785
Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. TESOL quarterly, 34(2), 337-340
Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391.
Lindner, M. A., Eitel, A., Barenthien, J., & Köller, O. (2018). An integrative study on learning and testing with multimedia: Effects on students’ performance and metacognition. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.002
Lindner, M. A., Eitel, A., Strobel, B., & Köller, O. (2017a). Identifying processes underlying the multimedia effect in testing: An eye-movement analysis. Learning and Instruction, 47 ,91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.007
Lindner, M. A., Lüdtke, O., Grund, S., & Köller, O. (2017b). The merits of representational pictures in educational assessment: Evidence for cognitive and motivational effects in a time-on-task analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 482-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.009
Magner, U. I., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Renkl, A. (2013). Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 29, 141-152.
Martinez, S., & Blanco, V. (2021). Analysis of problem posing using different fractions meanings. Education Sciences, 11(2), 65. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/2/65
Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2015). Eye-movement modeling of integrative reading of an illustrated text: Effects on processing and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 172-187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.004
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. Journal of educational psychology, 91(2), 358-368.
Milton, J. (2013). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In C. Bardel, C. Lindqvist, & B. Laufer (Eds.) L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp. 57-78). Eurosla.
Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177-213. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_02
Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 1-14.
Nikolić, D., Häusler, S., Singer, W., & Maass, W. (2009). Distributed fading memory for stimulus properties in the primary visual cortex. PLOS Biology, 7(12), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000260
Ozdemir, A. S., & Sahal, M. (2018). The effect of teaching integers through the problem posing approach on students’ academic achievement and mathematics attitudes. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(78), 117-138.
Özgen, K. (2019). An investigation of eighth grade students' skills in different problem posing types. International Journal for mathematics teaching and learning, 20(1), 106-130.
Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational psychology review, 6(4), 351-371.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press.
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Parhizgar, Z., Dehbashi, A., Liljedahl, P., & Alamolhodaei, H. (2020). Exploring students' misconceptions of the function concept through problem-posing tasks and their views thereon. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-25, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1937732
Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect: A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 5–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.006.
Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.005
Plass, J. L., & Jones, L. C. (2005). Multimedia Learning in Second Language Acquisition. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. (pp. 467-488). Cambridge University Press.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. Doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
Putra, H., Herman, T., & Sumarmo, U. (2020). The impact of scientific approach and what-if-not strategy utilization towards student’s mathematical problem posing ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13, 669-684.
Ramezanali, N., Uchihara, T., & Faez, F. (2021). Efficacy of multimodal glossing on second language vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 105-133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.579
Reeve, R. A., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition reconsidered: Implications for intervention research. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13(3), 343-356.
Sansone, K. (2015). Using strategies from graphic design to improve teaching and learning. In D. M. Baylen & A. D'Alba (Eds.), Essentials of teaching and integrating visual and media literacy: Visualizing learning (pp. 3-26). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05837-5_1
Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203-212.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. (pp. 199-227). Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921
Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (2nd ed.). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 72-104). Cambridge University Press.
Seufert, T. (2019). Training for coherence formation when learning from text and picture and the interplay with learners’ prior knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(193), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00193
Song, D., Oh, E. Y., & Glazewski, K. (2017). Student-generated questioning activity in second language courses using a customized personal response system: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1425-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9520-7
Suarsana, I., Lestari, I. A. P. D., & Mertasari, N. M. S. (2019). The effect of online problem posing on students' problem-solving ability in mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 809-820.
Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, Y. C. (2016). Development of a mobile learning system based on a collaborative problem-posing strategy. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 456-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.867889
Sung, H.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, S.-F. (2019). Effects of embedding a problem-posing-based learning guiding strategy into interactive e-books on students’ learning performance and higher order thinking tendency. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474235
Suryanti, Widodo, W., & Budijastuti, W. (2020). Guided discovery problem-posing: An attempt to improve science process skills in elementary school. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1336a
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science,13, 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 22(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205.
Tavşanlı, Ö. F., Kozaklı, T., & Kaldirim, A. (2018). The effect of graphic organizers on the problem-posing skills of 3rd grade elementary school students. PEGEM Journal of Education and Instruction, 8, 377-406. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2018.016
Teo, T., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., & Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2016). Exploring the digital natives among pre-service teachers in Turkey: A cross-cultural validation of the digital native assessment scale. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1231-1244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.980275
Uchihara, T., & Clenton, J. (2020). Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 540-556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818799371
Um, E., Plass, J., Hayward, E., & Homer, B. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026609
Vafaee, P., & Suzuki, Y. (2020). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 383-410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000676
Van den Broek, G. S. E., Van Gog, T., Jansen, E., Pleijsant, M., & Kester, L. (2021). Multimedia effects during retrieval practice: Images that reveal the answer reduce vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/edu0000499
Wang, S., & Lee, C. I. (2021). Multimedia gloss presentation: learners' preference and the effects on EFL vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(3950). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602520
Wang, S., Hwang, G., & Chen, S. (2015, July 12-16). Development of a contextual game for improving English vocabulary learning performance of elementary school students in Taiwan [Conference presentation]. 2015 IIAI 4th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, Okayama, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2015.161
Wang, X. M., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). A problem posing-based practicing strategy for facilitating students' computer programming skills in the team-based learning mode. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1655-1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9551-0
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Yamagata, S. (2018). Comparing core-image-based basic verb learning in an EFL junior high school: Learner-centered and teacher-centered approaches. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 65-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816659784
Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J. (2002). Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 33-58.
Yu, F. Y. (2021, November 22-26). Development and preliminary evaluation of the learning potential of an online system in support of a student-generated testlets learning activity. Paper accepted for presentation at and inclusion in the Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE2021), Bangkok, Thailand.
Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4), 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500062557
Yu, F. Y., Wu, W. S., & Huang, H. C. (2018). Promoting middle school students’ learning motivation and academic emotions via student-created feedback for online student-created multiple-choice questions. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(5), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0398-x
Yum, Y. N., Cohn, N., & Lau, W. K.-W. (2021). Effects of picture-word integration on reading visual narratives in L1 and L2. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101397
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20261028)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊