跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.236.124.56) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/30 04:40
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林宇亭
研究生(外文):LIN,YU-TING
論文名稱:大學生運用YouTube自學對自身的影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of YouTube Self-learning on Undergraduates
指導教授:吳金春吳金春引用關係
指導教授(外文):WU,CHIH-CHUN
口試委員:陳文彥江芳盛
口試委員(外文):CHEN,WEN-YANJIANG,FANG-SHENG
口試日期:2021-05-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
學門:教育學門
學類:教育行政學類
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:131
中文關鍵詞:大學生網路學習數位學習YouTube
外文關鍵詞:College StudentsDigital learningOnline learningYouTube
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在現代高度競爭的環境中,許多人開始重視第二專長的學習,且數位世代的來臨,人們的生活與網路開始密不可分,YouTube成為多數年輕人每天使用的平台。政府也發現了網路的重要性,開始推動相關的數位學習政策,因此本研究目的為探討大學生在運用YouTube學習對自身的影響,其中包含數位學習的性別差異、內外在因素差異以及資本的差異。本研究對象為全台大學生,並採用調查研究法,以電子問卷作為調查工具,總共收到1061份有效問卷。研究結果發現多數大學生有固定運用YouTube學習的習慣,且在不同頻道中內外在因素的影響程度不同。在資本方面則呈現正相關,表示當大學生認為學習可以幫助其增加某一項資本時,也可能偏向會增加另外兩項資本。在性別與觀看頻道,發現男性在軟硬體設備類以及金融投資類的平均數高於女性,但美妝美髮類、舞蹈音樂類、烹飪烘焙類、學科和語言類的平均數皆低於女性;女性需要較多的內外在因素才會運用YouTube進行學習,但在學習原因卻大致相同。最後則根據結論提出幾項建議。
In the modern and highly competitive environment, many people begin to attach importance to the learning of their second expertise, and with the advent of digital generations, people's lives and the Internet have become inseparable, and YouTube has become a platform used by most young people every day. The government has also discovered the importance of the Internet and has begun to promote related digital learning policies. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explore the impact of college students using YouTube for learning, including gender differences in digital learning, differences in internal and external factors, and differences in capital. The sample of this research is college students. Using online anonymous questionnaires as the survey tool, a total of 1061 valid questionnaires have been received. The results of the study found that most college students have the habit of learing via YouTube regularly, and the degree of influence of internal and external factors is different in different channels. In terms of capitals, there are positive correlations, which means that when college students think that learning can help them increase a certain kind of capital, they may also be inclined to increase the other two kind of capitals. Regarding the gender differences in watching different kinds of YouTube channels, males are found to be more favor in computer related and financial investment channels, while females are more engaged in watching beauty and salons, dancing and music, cooking and baking, as well as academic and language related channels. Women need further internal factors to use YouTube for learning, but the reasons for learning are roughly the same. Gender differences were detected. Finally, several suggestions are made based on the conclusion.
目次
致謝詞 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目次 v
表目次 vii
圖目次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4
第三節 名詞釋義 5
第四節 研究範圍與限制 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 數位學習之相關研究及政策 7
第二節 數位學習原因之相關研究 10
第三節 數位學習之性別差異相關研究 13
第四節 網路與資本關係之相關研究 16
第三章 研究方法與研究設計 20
第一節 研究架構 20
第二節 研究對象 21
第三節 研究方法與工具 21
第四節 研究實施流程與資料處理 23
第四章 研究結果與分析 25
第一節 樣本分析 25
第二節 大學生運用YouTube學習之現況分析 31
第三節 大學生運用YouTube學習之內外在因素與資本關係之分析 43
第四節 性別與不同變項之分析 73
第五章 結論與建議 96
第一節 結論與討論 96
第二節 建議 99
參考文獻 102
一、中文部分 102
二、英文部分 103
三、網路部分 109

附錄 113
附錄一 預試問卷回饋建議1 113
附錄二 預試問卷回饋建議2 116
附錄三 問卷 118
附錄四 預試問卷內容 119
附錄五 正式問卷內容 122


參考文獻
一、中文部分
朱珊瑩、陳忠榮(2015)。台灣網際網路使用種類、社會資本與快樂程度。經濟
論文,43(4),535-587。
朱國明(2007)。網路社群社會資本與成員間助人行為之相關研究。資訊管理學
報,14(2),169-202。
余民寧、翁雅芸、張靜軒(2018)。數理科學的學習動機有性別差異嗎?一個來
自後設分析的證據。當代教育研究季刊,26(1),45-75。
吳明隆(2011)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。台北市:易習
圖書。
林益民、余泰魁(2003)。線上學習行為傾向模式建構與實證。資訊管理學報,
10(1),205-232。
教育部資訊與教育科技司(2014年8月)。教育部大學遠距教學政策及發展概
況。「2014年大學遠距教學認證成果發表暨學術研討會」,劍潭海外青年活
動中心教學大樓。
陳姚真(2000)。全球資訊網學習環境中成人自我導向式教學系統設計與成效之研究。課程與教學,3(4),73-99+172。
陳儒晰、杜佳靜、邱方晞(2012)。大學生學習方法對網路學習態度的影響:以某科技大學為例。數位學習科技期刊,4(3),35-59。
楊正宏、林燕珍、張俊陽、曾憲雄(2008)。台灣高等教育數位學習現況與展望。數位學習科技期刊,1(1),1-12。

葉玉珠、葉怡伶、林俊甫(2013)。數位學習正向個人特質之量表發展:知識管理、自我調整學習與意義建構。數位學習科技期刊,5(3),59-89。
二、英文部分
Ashong, C. Y., & Commander, N. E. (2012). Ethnicity, gender, and perceptions of
online learning in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and
Teaching, 8(2).
Balleys, C., Millerand, F., Thoër, C., & Duque, N. (2020). Searching for Oneself on
YouTube: Teenage Peer Socialization and Social Recognition Processes. Social
Media+ Society, 6(2), 2056305120909474.
Bardakcı, S. (2019). Exploring High School Students' Educational Use of
YouTube. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed
Learning, 20(2).
Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E.
(2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics
Administration Issue Brief, (04-11).
Bentley, J. W., Van Mele, P., Barres, N. F., Okry, F., & Wanvoeke, J.(2019).
Smallholders download and share videos from the Internet to learn about
sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 17(1),
92-107.
Bourdieu, P., & Richardson, J. G. (1986). The forms of capital.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and
scholarship. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010, April). Social network activity and social
well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in
computing systems (pp. 1909-1912).
Chan, N. K. (2019). “Becoming an expert in driving for Uber”: Uber driver/bloggers’
performance of expertise and self-presentation on YouTube. New Media &
Society, 21(9), 2048-2067.
Cheng, C., Wang, H. Y., Sigerson, L., & Chau, C. L. (2019). Do the socially rich get
richer? A nuanced perspective on social network site use and online social capital
accrual. Psychological bulletin, 145(7), 734.
Clifton, A., & Mann, C. (2011). Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning?. Nurse
education today, 31(4), 311-313.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American
journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, 22(5), 320-334.
Corolleur, C. D., Carrere, M., & Mangematin, V. (2004). Turning scientific and
technological human capital into economic capital: the experience of biotech start-
ups in France. Research Policy, 33(4), 631-642.
Craig, L., Churchill, B., & Wong, M. (2019). Youth, recession, and downward gender
convergence: Young people’s employment, education, and homemaking in
Finland, Spain, Taiwan, and the United States 2000–2013. Social Politics:
International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 26(1), 59-86.
Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2013). The habitus of digital “strangers” in higher
education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 44-53.
da Silva, M. A. D., Pereira, A. C., & Walmsley, A. D. (2019). Who is providing dental
education content via YouTube?. British dental journal, 226(6), 437-440.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance
of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
de Bérail, P., Guillon, M., & Bungener, C. (2019). The relations between YouTube
addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: A
moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral
framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 190-204.
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., Yaakub, M. Y., Ayob, J., & Ishak, R. (2013). The
potential of Youtube for teaching and learning in the performing arts. Procedia-
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1118-1126.
Gonulal, T. (2019). The use of Instagram as a mobile-assisted language learning
tool. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(3), 309-323.
Hanson, G., & Haridakis, P. (2008). YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A
uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(3).
Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube:
Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of
Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317-335.
Henry, L. (2011). Internal and external factors that influence adult learners in an
online setting. INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 49.
Hoskins, S. L., & Van Hooff, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: which students use
online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement?. British
journal of educational technology, 36(2), 177-192.
Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Kolenic III, A., Fitzgerald, H. E., Harold, R., & Von Eye, A.
(2008). Race, gender, and information technology use: The new digital
divide. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 437-442.
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online
environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?. The
Internet and higher education, 13(4), 179-187.
Kassens-Noor, E. (2012). Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and
informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets. Active
Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), 9-21.
Kaye, A. & Rumble, G. (1981). Distance teaching for higher and adult
education.London: Croom Helm.
Kaye, L. K., Kowert, R., & Quinn, S. (2017). The role of social identity and online
social capital on psychosocial outcomes in MMO players. Computers in Human
Behavior, 74, 215-223.
Kennedy, T., Wellman, B., & Klement, K. (2003). Gendering the digital divide. IT &
society, 1(5), 72-96.
Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and
consumption on YouTube?. Computers in human behavior, 66, 236-247.
Kim, K. J., & Frick, T. W. (2011). Changes in student motivation during online
learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1-23.
Krasnova, H., Veltri, N. F., Eling, N., & Buxmann, P. (2017). Why men and women
continue to use social networking sites: The role of gender differences. The
Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(4), 261-284.
Lai, K.-W. (2011). Digital Technology and the Culture of Teaching and
Learning in Higher Education. Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, 27(8), 1263–1275.
Lim, D. H., & Kim, H. (2003). Motivation and learner characteristics affecting online
learning and learning application. Journal of Educational Technology
Systems, 31(4), 423-439.
Lin, C. I., Tang, W. H., & Kuo, F. Y. (2012). “Mommy Wants to Learn the Computer”
How Middle-Aged and Elderly Women in Taiwan Learn ICT Through Social
Support. Adult Education Quarterly, 62(1), 73-90.
Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical
study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in
human behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161.
Ma, W.W.K., & Yuen, A.H.K. (2011). Gender differences of knowledge sharing in
online learning environment Hybrid Learning (pp. 116–128): Springer
Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2011). Gender differences in using social
networks. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(2),
133-139.
Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018). Social media as a
complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of YouTube. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 37-42.
Mustafa, A. G., Taha, N. R., Alshboul, O. A., Alsalem, M., & Malki, M. E. (2020).
Using YouTube to learn anatomy: Perspectives of Jordanian medical
students. BioMed research international, 2020.
Ong, C. S., & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships
among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in human
behavior, 22(5), 816-829.
Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners' decision to drop
out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology &
Society, 12(4), 207-217.
Pornsakulvanich, V., & Dumrongsiri, N. (2013). Internal and external influences on
social networking site usage in Thailand. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6),
2788-2795.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5).
Price, L. (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: challenging
stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5),
349-359.
Rosenthal, S. (2018). Motivations to seek science videos on YouTube: Free-choice
learning in a connected society. International Journal of Science Education, Part
B, 8(1), 22-39.
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use
of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of applied
developmental psychology, 29(6), 434-445.
Suana, W. (2018). Students' Internet Access, Internet Self-Efficacy, and Internet for
Learning Physics: Gender and Grade Differences. Journal of Technology and
Science Education, 8(4), 281-290.
Svendsen, G. L. H., Kjeldsen, C., & Noe, E. (2010). How do private entrepreneurs
transform local social capital into economic capital? Four case studies from rural
Denmark. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(6), 631-644.
Tomlinson, M. (2008). ‘The degree is not enough’: students’ perceptions of the role of
higher education credentials for graduate work and employability. British journal
of sociology of education, 29(1), 49-61.
Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students’ Internet usage and self-
efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4),
1182-1192.
V. Shah, Nojin Kwak, R. Lance Holbert, D. (2001). " Connecting" and"
disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of
social capital. Political communication, 18(2), 141-162.
Van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & Peter, M. (2015). Increasing inequalities in what
we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among
the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and
income. Telematics and informatics, 32(2), 259-272.
Volungevičienė, A., Teresevičienė, M., & Ehlers, U. D. (2020). When is open and
online learning relevant for curriculum change in higher education? Digital and
network society perspective. Electronic journal of e-Learning. Sonning
Common: Academic Publishing Limited, 2020, Vol. 18, iss. 1.
Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet
increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation,
and community commitment. American behavioral scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
Wohn, D. Y., Ellison, N. B., Khan, M. L., Fewins-Bliss, R., & Gray, R. (2013). The
role of social media in shaping first-generation high school students' college
aspirations: A social capital lens. Computers & Education, 63, 424-436.
Yucel, A. S. (2006). E-learning approach in teacher training [Electronic version].
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(4). 123-131.
Zhang, P., & Goel, L. (2011). Is e-learning for everyone? An internal-external
framework of e-learning initiatives. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and
Teaching, 7(2), 193-205.
三、網路部分
Last.fm(2020)。About Last.fm。取自https://www.last.fm/about
INSIDE(2020年10月1日)。YouTube Brandcast 揭露台灣最新 YouTube 影音
趨勢。取自https://www.inside.com.tw/article/21120-YouTube-Brandcast-new-
trending
YouTube(2020)。新聞中心。取自https://www.YouTube.com/about/press/
人民網(2020年2月6日)。疫情防控期間做好高校在線教學組織與管理工
作。取自http://edu.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2020/0206/c1053-31574077.html
中華人民共和國中央人民政府(2020年8月27日)。教育部新聞發佈會介紹
2020年秋季學期學校疫情防控和教育教學工作有關情況。取自http://big5.www.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-08/27 /content_ 5537965. htm
中華民國教育部(2020)。重大教育政策發展歷程。取自
http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=11
台灣網路資訊中心(2019)。台灣網路報告。取自
https://report.twnic.tw/2019/TrendAnalysis_internetUsage.html
科技部(2019)。科技部109 年度性別平等成果報告。取自
https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/e0848082-09e7-479b-b7d9-
6486822b0077
科技新報(2017年12月13日)。邁向影音戰國時代!9個台灣YouTube頻道
破百萬訂閱,成長趨勢銳不可擋。取自https://www.smartm.com.tw/article/34343632cea3
查淑妝(2013年1月21日)。景氣差現危機 台灣93%上班族有意自
我進修 創新高。Anue鉅亨網。取自https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/1456689
教育部(2006)。專科以上學校遠距教學實施辦法。台北:教育部。
教育部中小學數位學習深耕計畫(2021)。教育部109年中小學數位學習深耕計
畫。取自file:///C:/Users/lin/Downloads/0_109%E4%B8%AD%E5% B0%8F%E
5%AD%B8%E6%95%B8%E4%BD%8D%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E6%B7
%B1%E8%80%95%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%9A%E
7%89%88(%E4%BF%AE)%20(1).pdf
教育部全球資訊網(2020年3月8日)。公私協力、居家防疫、學習持續 教育
部提供線上課程實施參考指引,提前做好線上教學準備。取自
https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=8FFF1AEA545E40F9
教育部電子報(2020年2月20日)。因應新冠病毒疫情 教育部多項措施以保
障學生安全、維護學習權益。取自
https://epaper.edu.tw/topical.aspx?period_num=909&topical_sn=1134&page=3
陳炳宏(2018年9月14日)。YouTube使用行為大調查:7成受訪者天天看 平
均花2.5小時。自由時報。取自
https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews /2551405
國家教育研究院(2012)。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。取自
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1453922/
黃郁欣(2018年11月9日)。創市際『越年輕越愛看,YouTuber既教學也
娛樂』調查。創市際®市場研究顧問公司。取自
https://www.ixresearch.com/news/news_11_09_18#more-14412
勞動部(2015)。104年勞工生活及就業狀況調查。取自
https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy04/0422menu.htm
勞動部(2019)。108年15-29歲青年勞工就業狀況調查。取自
https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy08/0811menu.htm
勞動部(2019)。勞工生活及就業狀況調查。取自
https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy08/0823menu.htm
彭紫晴(2016年6月17日)。Facebook:未來五年將進入全影片時代,文字或
會被取替。The news lens 關鍵評論。取自
https://www.thenewslens.com/article/42154
經濟及能源部產業發展局(2020)。數位學習與典藏產業推動計畫【計畫簡
介】。取自https://www.epark.org.tw/epark_project.php
綜合報導(2020年4月26日)。YouTube首支上傳影片距今15年短短18
秒點擊超過9000萬。聯合新聞網。取自
https://udn.com/news/story/7088/4520066
維基百科(2020)。YouTube。取自https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube
臺灣 PISA國家研究中心臺灣(2020)。PISA 2012 精簡報告。取自
http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/data/TaiwanPISA2012ShortReport.pdf
臺灣 PISA國家研究中心臺灣(2020)。臺灣PISA 2018記者會簡報。取自
http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/report/PISA2018%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E6%9C%83%E7%B0%A1%E5%A0%B1.pdf
數位典藏與數位學習國家型科技計畫(2020)。計畫簡介。取自
http://teldap.tw/Introduction/introduction.html


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top