跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/08 20:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張耿議
研究生(外文):Chang, Keng-YI
論文名稱:弱勢青少年的物質剝奪對主觀幸福感之影響:社會資本之中介效果
論文名稱(外文):The effect of material deprivation on the disadvantaged adolescents’ subjective well-being –the mediating effect of social capital.
指導教授:陳柯玫陳柯玫引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen, Ke-Mei
口試委員:呂朝賢何華欽
口試委員(外文):Leu, Chao-HsienHo, Hua-Chin
口試日期:2021-06-24
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東科技大學
系所名稱:社會工作系所
學門:社會服務學門
學類:社會工作學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:73
中文關鍵詞:物質剝奪主觀幸福感社會資本生活滿意度
外文關鍵詞:material deprivationsubjective well-beingsocial capitallife satisfaction
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:331
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:84
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要探討社會資本在弱勢青少年的物質剝奪與主觀幸福感之間的中介作用程度。本研究探討的議題為:1.探討弱勢青少年之物質剝奪與主觀幸福感的關係。2.探討家庭外社會資本對弱勢青少年主觀幸福感之中介效果。
本研究為量化研究,研究方法採用路徑分析,研究資料來源為台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會所資助之台灣貧窮兒少資料庫:2017年弱勢兒少生活趨勢調查,研究對象為12-24歲在學中的經濟弱勢青少年。
研究結果發現:1. 物質剝奪對弱勢青少年的社會資本有負向顯著的影響。2. 弱勢青少年之物質剝奪對主觀幸福感有負向顯著的影響。3.社會資本對弱勢青少年主觀幸福感有正向的影響。4. 社會資本在主要關係中具有中介效果。
最後,依據本研究結果,對實務工作提出建議:1.滿足青少年之基本生活需求。2.積極促進弱勢青少年與同儕的互動,改善同儕關係。建議社會福利機構:(1)提供相關資源協助弱勢青少年平等參與各項社會活動。(2)辦理非限定服務使用者參與之活動;對於學校方面建議:(1)積極辦理促進學生同儕關係的活動。(2)設立社會福利專戶。3.重視領取其他政府補助之弱勢青少年的同儕關係與心理健康。4.重視弱勢青少年的個別限制,積極改善師生關係。5.重視青少年女性的心理困擾。6.提高18-24歲青年之生活滿意度。
The study of this research is to understand the mediator between disad-vantaged adolescents’ material deprivation and their subjective well-being. The research covers these areas: 1.An examination of the relationship between ad-olescents’ material deprivation and their subjective well-being; 2. An under-standing of how social capital outside of the family as a mediator variable af-fects disadvantaged adolescents’ subjective well-being.
The researcher used path analysis for this quantitative study. The data used was published in the Taiwan Database of Children and Youth in Poverty by the Taiwan Fund for Children and Families. It is a survey on the trends of chil-dren’s and adolescents’ lives in 2017. The subjects of this research are disad-vantaged adolescents between the ages of 12 and 24 who are still in school. The research results are as follows: 1.Material deprivation has a significantly nega-tive impact on adolescents’ social capital; 2.Material deprivation has a negative impact on adolescents’ subjective well-being; 3.Social capital has a positive impact on their subjective well-being; 4.Social capital acts as a mediator varia-ble between deprivation and subjective well-being.
Lastly, the study offers some advice based on the findings. Advice for direct practice: 1.Satisfy the adolescents’ basic needs; 2. Create opportunities for interactions between disadvantaged adolescents and their peers to better their relationships. Advice for social welfare organizations: (1) Offer resources so that disadvantaged adolescents can participate in social activities equally; (2) Host events that non-service users can participate in as well. Advice for schools: (1) Engage actively in peer-promoting activities; (2) Create an account desig-nated for social welfare; 3. Pay attention to the peer relationships and mental health of disadvantaged adolescents receiving assistance from other govern-ment funds; 4. Look at the individual challenges that each disadvantaged ado-lescents faces and focus on improving their relationships with their teachers; 5. Pay attention to the emotional problems teenage girls face; 6. Improve the life satisfaction of young adults between the ages of 18 and 24.

Keywords: material deprivation, subjective well-being, social capital, life sat-isfaction
摘 要 I
Abstract II
謝 誌 IV
目 錄 V
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 4
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 主觀幸福感之內涵與相關研究 7
第二節 社會資本與幸福感 12
第三節 物質剝奪的影響 17
第三章 研究方法 22
第一節 研究架構與假設 22
第二節 資料來源與研究對象 24
第三節 變項操作型定義 27
第四節 分析方法 31
第四章 研究分析 33
第一節 描述性統計 33
第二節 物質剝奪對社會資本的影響 38
第三節 物質剝奪、社會資本對心理健康的影響 40
第四節 物質剝奪、社會資本對生活滿意度的影響 46
第五節 社會資本的中介效果 52
第五章 研究結論與建議 55
第一節 研究發現與討論 55
第二節 研究建議 58
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 62
參考文獻 64
一、中文文獻
內政部兒童局(2008)。高風險家庭評估表。2020年5月10日,取自衛生福利部保護服務司網頁http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/cp-1155
-7793-105.html。
內政部戶政司(2020)。歷年全國人口統計資料。2020年5月10日,取自內政部戶政司網頁http://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346。
王育敏、邱靖惠(2009)。窮孩子˙低社交?家庭貧窮對兒童社會參與之影響。社區發展季刊,124,72-85。
王珮旎(2019)。弱勢青少年家庭動力,學校適應及生活滿意度之關係探討(未發表之碩士論文)。中山醫學大學。台中市。
行政院主計總處(2020)。家庭收支調查。2019年7月10日,取自中華民國統計資訊網https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=40875&
ctNode=511&mp=4。
行政院(2005)。青少年政策白皮書。台北市:行政院。
江守峻、陳婉真(2017)。經濟弱勢青少年的教師支持、同儕支持、家庭凝聚力與心理資本之關係:台灣貧窮兒少資料庫分析。當代教育研究,25(4),11-50。
吳丹萍(2011)。相對所得位置與社會資本之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,台北市。
吳佩璇(2014)。家扶受扶少年復原力環境保護因子、社會排除與希望感之相關性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學。台中市。
呂千穗(2018)。家庭情感支持對兒少主觀幸福感之影響─以臺灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會受扶對象為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南大學。南投縣。
呂朝賢、陳柯玫、陳琇惠(2015)。童年剝奪及其成因。臺灣社會福利學刊,13(1),151-194。
呂詩涵(2016)。青少年網路受凌與其主觀幸福感─同儕關係扮演的角色(未發表之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。台北市。
李思賢、張弘潔、李蘭、吳文琪(2006)。家庭及學校的社會資本與國小學童內化行為問題之關係。中華心理衛生學刊,19(3),231-253。
林南(2007)。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢,1(1),1-32。
柯旻伶、趙善如、陳婕誼、龔家琳(2015)。青少年家庭社會資本與主觀幸福感模型建構之研究-以屏東縣國中生為例。朝陽人文社會學刊, 13(2),23-50。
唐貺怡、黃春太、姜逸群、黃雅文、胡益進(2008)。臺灣地區國中一年級學生的社會資本與心理健康之研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌(28),47-64。
徐美圓、張瑞興、許吉越(2013)。課業壓力、社會支持與幸福感之相關研究。運動休閒餐旅研究,8(1),56-71。
翁敏甄、陳嘉成(2018)。男女幸福大不同?-父母教養、教師管教與同儕關係品質對不同性別國中生幸福感預測之差異分析。臺中教育大學學報:數理科技類,32(2),57-77。
財團法人台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會(2018)。台灣貧窮兒少資料庫:2017年弱勢兒少生活趨勢調查。(D00166)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-D00166-1.
張雅惠(2012)。青少年家庭關係與幸福感之相關(未出版之碩士論文)。  
  國立臺北大學。台北市 。
陳亭瑋(2013)。社會資本與青少年偏差行為:家庭與學校的作用(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。台北市
陳威宇(2016)。貧窮青少年之剝奪經驗、因應策略與社會關係(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學。台中市。
陳香如(2011)。家庭資源與學生學習表現之模糊統計與相關分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南大學。南投縣。
陳憶、陳柯玫(2020)。家庭關係對弱勢青少年主觀幸福感之影響。人文社會科學研究,14(1),39-58。
陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。
黃春太(2010)。臺灣南部地區國中生的社經地位、社會資本、生活型態與幸福感之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。台北市。
黃春太、姜逸群、黃雅文、胡益進(2007)。國中生的社會資本與健康促進生活型態之研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報,28,105-126。
黃銘福、黃毅志(2010)。影響台東縣國二學生心理幸福之因果機制:家庭社經地位與社會網絡何者重要。教育與社會研究,(21),1-37。
黃毅志(1998)。社會階層、社會網絡與心理幸福。臺灣社會學刊,(21), 171-210。
衛生福利部統計處(2020)。社會福利統計調查。2020年5月10日,取自衛生福利部統計處網頁https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/np-17
65-113.html。
劉亭秀、陳柏霖(2017)。弱勢家庭國中生親子關係、學校生活適應與生活滿意度之關係。臺中教育大學學報:數理科技類,31(2),85-98。
鍾肇政(2004)。魯冰花。新北市:遠景。
羅加馨(2016)。臺灣經濟弱勢青少年金錢態度、制握信念與幸福感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學。台南市。
盧妍伶、呂朝賢(2014)家庭結構與兒童幸福感。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,4(2),95-125。 
二、英文文獻
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bellani, L. (2010). Multidimensional indices of deprivation: Should reference groups matter. Paper presented at the CEPS/INSTEAD, Research Seminars. Universita Bocconi, Italy.
Bellani, L., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2011). Deprivation, social exclusion and subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 104(1), 67-86.
Benach, J., Yasui, Y., Borrell, C., Sáez, M., & Pasarin, M. (2001). Material deprivation and leading causes of death by gender: evidence from a nationwide small area study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55(4), 239-245.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, 241-260.
Busseri, M. A., Choma, B. L., & Sadava, S. W. (2012). Subjective temporal trajectories for subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 1-15.
Callan, T., Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (1993). Resources deprivation and the measurement of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 22(2), 141-172.
Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of health psychology, 13(6), 764-775.
Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S. (1992). Stability and change in subjective well-being over short time periods. Social Indicators Research, 26(2), 101-117.
Chong, S.T., Koh, D., Nazri, Y.F.M., Ibrahim, F.,and Rahim, S.A.(2020). Social Capital and Well-being among Marginalized Young Malaysians.
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences,41(1): 176–180.
Chen, Ke-Mei (2020). Subjective poverty, deprivation, and the subjective well-being of children and young people: A multilevel growth curve analysis in Taiwan. Children and Youth Services Review, 114.
Cohn, D. A., Patterson, C. J., & Christopoulos, C. (1991). The family and children's peer relations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
, 8(3), 315-346.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, 95-120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Cooper, H., Okamura, L., & Gurka, V. (1992). Social activity and subjective well-being. Personality and individual differences, 13(5), 573-583.
Davis, J. A. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative depriv¬-
 ation. Sociometry, 22(4), 280-296.
De Neubourg, C., Chzhen, Y., Main, G., Martorano, B., Menchini, L., & Bradshaw, J. (2012). Child deprivation, multidimensional poverty and monetary poverty in Europe.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of happiness studies, 9(1), 1-11.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. The science of well-being, 11-58.
Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American psychologist, 67(8), 590.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119-169.
Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). personality and subjective well-being.
Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology, 213.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2009). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. In The science of well-being ,103-118. Springer, Dordrecht.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253.
Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African journal of psychology, 39(4), 391-406.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276.
Diener, E., Wolsic, B., & Fujita, F. (1995). Physical attractiveness and subjective well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(1), 120.
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The economic journal, 111(473), 465-484.
Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 89-97.
Fusco, A., Guio, A.-C., & Marlier, E. (2011). Income poverty and material deprivation in European countries.
Goswami, H. (2012). Social relationships and children’s subjective well be-ing. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 575-588.
Gross-Manos, D., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2017). How subjective well-being is as sociated with material deprivation and social exclusion in Israeli 12-year-olds. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87, 274–290.
Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well‐being and ill‐being. Economic record, 80, 24-33.
Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well–being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435-1446.
Hong, J. S., Choi, J., Espelage, D. L., Wu, C. F., Boraggina-Ballard, L., & Fisher, B. W. (2020). Are children of welfare recipients at a heightened risk of bullying and peer victimization?Child & Youth Care Forum,
50,547–568.
Hotard, S. R., McFatter, R. M., McWhirter, R. M., & Stegall, M. E. (1989). Interactive effects of extraversion, neuroticism, and social relationships on subjective well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(2), 321.
Kawachi, I. (1999). Social capital and community effects on population and individual health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 120-130.
Konu, A. I., Lintonen, T. P., & Rimpela, M. K. (2002). Factors associated with schoolchildren's general subjective well-being. Health education research, 17(2), 155-165.
Lau, M. & Li, W. (2011). The extent of family and school capital promoting positive subjective well-being among primary school children in Shenzhen, China. Children and Youth Service Review, 33, 1573-1582.
Lucas, R. E., & Dyrenforth, P. S. (2006). Does the existence of social relationships matter for subjective well-being?. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes ,254–273. New York: Guilford Press.
Magnus, K. B., & Diener, E. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of personality, life events, and subjective well-being. in Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Main, G., & Bradshaw, J. (2012). A child material deprivation index. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 503-521.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
McCullough, G., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). Life events, self‐concept, and adolescents' positive subjective well‐being. Psychology in the Schools, 37(3), 281-290.
Neugarten, B. L., Havighurst, R. J., & Tobin, S. S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of gerontology.
Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2001). Pleasures and subjective well‐being. European Journal of Personality, 15(2), 153-167.
Ozawa, M. N., Joo, M., & Kim, J. (2004). Economic deprivation and child well-being: A state-by-state analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(8), 785-801.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28(1), 1-20.
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Pinxten, W., & Lievens, J. (2014). The importance of economic, social and cultural capital in understanding health inequalities: using a Bourdieu‐based approach in research on physical and mental health perceptions. Sociology of health & illness, 36(7), 1095-1110.
Poortinga, W. (2012). Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health & place, 18(2), 286-295.
Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The american prospect, 13(Spring), Vol. 4. Available online: http://www. prospect. org/print/vol/13 (accessed 7 April 2003).
Ridge, T. (2011). The everyday costs of poverty in childhood: A review of qualitative research exploring the lives and experiences of low‐income children in the UK. Children & society, 25(1), 73-84.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.
Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (2009). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. In Assessing well-being ,119-138: Springer, Dordrecht.
Saunders, P., & Chen, Ke-Mei (2015). Deprivation and the Well-Being of Children and Young People in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 25(2), 80-95.
Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2001). Money and subjective well-being: it's not the money, it's the motives. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(6), 959.
Stafford, M., Bartley, M., Sacker, A., Marmot, M., Wilkinson, R., Boreham, R., & Thomas, R. (2003). Measuring the social environment: social cohesion and material deprivation in English and Scottish neighbourhoods. Environment and Planning A, 35(8), 1459-1475.
Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(5), 1091.
Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics: Clarendon Press.
Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(2), 354.
Torsheim, T., Currie, C., Boyce, W., Kalnins, I., Overpeck, M., & Haugland, S. (2004). Material deprivation and self-rated health: a multilevel study of adolescents from 22 European and North American countries. Social science & medicine, 59(1), 1-12.
Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: a survey of household resources and standards of living: Univ of California Press.
Townsend, P. (1987). Deprivation. Journal of Social Policy, 16(2), 125-146.
Turley, R. N. L., Gamoran, A., McCarty, A. T., & Fish, R. (2017). Reducing children’s behavior problems through social capital: A causal assess
   ment. Social science research, 61, 206-217.
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & behavior, 9(5), 584-590.
Van der Linden, J., Drukker, M., Gunther, N., Feron, F., & Van Os, J. (2003). Children’s mental health service use, neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation, and social capital. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 38(9), 507-514.
Verhaeghe, P.-P., & Tampubolon, G. (2012). Individual social capital, neighbourhood deprivation, and self-rated health in England. Social science & medicine, 75(2), 349-357.
Walper, S. (2009). Links of perceived economic deprivation to adolescents' well-being six years later. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 21(2), 107-127.
Wolock, I., & Horowitz, B. (1979). Child maltreatment and material deprivation among AFDC-recipient families. Social Service Review, 53(2), 175-194.
Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating. I. The biometric relations between parent and offspring.Genetics,6(2), 111.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊