跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.175) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/09 21:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鐘文成
研究生(外文):Chung, Wen-Cheng
論文名稱:品種對閹公羊屠體性狀與肉質之影響
論文名稱(外文):The effect of breed on carcass traits and meat quality of wether
指導教授:吳錫勳吳錫勳引用關係楊國泰楊國泰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wu, Hsi-HsunYang, Kuo-Tai
口試委員:陳文賢林義福吳建平
口試委員(外文):Chen, Wen-ShyanLin, Yih-FwuWu, Chean-Ping
口試日期:2020-07-18
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東科技大學
系所名稱:動物科學與畜產系所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:畜牧學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:75
中文關鍵詞:品種屠體性狀肉質閹公羊
外文關鍵詞:BreedCarcass characteristicMeat qualityWether
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:230
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探討品種對於閹公羊屠體性狀與肉質之影響。拍賣價中 努比亞雜交閹公羊(Nubian crossbred)每公斤均價高於阿爾拜因閹公羊 約 20 至 30 元新台幣,試驗一比較屠體性狀、肌肉物理性狀、化學組成、 肌纖維性狀;試驗二則進一步比較背最長肌與股四頭肌於肌肉物理性狀、 化學組成、肌纖維性狀及感官品評之差異;試驗三主要比較其腹脇肉燉 煮不同時間後對於感官品評之影響;試驗四針對肌肉物理性狀、感官品 評與肌纖維性狀測試。試驗一結果顯示,兩種品種閹公羊屠宰率及總肉 重皆無顯著差異,然而努比亞雜交閹公羊具顯著較高的消化道重量及比 例,且具顯著較低體腔脂肪重量及比例;此外,剪切力與肌纖維性狀兩 組間無顯著差異(P>0.05),但努比亞雜交閹公羊之硬度、彈性、膠著性 以及咀嚼性則有較高之趨勢(P<0.1)。試驗二結果顯示,阿爾拜因閹公 羊具顯著較高的多汁性與總接受度,其原因可能與蒸煮失重有關,而背 最長肌較股四頭肌有顯著較高的亮度值、脂肪含量與較低的蒸煮失重, 此可能與其肌纖維型態組成有關。試驗三結果顯示,兩品種間感官品評 並無顯著差異,但燉煮時間增加會使咀嚼性評分增加,但彈性則會降低, 而在蒸煮失重中阿爾拜因閹公羊會顯著高於努比亞閹公羊,推測為努比 亞閹公羊之腹脇肉脂肪較多,但燉煮時間對蒸煮失重卻無顯著影響;試 驗四之結果為努比亞閹公羊背最長肌之韌度(Firmness)稍高於阿爾拜因 閹公羊(P<0.1),而化學組成以阿爾拜因閹公羊具有顯著較高的脂肪, 而感官品評利用三角試驗發現受試者分辨兩品種之正確率僅 24%。綜合 上述,兩品種屠體性狀雖有部分差異,但可食用部分無顯著差異,且肉 質上阿爾拜因閹公羊會有較高之總接受度,而燉煮時間雖可改善其肉質, 但經燉煮後兩品種間並無顯著差異。但本試驗結果顯示,品種僅為影響 屠體品質以及肉質因子之一,推論市場價格可能是受肉販之偏好或有其 他未考慮之因子所影響。
The aim of this study was to investigate the difference of carcass traits and meat quality between Nubian crossbred and Alpine wether, the two specifications exist in the auction market. Nubian crossbred in average cost 20-30 dollars per kilogram more than Alpine wether. Trial 1 focused on carcass characteristics, muscle physical traits, chemical composition and myofiber characteristics. Trial 2 focused on muscle physical traits、chemical composition myofiber characteristics and sensory evaluation of Longissimus dorsi muscle and quadriceps femoris muscle (QF). Sensory evaluation of flank from three wethers of Alpine and Nubian crossbred were used in the trial 3. These flanks were stewed at different time respectively to determine the effect of different cooking time on sensory properties and cooking loss. Trial 4 was focus on muscle physical traits, sensory evaluation and myofiber characteristics. There was no significant difference on dressing percentage and meat yields between breeds, but significantly higher gastrointestinal tract (GIT) weight and ratio, lower internal fat and ratio for Nubian crossbred than Alpine wether. In terms of meat quality, there was non-significant difference on shear force and myofiber characteristics, but slightly higher (P > 0.1) hardness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness were observed in Nubian crossbred. Results from the second trial revealed that Alpine’s meat was not only significantly juicier (P < 0.05) but also scored higher (P < 0.05) overall acceptability in the sensory test. This may be related to juiciness. LM demonstrated significantly higher (P < 0.05) L, fat percentage, and lower CL than QF. This could be due to the difference in in myofiber type composition. Result from the third trial exhibited no significant difference (P > 0.05) on sensory evaluation between breeds. However, increasing cooking time will increase chewiness. Regardless of breeds, increasing cooking time will improve meat quality. Higher (P < 0.05) juiciness, chewiness and ether extract in Alpine wethers were observed in trial four, only 24% correct rate in triangle test, moreover myofiber diameter toughness, and firmness are positively III correlated were observed in the trial, based on the results, some differences were observed on the carcass traits of Alpine and Nubian crossbred, but there was no significant difference in the edible parts. Alpine demonstrated higher juiciness and overall acceptability than Nubian crossbred, and two breeds can’t be distinguished via sensory evaluation. Meat quality can be improved by different cooking time albeit no significant difference between the two breeds. In conclusion, breed is one of factors which affect carcass characteristics and meat quality, and market price could be affected by the purchasers’ preferences or some other factors which may not have been considered.
摘 要 I
Abstract II
謝誌 IV
目錄 VI
圖表目錄 VII
壹、前言 1
貳、文獻回顧 2
一、 山羊品種介紹 2
二、 肉用山羊概況 4
三、 台灣肉用山羊概況 5
四、 品種對山羊屠體性狀之影響 7
五、 品種與肌肉部位對山羊肉質之影響 12
六、 肌肉性狀對肉質之影響 16
參、材料方法 17
一、 試驗一:不同品種閹公羊於屠宰性狀與肉質之影響 17
二、 試驗二:不同品種及肌肉部位對閹公羊肉質之影響 20
三、 試驗三:不同品種與蒸煮時間於對閹公羊肉質之影響 26
四、 試驗四:不同品種對於閹公羊背最長肌之物理性狀、感官品評及肌肉纖維性狀影響 30
肆、結果與討論 32
一、 不同品種山羊屠體性狀之差異 32
二、 品種與肌肉部位對於肉質之差異 38
三、 品種與肌肉部位對於化學組成之影響 53
四、 品種與蒸煮時間對於感官品評與失重之差異 59
五、 品種與肌肉部位對於肌纖維性狀之差異 62
伍、結論 67
陸、參考文獻 68
柒、作者簡介 75
王文彥。2018。飼糧能量與蛋白質含量對努比亞與波爾雜交閹公羊生長性能與屠體性狀之影響。國立屏東科技大學碩士論文,屏東縣。
呂秀英。2016。台灣國產羊肉消費者行為與行銷通路分析。台灣農學會報17(3):265-287。
陳靖諺。2020。不同去勢年齡對國內肉用山羊生長性能之影響。國立屏東科技大學碩士論文,屏東縣。
莊璧華,萬添春,蘇安國。2015。肉用山羊雜交試驗之母羊繁殖性狀仔羊生長及屠體性狀調查。畜產研究. 48:68-76。
黃政齊。2009。適合本土環境飼養的山羊品種。第 9-16 頁。乳肉羊飼養管理暨人工授精訓練班課程講義。行政院農業委員會畜產試驗所。臺南。
楊深玄,蘇安國,王勝德。2011。不同品種與屠宰體重對五種臺灣常用閹公羊屠體性狀與肌肉脂肪酸組成之影響。畜產研究。44(4):285-300。
Abdullah, Y., and R. Qudsieh. 2009. Effect of slaughter weight and aging time on the quality of meat from Awassi ram lambs. Meat sci. 82:309-316.
Alemu, Y., and R. C. Merkel. 2008. Sheep and goat production handbook for Ethiopia. Ethiopia sheep and goat productivity improvement program. Addis Ababa. Ethiopia.
American Dairy Goat Association. 2020. ADGA breed standards. North Carolina, NC, Retrieved June 03, 2020, from the World Wide Web: http://adga.org/breed-standards/
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of analysis. 15th ed. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem. Arlington, VA.
Arian, M., K. M, I. Rajput, S. Syed, R. S, M. Umer Chhalgari, and D. K. 2010. Effect of Slaughtering Age on Chemical Composition of Goat Meat. Pak. J. Nutr. 9:404-408.
Baldwin, D. E. 2012. Sous vide cooking: A review. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 1(1):15-30.
Brand, T. S., D. A. Van Der Merwe, L. C. Hoffman, and G. Geldenhuys. 2018. The effect of dietary energy content on quality characteristics of Boer goat meat. Meat sci. 139:74-81.
Bondoc, O. L., I. V. Gomez, B. R. Garcia, E. D. Beltran, O. D. Abanto, M. d. Rapusas, B. C. Gomez, and N. P. Roxas. 2003. Comparative Analysis of Carcass Yield and Quality, Physical, Chemical and Sensory Properties of Chevon from Different Breeds of Goats (Capra Hircus). Philipp J. Vet. Anlm. Sci. 29:25-36.
Cameron, M., J. Luo, T. Sahlu, S. Hart, S. Coleman, and A. Goetsch. 2001. Growth and slaughter traits of Boer× Spanish, Boer× Angora, and Spanish goats consuming a concentrate-based diet. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1423-1430.
Cho, S. H., G. Kang, P. Seong, S. Kang, C. Sun, S. Jang, J. H. Cheong, B. Park, and I. Hwang. 2017. Meat quality traits as a function of cow maturity. Anim. Sci. J. 88(5):781-789.
Choi, Y. M., and B. C. Kim. 2009. Muscle fiber characteristics, myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality. Livest. Sci. 122(2-3), 105–118.
Combes, S., J. Lepetit, B. Darche, and F. Lebas. 2004. Effect of cooking temperature and cooking time on Warner–Bratzler tenderness measurement and collagen content in rabbit meat. Meat sci. 66:91-96.
Corazzin, M., S. Del Bianco, S. Bovolenta, and E. Piasentier. 2019. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of sheep and goat, More than beef, pork and chicken–The production, processing, and quality traits of other sources of meat for human diet. Springer. p. 119-165.
Davey, C.L., A.F. Niederer, A.E. Graafhuis, 1976. Effects of ageing and cooking on the tenderness of beef muscle. J. Sci. Food Agric. 27: 251–256.
Dhanda, J. S., D. G. Taylor, and P. J. Murray. 2003a. Part 1. Growth, carcass and meat quality parameters of male goats: effects of genotype and liveweight at slaughter. Small Rumin. Res. 50(1-2):57-66.
Dhanda, J. S., D. G. Taylor, and P. J. Murray. 2003b. Part 2. Carcass composition and fatty acid profiles of adipose tissue of male goats: effects of genotype and liveweight at slaughter. Small Rumin. Res. 50(1-2):67-74.
Dhanda, J. S., D. G. Taylor, P. J. Murray, and J. E. McCosker. 1999. The influence of goat genotype on the production of Capretto and Chevon carcasses. 2. Meat quality. Meat sci. 52:363-367.
Dransfield, E., J. F. Martin, D. Bauchart, S. Abouelkaram, J. Lepetit, J. Culioli, C. Jurie, and B. Picard. 2003. Meat quality and composition of three muscles from French cull cows and young bulls. Anim. Sci. 76(3):387-399.
FAO, 2018. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Retrieved March 03, 2020, from the World Wide Web: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QA
Gibb, M. J., J. E. Cook, and T. T. Treacher. 1993. Performance of British Saanen, Boer × British Saanen and Anglo-Nubian castrated male kids from 8 weeks to slaughter at 28, 33 or 38 kg live weight. Anim. Prod. 57(2):263-271.
Gionbelli, M. P., S. Valadares Filho, and E. Detmann. 2016. Adjusting cattle body weight to physiological and feeding conditions. Suprema Gráfica Ltda, Viçosa. 1-14.
Goetsch, A. L., R. C. Merkel, and T. A. Gipson. 2011. Factors affecting goat meat production and quality. Small Rumin. Res. 101(1-3):173-181.
Gökdal, Ö. 2013. Growth, slaughter and carcass characteristics of Alpine×Hair goat, Saanen×Hair goat and Hair goat male kids fed with concentrate in addition to grazing on rangeland. Small Rumin. Res. 109(2-3):69-75.
Griffin, C., M. Orcutt, R. Riley, G. Smith, J. Savell, and M. Shelton. 1992. Evaluation of palatability of lamb, mutton, and chevon by sensory panels of various cultural backgrounds. Small Rumin. Res. 8(1-2):67-74.
Guerrero, A., M. d. M. Campo, J. L. Olleta, and C. Sañudo. 2018. Carcass and Meat Quality in Goat, Goat Science. 267-286.
Guzmán, J. L., F. de la Vega, L. Á. Zarazaga, A. Argüello, and M. Delgado-Pertíñez. 2019. Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Conventionally and Organically Reared Suckling Dairy Goat Kids of the Payoya Breed. Ann. Anim. Sci. 19(4):1143-1159.
Hwang, Y. H., S.-H. Joo, A. Bakhsh, I. Ismail, and S.-T. Joo. 2017. Muscle fiber characteristics and fatty acid compositions of the four major muscles in Korean native black goat. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 37(6):948-954.
Ivanović, S. D., Z. M. Stojanović, K. D. Nešić, B. P. Pisinov, M. Ž. Baltić, J. V. Popov-Raljić, and J. M. Đurić. 2014. Effect of goat breed on the meat quality. Hem. ind. 68(6):801-807.
Joo, S. H., K.-W. Lee, Y.-H. Hwang, and S.-T. Joo. 2017. Histochemical Characteristics in Relation to Meat Quality Traits of Eight Major Muscles from Hanwoo Steers. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 37(5):716-725.
Joo, S. T., G. D. Kim, Y. H. Hwang, and Y. C. Ryu. 2013. Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics. Meat sci. 95(4):828-836.
Judge, M. D., E. D. Aberle, J. C. Forrest, H. B. Hedrick and R. A. Merkel Principles of Meat Science (2). Kendall Hunt Publishing Company. Dubuque. America.
Jurie, C., B. Picard, J. F. Hocquette, E. Dransfield, D. Micol, and A. Listrat. 2007. Muscle and meat quality characteristics of Holstein and Salers cull cows. Meat sci 77(4):459-466.
Kadim, I. T., O. Mahgoub, D. S. Al-Ajmi, R. S. Al-Maqbaly, N. M. Al-Saqri, and A. Ritchie. 2003. An evaluation of the growth, carcass and meat quality characteristics of Omani goat breeds. Meat sci. 66(1):203-210.
Klont, R., L. Brocks, and G. Eikelenboom. 1998. Muscle fibre type and meat quality. Meat sci. 49:219-229.
Lefaucheur, L. 2010. A second look into fibre typing--relation to meat quality. Meat sci. 84(2):257-270.
Lepetit, J. 2008. Collagen contribution to meat toughness: Theoretical aspects. Meat sci. 80(4):960-967.
Listrat, A., B. Lebret, I. Louveau, T. Astruc, M. Bonnet, L. Lefaucheur, B. Picard, and J. Bugeon. 2016. How Muscle Structure and Composition Influence Meat and Flesh Quality. Sci. World J. 2016:1-14.
Minchin, W., F. Buckley, D. A. Kenny, F. J. Monahan, L. Shalloo, and M. O’Donovan. 2009. Effect of grass silage and concentrate based finishing strategies on cull dairy cow performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics. Meat sci. 81(1):93-101.
Ngwa, A. T., L. J. Dawson, R. Puchala, G. D. Detweiler, R. C. Merkel, Z. Wang, K. Tesfai, T. Sahlu, C. L. Ferrell, and A. L. Goetsch. 2009. Effects of breed and diet on growth and body composition of crossbred Boer and Spanish wether goats. J. Anim. Sci. 87(9):2913-2923.
Oliveira, A. N. d., A. B. Selaive-Villarroel, A. L. S. Monte, R. G. Costa, and L. B. A. Costa. 2008. Características da carcaça de caprinos mestiços Anglo-Nubiano, Boer e sem padrão racial definido. Cienc. Rural. 38(4):1073-1077.
Peña, F., A. Bonvillani, B. Freire, M. Juarez, J. Perea, and G. Gomez. 2009. Effects of genotype and slaughter weight on the meat quality of Criollo Cordobes and Anglonubian kids produced under extensive feeding conditions. Meat sci. 83(3):417-422.
Pophiwa, P., E. C. Webb, and L. Frylinck. 2017. Carcass and meat quality of Boer and indigenous goats of South Africa under delayed chilling conditions. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 47:794-803.
Priolo, A., D. Micol, and J. Agabriel. 2001. Effects of grass feeding systems on ruminant meat colour and flavour. A review. Anim Res. 50(3):185-200.
Priolo, A., D. Micol, J. Agabriel, S. Prache, and E. Dransfield. 2002. Effect of grass or concentrate feeding systems on lamb carcass and meat quality. Meat sci. 62(2):179-185.
Ripoll, G., M. Alcalde, A. Horcada, M. Campo, C. Sañudo, A. Teixeira, and B. Panea. 2012. Effect of slaughter weight and breed on instrumental and sensory meat quality of suckling kids. Meat sci. 92(1):62-70.
Ripoll, G., M. Alcalde, A. Horcada, and B. Panea. 2011. Suckling kid breed and slaughter weight discrimination using muscle colour and visible reflectance. Meat sci. 87(2):151-156.
Rodrigues, L., H. C. Gonçalves, B. B. L. Medeiros, M. F. Martins, C. M. Komiyama, and M. C. Cañizares. 2011. Effect of genotype, finishing system, and sex on physiochemical characteristics of goat meat. Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment. 31:992-997.
Roldan, M., T. Antequera, A. Martin, A. I. Mayoral, and J. Ruiz. 2013. Effect of different temperature-time combinations on physicochemical, microbiological, textural and structural features of sous-vide cooked lamb loins. Meat sci. 93(3):572-578.
Solaiman, S., B. R. Min, N. Gurung, J. Behrends, and W. McElhenney. 2012. Effects of breed and harvest age on feed intake, growth, carcass traits, blood metabolites, and lipogenic gene expression in Boer and Kiko goats1. J. Anim. Sci. 90:2092-2108.
Solaiman, S., B. R. Min, N. Gurung, J. Behrends, and E. Taha. 2011. Assessing feed intake, growth performance, organ growth, and carcass characteristics of purebred Boer and Kiko male kids fed high concentrate diet. Small Rumin. Res. 98:98-101.
Stanišić, N., M. Žujović, Z. Tomić, N. Maksimović, Z. Bijelić, S. Ivanović, and N. Memiši. 2012. The Effects of Crossing Balkan and Saanen Goat Breeds on Carcass Traits and Certain Quality Parameters of Kid Meat. Ann. Anim. Sci. 12(1):53-62.
Stanisz, M., A. Ludwiczak, M. Pietrzak, and P. Ślósarz. 2015. The quality of meat and edible by-products from kids with different inheritance of Boer goat. Small Rumin. Res. 125:81-87.
Suzuki, A., N. Kojima, and Y. Ikeuchi. 1991. Carcass Composition and Meat Quality of Chinese Purebred and European x Chinese Crossbred Pigs. Meat sci. 29:31-41.
Tomović, V. M., M. R. Jokanović, J. V. Švarc-Gajić, I. M. Vasiljević, B. V. Šojić, S. B. Škaljac, I. I. Pihler, V. B. Simin, M. M. Krajinović, and M. M. Žujović. 2016. Physical characteristics and proximate and mineral composition of Saanen goat male kids meat from Vojvodina (Northern Serbia) as influenced by muscle. Small Rumin. Res. 145:44-52.
Valadares Filho, S., L. F. Costa e Silva, M. Gionbelli, P. Rotta, M. Marcondes, M. Chizzotti, and L. Prados. 2016. Nutrient Requirements of Zebu and Crossbred Cattle - BR-CORTE.
Webb, E., N. Casey, and L. Simela. 2005. Goat meat quality. Small Rumin. Res. 60:153-166.
Weston, A. R., R. W. Rogers, and T. G. Althen. 2002. Review: The Role of Collagen in Meat Tenderness. PAS. 18(2):107-111.
Zamiri, M. J., B. Eilami, and M. R. Kianzad. 2012. Effects of castration and fattening period on growth performance and carcass characteristics in Iranian goats. Small Rumin. Res. 104(1):55-61.
Żochowska, J., K. Lachowicz, L. Gajowiecki, M. Sobczak, M. Kotowicz, and A. Żych. 2005. Effects of carcass weight and muscle on texture, structure and myofibre characteristics of wild boar meat. Meat Sci. 71(2):244–248.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20260114)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊