跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 18:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:楊子瑩
研究生(外文):Yang, Tzu-Ting
論文名稱:以專利探勘技術探討專利強度及多樣性對公司財務績效之影響研究
論文名稱(外文):Using Patent Mining to Explore the Impacts of Patent Intensity and Diversity on the Enterprise’s Financial Performance
指導教授:陳灯能陳灯能引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen, Deng-Neng
口試委員:朱培宏賴佳瑜
口試委員(外文):Ju, Pei-HungLai, Chia-Yu
口試日期:2021-01-25
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東科技大學
系所名稱:資訊管理系所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:109
語文別:英文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:專利探勘專利多樣性專利強度財務績效
外文關鍵詞:Patent MiningPatent DiversityPatent IntensityFinancial Performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:128
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
專利的相關研究與討論一直都非常熱絡,公司在專利的申請數量上也是逐年升高,但多數的議題是針對專利佈局的決策處理對績效的影響,或是專利強度對企業績效的影響。而結合專利多樣性與專利強度來分析公司績效的相關研究卻鮮少人研究。本研究提出,以專利探勘技術從專利文件中提取特徵,計算的專利的多樣性及強度對財務績效的關聯與影響。公司的名單從德溫特公司發布的百大創新公司為主,並從美國專利與商標局與Google Patents獲取專利、Macrotrends網站獲取財務報表。將專利文本進行前處理後,使用TF-IDF技術提取專利特徵,並利用赫芬達爾指標與香濃多樣性指標計算題取出來的專利特徵的多樣化數據。使用前述所提到的特徵與財務報表中獲得的財務指標進行分析、建立模型。得到公司發表的專利與獲利之間是具有相關性,由此推斷財務績效與專利的緊密關係,能為未來提供探討企業專利佈局的方式及利用隱藏在專利中關鍵字預測企業發展趨勢之研究。
Patent-related research and discussions have always been very active. The number of patent applications by companies has increased yearly. However, many research topics is the impact of patenting strategy on performance or the impact of patent intensity on company performance. The goal of this study is to use patent mining to explore the impacts of patent diversity on enterprise finance performance. The selected companies are from the list of Derwent Top 100 Global Innovators 2020 by Clarivate Analytics, patents are from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and Google Patents, and the Financial Information is from the macrotrends website.
After pre-processing the patent text, we use TF-IDF to extract patent features and calculate the diversity data of patent characteristics by using Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) and Shannon's diversity index. Next, we analyze diversity data and financial indicators to build models. The patents are related to company profit, inferring the relationship between the company financial performance and patents. It can provide a way to explore the company's Patenting strategy, as well as using keywords hidden in patents to predict enterprise development trends.
摘要 I
Abstract III
謝誌 V
Table of Contents VI
List of Tables VIII
List of Figures IX
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature review 3
2.1 Patent 3
2.1.1 Patent value 5
2.1.2 Patent Mining 6
2.1.3 Patenting strategy 9
2.2 Diversity Index 11
2.2.1 Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 11
2.2.2 Shannon Diversity Index 11
2.3 Corporate Innovation and Finance 12
2.4 Financial Index 13
2.4.1 Revenue 13
2.4.2 Operating cash flow (OCF) 14
2.4.3 Return on assets (ROA) 14
2.4.4 Non-operating income and expense 14
2.4.5 Income from continuous operations 15
2.4.6 Shares outstanding 15
2.4.7 Basic EPS 15
3. Methodology 17
3.1 Data collection 18
3.2 Feature extraction 19
3.2.1 Patent intensity index 20
3.2.2 Patent diversity index 23
3.3 Missing 25
3.4 Modeling 26
4. Experiments and results 27
4.1 Descriptive Statistics 27
4.2 Revenue 31
4.3 OCF 34
4.4 ROA 37
4.5 Non-operating income and expense 38
4.6 Income from continuous 40
4.7 Shares outstanding 42
4.8 Basic EPS 44
5. Conclusion 47
5.1 Research result 47
5.2 Research contribution 48
5.3 Research limitations 49
6. References 50
Appendix 1. The Correlation Matrix of Variables (model: Y) 53
Appendix 2. The Correlation Matrix of Variables (model: Y+1) 56
Appendix 3. The Correlation Matrix of Variables (model: Y+2) 60
Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3-13.
Acharya, V., & Xu, Z. (2017). Financial dependence and innovation: The case of public versus private firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2), 223-243.
Acharya, V. V., & Subramanian, K. V. (2009). Bankruptcy codes and innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(12), 4949-4988.
Aristodemou, L., & Tietze, F. (2017). A literature review on the state-of-the-art on intellectual property analytics.
Atanassov, J., Nanda, V. K., & Seru, A. (2007). Finance and innovation: The case of publicly traded firms. Ross School of Business Paper(970).
Basberg, B. L. (1987). Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature. Research policy, 16(2-4), 131-141.
Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932-945.
Chang, K.-C., Chen, D.-Z., & Huang, M.-H. (2012). The relationships between the patent performance and corporation performance. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 131-139.
Chen, R. (2009). Design patent map visualization display. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(10), 12362-12374.
Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010). The relationship between a firm's patent quality and its market value—the case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 20-33.
Cronk, B. C. (2019). How to use SPSS®: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation. Routledge.
Fink, C., Khan, M., & Zhou, H. (2016). Exploring the worldwide patent surge. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(2), 114-142.
Fitzgerald, T., Balsmeier, B., Fleming, L., & Manso, G. (2019). Innovation search strategy and predictable returns. Management Science, forthcoming.
Gallini, N. T. (1992). Patent policy and costly imitation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 52-63.
Granstrand, O. (1999). The economics and management of intellectual property. Books.
Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2019). Indexes of patent value: a systematic literature review and classification. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1-20.
Hall, B. (2005). A note on the bias in herfindahl-type measures based on count data. Revue d'économie industrielle, 110(1), 149-156.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of economics, 16-38.
He, J., & Tian, X. (2018). Finance and corporate innovation: A survey. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 47(2), 165-212.
Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P.-H., & Li, D. (2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3), 632-654.
IBM. (2020). In SPSS Statistics.
Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The journal of industrial economics, 359-369.
Karki, M. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272.
Kim, Y. G., Suh, J. H., & Park, S. C. (2008). Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology. Expert systems with applications, 34(3), 1804-1812.
Lee, S., Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2009). An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach. Technovation, 29(6-7), 481-497.
Park, G., & Park, Y. (2006). On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 793-812.
Ramos, J. (2003). Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. Proceedings of the first instructional conference on machine learning,
Salton, G., Wong, A., & Yang, C.-S. (1975). A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613-620.
Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1985). Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During thePost-1950 Period (0898-2937).
WIPO. (2019). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2019.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20260131)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top