跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.210.83.132) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/22 21:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:彭歆茹
研究生(外文):Peng, Hsin-Ju
論文名稱:綠色創新能力、綠色關係能力與資源餘裕對創業機會辨識之影響-以市場動盪為調節變項
論文名稱(外文):The Influences of Green Innovative Capability, Green Relational Capability and Resource Slacks on Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition: The Moderating Role of Market Turbulence
指導教授:張敬珣張敬珣引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chang, Ching-Hsun
口試委員:張珈進楊立人
口試委員(外文):Chang, Chia-ChinYang, Li-Jen
口試日期:2021-06-11
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:科技應用與人力資源發展學系
學門:教育學門
學類:其他教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:95
中文關鍵詞:綠色創新能力綠色關係能力資源餘裕創業機會辨識市場動盪
外文關鍵詞:Green Innovative CapabilityGreen Relational CapabilityResource SlacksEntrepreneurial Opportunity RecognitionMarket Turbulence
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:131
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究以動態能力作為基礎,將綠色創新能力、綠色關係能力與資源餘裕作為前置變項,創業機會辨識作為結果變項,並以市場動盪作為調節變項。以組織層級的角度,試圖探討綠色創新能力、綠色關係能力與資源餘裕為企業創業機會的關聯性。
本研究針對臺灣製造業的負責人或高階主管採用隨機抽樣的方式,透過郵寄的方式發放紙本問卷 2039份,回收有效樣本共211份,並使用SPSS23及PROCESS統計軟體進行資料的分析。其研究結果顯示:(1)在三個前置變項中,綠色創新能力及資源餘裕對創業機會辨識具有正向影響;企業若能對於資源的運用較有餘裕,可以使企業更靈活的運用,藉由創新的方式重新整合或配置,辨識出新的市場機會的可能性也會隨之提升。然而,(2)市場動盪在綠色創新能力、綠色關係能力、資源餘裕與創業機會辨識之間並無顯著的調節效果。本研究對於企業提出以下建議:首先,企業藉由綠色創新能力可以在研發、製造、回收的過程中,使用低汙染、可回收的原料。其次,企業若能對於資源的運用較有餘裕,即可發掘市場機會,為創業提供更多的策略選擇,當綠色創新能力、資源餘裕越高,應能提升創業機會辨識。
This study is based on dynamic capabilities, tried to explore the positive effect of green innovative capability, green relational capability and resource slacks on entrepreneurial opportunity recognition, via the moderating role of market turbulence.
This study utilized random sampling and distributed the 2039 questionnaires in Taiwanese manufacturing companies. Respondents in this study are leaders or senior executives in Taiwan’s manufacturing companies. In total, 211 valid questionnaires were collected from manufacturing companies. This study utilized SPSS23 & PROCESS to verify the hypotheses. The results showed that: (1) Among the three constructs, green innovative capability and resource slacks had positive effect on entrepreneurial opportunity recognition; resource slacks let enterprises use flexibly and reintegrate or configure them in innovative ways, the entrepreneurial opportunity recognition will also increase. However, (2) market turbulence had no moderating effect among green innovative capability, green relational capability, resource slacks and the entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. We hope the research results are beneficial to companies, researchers, and future research as reference. First, enterprises can use low-polluting, recyclable raw materials during the process of R&D, manufacturing, and recycling by green innovative capability; Second, If enterprises have resource slacks, they can explore market opportunities and provide more strategic choices for entrepreneurship. When the green innovative capability and resource slacks are higher, entrepreneurial opportunity recognition will be higher.
第一章 緒 論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 5
第三節 名詞解釋 6

第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 動態能力 7
第二節 綠色創新能力 10
第三節 綠色關係能力 15
第四節 資源餘裕 19
第五節 創業機會辨識 21
第六節 市場動盪 23
第七節 各變項之相關性 25

第三章 研究設計與實施 31
第一節 研究架構 31
第二節 研究假設 32
第三節 研究對象 33
第四節 研究法 34
第五節 研究工具 35
第六節 資料處理與分析 41
第七節 研究程序 43

第四章 研究結果 45
第一節 描述性統計分析 45
第二節 項目分析 49
第三節 迴歸分析 55
第四節 差異性分析 66

第五章 結論與建議 69
第一節 研究結論 69
第二節 管理意涵 73
第三節 研究貢獻 78
第四節 研究限制與建議 80

參考文獻 83
一、中文部份 83
二、外文部份 83
附錄一 研究問卷 93
李明譯(2009年2月1日)。贏在市場動盪時。哈佛商業評論。2009年2月號(逆境創優勢)。檢自:https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0001004.html
周頌宜(2020年8月31日)。一次讀懂破壞式創新。經理人月刊。第190期。檢自:https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/60289
莊順斌(2016)。企業綠化、環境企業社會責任對環境績效及企業競爭力影響之研究:以綠色IT資本為中介變項。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系博士論文,台北市。
黃暖雲(2019年4月24日)。全球創業觀察—2018/19全球創業觀察。臺北產經資訊網。檢自:https://www.taipeiecon.taipei/article_cont.aspx?MSid=1035157425303027542&MmmID=1205&CatID=707755502234500202
謝如梅、劉常勇(2009)。創新機會辨識:創業警覺能力、先前知識與資訊獲取之關聯性研究。組織與管理,2(2),77-108。
Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912-4917.
Amui, L. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Kannan, D. (2017). Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 308-322.
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105-123.
Arthurs, J. D., & Busenitz, L. W. (2006). Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 195-215.
Ardyan, E., Nurtantiono, A., Istiyanto, B., & Rahmawan, G. (2017). Green innovation capability as driver of sustainable competitive advantages and smes marketing performance. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(8), 1114-1122.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bartel, C. A., & Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science, 20(1), 107-117.
Beske, P., Land, A., & Seuring, S. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 131-143.
Çakar, N. D., & Ertürk, A. (2010). Comparing innovation capability of small and medium-sized enterprises: Examining the effects of organizational culture and empowerment. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(3), 325-359.
Chandra, Y., Styles, C., & Wilkinson, I. (2009). The recognition of first time international entrepreneurial opportunities: Evidence from firms in knowledge-based industries. International Marketing Review, 26(1), 30-61.
Chen, J., & Liu, L. (2020). Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: The mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 119, 151-162.
Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
Choi, D. (2012). Supply chain governance mechanisms, green supply chain management, and organizational performance. ETD collection for University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
Collins, J. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2006). Leveraging tacit knowledge in alliances: The importance of using relational capabilities to build and leverage relational capital. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(3), 147-167.
Cousins, P. D., Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2011). Breakthrough scanning, supplier knowledge exchange, and new product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 930-942.
Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability-Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506.
Day, G. S. (2000). Managing market relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 24-30.
De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Voronov, M. (2018). Sustainability in the Face of Institutional Adversity: Market Turbulence, Network Embeddedness, and Innovative Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 437-455.
De Koning, A., & Muzyka, D. (1999). Conceptualising opportunity as a socio-cognitive process. Stockholm:INSEAD.
Donaldson, L., 2001. The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333-349.
El-Kassar, A.-N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: the influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 483-498.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
Fitjar, R. D., Gjelsvik, M., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). The combined impact of managerial and relational capabilities on innovation in firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(5-6), 500-520.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 328–388.
Foster, C., & Green, K. (2000). Greening the innovation process. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(5), 287-303.
George, G. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661-676.
Hagedoorn, J. (1996). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 883-896.
Huang, S. Z., Chau, K. Y., Chien, F., & Shen, H. (2020). The impact of startups' dual learning on their green innovation capability: The effects of business executives' environmental awareness and environmental regulations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16).
Hurley, R., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42 – 54.
Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429-438.
Indriastuti, H. (2019). Entrepreneurial innovativeness, relational capabilities, and value co-creation to enhance marketing performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 181-188.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124-141.
Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International journal of Innovation Management, 5(03), 377-400.
Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(1), 1-26.
Li, S., Qiao, J., Cui, H., & Wang, S. (2020). Realizing the environmental benefits of proactive environmental strategy: The roles of green supply chain integration and relational capability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7).
Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Chen, C. C. (2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: An empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359.
Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2009, August). The positive effect of green relationship learning on green innovation performance: the mediation effect of corporate environmental ethics. In PICMET'09-2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 2341-2348). IEEE.
Lin, Y., Tseng, M. L., Chen, C. C., & Chiu, A. S. F. (2011). Positioning strategic competitiveness of green business innovation capabilities using hybrid method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1839-1849.
Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317-338.
Marvel, M. R., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2007). Technology entrepreneurs’ human capital and its effects on innovation radicalness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 807-828.
Mary George, N., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350.
Melander, L. (2018). Customer and Supplier Collaboration in Green Product Innovation: External and Internal Capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(6), 677-693.
Mellett, S., Kelliher, F., & Harrington, D. (2018). Network-facilitated green innovation capability development in micro-firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(6), 1004-1024.
Ozgen, E., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 174-192.
Park, J. S. (2005). Opportunity recognition and product innovation in entrepreneurial hi-tech start-ups: A new perspective and supporting case study. Technovation, 25(7), 739-752.
Paulraj, A., Lado, A. A., & Chen, I. J. (2008). Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 45-64.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(4), 30-41.
Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. The Dynamics of the eco-efficient economy: environmental regulation and ompetitive advantage, 33.
Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 3(1), 44-55.
Santos-Vijande, M. L., & Álvarez-González, L. I. (2007). Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: The moderating role of market turbulence. Technovation, 27(9), 514-532.
Saraf, N., Langdon, C. S., & Gosain, S. (2007). IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 320-339
Saunila, M., Pekkola, S., & Ukko, J. (2014). The relationship between innovation capability and performance: The moderating effect of measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(2), 234-249.
Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review. R and D Management, 42(2), 180-192.
Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2003). The theory of economic development. In Joseph Alois Schumpeter (pp. 61-116): Springer.
Selnes, F., & Sallis, J. (2003). Promoting relationship learning. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 80-95.
Shang, K. C., Chen, S. Y., Ye, K. D. ve Yu, H. Y. (2019). Green dynamic capabilities - the necessity between gren intellectual capital and firm performance: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing sector. Corporate Management Review, 39(2), 37-67.
Short, J. C., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Shook, C. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). The concept of "Opportunity" in entrepreneurship research: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 36(1), 40-65.
Smirnova, M., Naudé, P., Henneberg, S. C., Mouzas, S., & Kouchtch, S. P. (2011). The impact of market orientation on the development of relational capabilities and performance outcomes: The case of Russian industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(1), 44-53.
Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. L. (2018). Slack resources, exploratory and exploitative innovation and the performance of small technology-based firms at incubators. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1213-1231.
Sok, P., & O’Cass, A. (2015). Achieving service quality through service innovation exploration-exploitation: The critical role of employee empowerment and slack resources. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(2), 137-149.
Sun, Y., Du, S., & Ding, Y. (2020). The relationship between slack resources, resource bricolage, and entrepreneurial opportunity identification - Based on resource opportunity perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3).
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M. M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 77-94.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Troilo, G., De Luca, L. M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2014). More innovation with less? A strategic contingency view of slack resources, information search, and radical innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 259-277.
Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., & Paeleman, I. (2013). The relationship between slack resources and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: The role of venture capital and angel investors. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1070-1096.
Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., & Zahra, S. A. (2017). Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), 1305-1326.
Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 147-164.
Wang, G., Dou, W., Zhu, W., & Zhou, N. (2015). The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance: The moderating role of market turbulence. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1928-1936.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
Yang, K. P., Chou, C., & Chiu, Y. J. (2014). How unlearning affects radical innovation: The dynamics of social capital and slack resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 152-163.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265-289.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
1. 如何落實永續發展?以整合型科技接受模型探討企業數位學習之使用意圖與學習成效
2. 永續導向對綠色價值共創行為之影響─以供應商與購買者之共創態度為中介變項
3. 員工知覺主管領導風格、獎勵機制對員工綠色創造力影響之研究
4. 運用知識翻新搭配6E教學策略於機器人實作課程對國中生之學習成效與行為模式之研究
5. 探討環境偵測能力與吸收能力對人工智慧技術創新績效之影響—以人工智慧焦慮為中介
6. 組織創意氛圍對綠色開放式創新之影響─以組織技術調適能力為中介變項
7. 感受當責對於工作敬業度及主動行為影響之研究-以組織氣候、獲取資源為調節變項
8. 領導風格對於綠色創新績效影響之研究:以綠色開放式創新活動為中介變項
9. 雙面靈活性與組織敏捷性對數位創新之影響─以數位轉型科技準備度為中介變項
10. 探討組織資源餘裕與環境偵測能力對數位轉型科技準備度之影響-以組織數位轉型訓練投入度為中介變項
11. 智慧資本、知覺相似性對於綠色創新績效影響之研究:以知識創造能力為中介變項
12. 企業社會責任及綠色創新對於永續績效之影響-以金融業為例
13. 如何透過綠色創新強化可持續發展績效之研究
14. 數位轉型能耐、敏捷式綠色學習、敏捷式綠色創新 與企業永續績效關聯性之研究 - 以台灣地區製造業為例
15. 以資源基礎觀點探討綠色創新促進水電產業的永續發展