跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(34.204.180.223) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/03 22:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭姵均
研究生(外文):Cheng, Pei-Chun
論文名稱:重度聽損高等教育學生與聽常同儕互動之經驗探究
論文名稱(外文):Exploring Interaction Between Students with Severe Hearing Loss in Higher Education and Their Hearing Peers
指導教授:劉秀丹劉秀丹引用關係
指導教授(外文):Liu, Hsiu-Tan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:特殊教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:特殊教育學類
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:125
中文關鍵詞:重度聽損互動自我介紹訪談助聽輔具環境談話者
外文關鍵詞:Severe hearing lossInteractSelf-introductionInterviewHearing aidsEnvironmentSpeaker
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:8
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
雖然重度聽損孩子能有很好的說話表現,甚至可以通過互動評量的標準化測驗,得到好的評量結果;但在生活上,孩子的聽力和言語上問題仍然存在。例如在人工耳蝸或助聽器的幫助下聽損兒童具備良好的說話能力,可是他們在社交互動中仍然會遇到很多挫折。
研究者為要深入了解重度聽損高等教育學生對於與聽常同儕互動的情形,比如:自我介紹會否主動提出聽損問題、對互動的滿意情形和正負向經驗,以使本研究進步探討其可能的相關因素以及蒐集互動的因應策略。本研究以10位大台北地區重度聽損高等教育學生為對象,採用一對一的半結構式深度訪談法邀請重度聽損高等教育學生分享其與聽常同儕互動的經驗,並以主題分析法歸納成不同的主題。
結果,研究者發現大部分重度聽損生對主動提及聽損的問題是各有不同的作法;在正向經驗方面,重度聽損生從同學主動提出願意幫忙、歡迎詢問的意願以及稱讚他人感受到正向的支持力量等;在負向經驗方面,大部分的經驗可以總括於因為聽不清楚而造成的,如:一直聽不懂對方在說什麼、雞同鴨講、無法玩得開心等。本研究結果顯示負向經驗多於正向經驗,其對人際互動是有影響的。影響與聽常同儕互動的相關因素大致分為四大類,乃是「助聽輔具」、「環境」、「談話者」以及「重度聽損生」。比如:「助聽輔具」的助力有限且昂貴;「環境」的噪音干擾;「談話者」的說話方式、人數、位置以及態度,說話方式像是面對面、講慢點以及聲音適中等。至於三人以上的團體互動對重度聽損生來說是有不方便之處、談話者須位於重度聽損生的優耳一側以便較能清楚的處理聲音、談話者若表現出不耐煩,則可能會影響到重度聽損生的互動心理,不會再提出重複說的請求。
「重度聽損生」的部分,又分為四方面,第一是「心理建設」,有的重度聽損生是因為在啟聰學校以接觸聽損同學為主,故不知如何與聽常同儕互動,也有的是因為對方的情緒是容易受到對方覺得不耐煩而受到影響等。第二是「互動能力」,有的重度聽損生覺得自己的互動能力不夠,無法主動去和聽常同儕互動,第三是因為重度聽損生處理聲音的方式就是「先消化音韻後才思考語音意涵」,最後是遇到共同困難的是「無法同時聽和思考」。本研究也蒐集重度聽損生分享互動的使用預防策略和因應策略,也將本研究的結果進行綜合討論和省思,並提出研究限制與建議。
Although children with severe hearing loss can have good speaking performance, and can even get good evaluation results through standardized tests of interactive evaluation; but in life, the children’s hearing and speech problems still exist. For example, with the help of cochlear implants or hearing aids, children with severe hearing loss have good speaking skills, but they still encounter many frustrations in social interaction.
In order to further understand the interaction between students with severe hearing loss in higher education and their peers, such as whether self-introduction would actively raise the problem of hearing loss, their satisfaction with the interaction and their positive and negative experiences, the researchers made progress in this study to explore the possible related factors and to collect the coping strategies for interaction. In this study, ten students with severe hearing loss in higher education in The Greater Taipei area were invited to share their experiences of interaction with their peers by using a semi-structured one-to-one in-depth interview method, and the subjects were summarized into different topics by subject analysis.
As a result, the researchers found that the majority of respondents had different approaches to the active mention of hearing loss. In terms of positive experiences, students with severe hearing loss felt positive support from their classmates' willingness to help, willingness to welcome inquiries, and praise others. In terms of negative experiences, most of the experiences can be summarized as the result of not being able to hear clearly, such as not being able to understand what the other person is saying, apples and oranges, not being able to have fun, etc. The results of this study show that the negative experience is more than the positive experience, which has an impact on interpersonal interaction. There are four categories of related factors that influence peer interaction with listeners, namely "hearing aids ", "environment", "speaker" and "student with severe hearing loss". For example, "hearing aids " are limited and expensive. Noise interference from the "environment"; The manner, number, location, and attitude of the conversationalist, such as speaking face to face, speaking slowly, and speaking in a moderate voice.
As for the group interaction of more than three people, it is inconvenient for the student with severe hearing loss. The speaker should be located on the superior ear side of the severe hearing loss person so as to process the voice more clearly. If the speaker shows impatience, it may affect the interaction psychology of the student with severe hearing loss and will not make repeated requests. As for the group interaction of more than three people, it is inconvenient for these students with severe hearing loss. The speaker should be located on the superior ear side of these students with severe hearing loss so that they can process the sound more clearly. If the speaker shows impatience, it may affect the interactive psychology of the student with severe hearing loss and they will not make repeated requests.
The " student with severe hearing loss " part is divided into four aspects. The first is "psychological construction". Some students with severe hearing loss do not know how to interact with their hearing peers because they are mainly in contact with hearing loss students in the school for the Deaf. Some students with severe hearing loss are easily affected by the other's impatience. The second is "interaction ability". Some students with severe hearing loss think that their interaction ability is not enough to actively interact with their peers. The third reason is that the student with severe hearing loss process the sound by "digesting the sound before thinking about the phonetic meaning", and the last one is the common difficulty that they cannot listen and think at the same time. This study also collects the respondents' interactive use prevention strategies and coping strategies. Then, the researchers will conduct a comprehensive discussion and reflection on the research results and put forward research limitations and suggestions.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 4

第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 重度聽損的內涵與特質 6
第二節 聽損學生與聽常同儕的互動 9
第三節 協助聽損生有效互動的策略 23

第三章 研究方法 28
第一節 研究理念 28
第二節 研究參與者 30
第三節 研究工具 35
第四節 研究程序 42
第五節 資料處理與分析 44
第六節 研究倫理的重視 46

第四章 研究結果與討論 47
第一節 與聽常同儕間的互動 47
第二節 與聽常同儕互動困難的相關因素 63
第三節 互動困難的預防及因應策略 69

第五章 討論與反思 82
第一節 綜合討論 82
第二節 研究者的省思 95

第六章 結論與建議 99
第一節 研究結論 99
第二節 研究限制與建議 101

參考文獻 103
中文部份 103
英文部份 107


附錄 112
附錄一 訪談邀請函 112
附錄二 研究參與者知情同意書 113
附錄三 正式訪談大綱(含個人基本資料 118
附錄四 合作意向書 123
附錄五 省思日誌 125
中文部分
王文科、王智弘(2010)質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。
王天苗、邱上真、莊妙芬、鄭麗月、葉瓊華、孫淑柔、鄒啟蓉(1997)。特殊教育法修正草案評估報告。台北市:立法院立法諮詢中心。
朱尹安(2011)。臺北市特殊教育相關專業人員服務模式初探。特殊教育季刊,120,45-52。
江源泉(2006)。電腦視覺回饋在國中聽障生學習國字聲調書寫上的應用。特殊教育研究學刊,30,95-111。
江源泉、楊淑惠、姚甸京(2004)。聲場調頻系統與國內教室聽環境的改善。特殊教育研究學刊,27,93-111。
李育逢(2016)。[同步聽打] 落實聽覺障礙學生資訊平權的理想與實踐-以國立臺灣大學畢業典禮為例。學生事務與輔導,55(2),66-72。
李威霆、吳俊良、陳小娟、楊惠美(2011)。人工耳蝸植入兒童在噪音環境中語音聽取表現之探討。臺灣耳鼻喉頭頸外科雜誌,45(2),72-78。
李碧真(1992)。國民中學學生對對聽覺障礙學生接納態度之研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,彰化。
李毓貞(2006)。聽覺障礙學生的社會心理問題與介入。雄中學報,9,165-172。
林易佐(2017)。聽障學習者資訊需求與資訊尋求行為之研究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學系碩士論文,臺北。
林曉萱(2015)。融合教育環境中聽障幼兒同儕互動行為之研究(未出版)。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺南。
林岳慶(2015)。啟聰學校及普通學校高中職聽障生與聽常同儕之友誼經驗研究(未出版)。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士在職專班論文,臺南。
林真平、陳靜江(2003)。身心障礙大學生壓力因應歷程之探討。東臺灣特殊教育學報,5,143-162。
林寶貴(2004)。溝通障礙:理論與實務。臺北:心理。
林寶貴(1994)。聽覺障礙教育與復健。臺北:五南。
林寶貴、錡寶香(1990)。聽覺障礙學生升學輔導與安置措施之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育叢書第八十三輯。
吳哲民、鄒詠婷(2015)。人工電子耳綜論。臺灣耳鼻喉頭頸外科雜誌,50(4),197-210。
吳靖國(2006)。「靠」在哪裡與「看」到什麼—學習乃發生在「視域交融」之中。海洋鐸聲,36,1-2。
吳美萩(2006)。追求超越的旅程-聽障碩博士之求學歷程(未出版)。臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系學位碩士論文,臺北。
柯欣蓉(2009)。聽覺障礙幼兒與聽常同儕互動之主動發起與回應行為研究(未出版)。臺北市立教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。
教育部特殊教育通報網(2019)。年度特教統計。2019年11月1日,取自: https://www.set.edu.tw/actclass/fileshare/default.asp
莊雅筑(2009)。國立台南啟聰學校國高中聽覺障礙學生學習動機與學習態度之研究(未出版)。臺東大學進修部暑期特殊教育 學系碩士論文,臺東。
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課:揚帆再訪之旅。麗文文化。
徐西森、連廷嘉、陳仙子和劉雅瑩(2002)。人際關係的理論與實務。心理。
郭怡廷(2011)。聽覺障礙者大學生活中的同儕關係(未出版)。輔仁大學社會工作學系碩士論文,臺北。
陳小娟、邢敏華(譯)(2004)。失聰者:心理、教育及社會轉變中的觀點(原作者:J.F.Andrews,l.W.Leigh&M.T.Weiner)。心理。
翁素珍、洪儷瑜、林寶貴(2006)。聽障違抗兒童之溝通互動能力研究。特殊教育研究學刊,30,155-180。
畢恆達(1995)。生活經驗研究的反省:詮釋學的觀點。本土心理學研究,4,224-259。
游政諺、陳孝平(2015)。就醫路關卡多:成年聽覺障礙者就醫經驗之研究。臺灣社會福利學刊,12(2),145-184。
曾葆賢(2004)。發展遲緩幼兒在融合教育學習區之同儕互動個案研究(未出版)。臺北市立師範學院身心障礙教育學系碩士論文,台北。
黃秀文(2016)。質性研究:典範與實務。臺北:華騰文化。
黃婷婷(2005)。「永不止息的自我征戰」聽障者/聾人求學經驗之敘說研究(未出版)。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文,臺北。
張蓓莉(2003)。聽覺障礙學生學習特質與需求。聽障教育期刊,2,7-17。
張蓓莉(1985)。聽覺障礙學生的情緒問題。特殊教育季刊,15,6-9。
游士龍(2020)。基於唇部特徵點座標差之中文唇語識別系統(未出版)。國立成功大學工程科學系學位論文,臺南。
鈕文英(2017)。質性研究方法與論文寫作二版。臺北:雙葉書廊。
詹詩儀(2019)。喪親兒童的失落經驗研究-以國小四~六年級經歷喪親事件的成人為例= A Study of Loss Experience of Bereaved Children: Focusing on Adults who have Lost Parents in their Fourth to Sixth Grades of the Elementary School.台灣神學研究學院。
劉俊榮(2005)。聽損長者聽覺復健方案及其成效評估之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文,彰化市。
劉樹玉(2018)。行為聽力檢查。載於陳小娟、李國熙、李宗憲、羅意琪、劉樹玉、羅敦信…黃仲鋒,聽覺障礙(3-9-3-10頁)。臺北:華騰文化。
劉庭君(2018)。聽障者的友誼發展經驗(未出版)。靜宜大學社會工作與兒童少年福利學系碩士論文,台中市。
劉俊榮等人(譯)(2016)。聽能復健導論(原作者:Nancy Tye-Murray)。臺北:華騰文化。(原著出版年:2014)。
管美玲、邱文貞、張憶萍(2016)。聽見問題:聽覺損傷兒童父母常見的問題與解答。臺北:心理。
劉忠讓(2014)。大專聽障生人際行為與生活品質之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學復健諮商學系碩士論文,臺北市。
劉貴傑(2005)。詮釋學及其教育意涵。區域人文社會學報,8,1-27。
翟宗悌(2018)。啟聰學校聾/聽障高中生的離校準備。特殊教育季刊,147,13-24。
衛生福利部(2018年5月9日)。身心障礙者鑑定作業辦法第五條附表二.pdf【身心障礙者鑑定作業辦法】。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DONAHC/cp-1032-5186-104.html
蕭金土(2000)。聽覺障礙。載於許天威、徐享良、張勝成主編,新特殊教育通論,229-247。臺北:五南。
賴曉楓、林桂如(2012)。聽覺障礙學童之對話修補技巧與教學策略探討。國小特殊教育,54,49-60。
蘇鈺婷(2017)。以噪音分類為基礎之深度學習噪音消除法提升人工電子耳使用者之語音理解度表現(未出版)。臺灣師範大學機電工程學系學位碩士論文,臺北。
謝美英(1998)。青少年同儕關係與倫理。訓育研究,37(3),55-60。
羅珮芳、李芃娟、邱柏升(2015)。個別式調頻系統對一名國小多重障礙學生專注行為之介入成效。特殊教育季刊,134,31-43。

英文部分
Adkins, C. S. (2020). The Transition Experiences of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students Into Postsecondary Education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Murray State University, Murray, KY.
Allen, D., Mondragon, F., & Horn, J. V. (1999). Process and patterns of dialog between deaf and hearing siblings during play. Unpublished doctor dissertation, the University of British Columbia. From https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/Degree-of-Hearing-Loss/
Anderson, K. L., & Arnoldi, K. A. (2011). Building skills for success in the fast-paced classroom optimizing achievement for students with hearing loss. Butte, OR: Butte Publications.
Antia, S. D., & Kreimeyer, K. H. (2003). Peer interactions of deaf and hard of hearing children. Oxford handbook of Deaf studies,Language, and Education, 1, 164-176.
Antia, S. D., & Dittillo, D. A. (1998). A comparison of the peer social behavior of children who are deaf/hard of hearing and hearing. Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19(2), 1-10.
Antia, S. D., & Kreimeyer, K. H. (1996). Social interaction and acceptance of deaf or hard-of-hearing children and their peers: A comparison of social-skills and familiarity-based interventions. Volta Review, 98(4), 157-180.
Bench, R. J. (1992). Communication skills in hearing-impaired children. London: Whurr.
Blamey, P. J., Sarant, J. Z., Paatsch, L. E., Barry, J. G., Bow, C. P., Wales, R. J., . . .Tooher, R. (2001). Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
Bobzien, J., Richels, C., Raver, S. A., Hester, P., Browning, E., & Morin, L. (2013). An observational study of social communication skills in eight preschoolers with and without hearing loss during cooperative play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5), 339-346.
Brown, P. M., Remine, M. D., Prescott, S. J., & Rickards, F. W. (2000). Social interactions of preschoolers with and without impaired hearing in integrated kindergarten. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(3), 200-211.
Burger, F. (1977). Facilitating Classroom Listening. London: Taylor & Francis. Ltd. Cappelli M, Daniels T, Durieux-Smith A, McGrath PJ, Neuss D. (1995). Social development of children with hearing impairments who are integrated into general education classrooms. The Volta Review. 1995; 97: 197-208.
Christiansen J. B. Leigh I. W. (2002). Cochlear implants in children: Ethics and Choices. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Ciocci, S. J., & Baran, J. (1998). The use of conversational repair strategies by children who are deaf. Am Ann Deaf. 143(3), 235-245.
DeLuzio, J., & Girolametto, L. (2011). Peer interactions of preschool children with and without hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
Hadley, W. M. (2011). College students with disabilities: A student development perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 154(8), 77-81.
Halle, J., Brady, N. C., & Drasgow, E. (2004). Enhancing socially adaptive communicative repairs of beginning communicators with disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.
Jeanes, R. C., Nienhuys, T. G., & Rickards, F. W. (2000). The pragmatic skills of profoundly deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(3), 237-247.
Keating, E., & Mirus, G. (2003). Examining interactions across language modalities: Deaf children and hearing peers at school. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 34(2), 115-135.
Kelman, C. A., & Branco, A. U. (2009). (Meta) Communication strategies in inclusive classes for deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(4), 371-381.
Kirk, S., Gallagher, M., & Anastasiow, N. (2000). Educating Exceptional Children Houghton Mifflin Company. USA: Wadsworth Pub.
Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Marschark, M., Convertino, C. M., Macias, G., Monikowski, C. M., Sapere, P., & Seewagen, R. (2007). Understanding communication among deaf students who sign and speak: A trivial pursuit? American Annals of the Deaf, 152(4), 415-424.
Milsom, A., & Hartley, M. T. (2005). Assisting students with learning disabilities transitioning to college: what school counselors should know, Professional School Counseling, 8(5), 436-441.
Minnett, A., Clark, K., & Wilson, G. (1994). Play behavior and communication between deaf and hard of hearing children and their hearing peers in an integrated preschool. American Annals of the Deaf, 139(4), 420-429.
Punch, R., & Hyde, M. (2011). Social participation of children and adolescents with cochlear implants: A qualitative analysis of parent, teacher, and child interviews. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(4), 474-493.
Samuelsson, S., & Ronnberg, J. (1993). Implicit and explicit use of scripted constraints in lip-reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 201-233.
Spencer, P. E. (1993). Communication behaviors of infants with hearing loss and their hearing mothers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(2), 311-321.
Spilton, D., & Lee, L. C. (1977). Some determinants of effective communication in four-year-olds. Child Development, 968-977.
Stinson, M., & Antia, S. (1999). Considerations in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing students in inclusive settings. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 4(3), 163-175.
Stinson, M., & Liu, Y. (1999). Participation of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in classes with hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4(3), 191-202.
Ten Hulzen, R. D., & Fabry, D. A. (2020). Impact of Hearing Loss and Universal Face Masking in the COVID-19 Era. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 95(10), 2069-2072.
Wauters, L. N., & Knoors, H. (2007). Social integration of deaf children in inclusive settings. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(1), 21-36.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top