跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.173) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/10 04:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張泰銓
研究生(外文):Thai-Tsuan Chang
論文名稱:覺知父母對努力或成績的特定教養組型與台灣青少年的適應:子女解讀所扮演的角色
論文名稱(外文):Perceived Effort- and Academic Grade-Related Parenting Profiles and Taiwanese Adolescent’s Adjustment: The Role of Children’s Interpretation
指導教授:雷庚玲雷庚玲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Keng-Ling Lay
口試委員:朱瑞玲趙儀珊林文瑛劉奕蘭
口試委員(外文):Ruey-Ling ChuYee-San TeohWen-Ying LinYih-Lan Liu
口試日期:2021-07-12
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:心理學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:115
中文關鍵詞:努力成績信念取向教養實作個體中心取向對教養實作的解讀
外文關鍵詞:academic gradebelief-oriented parenting practiceeffortinterpretation to parenting practiceperson-centered approach
DOI:10.6342/NTU202102384
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:538
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:111
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究從動態系統取向的角度思考,根據儒家文化對於「努力」的觀點、子女學業成就的受影響對象、及其他西方成就動機理論,一方面以個體中心取向分別找出台灣青少年所覺知其父母在面對子女不努力與成績不佳時的信念取向教養實作組型,並分別探討不同的教養組型與青少年適應的關係;另一方面,則透過檢驗青少年對特定教養實作的不同解讀方式對前述教養組型與青少年適應關係的調節效果,以凸顯在過去親子互動關係或教養研究中較被忽略的青少年主體性。總共有大台北地區724名國中七年級或八年級學生以及835位國中七年級或八年級學生之父母進行問卷填寫。實際測量概念包括:青少年父母所抱持之努力與學業成就相關信念、青少年覺知該父母認為該青少年「不努力」及「成績不佳」時的信念取向教養實作、青少年對前述各教養實作的解讀方式、及青少年自陳之認知、情緒,行為面向之適應。潛在類別分析結果指出,青少年所覺知之父母認為青少年「不努力」時的教養組型可分為四種,青少年覺知父母認為青少年「成績不佳」時的教養組型也可分為四種。不同努力教養組型在父母努力信念上及青少年適應上有所差異,不同成績教養組型在父母學業成就信念上及青少年適應上也有所差異。不僅於此,青少年的努力信念在不同努力教養組型間的差異樣貌,還會因青少年對特定「儒家努力信念取向教養實作」採取之特定解讀方式而有所不同。本研究將對所辦認出之信念取向教養組型及青少年解讀的意涵進行討論。
From the perspective of dynamic system approaches, this study investigated effort- and academic grade- related belief-oriented parenting practices perceived by Taiwanese adolescents and adolescent’s interpretation to the parenting practices. The belief-oriented parenting practices were based on Confucian view about effort, highlighted target person (adolescent or parent) relevant to adolescent’s academic achievement, and Western theories in the field of academic motivation such as self-determination theory and growth mindset theory. The person-centered approach was adopted to separately identify potential groups characterized by different profiles of effort-related belief-oriented parenting practices and potential groups with different profiles of academic grade-related belief-oriented parenting practices. Between-group differences of effort-related parenting profiles and between-group differences of grade-related parenting profiles in adolescents’ adjustments were then investigated. Moderating effects of adolescent’s interpretation for specific parenting practice on the aforementioned relation between effort-related / academic grade-related parenting profiles and adolescent’s adjustment were further explored. A total of 724 seventh- and eighth- graders and 835 parents of seventh- and eighth- graders in the great Taipei area participated this study. These adolescents reported their perceptions about one of their parents’ parenting practices when their parents had thought the adolescents did not study hard or got bad grades in school. They also reported their interpretation to each of the aforementioned effort- and academic grade- related belief-oriented parenting practices as well as their adjustment. Parents participating this study filled out questionnaires about their beliefs toward effort and children’s academic achievement. The results revealed that four profiles of effort-related parenting practices and four profiles of academic grade-related parenting practices emerged. The effort-related parenting profiles differed in not only parent’s effort-related beliefs but also adolescent’s adjustment. Similarly, the academic grade-related parenting profiles differed in not only parent’s academic achievement-related beliefs but also adolescent’s adjustment. Moreover, adolescent’s interpretation toward specific parenting practices moderated the relations between effort-related parenting profiles and adolescent’s effort-related beliefs. Implications of the emerged effort- and academic grade-related belief-oriented parenting practices were discussed.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 父母的努力信念:美德觀、角色義務觀、常規與道德信念 3
第二節 父母對子女學業成就之信念:關乎子女未來與關乎父母自我價值 6
第三節 父母教養實作與青少年學習適應:信念取向之教養實作 10
第四節 青少年對父母教養實作的解讀 16
第五節 以個體中心取向探討教養實作 21
第六節 研究目標 24
第二章 研究方法 29
第一節 研究參與者 29
第二節 研究程序 29
第三節 研究工具 30
第四節 分析方法 36
第三章 研究結果 41
第一節 青少年覺知之父母努力與成績教養組型 41
第二節 不同父母教養組型背後的父母信念差異 46
第三節 不同父母教養組型下青少年的學習適應 50
第四節 青少年對父母信念取向教養實作之解讀對不同父母教養組型下青少年的適應的調節效果 53
第四章 討論 63
第一節 青少年覺知父母努力教養組型與父母的努力信念及青少年的適應的關係 64
第二節 青少年覺知父母成績教養組型與父母的學業成就信念及青少年的適應的關係 68
第三節 努力議題與成績議題下父母教養實作的差異性 72
第四節 研究限制與未來展望 73
參考文獻 77
附錄 91
王冠樺(2018):《父母努力信念對兒童學習投入之預測效果:以兒童知覺父母與自身努力信念為中介》(未出版之碩士論文)。國立清華大學學習科學與科技研究所,台灣。
王震武(2002):〈升學主義的成因及其社會心理基礎-一個歷史觀察〉。《本土心理學研究》,17,3-65。https://doi.org/10.6254/2002.17.3
王德睦、陳宇嘉、張維安(1986):〈教育結構變遷與教育機會均等〉。見瞿海源、章英華(主編):《台灣社會與文化變遷(上冊)》,353-378。中央研究院民族學研究所。
吳明燁(2016):《父母難為:臺灣青少年教養的社會學分析》。台灣:五南。
林文瑛(2003):〈教養觀背後的人性觀-以能力觀為例〉。《本土心理學研究》,20,253-293。https://doi:10.6254/2003.20.253
林文瑛、王震武(1995):《分流教育的社會效果分析》(AB10)。行政院教育改革審議委員會。
章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996):《教育分流與社會經濟地位——兼論:對技職教育改革的政策意涵》(AB09)。行政院教育改革審議委員會。
許佩賢(2012):《太陽旗下的魔法學校 : 日治台灣新式教育的誕生》。台灣:東村。
許佩賢(2015):《殖民地台湾における近代教育の鏡像 : 一九三〇年代臺灣的教育與社會》。台灣:衛城。
許詩淇、黃囇莉(2009):〈天下無不是的父母?― 華人父母角色義務對親子衝突與親子關係的影響〉。《中華心理學刊》,51,295-317。https://doi.org/10.6129/cjp.2009.5103.02
陳怡群、黃惠玲、趙家琛(2009):《阿肯巴克實證衡鑑系統》。台灣:心理。
陳舜文、魏嘉瑩(2013):〈大學生學習動機之「雙因素模式」:學業認同與角色認同之功能〉。《中華心理學刊》,55,41-55。https://doi.org/10.6129/ CJP.20120717
張泰銓、雷庚玲(2018):〈台灣青少年是否認為努力與學業成就關乎道德?〉。《中華心理學刊》,60,151-172。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.201809_60(3).0001
傅仰止(2016):台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2015第七期第一次:綜合問卷組(C00315_1)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
黃春木(2007):《臺灣社會升學主義的發展與解決對策 (1945-2007) 》(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育系,台灣。
駒込武(Komagome, T., 2019):《「臺灣人的學校」之夢 : 從世界史的視角看日本的臺灣殖民統治 》( 世界史のなかの台湾植民地支配 : 台南長老教中学校からの視座,蘇碩斌、許佩賢、林詩庭譯)。台灣:臺大出版中心。
瞿海源(2003):〈追求高教育成就 ─ 清代及日據時期臺灣教育制度與價值的分析〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》,3,1-39。
顏綵思、黃光國(2011):〈儒家社會中學生的角色義務及其對獎懲正當性的知覺〉。《中華心理學刊》,53,79-95。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2011.5301.05
顏學誠(2014):〈教育與社會秩序: 解析升學主義〉。《教育實踐與研究》,27,121-144。
藍佩嘉(2019):《拼教養:全球化、親職焦慮與與不平等童年》。台灣:春山。
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1987). Manual for the adolescents self-report and profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Ames, R. T. (2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Chinese University Press.
Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126611
Bornstein, M. H., & Lansford, J. E. (2010). Parenting. In M.H. Bornstein (Eds.), Handbook of cultural developmental science. (pp. 259–277). Psychology Press.
Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., & Suwalsky, J. T. D. (2018). Parenting cognitions → parenting practices → child adjustment? the standard model. Development and Psychopathology, 30(2), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417000931
Camras, L. A., Sun, K., Fraumeni, B. R., & Li, Y. (2017). Interpretations of parenting by mainland Chinese and U.S. American children. Parenting, 17(4), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2017.1369330
Camras, L. A., Sun, K., Li, Y., & Wright, M. F. (2012). Do Chinese and American children’s interpretations of parenting moderate links between perceived parenting and child adjustment? Parenting, 12(4), 306–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2012.709154
Chang, T., Lay, K., & Wu, C. (2021, January 8). Parental effort and outcome goals_preprint. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vmq3p
Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00806.x
Cheah, C. S. L., Yu, J., Liu, J., & Coplan, R. J. (2019). Chinese children’s cognitive appraisal moderates associations between psychologically controlling parenting and children’s depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 76(January), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.08.005
Chen, S. W., Fwu, B. J., Wei, C. F., & Wang, H. H. (2016). High-school teachers’ beliefs about effort and their attitudes toward struggling and smart students in a confucian society. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(SEP). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01366
Ching, B. H. H., Wu, H. X., & Chen, T. T. (2021). Maternal achievement-oriented psychological control: Implications for adolescent academic contingent self-esteem and mathematics anxiety. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420981638
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/0.1016/B978-0-12-179060-8.50006-2
Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31–49). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1280-0_3
de Ruiter, N. M. P., van der Gaag, M. A. E., Jeronimus, B. F., & Kunnen, E. S. (2019). Introduction to a dynamic systems approach to psychosocial development in adolescence. In E. S. Kunnen, N. M. P. de Ruiter, B. F. Jeronimus, & M. A. E. van der Gaag (Eds.), Psychosocial development in adolescence: Insights from the dynamic systems approach (1st ed., pp. 1–16). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165844-1
Dweck, C. S. (2017). The journey to children’s mindsets—and beyond. Child Development Perspectives, 11(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12225
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166
Filippello, P., Larcan, R., Sorrenti, L., Buzzai, C., Orecchio, S., & Costa, S. (2017). The mediating role of maladaptive perfectionism in the association between psychological control and learned helplessness. Improving Schools, 20(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216688554
Fwu, B. J., Chen, S.-W., Wei, C.-F., & Wang, H.-H. (2018). I believe; therefore, I work harder: The significance of reflective thinking on effort-making in academic failure in a Confucian-heritage cultural context. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.004
Fwu, B. J., Wei, C. F., Chen, S. W., & Wang, H. H. (2014). Effort counts: The moral significance of effort in the patterns of credit assignment on math learning in the Confucian cultural context. International Journal of Educational Development, 39, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.07.010
Galla, B. M., Plummer, B. D., White, R. E., Meketon, D., D’Mello, S. K., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). The Academic Diligence Task (ADT): Assessing individual differences in effort on tedious but important schoolwork. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.001
Gao, D., Liu, J., Bullock, A., & Chen, X. (2020). Children’s interpretation moderates relations of maternal autonomy support with sociability and assertiveness in China. Social Development, October, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12491
Gershoff, E. T., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Zelli, A., Deater-Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. A. (2010). Parent discipline practices in an international sample: Associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness. Child Development, 81(2), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01409.x
Gjerde, P. F. (2004). Culture, power, and experience: Toward a person-centered cultural psychology. Human Development, 47(3), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1159/000077987
Gottfried, A. E. (2019). Parenting of children’s academic motivation. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting volume 5: The practice of parenting (3rd ed., pp. 242–277). Routledge.
Granic, I., Dishion, T. J., & Hollenstein, T. (2008). The family ecology of adolescence: A dynamic systems perspective on normative development. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (Issue 541, pp. 60–91). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756607.ch4
Grolnick, W. S., Levitt, M., & Caruso, A. (2017). Adolescent autonomy in context: Facilitative parenting in different cultures, domains, and settings. In B. Soenens, M. Vansteenkiste, & van Petegem (Eds.), Autonomy in adolescent development (pp. 94–118). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636511-5
Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development, 81(3), 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01426.x
Gunderson, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Robins, R. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2018). The specificity of parenting effects: Differential relations of parent praise and criticism to children’s theories of intelligence and learning goals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 173, 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.015
Gurland, S. T., & Grolnick, W. S. (2005). Perceived threat, controlling parenting, and children’s achievement orientations. Motivation and Emotion, 29(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-005-7956-2
Harden, J., Backett-Milburn, K., Maclean, A., & Jamieson, L. (2012). Hopes for the future: Parents’ and children’s narratives of children’s future employment orientations. Sociological Research Online, 17(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2619
Helwig, C. C., To, S., Wang, Q., Liu, C., & Yang, S. (2014). Judgments and reasoning about parental discipline involving induction and psychological control in China and Canada. Child Development, 85(3), 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12183
Helwig, C. C., & Turiel, E. (2011). Children’s social and moral reasoning. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), The Wiley-blackwell handbook of childhood social development (2nd ed., pp. 567–583). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390933.ch30
Hill, N. E. (2015). Family–school relationships during adolescence: Clarifying goals, broadening conceptualizations, and deepening impact. In S. M. Sheridan & E. M. Kim (Eds.), Processes and pathways of family-school partnerships across development (pp. 41–59). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16931-6_3
Hill, N. E., Liang, B., Price, M., Polk, W., Perella, J., & Savitz-Romer, M. (2018). Envisioning a meaningful future and academic engagement: The role of parenting practices and school-based relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 55(6), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22146
Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362
Hill, N. E., & Wang, M. te. (2015). From middle school to college: Developing aspirations, promoting engagement, and indirect pathways from parenting to post high school enrollment. Developmental Psychology, 51(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038367
Howard, M. C., & Hoffman, M. E. (2018). Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific Aapproaches: Where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 846–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117744021
Hwang, K.-K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1_12
Kakihara, F., & Tilton-Weaver, L. (2009). Adolescents’ interpretations of parental control: Differentiated by domain and types of control. Child Development, 80(6), 1722–1738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01364.x
Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835
Kaniušonytė, G., & Laursen, B. (2021). Parenting styles revisited: A longitudinal person-oriented assessment of perceived parent behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(1), 210–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520960818
Keijsers, L., Frijns, T., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. (2009). Developmental links of adolescent disclosure, parental solicitation, and control with delinquency: Moderation by parental support. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1314–1327. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016693
Kim, J.-S., & Bang, H. (2017). Education fever: Korean parents’ aspirations for their children’s schooling and future career. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1252419
Kim, S. Y., Wang, Y., Orozco-Lapray, D., Shen, Y., & Murtuza, M. (2013). Does “tiger parenting” exist? Parenting profiles of Chinese Americans and adolescent developmental outcomes. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030612
Kuczynski, L., & Mol, J. de. (2015). Dialectical models of socialization. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1–46). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy109
Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0029
Lee, M., & Bong, M. (2016). In their own words: Reasons underlying the achievement striving of students in schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000048
LeVine, R. A. (1988). Human parental care: Universal goals, cultural strategies, individual behavior. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1988(40), 3–12. https://doi:10.1002/cd.23219884003
Li, J. (2003). The core of Confucian learning. American Psychologist, 58(2), 146–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.58.2.146
Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and west. Cambridge University Press.
Lickona, T., Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (2007). CEP’s eleven principles of effective character education. In Character Education Partnership. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505086
Luebbe, A. M., Tu, C., & Fredrick, J. W. (2018). Socialization goals, parental psychological control, and youth anxiety in Chinese students: Moderated indirect effects based on school type. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(2), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0784-3
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen, & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley.
Marbell, K. N., & Grolnick, W. S. (2013). Correlates of parental control and autonomy support in an interdependent culture: A look at Ghana. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9289-2
Marbell‐Pierre, K. N., Grolnick, W. S., Stewart, A. L., & Raftery‐Helmer, J. N. (2019). Parental autonomy support in two cultures: The moderating effects of adolescents’ self‐construals. Child Development, 90(3), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12947
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., & Urdan, T. (2000). PALS—Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
Mirels, H. L., & Garrett, J. B. (1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36(1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030477
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2013). On the necessity to use person-specific data analysis approaches in psychology. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.747435
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Intelligence praise can undermine motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.).
Ng, F. F. Y., Pomerantz, E. M., & Deng, C. (2014). Why are chinese mothers more controlling than american mothers? “My child is my report card.” Child Development, 85(1), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12102
Ng, F. F.-Y., Sze, I. N. L., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Ruble, D. N. (2017). Immigrant Chinese mothers’ socialization of achievement in Children: A strategic adaptation to the host society. Child Development, 88(3), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12701
Ng, F. F.-Y., & Wang, Q. (2019). Asian and Asian American parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting. Vol. 4: Social conditions and applied parenting (3rd ed., pp. 108–169). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398995-4
Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(5), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312960
Nuyen, A. T. (2009). Moral obligation and moral motivation in confucian role-based ethics. Dao, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9104-7
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
Okagaki, L., & Bingham, G. E. (2005). Parents’ social cognitions and their parenting behaviors. In T. Luster & L. Okagaki (Eds.), Parenting: An ecological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 3–33). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613394-8
Osenk, I., Williamson, P., & Wade, T. D. (2020). Does perfectionism or pursuit of excellence contribute to successful learning? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 32(10), 972–983. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000942
Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 9–62). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy102
Overton, W. F., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2015). Concepts, theory, and method in developmental science. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1–8). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy101
Perelman, L., & Vargas, P. (2017). Credentialism and recommendations: The bases of the reproduction of the metallurgical working class in Contemporary argentina. In S. Narotzky & V. Goddard (Eds.), Work and livelihoods history, ethnography and models in times of crisis (pp. 46–59). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315747804-10
Pomerantz, E. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (2017). The role of parenting in children’s motivation and competence: What underlies facilitative parenting? In Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application, 2nd ed. (pp. 566–585). The Guilford Press.
Pomerantz, E. M., & Kempner, S. G. (2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2040–2046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031840
Post, T., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2021). Effects of an inquiry-focused school improvement program on the development of pupils’ attitudes towards curiosity, their implicit ability and effort beliefs, and goal orientations. Motivation and Emotion, 45(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09851-5
Rice, K. G., Richardson, C. M. E., & Tueller, S. (2014). The short form of the revised almost perfect scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(3), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.838172
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
Romm, K. F., & Metzger, A. (2021). Profiles of parenting behaviors: Associations with adolescents’ problematic outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(4), 941–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-01920-8
Rote, W. M., & Smetana, J. G. (2017). Situational and structural variation in youth perceptions of maternal guilt induction. Developmental Psychology, 53(10), 1940–1953. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000396
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Shih, S. (2009). An examination of factors related to Taiwanese adolescents’ reports of avoidance strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.5.377-388
Shih, S. S. (2019). An examination of academic coping and procrastination from the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Education and Human Development, 8(1), 2334–2978. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v8n1a8
Smetana, J. G. (1989). Adolescents’ and parents’ reasoning about actual family conflict. Child Development, 60(5), 1052–1067.https://doi.org/10.2307/1130779
Smetana, J. G. (2017a). The development of autonomy during adolescence: A social-cognitive domain theory view. In B. Soenens, M. Vansteenkiste, & van Petegem (Eds.), Autonomy in Adolescent Development (pp. 53–73). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636511-3
Smetana, J. G. (2017b). Current research on parenting styles, dimensions, and beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15(February), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.012
Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (2nd ed., pp. 23–45). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203581957.ch2
Smetana, J. G., & Rote, W. M. (2019). Adolescent–parent relationships: Progress, processes, and prospects. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084903
Smetana, J. G., Yau, J. Y. P., & Rote, W. M. (2021). How do Chinese youth in Hong Kong evaluate maternal guilt and shame induction? Age, form, and domain differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01468-2
Soenens, B., Boncquet, M., Vansteenkiste, M., Lavrijsen, J., & Verschueren, K. (2021, April 7-9). The role of parental involvement and feedback in adolescents’ level and contingency of self-worth: An examination at the level of within-person change. In E. Brummelman & D. Cvencek (Chairs), Heterogeneity in self-esteem development: New theoretical insights and longitudinal evidence [Symposium]. Biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Online conference.
Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyten, P., Duriez, B., & Goossens, L. (2008). Maladaptive perfectionism as an intervening variable between psychological control and adolescent depressive symptoms: A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.465
Soenens, B., Park, S. Y., Vansteenkiste, M., & Mouratidis, A. (2012). Perceived parental psychological control and adolescent depressive experiences: A cross-cultural study with Belgian and South-Korean adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.05.001
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). Taking adolescents’ agency in socialization seriously: The role of appraisals and cognitive‐behavioral responses in autonomy‐relevant parenting. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, cad.20370. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20370
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2019). Parenting Adolescents. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Vol1: Children and Parenting (3rd ed, pp. 111–167). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440847-4
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Luyten, P. (2010). Toward a domain-specific approach to the study of parental psychological control: Distinguishing between dependency-oriented and achievement-oriented psychological control. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 217–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00614.x
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., & Ryan, R. (2017). How to solve the conundrum of adolescent autonomy? In B. Soenens, M. Vansteenkiste, & van Petegem (Eds.), Autonomy in Adolescent Development (pp. 1–32). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636511-1
Sorkhabi, N., & Mandara, J. (2013). Are the effects of Baumrind’s parenting styles culturally specific or culturally equivalent? In R. E. Larzelere, A. S. Morris, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp. 113–135). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13948-006
Sorkhabi, N., & Middaugh, E. (2019). Domain-specific Parenting Practices and Adolescent Self-esteem, Problem Behaviors, and Competence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(2), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1270-6
The jamovi project (2021). jamovi. (Version 1.6) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
Tsuneyoshi, R. (2011). The changing relationship between the home and school in Japan. In Y. Zhao, J. Lei, G. Li, M. F. He, K. Okano, N. Megahed, D. Gamage, & H. Ramanathan (Eds.), Handbook of Asian Education (pp. 265–277). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203816318.ch14
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
van Geert, P. L. C. (2019). Dynamic systems, process and development. Human Development, 63(3-4), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503825
Wang, K. T. (2007). Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (Traditional Chinese). Retrieved from http://kennethwang.com/apsr/measures.html
Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning. Child Development, 78(5), 1592–1610. https://doi.org/0009-3920/2007/7805-0012
Wang, Y., & Benner, A. D. (2014). Parent-child discrepancies in educational expectations: Differential effects of actual versus perceived discrepancies. Child Development, 85(3), 891–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12171
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
Wuyts, D., Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2015). Social pressure and unfulfilled dreams among Chinese and Belgian parents: Two roads to controlling parenting via child-invested contingent self-esteem. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(9), 1150–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115603125
Wuyts, D., Vansteenkiste, M., Mabbe, E., & Soenens, B. (2017). Effects of social pressure and child failure on parents’ use of control: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51(October), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.010
Wuyts, D., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Assor, A. (2015). An examination of the dynamics involved in parental child-invested contingent self-esteem. Parenting, 15(2), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2015.1020135
Xu, X., Dai, D., Liu, M., & Deng, C. (2018). Relations between parenting and adolescents’ academic functioning: The mediating role of achievement goal orientations. Frontiers in Education, 3(January), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00001
Xu, X., Dai, D. Y., Liu, M., & Deng, C. (2020). Parental psychological control and academic functioning in Chinese high school students: A short-term longitudinal study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12308
Yau, J., & Smetana, J. G. (2003). Adolescent-parent conflict in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: A comparison of youth in two cultural contexts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250244000209
Yu, S., Chen, B., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2018). Chinese education examined via the lens of self-determination. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9395-x
Zhang, W., Wei, X., Ji, L., Chen, L., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2017). Reconsidering parenting in Chinese culture: Subtypes, stability, and change of maternal parenting style during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(5), 1117–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0664-x
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊