跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.82) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/11 21:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:高夢冉
研究生(外文):Meng-Ran Gao
論文名稱:漢娜·鄂蘭「惡」的思想探究及思考
論文名稱(外文):A study of Hannah Arendt’s thought of evil
指導教授:陳思賢陳思賢引用關係
指導教授(外文):Sy-Shyan Chen
口試委員:張福建楊貞德
口試委員(外文):Fu-Kien ChangChen-Te Yang
口試日期:2021-07-28
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:政治學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:65
中文關鍵詞:極端惡惡的庸常行動判斷政治
外文關鍵詞:radical evilbanality of evilactionjudgementthe political
DOI:10.6342/NTU202102136
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:383
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
「惡」(evil)作為人性探討議題的概念,時刻伴隨著關心和研究「價值取向」的政治哲學,自蘇格拉底伊始便被不同的思想家以不同的方式和角度詮釋。進入二十世紀以來,這一引發人們上千年討論的議題在經歷了戰爭與動盪後開始被重新思考。漢娜•鄂蘭是二十世紀最傑出的政治思想家之一,曾經受納粹德國統治以及猶太裔思想家的身份讓她對於思考「惡」的概念和內涵有著自己獨到的見解。作為對納粹德國極權主義制度和集中營的反思她提出了「極端惡」(radical evil)的概念;在經歷艾希曼審判後又提出「惡的庸常」(the banality of evil)的概念,這既是她最具代表性的理論,也是她最受爭議的理論;以上二者也共同成為了鄂蘭有關惡的思想體系的基本要素。本文希望重新審視鄂蘭思想脈絡中對「惡」的詮釋,探究「極端惡」與「惡的庸常」的內涵、原因及影響,並嘗試思考建構新的政治秩序以應對惡之可能性。
As a concept of humanity discussion issue, “evil” has always been interpreted by different philosophers in different aspects and theories since Socrates, along with political philosophy that caring and studying “value orientation”. Since the twentieth century, as an issue which has been talking about for thousands of years, evil has been rethinking since the twentieth century after the war and turmoil. Hannah Arendt, as one of the most outstanding political thinkers of twentieth century, has been expressed her personalized perspective of the connotation of evil from her past experience as a Jew in Nazi Germany. She proposed the notion of “radical evil” as the reflection on totalitarianism institution and extermination camps as well as the notion of “banality of evil” after the trial of Eichmann. It is her most representative but controversial theory. These two elements are also the basic elements of Arendt's system of thought about evil. The thesis attempts to re-examine the evil thought in Hannah Arendt’s thought thread, to make an exploration of the notions, reasons and impacts of “radical evil” and “banality of evil”. It also tries to consider the possibility of constructing a new political order to deal with evil.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景及目的 1
第二節 文獻檢閱 2
第三節 研究方法 7
第四節 寫作框架 8
第二章 緣起:惡何時成為了問題? 11
第一節 奧古斯丁的遺產 11
第二節 猶太問題與集體殺戮 16
第三章 根本還是極端?對radical evil的分析與詮釋 20
第一節 趨向:康德筆下的「根本惡」 20
第二節 極權主義制度與「極端之惡」 24
第三節 伯恩斯坦:重新思考radical evil 28
第四章 我們何時喪失了思考的能力? 32
第一節 「庸常」的艾希曼 32
第二節 「不再思考」的我們 36
第三節 尋找黑暗時代的微光 41
第五章 判斷、公共領域與心智 44
第一節 判斷與判斷力 45
第二節 重返公共領域 47
第三節 心智生命 49
第六章 找回真正的政治 51
第一節 行動與言說 51
第二節 何謂「政治」? 55
第三節 政治與惡 58
結論 61
參考文獻 63
中文部份 63
西文部份 63
Amery, J. 2009. At the Mind's Limits: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and its Realities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Arendt, H. 1971. “Thinking and Moral Considerations: A Lecture”. Social Research 38(3): 417-446.
1972. Crises of the Republic. NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
1985. The origins of Totalitarianism. NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
1994. Essays in Understanding: 1930-1954. NY: Harcourt Brace & Company.
1995. Men in Dark Times. FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2003. Responsibility and Judgement. NY: Schocken Books.
2005. The Promise of Politics. NY: Schocken Books.
2006a. Eichmann in Jerusalem. NY: Penguin Books.
2006b. On Revolution. NY: Penguin Books.
2006c. Between Past and Future. NY: Penguin Books.
2014. Love and Saint Augustine. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. and K. T. J. 1992. Hannah Arendt Karl Jaspers: correspondence, 1926-1969. FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. and Scholem, G. 2017. The Correspondence of Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Aristotle. 2014. Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Augustine. 2010. On the Free Choice of the Will, On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benhabib, S. 1996. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. CA: Modernity and Political Thought.
Berlin, I. and Jahanbegloo, R. 2000. Conversations with Isaiah Berlin. London: Phoenix.
Bernstein, R. 2002. Radical Evil: A Philosophical interrogation. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
Bloom, A. 1968. The Republic of Plato. NY: Basic Books.
Canovan, M. 1992. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diogenes, L. 1925. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Hayden, P. 2017. Hannah Arendt: Key Concepts. London: Routledge.
Kant, I. 2019. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kateb, G. 1984. Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Patterson, M. and Monroe, K. R. 1998. Narrative in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 315-331.
Ricoeur, P. 1992. Oneself as Another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Stangneth, B. 2014. Eichmann before Jerusalem: The Unexamined Life of a Mass Murderer. NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
Villa, D. 2000. The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voegelin, E. 1953. “The Origins of Totalitarianism” The Review of Politics 15(1): 68-76.
Widmaier, C. 2012. Fin de la Philosophie Politique? Paris: CNRS.
Young-Bruehl, E. 2004. Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World. Yale: Yale University Press.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top