臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

研究背景：
依據國發會推估臺灣2026年將邁入超高齡社會，政府積極依主流文化及國際趨勢推動社區及居家式長期照顧服務(以下簡稱長照服務)。近五年老人長期照顧機構(以下簡稱長照機構)使用率不斷提升。由此可見長照機構在臺灣的長照服務中扮演不可或缺的角色。長照機構品質是各國重視且困擾的議題，臺灣以評鑑制度來管控長照機構品質，但良莠不齊。而美國自1970年開始有一連串，為了提升長照機構去機構化的照顧，發展以使用者為中心的照顧模式文化變革(Culture Change)，改善了美國長照機構照護品質，並發展出「文化變革特點(Artifacts of Culture Change)自評表」，讓長照機構經營者可以自我評值變革的達成率。本研究將以經營者角度，透過翻譯「文化變革特點(Artifacts of Culture Change)自評表」，進行臺灣文化變革(Culture Change)的重要性與可行性探討。
研究目標：
1. 瞭解臺灣長照機構經營者對於臺灣長照機構文化變革重要性及可行性間之關係
2. 瞭解臺灣長照機構經營者之特性對於臺灣長照機構文化變革看法之關係
3. 瞭解臺灣長照機構經營者對於臺灣長照機構文化變革之看法
研究方法：
調整美國長照文化變革特點自評表，從原79題改為51題，分為六個面向(照護面、環境面、家庭和社區面、領導面、工作場所面、工作人員面)，各面中各題皆分為重要性及可行性，並個別以五分法請經營者填寫。問卷最後提供開放式欄位自由填寫，不可行或非常不可行之原因。問卷透過三位專家(包含長照業者及學者)進行表面效度檢測。請15位未來可能的機構經營者填寫，預試整體信度Cronbach's α大於0.7。依據臺長照機構類型及各縣市資源比例，進行兩個層次的分層隨機抽樣，抽300家機構，進行經營者匿名橫斷性調查研究。以相關矩陣檢測、獨立樣本T檢定、複迴歸分析、座標圖，分析經營者特性、重要性、可行性三者間之關聯性。以內容分析法，將質性回饋進行分類和彙整。
研究結果：
回收率23%，其中一般護理之家44.1%、養護型機構38.2%。整體問卷實測信度Cronbach’s α達0.9以上，內在同質性高。六個面向為：第一生活類(包含照護面、環境面、家庭和社區面)，第二經營類(機構領導面、工作場所面、工作人員面) 個面向重要性及可行性Cronbach's α介於0.70~0.90之間。經營類面向重要性或可行性平均分數皆大於生活類面向。重要性及可行性平均照護面都最低、工作人員面都最高。以各題之重要性及可行性平均分數，畫出座標圖，並以中位數作為輔助線劃分四個象限，45%題項位於重要且可行的第一象限、41%題項位於不重要且不可行的第三象限。被認為最重要也最可行的前三題皆為工作場所面，包含「專業有分工」、「嘉許優良員工」、「鼓勵員工能力提升」。而經營者回饋較不可行的原因，最多為「機構方便性」，其次為「長輩功能與個人偏好」提及最多。經營者對各面向之重要性及可行性平均分數皆為顯著正相關。其中「家庭和社區面」的重要性和另外3個面向之可行性；「環境面」及「工作場所面」的可行性分別和另外3個面向重要性顯著中度正相關(r > 0.5 , p <0.001)，可見關聯性高於其他面向間。經營者特性與其對於各面向之看法無顯著相關。
討論與建議：
從研究結果中可以看出，經營者認為生活類比經營類不重要且不可行，這與國外發展文化變革的目的與研究結果相佐，可見臺灣長照機構經營者仍舊偏向傳統機構式照顧。但提升(1)經營者對於家庭和社區面的重視程度、(2)環境面和工作場所面的可行性，有助於推動臺灣整體文化變革，因此可以成為政策推展的優先方向。長照機構以長者為中心的照顧理念，對於經營者而言多半仍處於概念及表面宣導，未來臺灣發展文化變革建議從其覺得可行的面向政策優先。也可透過經營者在意的評鑑制度及財務資源觀點來提升台灣機構的文化變革。

Background
According to the National Development Council’s estimation, Taiwan will enter a super-aged society in 2026, for which the government is actively promoting community and home-based long-term care services (hereinafter referred to as long-term care services) in accordance with mainstream culture and international trends. In the past 5 years, the utilization rate of long-term care institutions for the elderly (long-term care institutions) has been increasing. This shows that long-term photography institutions play an indispensable role in Taiwan’s long-term photography services. The quality of long-term care institutions is an important issue in many countries. Taiwan uses an evaluation system to control the quality of long-term care institutions, but institutions’ quality still in different level. In the United States, there has been a series Culture Change since 1970. To improve the deinstitutional care of long-term care institutions, Culture Change has developed a user-centered care model, improved the quality of care in long-term care institutions in the United States, and established the “Artifacts of Culture Change,” allowing the operators of long-term care institutions to self-evaluate the achievement rate of changes. From the perspective of an operator, this study will provide a discussion on the importance and feasibility of Taiwan’s Culture Change through the translation of the “Artifacts of Culture Change.”
Objectives
1. Understand the relationship between the importance and feasibility of cultural change among managers of long-term care institutions in Taiwan.
2. Understand the relationship between the characteristics and their perspectives regarding cultural change among managers of long-term care institutions in Taiwan.
3. Understand the perspectives regarding cultural change among managers of long-term care institutions in.
Methods
The Artifacts of Culture Change of American long-term care from the original 79 to 51 questions, were divided into six aspects (care, environment, family and community, leadership, workplace, and staff). Each question in the face was divided into importance and feasibility, and the operator was asked to fill it out in five points. At the end of the questionnaire, open-end fields were provided to be filled freely . The questionnaire was tested for surface validity by three experts (including long-term care providers and scholars). Fifteen possible future institutional operators filled in the questionnaire, and the overall pretest reliability Cronbach’s α was greater than 0.7. According to the type of agency responsible for the supervision of the office and proportion of resources in each county and city, two-level stratified random sampling was conducted, and 300 institutions were selected to conduct an anonymous cross-sectional survey of operators. The correlation between the characteristics, importance, and feasibility of the operators with correlation matrix testing, independent sample T verification, multiple regression analysis, and coordinate graphs was tested. Content analysis to classify and aggregate qualitative feedback was used.
Discussion and suggestions
The research results showed that the operators believe that the life analogy management category is not important and unfeasible, which is in line with the purpose of developing cultural changes abroad and research results. It was presented that the operators of long-term care institutions in Taiwan still prefer traditional institutional care. However, increasing (1) the importance that operators place on the family and community and (2) the feasibility of the environment and workplace will help promote the overall cultural change in Taiwan, so it can be a priority for policy promotion. The long-term care institution’s elder-centered care concept is still mostly conceptual and superficial to the operators. In the future, Taiwan’s development of cultural reform proposals will give priority to policies that they think are feasible. It is also possible to enhance the cultural change of Taiwanese institutions through the evaluation system and financial resources that the operators care about.

口試委員會審定書 I
致謝 II
中文摘要 III
Abstract V
第一章 緒論 5
第一節 研究背景 5
第二節 知識缺口與研究重要性 7
第三節 研究問題與目標 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 各名詞定義與介紹 9
(一) 住宿式長期照顧服務機構 9
(二) 機構經營者 9
(三) 長期照護文化變革(Culture Change in long-term care) 9
第二節 臺灣長期照護機構發展相關政策與現況 10
第三節 機構照顧概念與理論 12
(一) 美國長期照護文化變革(Culture Change in long-term care) 12
(二) 以使用者為中心的長照機構照護服務模式 13
(三) 以使用者為中心的長照機構環境設施與服務團隊 14
(四) 文化變革特點(Artifacts of Culture Change)自評表 15
(五) 長照機構服務品質與以長者為中心的服務相關 15
(六) 經營者在文化變革中扮演很重要的角色 16
(七) 臺灣長照機構引入長照文化變革的好處 16
第三章 研究設計與方法 18
第一節 研究架構 18
第二節 研究對象 18
第三節 抽樣及問卷發放方式 19
(一) 分層隨機抽樣（Stratified Random Sampling） 19
(二) 問卷發放方式 19
第四節 測量工具與測量方法 19
(一) 問卷發展 19
(二) 效度與信度測試 22
第五節 變項定義 23
(一) 自變項 23
(二) 依變項 24
(三) 操作型定義(詳如表2) 24
第六節 分析方法 25
第四章 研究結果 26
第一節 問卷信度 26
第二節 經營者特性與六大面向結果 27
第三節 經營者特性與六大面向間相互之關係 28
第四節 經營者對各題項重要性與可行性看法 34
第五節 經營者之質性回饋 38
第五章 討論 42
第一節 測量工具討論 42
第二節 經營者特性、重要性、可行性三者間之關係 43
(一) 各面向的重要性及可行性關係 43
(二) 經營者之特性與其對於文化變革看法之關係 43
第三節 經營者對於文化變革之看法 44
生活類：最不被重視且困難執行的照護面 45
生活類：串聯生活類與經營類的環境面 47
生活類：扮演關鍵角色的家庭和社區面 49
經營類：與工作場所面相關的機構領導面 51
經營類：串聯生活類與經營類的工作場所面 52
經營類：與其他面向最不相關的工作人員面 53
第四節 研究限制 54
(一) 測量工具及研究方法 54
(二) 樣本數及抽樣方式 55
第六章 結論與建議 56
第一節 結論 56
第二節 建議 57
(一) 針對政策面建議 57
(二) 針對經營者建議 58
(三) 對未來研究建議 59
參考文獻 60
附錄 65
附錄一-國立臺灣大學行為與社會科學研究倫理委員會審查核可證明 65
附錄二-取得Pioneer Network同意往返信件 66
附錄三-問卷 68
附錄四-各題之描述性統計 72
附錄五-經營者質性回饋內容及分類說明 76

Abbott, K. M., R. Klumpp, K. A. Leser, J. K. Straker, G. C. Gannod, and K. Van Haitsma. 2018. 'Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports', J Am Med Dir Assoc, 19: 169-73.
Afendulis, C. C., D. J. Caudry, A. J. O'Malley, P. Kemper, and D. C. Grabowski. 2016. 'Green House Adoption and Nursing Home Quality', Health Serv Res, 51 Suppl 1: 454-74.
Aij, K. H., and S. Rapsaniotis. 2017. 'Leadership requirements for Lean versus servant leadership in health care: a systematic review of the literature', J Healthc Leadersh, 9: 1-14.
Bassuk, S. S., T. A. Glass, and L. F. Berkman. 1999. 'Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons', Ann Intern Med, 131: 165-73.
Bodner, S. 2008. 'Stress management in the difficult patient encounter', Dent Clin North Am, 52: 579-603, ix-x.
Bowman, Carmen S., and LLP Edu-Catering. 2006. 'Development of the Artifacts of Culture Change Tool', Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Brownie, S., L. Horstmanshof, and R. Garbutt. 2014. 'Factors that impact residents' transition and psychological adjustment to long-term aged care: a systematic literature review', Int J Nurs Stud, 51: 1654-66.
Chang, H., C. Gil, H. Kim, and H. Bea. 2020. 'Person-Centered Care, Job Stress, and Quality of Life Among Long-Term Care Nursing Staff', J Nurs Res.
Chenoweth, L., Y. H. Jeon, J. Stein-Parbury, I. Forbes, R. Fleming, J. Cook, S. Cheah, S. Fletcher, and L. Tinslay. 2015. 'PerCEN trial participant perspectives on the implementation and outcomes of person-centered dementia care and environments', Int Psychogeriatr, 27: 2045-57.
Chisholm, L., N. J. Zhang, K. Hyer, R. Pradhan, L. Unruh, and F. C. Lin. 2018. 'Culture Change in Nursing Homes: What Is the Role of Nursing Home Resources?', Inquiry, 55: 46958018787043.
Cohen, L. W., S. Zimmerman, D. Reed, P. Brown, B. J. Bowers, K. Nolet, S. Hudak, and S. Horn. 2016. 'The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care in Design and Implementation', Health Serv Res, 51 Suppl 1: 352-77.
David Seaton, MA, and MHA Christina Edwards. 2011. 'Culture Change in Long-term Care:Its History and Development, Principles,Implementation and Legislation', College of Health Professions Texas State University.
Davis, Sandra, Suzanne Byers, Rhonda Nay, and Susan Koch. 2009. 'Guiding design of dementia friendly environments in residential care settings: Considering the living experiences', Dementia, 8: 185-203.
Edvardsson, David, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, Rhonda Nay, and Stephen Gibson. 2010. 'Development and initial testing of the Person-centered Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT)', International Psychogeriatrics: 8.
Fishman, N. W., J. I. Lowe, and S. F. Ryan. 2016. 'Promoting an Alternative to Traditional Nursing Home Care: Evaluating the Green House Small Home Model. An Introduction from the Funders and the Green House Project', Health Serv Res, 51 Suppl 1: 344-51.
Flesner, M. K. 2009. 'Person-centered care and organizational culture in long-term care', J Nurs Care Qual, 24: 273-6.
Glass, T. A., C. M. de Leon, R. A. Marottoli, and L. F. Berkman. 1999. 'Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans', Bmj, 319: 478-83.
Harris, Y., Poulsen, R., & Vlangas, G. . 2016. 'Measuring culture change: Literature review', Englewood: Colorado Foundation for Medical Care.
Johnson, R. A., and J. Bibbo. 2014. 'Relocation decisions and constructing the meaning of home: a phenomenological study of the transition into a nursing home', J Aging Stud, 30: 56-63.
Kane, R. A., T. Y. Lum, L. J. Cutler, H. B. Degenholtz, and T. C. Yu. 2007. 'Resident outcomes in small-house nursing homes: a longitudinal evaluation of the initial green house program', J Am Geriatr Soc, 55: 832-9.
Koren, M. J. 2010. 'Person-centered care for nursing home residents: the culture-change movement', Health Aff (Millwood), 29: 312-7.
Lepore, M. J., J. C. Lima, and S. C. Miller. 2020. 'Nursing Home Culture Change Practices and Survey Deficiencies: A National Longitudinal Panel Study', Gerontologist, 60: 1411-23.
Lepore, M. J., R. R. Shield, J. Looze, D. Tyler, V. Mor, and S. C. Miller. 2015. 'Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement Rates for Nursing Homes Motivate Select Culture Change Practices But Not Comprehensive Culture Change', J Aging Soc Policy, 27: 215-31.
Miller, S. C., M. Lepore, J. C. Lima, R. Shield, and D. A. Tyler. 2014. 'Does the introduction of nursing home culture change practices improve quality?', J Am Geriatr Soc, 62: 1675-82.
Miller, S. C., M. L. Schwartz, J. C. Lima, R. R. Shield, D. A. Tyler, C. W. Berridge, P. L. Gozalo, M. J. Lepore, and M. A. Clark. 2018. 'The Prevalence of Culture Change Practice in US Nursing Homes: Findings From a 2016/2017 Nationwide Survey', Med Care, 56: 985-93.
'Person-Centered Care: A Definition and Essential Elements'. 2016. J Am Geriatr Soc, 64: 15-8.
Poey, J. L., L. Hermer, L. Cornelison, M. L. Kaup, P. Drake, R. I. Stone, and G. Doll. 2017. 'Does Person-Centered Care Improve Residents' Satisfaction With Nursing Home Quality?', J Am Med Dir Assoc, 18: 974-79.
Reid Ponte, P., M. Connor, R. DeMarco, and J. Price. 2004. 'Linking patient and family-centered care and patient safety: the next leap', Nurs Econ, 22: 211-3, 15.
Reinardy, J., and R. A. Kane. 1999. 'Choosing an adult foster home or a nursing home: residents' perceptions about decision making and control', Soc Work, 44: 571-85.
Sharp, T., E. Moran, I. Kuhn, and S. Barclay. 2013. 'Do the elderly have a voice? Advance care planning discussions with frail and older individuals: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis', Br J Gen Pract, 63: e657-68.
Shechtman, Orit. 2001. 'Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd Edition, Leslie Gross Portney, Mary P. Watkins. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2000), 752 pages. $60', Journal of Hand Therapy, 14: 221.
Shield, R. R., D. Tyler, M. Lepore, J. Looze, and S. C. Miller. 2014. '"Would You Do That in Your Home?" Making Nursing Homes Home-like in Culture Change Implementation', J Hous Elderly, 28: 383-98.
Shield RR, Looze J, Tyler D, Lepore M, Miller SC. 2014. 'Why and How Do Nursing Homes Implement Culture Change Practices? Insights From Qualitative Interviews in a Mixed Methods Study. ', Journal of Applied Gerontology: 33(6):737-63.
Shura, R., R. A. Siders, and D. Dannefer. 2011. 'Culture change in long-term care: participatory action research and the role of the resident', Gerontologist, 51: 212-25.
Spreitzer, Jane Banaszak-Holl;Nicholas G. Castle; Michael Lin; Gretchen. 2013. 'An assessment of cultural values and resident-centered culture change in U.S. nursing facilities', Wolters Kluwer Health 295-304.
Stevens, N. 2001. 'Combating loneliness: a friendship enrichment programme for older women.', Ageing and Society.
Susan C. Miller, Edward Alan Miller, Hye-Young Jung, Samantha Sterns, Melissa Clark, and Vincent Mor. 2010. 'Nursing Home Organizational Change: The “Culture Change” Movement as Viewed by Long-Term Care Specialists', SAGE: 65S–81S.
Tyler, D. A., M. Lepore, R. R. Shield, J. Looze, and S. C. Miller. 2014. 'Overcoming resistance to culture change: nursing home administrators' use of education, training, and communication', Gerontol Geriatr Educ, 35: 321-36.
Wang, J. J., K. Feldt, and W. Y. Cheng. 2012. 'Characteristics and underlying meaning of hoarding behavior in elders with Alzheimer's dementia: caregivers' perspective', J Nurs Res, 20: 189-96.
Yoon, J. Y., R. L. Brown, B. J. Bowers, S. S. Sharkey, and S. D. Horn. 2016. 'The effects of the Green House nursing home model on ADL function trajectory: A retrospective longitudinal study', Int J Nurs Stud, 53: 238-47.
Zhang, N. J., and T. T. Wan. 2007. 'Effects of institutional mechanisms on nursing home quality', J Health Hum Serv Adm, 29: 380-408.
Zimmerman, S., C. Dumond-Stryker, M. Tandan, J. S. Preisser, C. J. Wretman, A. Howell, and S. Ryan. 2021. 'Nontraditional Small House Nursing Homes Have Fewer COVID-19 Cases and Deaths', J Am Med Dir Assoc, 22: 489-93.
王明鳳. 2015. '長者為中心的個別化照顧服務思維～以行動學具車運用於臥床老人服務方案為例', 社會工作實務與研究學刊: 41+43+45-71.
王昭榮. 2014. '長期照護機構經營關鍵成功因素分析-以南投縣長期照護機構為例', 國立暨南國際大學.
王順治;李淑貞;張力山;談宜芳;何季蓉;羅貝系. 2012. '老人養護機構有關生活環境空間與設施設備之研究', 內政部建築研究所協同研究報告: 179.
立法院網站. 2017. '長期照顧組織體系整合問題之探討', 議題研析.
全國法規資料庫. 2021a. '老人福利機構設立標準', 全國法規資料庫.
———. 2021b. '長期照顧服務法'.
吳舜堂, and 陳欽雨. 2017. '高齡長者社會支持、社會參與與活躍老化關係之研究', 福祉科技與服務管理學刊, 5: 331-52.
宋文娟. 2001. '一種質量並重的研究法－德菲法在醫務管理學研究領域之應用', 醫務管理期刊, 2: 11-20.
李承駿, and 張振傑. 2019. '以KANO及IPA模式探討護理之家的照護品質', 健康管理學刊, 17: 23-30.
李莉. 2020. '政府推居家照顧機構人力流失', 聯合報.
林榮春, and 黃百麟. 2005. '台北市老人安養護機構經營管理之研究', 2005 第九屆科際整合管理研討會: 700.
林翠芳. 2017. '從美國經驗探討台灣長期照護制度改革', 台灣衛誌 2017, Vol.36, No.6: 544.
林薔. 2018. '由組織變革落實企業文化—以某預防醫學機構為例', 國立臺灣大學.
邱汝娜, 陳素春, 黃雅鈴. 2004. '照顧服務社區化-當前老人及身心障礙者照顧服務之推動與整合規劃', 社區發展季刊.
施麗紅. 2010. '老人入住長期照顧機構行為初探—以自我決定理論析之', 社區發展季刊: 18.
柯姿婷. 2015. '長期照顧機構經營策略之研究-以臺北市小型長期照顧機構為例'.
胡月娟, 郭淑珍, and 林豐裕. 2007. 'Association between Facility Characteristics and Outcome of On-Site Visit in Nursing Homes', 澄清醫護管理雜誌, 3: 19-28.
胡瑛麒, 李宜靜, 洪錦墩, 葉季森, 宋炫瑛, David Edvardsson, and 何清治. 2020. '以人為中心照護氛圍量表中文版信效度之初探', 醫學與健康期刊, 9: 35-49.
徐慶發, 黃旐濤, 賴添福,蔡芳文,吳秀鳳,黃梓松,辛振三,林梅雅,黃偉誠,周慧敏,戴章洲 2007. '老人服務事業經營與管理'.
張育豪. 2013. '長期照護機構經營模式之研究', 長榮大學.
張素嫺, and 方妙君. 2004. 'The Elderly Living in Nursing Homes: Cross - Culture Comparison', 慈濟護理雜誌, 3: 41-49.
張淑卿, 許銘能, and 吳肖琪. 2010. '台灣長期照護機構品質確保機制發展之趨勢', 長期照護雜誌, 14: 149-59.
張詩芹, 張碩芳, and 陳惠芳. 2019. '長照機構品質管理實踐之缺口－以全面品質管理觀點', 醫務管理期刊, 20: 305-24.
張靜倫. 2018. '赴美國考察整合社區、居家及機構式照顧服務計畫成果報告書', 衛生福利部社會及家庭署: 57.
梁亞文等11人. 2016. '長期照護機構管理', 華杏出版股份有限公司: 15-16.
許佩蓉..等. 2016. '機構式長期照護綜論', 台灣老年醫學雜誌民國 95 年第 1 卷第 4 期.
許碧峰. 2020. '台灣住宿型長照機構之市場結構與品質誘因', 商略學報, 12: 269-83.
陳季穎, 鄒家齊. 2013. 'A電梯製造公司的組織變革認知、領導行為、組織承諾及工作投入關聯性之研究'.
楊嘉玲. 2001. '護理之家照護品質指標：以老年住民、家屬以及護理人員的觀點探討', 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 20: 238-47.
楊嘉玲, and 徐亞瑛. 2001. '護理之家照護品質指標－以老年住民的觀點探討', 護理研究, 9: 53-64.
葉俊廷. 2017. '老人福利機構資源運用策略之研究', 當代社會工作學刊: 51-77.
廖慧媛. 2012. '長期照護經營管理關鍵成功因素之研究一以Ａ長期照護中心為例', 國立臺灣大學.
劉正, and 齊力. 2019. '臺灣高齡者的居住狀況與機構照顧的需求趨勢', 國土及公共治理季刊, 7: 70-81.
衛福部長照專區. 2017. '長照歷史政策', 衛生福利部網站.
———. 2020. '衛生福利部109 年度住宿式服務機構品質提升卓越計畫'.
鄧素文. 2010. '淺談我國長期照護機構之評鑑制度', 長期照護雜誌, 14: 117-24.
蕭宇涵, 蔡興治, 陳厚全, 戴志融, 王懿範, 徐永年, and 李孟智. 2017. '衛政與社政整合之理念、模式與先驅計畫', 醫學與健康期刊, 6: 1-16.
薛承泰. 2016. '台灣長照產業的發展與挑戰', 財團法人中技社專題報告: 14.
謝碧容, 彭靖嵐, 彭靖雯, 吳亭儀, 王怡茹, 王美秀, and 蘇靖惠. 2020. '探討臺灣中年人對於未來入住長照機構的意圖：整合計畫行為理論及社會網絡', 健康管理學刊, 18: 45-62.
嚴隆慶. 2018. '養護型住宿式長照機構專業團隊合作經驗之探討─以護理人員、照顧服務員及社會工作人員為例', 國立臺灣大學.
蘇清菁, and 陳玉敏. 2004. '照顧護理之家一位無望感老年住民之經驗', 榮總護理, 21: 136-44.