臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

永續價值共創促進並鼓勵消費者積極參與企業的研發、設計和生產過程，以解決問題，創造新的產品或是服務概念，與企業共同為時尚產業帶來永續價值。本研究旨在製定指導方針，以實現時時尚產業的永續價值共創。本研究目的確定如下：（1）探討時尚產業在永續價值共創理論下的發展 （2）以「供應商網絡」、「消費者網絡」、「社會」、「環境」、「經濟」五大構面發 展出33項標準因素，作為作為模糊德菲法(Fuzzy Delphi Method)問卷分析之表格（3）為幫助時尚產業的相關管理階層採用永續價值共創定指導方針提供適當的標準。本研究以模糊德爾菲法（FDM）方法作為研究方法，並為時裝行業屬性中的永續價值共創的初始集合提供意見，這些意見來自時尚產業專家組。 結果表明，最重要的前五個標準是促進永續消費教育（C18）、綠色採購行為（C9）、品牌意識（C33）、有效的政府政策（C28）和消費者參與（C8）。這些結果為時尚產業提供了真實和準確的了解，並為時尚產業的相關管理階層管理開發行動方案。由於初始屬性是從以往文獻和產業專家那裡獲得的，可能會導致現有研究導致框架不完整。本研究僅限於台灣永續價值共創中的5個方面和33個標準，造成了結果推廣的局限性。

Sustainable value co-creation promotes and encourages customers to actively participate in the R&D, design, and production process of enterprises, so as to solve problems, create new products or service concepts, and bring sustainable value to the fashion industry together with enterprises. The purpose of this study is to formulate guidelines to realize the sustainable value creation of the fashion industry. The objective of this study is as follows: (1) Explore the development of the fashion industry under the theory of sustainable value co-creation; (2) Develop 33 criteria from five aspects: "supplier network", "consumer network", "society", "environment" and "economy", which can be used as the questionnaire analysis form of Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM); (3) To provide appropriate standards for helping the relevant management of fashion industry to adopt sustainable value co-creation guidelines. This study uses the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) method as the research method and provides opinions on the initial set of sustainable value co-creation in the attributes of the fashion industry. These opinions come from the fashion industry expert group. The results show that the top five most important standards are promoting sustainable consumption education (C18), green purchasing behavior (C9), brand awareness (C33), effective government policies (C28), and consumer participation (C8). These results provide a true and accurate understanding of the fashion industry and develop an action plan for the relevant management of the fashion industry. Because the initial attributes are obtained from previous literature and industry experts, the existing research may lead to an incomplete framework. This study is limited to 5 aspects and 33 standards in Taiwan Province's sustainable value co-creation, which results in the limitation of results promotion.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT i
ABSTRACT ii
摘要 iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS v
LIST OF TABLE vii
LIST OF FIGURES viii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Research Objectives 3
1.3 Research Flowchart 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review 5
2.1 Proposed measures 5
2.1.1 Supplier Network 5
2.1.2 Customer Network 6
2.1.3 Social Challenges 7
2.1.4 Environment Responsibility 8
2.1.5 Economic Benefit 9
Chapter 3 Methodology 14
3.1 Industrial background 14
3.2 Analytical methods 16
3.2.1 Fuzzy Delphi Method 16
Chapter 4 Results 19
Chapter 5 Discussion and Implications 26
5.1 Managerial Implications 26
Chapter 6 Conclusion 30
REFERENCES 31
Appendix 34

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Supplier Network Criteria 9
Table 2. Customer Network Criteria 10
Table 3. Social Challenges Criteria 11
Table 4. Environment Responsibility Criteria 12
Table 5. Economic Benefits Criteria 13
Table.6 Experts’ profile in the fashion industry 16
Table 7. Fuzzy number linguistics for FDM 17
Table 8. A1 Supplier Network FDM criteria results 19
Table 9. A2 Customer Network FDM criteria results 20
Table 10. A3 Social Challenges FDM criteria results 21
Table 11. A4 Environment Responsibility FDM criteria results 21
Table 12. A5 Economic Benefit FDM criteria results 22
Table 13. FDM Aspects results 22
Table 14. FDM accepted criteria 23
Table15. Top 10FDM accepted criteria sort 25

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure. 1 Research Flowchart 4

REFERENCES

Babu, M. M., Dey, B. L., Rahman, M., Roy, S. K., Alwi, S. F. S., & Kamal, M. M. (2020). Value co-creation through social innovation: A study of sustainable strategic alliance in telecommunication and financial services sectors in Bangladesh. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 13-27.
Cai, Y.-J., & Choi, T.-M. (2020). A United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals perspective for sustainable textile and apparel supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 141, 102010.
Demarque, C., Charalambides, L., Hilton, D. J., & Waroquier, L. (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 166-174.
Gardas, B. B., Raut, R. D., & Narkhede, B. (2018). Modelling the challenges to sustainability in the textile and apparel (T&A) sector: A Delphi-DEMATEL approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 96-108.
Ghazilla, R. A. R., Sakundarini, N., Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Ayub, N. S., Olugu, E. U., & Musa, S. N. (2015). Drivers and barriers analysis for green manufacturing practices in Malaysian SMEs: a preliminary findings. Procedia Cirp, 26, 658-663.
Gottlieb, B. H., & Bergen, A. E. (2010). Social support concepts and measures. Journal of psychosomatic research, 69(5), 511-520.
Lacoste, S. (2016). Sustainable value co-creation in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 151-162.
Lawless, E., & Medvedev, K. (2016). Assessment of sustainable design practices in the fashion industry: experiences of eight small sustainable design companies in the Northeastern and Southeastern United States. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 9(1), 41-50.
Macchion, L., Moretto, A., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Danese, P., & Vinelli, A. (2015). Production and supply network strategies within the fashion industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 163, 173-188.
Majumdar, A., & Sinha, S. K. (2019). Analyzing the barriers of green textile supply chain management in Southeast Asia using interpretive structural modeling. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 176-187.
Mobrezi, H., & Khoshtinat, B. (2016). Investigating the factors affecting female consumers’ willingness toward green purchase based on the model of planned behavior. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 441-447.
Oliver, J., Benjamin, S., & Leonard, H. (2019). Recycling on vacation: Does pro-environmental behavior change when consumers travel? Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 29(2), 266-280.
Pal, R., & Gander, J. (2018). Modelling environmental value: An examination of sustainable business models within the fashion industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 251-263.
Pessôa, C., Araújo, K., & Arruda, A. (2015). Discussing Consumption and Sustainability in Clothing Production: a case study of a company in Recife/BR. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 6175-6182.
Sahakian, M., & Seyfang, G. (2018). A sustainable consumption teaching review: From building competencies to transformative learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 231-241.
Shrivastava, A., Jain, G., Kamble, S. S., & Belhadi, A. (2021). Sustainability through online renting clothing: Circular fashion fueled by instagram micro-celebrities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123772.
Van Tonder, E., & Petzer, D. J. (2018). The interrelationships between relationship marketing constructs and customer engagement dimensions. The Service Industries Journal, 38(13-14), 948-973.
Vitell, S. J. (2015). A case for consumer social responsibility (CnSR): Including a selected review of consumer ethics/social responsibility research. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 767-774.
Wang, C., Ghadimi, P., Lim, M. K., & Tseng, M.-L. (2019). A literature review of sustainable consumption and production: A comparative analysis in developed and developing economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 741-754.
Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business research, 66(9), 1279-1284.
Yousef, S., Tatariants, M., Tichonovas, M., Kliucininkas, L., Lukošiūtė, S.-I., & Yan, L. (2020). Sustainable green technology for recovery of cotton fibers and polyester from textile waste. Journal of cleaner production, 254, 120078.